MARC SIEGEL (CSBN 142071)
LISA V. TENORIO (CSBN 205955)
KESLIE STEWART (CSBN 184090)
DANA R. WAGNER (CSBN 209099)
DINA WONG (CSBN 202878)
Antitrust Division
U.S. Department of Justice
450 Golden Gate Avenue
Box 36046, Room 10-0101
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: (415) 436-6660
Attorneys for the United States
|
Original Filed April 12, 2002
|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
PATRICK STAINTON,
Defendant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. CR 02-0078 SI
PLEA AGREEMENT
|
The United States of America and PATRICK STAINTON ("defendant"), with
the advice of counsel, enter into the following Plea Agreement under Rule
11(e)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure ("Fed. R. Crim. P."):
RIGHTS OF DEFENDANT
1. The defendant understands and agrees that by pleading guilty he is
giving up the following rights which he would have if the case went to trial:
- The rights to plead not guilty, to be presumed innocent, and to
require the government to prove all of the elements of the crimes
beyond a reasonable doubt;
- The right to a speedy and public jury trial with the assistance of
an attorney, including an attorney appointed by the court if he
could not afford one;
- The right to a unanimous jury verdict;
- The right to confront and cross-examine government witnesses;
- The rights to testify on his own behalf, to present evidence
and/or witnesses, and to compulsory process;
- The right not to testify or have adverse inferences drawn if he
does not testify;
- The rights to pursue any affirmative defenses (including but not
limited to the statute of limitations), Fourth or Fifth
Amendment claims, or any other claims presented or that could
be presented in any pretrial or post-trial motion;
- The rights to both appeal and collaterally attack, including the
filing of a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the guilty plea,
the judgment of guilt, orders of the Court, and any part of the
sentence imposed by the Court;
- The right to be indicted by a grand jury for the felony charges to
which he is pleading guilty;
- The right, as a citizen of France, to decline to accept service of
the Summons in this case, and to contest the jurisdiction of the
United States to prosecute this case against him in United
States District Court; and
- The right to be charged in the State and District where the
offense occurred.
WAIVER OF RIGHTS AND OFFENSE CHARGED
2. Subject to the express condition stated in this paragraph, the defendant
waives each of the rights set out in Paragraph 1(a)-(k), including all jurisdictional
defenses to the prosecution of this case, and agrees voluntarily to consent to the
jurisdiction of the United States to prosecute this criminal case against him in
United States District Court. Under Rule 7(b), Fed. R. Crim. P., the defendant will
waive indictment. The defendant will plead guilty to a one-count Information filed
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. It is
expressly understood that all waivers of rights are conditioned on the Court
accepting this Plea Agreement. If this Plea Agreement is rejected or voided, the
defendant's waivers likewise will be rendered void and his rights will remain in
full force and effect. The Information will charge the defendant with participating
in a conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the prices and
allocating market shares of monochloroacetic acid and sodium monochloroacetate
(collectively referred to as "MCAA") to be sold in the United States and elsewhere,
beginning in or about September 1995 and continuing until in or about December
1996, in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.
3. Under the terms of this Plea Agreement, the defendant will plead
guilty to the criminal charge described in Paragraph 2, and will make a factual
admission of guilt to the Court in accordance with Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P., as set
forth in Paragraph 4.
