IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
The United States and Nippon Electrode Company, Ltd. (NDK), have entered into a plea agreement, pursuant to which NDK will waive indictment and plead guilty to the captioned Information. The one-count Information charges NDK with a violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.
A. 15 U.S.C. § 1
Section One of Title 15, United States Code, provides:
B. The Information
The Information charges the defendant with participating in a conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the price of carbon cathode block sold in the United States and elsewhere in unreasonable restraint of trade and commerce beginning at least as early as February 1996 and continuing until at least December 1997.
C. Elements of the Offense
The elements of a Sherman Act offense, each of which the United States would be required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt at trial, are:
D. Maximum Penalty
The maximum penalty NDK may receive upon its conviction in this case is a fine in an amount equal to the largest of: (a) $10 million; (b) twice the gross pecuniary gain derived by the conspirators from the crime; or (c) twice the gross pecuniary loss caused to the victims of the crime.
The Government and NDK agree that the following is the appropriate volume of affected commerce and the resultant United States Sentencing Guidelines fine range. The Guidelines calculation is set forth below:
GOVERNMENT'S SENTENCING RECOMMENDATION
Pursuant to the terms of the Plea Agreement entered into with NDK, the United States recommends that the Court impose a sentence requiring NDK to pay a Guidelines fine of $450,000. If accepted by the Court, NDK will pay the $450,000 fine within seven (7) days from the date of the imposition of sentence. Defendant's total relevant U.S. commerce during the conspiratorial period was $2,075,000. Thus, the Guidelines fine range is $415,000 to $830,000, and the agreed-upon fine of $450,000 is within the Guidelines range.
There are several reasons why the agreed-upon fine is the appropriate disposition of this matter. While defendant was a participant in the conspiracy, it was not one of its organizers, leaders or major players. Indeed, in terms of total volume of commerce, it was the smallest participant in the conspiracy. The individuals responsible for Defendant's antitrust misconduct are no longer employees of the Defendant or any of its affiliates. In addition, Defendant has waived venue and agreed to submit to jurisdiction. Further, Defendant has already provided meaningful cooperation in this investigation and its cooperation is ongoing. For all these reasons, the Government submits that this agreed-upon fine is in the public interest and is the appropriate disposition of this case.
The United States also recommends that the Court not impose an order of restitution due to the likelihood that the victims of the conspiracy, all sophisticated aluminum companies, may institute individual or class actions seeking treble damages and attorneys fees as provided for persons harmed by violations of the antitrust laws under Section Four of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 4. Indeed, we are advised that two of the aluminum companies have filed individual suits. Given the remedies afforded victims of antitrust crime and the anticipated involvement of private antitrust counsel representing victims in this case, the need to fashion a restitution order is outweighed by the difficulty the Court would encounter in attempting to determine the amount of any losses suffered by all of the victims and would unduly complicate and prolong the sentencing process. Further, we have notified the aluminum companies about this Information and they have the right to be heard at sentencing, if they so choose, and none have contacted us.
For the reasons stated above, the United States respectfully requests that the Court impose a sentence consistent with the terms of the Plea Agreement entered into between the United States and NDK and with the recommendation of the United States that NDK be required to pay a criminal fine of $450,000 within seven (7) days of the date of the imposition of sentence.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
This is to certify that on the 24th day of April 2002, a copy of the Government's Sentencing Memorandum has been faxed/mailed to counsel of record for the defendant as follows: