Information

Date: 
Tuesday, August 19, 2003
Document Type: 
Informations
This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.


MATTHEW D. SEGAL (CSBN 190938)
RICHARD B. COHEN (CSBN 79601)
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 Golden Gate Avenue
Box 36046, Room 10-0101
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: (415) 436-6660

Attorneys for the United States

Filed Aug. 19, 2003

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRESNO DIVISION



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

DUANE MAYNARD,

                  Defendant.


|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
No. CRF-03-5325 OWW

VIOLATION: 15 U.S.C. § 1 -

Bid rigging

INFORMATION

The United States of America, through its attorneys, charges:

DESCRIPTION OF THE OFFENSE

1. DUANE MAYNARD is hereby charged and made a defendant herein.

2. The E-Rate program is a federal program administered by the Universal Service Administrative Company ("USAC") under direction of the Federal Communications Commission. Telecommunications companies in the United States charge their customers fees that are ultimately disbursed by the USAC for, among other things, subsidies for the purchase of telecommunications services, Internet access, and internal connections for schools. Subject to its regulations, the E-Rate program will pay for up to 90% of a school's expenditures for eligible equipment and services.

3. Beginning on or about February 18, 1999 and continuing at least until January 17, 2002, the exact dates being unknown to the United States, the defendant and co-conspirators entered into and engaged in a combination and conspiracy to suppress and restrain competition for an E-Rate-subsidized project to provide, among other things, goods and services related to telecommunications, Internet access, and internal connections at the West Fresno Elementary School District ("the West Fresno Elementary School District E-Rate Project") in Fresno, California, in unreasonable restraint of interstate trade and commerce, in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, Title 15, United States Code, Section 1.

DEFENDANT AND CO-CONSPIRATORS

4. During the period covered by this Information, DUANE MAYNARD was a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of California. He held the title of Senior Estimator for his employer and represented his employer on the West Fresno Elementary School District E-Rate Project.

5. Various individuals and corporations, not made defendants in this Information, participated as co-conspirators in the offense charged and performed acts and made statements in furtherance of it.

THE CONSPIRACY

6. The charged combination and conspiracy consisted of an agreement, understanding, and concert of action among the conspirators, the substantial terms of which were to suppress bidding for the West Fresno Elementary School District E-Rate Project and to allocate among conspirators responsibility for the supply of goods and services for the West Fresno Elementary School District E-Rate Project.

7. For the common purpose of forming and carrying out the charged combination and conspiracy, the defendant and co-conspirators together performed the following acts, among others:

  1. agreed in advance that the defendant's employer would be the successful bidder, among the co-conspirators, to have the general responsibility for the West Fresno Elementary School District E-Rate Project;
  2. agreed in advance that no co-conspirator other than the defendant's employer would submit to the West Fresno Elementary School District a bid for the entire West Fresno Elementary School District E-Rate Project;
  3. agreed in advance that certain co-conspirator companies would be the defendant's employer's subcontractors for the West Fresno Elementary School District E-Rate Project;
  4. ensured that any bid competing with that of the defendant's employer would be disqualified as nonresponsive;
  5. provided goods and services to the West Fresno Elementary School District; and
  6. received payments from the USAC for claimed provision of goods and services to the West Fresno Elementary School District.

TRADE AND COMMERCE

8. Equipment provided as part of the West Fresno Elementary School District E-Rate Project was shipped across state lines. The payments from the USAC were sent from banks outside the State of California to a bank inside the State of California. Thus, the West Fresno Elementary School District E-Rate Project was conducted within the flow of, and substantially affected, interstate trade and commerce.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

9. The aforesaid combination and conspiracy was formed and carried out, in part, within the Eastern District of California within the five years preceding the filing of this Information.

IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 15, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1.

DATED this ______ day of July, 2003.

_______________/s/________________
R. HEWITT PATE
Assistant Attorney General
Antitrust Division

_______________/s/________________
JAMES M. GRIFFIN
Deputy Assistant Attorney
General

_______________/s/________________
SCOTT D. HAMMOND
Director of Criminal
Enforcement

_______________/s/________________
PHILLIP H. WARREN
Chief, San Francisco
Field office

_______________/s/________________
MATTHEW D. SEGAL
Trial Attorney

_______________/s/________________
RICHARD B. COHEN
Trial Attorney

Attachments: 
Updated June 30, 2015