Stipulation and Order

Date: 
Monday, March 9, 1998
Document Type: 
Stipulations - Miscellaneous
This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    
                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

ENOVA CORPORATION,
                  Defendant.


|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
Civil Action No.

STIPULATION AND ORDER

It is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, through their respective attorneys, that:

1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over each of the parties hereto, and venue of this action is proper in the District of Columbia.

2. The parties consent that a Final Judgment in the form hereto attached may be filed and entered by the Court, upon the motion of any party or upon the Court's own motion, at any time after compliance with the requirements of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16, and without further notice to any party or other proceedings, provided that Plaintiff United States has not withdrawn its consent, which it may do at any time before the entry of the proposed Final Judgment by serving notice thereof on Defendant and by filing that notice with the Court.

3. Defendant shall abide by and comply with the provisions of the proposed Final Judgment pending entry of the Final Judgment, or until expiration of time for all appeals of any court ruling declining entry of the proposed Final Judgment, and shall, from the date of signing of this Stipulation, comply with all terms and provisions of the proposed Final Judgment as though the same were in full force and effect as an order of the Court.

4. This Stipulation shall apply with equal force and effect to any amended proposed Final Judgment agreed upon in writing by the parties and submitted to the Court.

5. In the event Plaintiff United States withdraws its consent, as provided in Paragraph 2, above, or if the proposed Final Judgment is not entered pursuant to this Stipulation, the time has expired for all appeals of any Court ruling declining entry of the Final Judgment, and the Court has not otherwise ordered continued compliance with the terms and provisions of the proposed Final Judgment, then the parties are released from all further obligations under this Stipulation, and the making of this Stipulation shall be without prejudice to any party in this or any other proceeding.

6. Defendant represents that the divestiture ordered in the proposed Final Judgment can and will be made, and that they will later raise no claims of hardship or difficulty as grounds for asking the Court to modify any of the divestiture provisions contained therein.

Respectfully submitted,

FOR PLAINTIFF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

_______________________________
JADE ALICE EATON
DC Bar # 939629

_______________________________
ANDREW K. ROSA
HI Bar # 6366
Attorneys
Antitrust Division
U.S. Department of Justice
325 Seventh St., N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
(202) 307-6316
(202) 307-0886

Dated:____________________

FOR DEFENDANT

ENOVA CORPORATION:

_______________________________
STEVEN C. SUNSHINE
DC Bar # 450078
SHEARMAN & STERLING
801 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
(202) 508-8022


ORDER

It is SO ORDERED, this ______ day of __________, 1998.

_______________________________
United States District Court Judge

Attachments: 
Updated June 30, 2015