Stipulation re Entry of Final Judgment

Date: 
Wednesday, January 19, 1994
Document Type: 
Stipulations - Miscellaneous
This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
[PEORIA] DIVISION



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC. and
AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION,   

                  Defendants.


|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
Civil Action No. 94-1026

STIPULATION
RE ENTRY OF
FINAL JUDGMENT

It is stipulated by and between the undersigned parties, by their respective attorneys, that:

1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over each of the parties thereto, and venue of this action is proper in the Central District of Illinois;

2. The parties consent that a Final Judgment in the form hereto attached may be filed and entered by the Court, upon the motion of any party or upon the Court's own motion, at any time after compliance with the requirements of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act (15 U.S.C. § 16), and without further notice to any party or other proceedings, provided that Plaintiff has not withdrawn its consent, which it may do at any time before the entry of the proposed Final Judgment by serving notice thereof on Defendants and by filing that notice with the Court;

3. The parties shall abide by and comply with the provisions of the Final Judgment pending its entry, and shall, from the date of the filing of this Stipulation, comply with all terms and provisions thereof as though the same were in full force and effect as an order of the Court.

4. In the event Plaintiff withdraws its consent or if the proposed Final Judgment is not entered pursuant to this Stipulation, this Stipulation shall be of no effect whatever, and the making of this Stipulation shall be without prejudice to any party in this or any other proceeding.

Dated:

FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:

/s/_______________________________
ANNE K. BINGAMAN
Assistant Attorney General

/s/_______________________________
ROBERT E. LITAN

/s/_______________________________

/s/_______________________________
MARK C. SCHECHTER

/s/_______________________________
GARY R. SPRATLING

Attorneys
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division

_______________/s/________________
GERARD BROST,
Asst. U.S. Attorney

/S/_______________________________
HOWARD J. PARKER

/s/_______________________________
STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN

/s/_______________________________
JAMES E. FIGENSHAW

Attorneys
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 Golden Gate Avenue
Box 36046
Room 10-0101
San Francisco, California
94102
(415) 556-630

FOR DEFENDANT ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS INC.

Howrey & Simon

By /s/_______________________________
A Member of the Firm
1299 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004-2402

FOR DEFENDANT AEROJET-GENERAL CORPORATION

Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue

By /s/_______________________________
A Member of the Firm
Metropolitan Square
1450 G Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005-2088

Attachments: 
Updated June 30, 2015