Declaration in Support of Petition

Date: 
Tuesday, August 1, 1995
Document Type: 
Affidavits / Declarations of Division Personnel
This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect.  To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

FTD CORPORATION; FLORISTS'
TRANSWORLD DELIVERY, INC.;
and FTD ASSOCIATION,
               Defendants.


|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         

Supplemental to
Civil Action No. 56-15748

Hon. Paul V. Gadola

Civil Contempt Of Judgment

Filed: 8/1/95


DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF PETITION

I, Bernard M. Hollander, declare as follows:

  1. This is a Declaration in Support of a Petition by the United States for an Order to Show Cause why the above-named Respondents should not be found in civil contempt.
  2. Declarant is a Senior Trial Attorney in the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice, charged with the responsibility of investigating alleged violations of the Modified Final Judgment, entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on November 8, 1990, in the case entitled United States of America v. Florists' Transworld Delivery Association, Civil No. 56-15748.
  3. In the course of this investigation, Declarant has examined (a) certain relevant files and documents of the Department of Justice; and (b) certain documents, records and answers to Interrogatories, produced to the Department of Justice pursuant to Civil Investigation Demands issued to Respondents FTD Corporation (formerly Perry Capital Corporation) and FTDA Association.
  4. Based upon the information which has been obtained from the above and other sources, Declarant affirms that to the best of his knowledge and belief the allegations and statements contained in the foregoing Petition are true and correct.
  5. No previous application has been made for such an order.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Dated at Washington, D.C., this 1st day of August, 1995.

 

_______________/s/________________
BERNARD M. HOLLANDER

Attachments: 
Updated June 30, 2015