FACTUAL BASIS FOR OFFENSE CHARGED
4. Had this case gone to trial, the United States would have presented
evidence to prove the following facts:
- For purposes of this Plea Agreement, the "relevant period"
begins in or about September 1995 and continues until in or about December
1996. During the relevant period, the defendant was a Department Head of
the Chlorine, Bromine, and Derivatives Division of Elf Atochem S.A. ("Elf"), a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of France, with its
principal place of business in Paris, France. During the relevant period, Elf
was a producer of MCAA and was engaged in the sale of MCAA in the United
States and elsewhere. MCAA is a reactive compound that is used to form a
number of intermediate chemicals. Markets for MCAA and its derivatives
include drilling fluids, plastic stabilizers, herbicides, and pharmaceuticals. In
his capacity as a Department Head of Elf's Chlorine, Bromine, and
Derivatives Division, the defendant was responsible for the sales and
marketing of MCAA worldwide;
- During the relevant period, the defendant participated in a
conspiracy among major MCAA producers, the primary terms of which were
to fix the prices and allocate the market shares of MCAA to be sold in the
United States and elsewhere. In furtherance of the conspiracy, the defendant
engaged in discussions and attended meetings with representatives of other
major MCAA producers. During these discussions and meetings, agreements
were reached to fix the prices and allocate the market shares for MCAA to be
sold in the United States and elsewhere; and
- During the relevant period, MCAA sold by one or more of the
conspirator firms, and equipment and supplies necessary to the production
and distribution of MCAA, as well as payments for MCAA, traveled in
interstate and foreign commerce. The business activities of the defendant, his
current employer, Elf, and their coconspirators in connection with the
production and sale of MCAA affected by this conspiracy were within the flow
of, and substantially affected, interstate and foreign trade and commerce.
POSSIBLE MAXIMUM SENTENCE
5. The defendant understands that the maximum penalty that may be
imposed against him upon conviction for a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act
is a term of imprisonment of three years (15 U.S.C. § 1); a term of supervised
release of one year to follow imprisonment (18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(5), 18 U.S.C.
§ 3583(b)(3), and United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines ("U.S.S.G.") (§§
5D1.1, 5D1.2(a)(3)); and a fine equal to the largest of:
- $350,000 (15 U.S.C. § 1);
- Twice the gross pecuniary gain the conspirators derived from the
crime; or
- Twice the gross pecuniary loss caused to the victims of the crime
(18 U.S.C. § 3571(d)).
6. In addition, the defendant understands that:
- Under U.S.S.G. § 5E1.1(a)(2), the Court may order him to pay
restitution to the victims of the offense; and
- Under 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(A) and U.S.S.G. § 5E1.3, the Court
is required to order the defendant to pay a $100 special assessment upon
conviction for the charged crime.
SENTENCING GUIDELINES
7. Sentencing for the offense to be charged will be based on the U.S.S.G.
Manual in effect on the day of sentencing. The United States and the defendant
agree on the determination of the U.S.S.G. offense level in this case, as set out
below, based on currently available information. The defendant understands that,
should the United States become aware of information that renders incorrect the
calculation of the defendant's total offense level, criminal history category, or
applicable adjustments or enhancements set out below, the United States will
notify the Court before sentencing. Under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.8, self-incriminating
information provided to the United States under this Plea Agreement and
discussions leading to this Plea Agreement will not be used to increase the volume
of affected commerce applicable to the defendant or in determining the Guidelines
range.
| (a) |
Base Offense Level (§ 2R1.1(a)) |
10 |
| |
| (b) |
Volume of Affected Commerce (§ 2R1.1(b)(2)(D))
(More than $6.25 million) |
+4 |
| |
| (c) |
Total Adjusted Offense Level |
14 |
| |
| (d) |
Victim-Related Adjustments (§ 3A) |
+0 |
| |
| (e) |
Role in the Offense Adjustments (§ 3B)
(Aggravating Role § 3B1.1(b)) |
+3 |
| |
| (f) |
Obstruction Adjustments (§ 3C) |
+0 |
| |
| (g) |
Acceptance of Responsibility
(§ 3E1.1(b)(2)) |
-3 |
| |
| (h) |
Total Offense Level |
14 |
| |
| (i) |
Criminal History Category (§ 4A1.1) |
I |
| |
| (j) | Therefore, the appropriate range of sentence is 15 to 21 months
imprisonment, no term of probation (§ 5B1.1), supervised release
of one year (§§ 5D1.1, 5D1.2(a)(3)), restitution (§ 5E1.1), a fine of
1% to 5% of the volume of commerce (§§ 2R1.1(c)(1), 5E1.2(b)),
and a special assessment of $100 (§ 5E1.3). |
SENTENCING AGREEMENT
8. Under Rule 11(e)(1)(C), Fed. R. Crim. P., the United States and the
defendant agree that the appropriate disposition of this case is, and agree to jointly
recommend that the Court impose, a sentence of imprisonment for a period of
ninety (90) days, the payment of a criminal fine of $50,000, and no period of
supervised release. The United States will not object to the defendant's request
that the Court make a recommendation to the Bureau of Prisons that the Bureau
of Prisons designate that the defendant be assigned to a Federal Minimum
Security Camp (if possible, at Lompoc, California) to serve his sentence of
imprisonment and that the defendant be released following the imposition of
sentence to allow him to self-surrender to the assigned correctional facility on a
specified date. This paragraph (excluding subparagraphs 8(a) - (c)) constitutes the
agreed-upon sentence in this case.
- The United States and the defendant further agree to jointly recommend that the $50,000 fine be paid in full before the fifteenth day after
the date of judgment. The defendant understands that the Court will order
him to pay a $100 special assessment under 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(A) and
U.S.S.G. § 5E1.3, in addition to any fine imposed;
- The United States agrees that at the initial appearance or arraignment it will recommend the release of the defendant on his personal
recognizance, under 18 U.S.C. § 3142, without restriction as to travel,
pending the sentencing hearing in this case; and
- In the event that the defendant fails to return to the United States to serve his sentence of imprisonment at a Federal Minimum Security
Camp, the defendant agrees not to oppose or contest any request for
extradition by the United States to face charges either in the Information
referenced in Paragraph 2 of this Plea Agreement or in any related
indictment.
9. The United States and the defendant agree that the Guidelines
sentence range exceeds the agreed-upon sentence. The United States agrees that,
based on the defendant's past and ongoing cooperation, which occurred prior to the
sentencing hearing in this case, it will file a motion, under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1, for a
downward departure from the Guidelines sentence range and will request that the
Court impose the agreed-upon sentence set out in Paragraph 8 because of the
substantial assistance the defendant has provided in the government's
investigation of violations of federal criminal laws in the MCAA industry. Subject
to the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the defendant described in
Paragraph 12, the United States will fully advise the Court and the Probation
Office of the fact, manner, and extent of the defendant's past and ongoing
cooperation with the United States' investigation and prosecutions, all material
facts relating to the defendant's involvement in the charged offense, and all other
relevant conduct. Under U.S.S.G. § 1B1.8, the United States agrees that self-incriminating information previously unknown to the United States that the
defendant provides under this Plea Agreement and in discussions leading to this
Plea Agreement will not be used in determining the defendant's applicable
Guidelines range.
10. The United States and the defendant understand that the Court
retains complete discretion to accept or reject the agreed-upon sentence in
Paragraph 8.
- If the Court does not accept the agreed-upon sentence, this entire Plea Agreement, except Paragraph 10(b), below shall be rendered null
and void.
- If the Court does not accept the agreed-upon sentence, the
defendant will be free to withdraw his guilty plea (Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e)(4)).
If the defendant does withdraw his guilty plea, this Plea Agreement, the
guilty plea, and any statements made in connection with or in furtherance of
the plea or this Plea Agreement, or in discussions leading to the plea or this
Plea Agreement, shall not be admissible against the defendant in any
criminal or civil proceeding (Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(e)(6)). In addition, should the
Court not accept the Plea Agreement and should the defendant then
withdraw his guilty plea, the United States agrees that it will dismiss the
Information, without prejudice to the United States' right to indict the
defendant on the charge contained in the Information and any other related
charges. For a period of ten (10) consecutive days following the withdrawal of
the guilty plea, the United States shall take no action, based either upon the
offenses subject to this Plea Agreement or any actual or alleged violation of
the Plea Agreement, to revoke the defendant's release on his personal
recognizance, to subject the defendant to service of process or arrest, or to
prevent the defendant from departing the United States.
11. In light of civil cases filed that potentially provide for a recovery of a
multiple of actual damages, the United States agrees that it will not seek a
restitution order for the offense charged in the Information.
DEFENDANT'S COOPERATION
12. The defendant will fully and truthfully cooperate with the United
States in the prosecution of this case, the current federal investigation of violations
of federal antitrust and related criminal laws involving the manufacture or sale of
MCAA, any other federal investigation of MCAA resulting from the current
investigation, and any litigation or other proceedings arising or resulting from any
investigation to which the United States is a party ("Federal Proceeding"). This
cooperation shall include, but not be limited to:
- Producing in the United States and at other mutually agreed- upon locations all documents, including claimed personal documents, and
other materials in his possession, custody, or control requested in writing by
the United States;
- Upon reasonable notice by and at the request of the United
States, making himself available for interviews in the United States or at
other mutually agreed-upon locations;
- Responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United
States in connection with any Federal Proceeding, without falsely implicating
any person or intentionally withholding any information, subject to the
penalties of making false statements or declarations (18 U.S.C. § 1001) or
obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503);
- Otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any
materials or information not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph that he
may have that is relevant to any Federal Proceeding; and
- When called upon to do so by the United States in connection
with any Federal Proceeding, testifying in trial and grand jury or other
proceedings in the United States fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to
the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or
declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), and
contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402).
GOVERNMENT'S AGREEMENT
13. Upon acceptance of the guilty plea called for by this Plea Agreement
and imposition of the agreed-upon sentence, and subject to the cooperation
requirements of Paragraph 12, the United States agrees that it will not bring
further criminal charges against the defendant for any act or offense committed
before the Court's acceptance of this Plea Agreement and undertaken in
furtherance of an attempted or completed antitrust conspiracy involving the
manufacture or sale of MCAA ("Relevant Offense"). The non-prosecution terms of
this paragraph do not apply to any civil liability to the United States, to any
violations of the federal tax or securities laws, or to any crime of violence.
14. The United States agrees that when the defendant is required to travel
to the United States for interviews by the United States, grand jury appearances,
or court appearances under this Plea Agreement, the United States will take no
action, based upon any offense subject to this Plea Agreement, to subject the
defendant to arrest, service of process, or prevention from departing the United
States, except where the United States has sought to void the Plea Agreement
under Paragraph 18. Counsel for the United States shall provide the defendant a
letter to such effect in connection with any such travel required by the United
States. This paragraph does not apply to the defendant's commission of perjury (18
U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations (18 U.S.C. § 1001), making
false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C.
§ 1623), obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), or contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) in connection with any testimony provided under this Plea Agreement in
trial, grand jury, or other judicial proceedings in the United States. The United
States also agrees that documents provided under Paragraph 12 shall be deemed
responsive to outstanding grand jury subpoenas issued to Elf.
15. - Subject to the full and continuing cooperation of the defendant,
as described in Paragraph 12 of this Plea Agreement, and upon the Court's
acceptance of the defendant's guilty plea and imposition of sentence in this
case, the United States agrees not to seek to remove the defendant from the
United States under section 240 of the Immigration and Nationality Act,
based upon the defendant's guilty plea and conviction in this case, should the
defendant apply for or obtain admission to the United States as a
nonimmigrant (hereinafter referred to as the "agreement not to seek to
remove the defendant"). The agreement not to seek to remove the defendant
is the equivalent of an agreement not to exclude the defendant from
admission to the United States as a nonimmigrant or to deport the defendant
from the United States. (Immigration and Nationality Act, § 240(e)(2));
- The Antitrust Division of the United States Department of
Justice has consulted with the Immigration and Naturalization Service of the
United States Department of Justice ("INS"). The INS, in consultation with
the United States Department of State, has agreed to the inclusion in this
Plea Agreement of this agreement not to seek to remove the defendant;
- So that the defendant will be able to obtain any nonimmigrant
visa that he may need to travel to the United States, the INS and the Visa
Office, United States Department of State, have concurred in the granting of
a nonimmigrant waiver of the defendant's inadmissibility. This waiver will
remain in effect so long as this agreement not to seek to remove the defendant
remains in effect. While the waiver remains in effect, the Department of
State will not deny the defendant's application for a nonimmigrant visa on
the basis of the defendant's guilty plea and conviction in this case, and the
INS will not deny his application for admission as a nonimmigrant on the
basis of his guilty plea and conviction in this case;
- This agreement not to seek to remove the defendant will remain
in effect so long as the defendant:
- acts and has acted consistently with his cooperation
obligations under this Plea Agreement;
- is not convicted of any felony under the laws of the United
States or any state, other than the conviction resulting from the
defendant's guilty plea under this Plea Agreement or any conviction
under the laws of any state resulting from conduct constituting an
offense subject to this Plea Agreement; and
- does not engage in any other conduct that would warrant
his removal from the United States under the Immigration and
Nationality Act.
The defendant understands that should the Antitrust Division become aware
that the defendant has violated any of these conditions, the Antitrust Division
will notify the INS. The INS will then determine, in consultation with the
Antitrust Division, whether to rescind this agreement not to seek to remove
the defendant;
- The defendant agrees to notify the Assistant Attorney General of
the Antitrust Division should the defendant be convicted of any other felony
under the laws of the United States or of any state; and
- Should the United States rescind this agreement not to seek to
remove the defendant because of the defendant's violation of a condition of
this plea agreement, the defendant irrevocably waives his right to contest his
removal from the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act
on the basis of his guilty plea and conviction in this case, but retains his right
to notice of removal proceedings.
REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL
16. The defendant has been represented by counsel and is fully satisfied
that his attorney has provided competent legal representation. The defendant has
thoroughly reviewed this Plea Agreement and acknowledges that counsel has
advised him of the nature of the charge, any possible defense to the charge, and the
nature and range of possible sentences.
VOLUNTARY PLEA
17. The defendant's decision to enter into this Plea Agreement and the
defendant's decision to tender a guilty plea are freely and voluntarily made and are
not the result of force or threats, assurances, promises, or representations other
than the representations in this Plea Agreement. The United States has made no
promises or representations to the defendant as to whether the Court will accept or
reject this Plea Agreement. In signing this Plea Agreement, the defendant is not
under the influence of any drug, medication, liquor, intoxicant or depressant, and
is fully capable of understanding the terms and conditions of this Plea Agreement.
VIOLATION OF PLEA AGREEMENT
18. The defendant agrees that, should the United States determine in good
faith, during the period any Federal Proceeding is pending, that the defendant has
failed to provide full cooperation, as described in Paragraph 12, or otherwise has
violated any other provision of this Plea Agreement, the United States may notify
counsel for the defendant in writing by personal or overnight delivery or facsimile
transmission of its intention to void its obligations under this Plea Agreement
(except its obligations under this paragraph), and the defendant shall be subject to
prosecution for any federal crime including, but not limited to, perjury (18 U.S.C.
§ 1621), making a false statement or declaration (18 U.S.C. § 1001), making a false
statement or declaration in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623),
obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and any
Relevant Offense. The defendant agrees that in any such prosecution the United
States may use against the defendant information provided by the defendant to the
United States, federal grand juries, or courts. The defendant may seek court
review of any determination made by the United States under this paragraph.
ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT
19. This Plea Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
United States and the defendant concerning the disposition of the criminal charge
in this case. This Plea Agreement cannot be modified except in writing signed by
the United States and the defendant.
20. A facsimile signature shall be deemed an original signature for the
purpose of executing this Plea Agreement.
DATED: 03/27/02
|
|
Respectfully submitted,
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION
| BY: |
_______________/s/________________
Marc Siegel
Lisa V. Tenorio
Keslie Stewart
Dana R. Wagner
Dina Wong
Attorneys
450 Golden Gate Avenue
Box 36046, Room 10-0101
San Francisco, CA 94102
(415) 436-6660
|
|
I have consulted with my attorney and fully understand all my rights with
respect to the offense charged in the pending Information. Further, I have
consulted with my attorney and fully understand my rights with respect to the
provisions of the U.S.S.G. I have read this Plea Agreement and carefully reviewed
every part of it with my attorney. I understand this Plea Agreement and I
voluntarily agree to it.
|
DATED: March 4, 2002
|
_______________/s/________________
PATRICK STAINTON
Defendant
|
I am the attorney representing PATRICK STAINTON. I have fully explained
to him his rights with respect to the offense charged in the pending Information.
Further, I have reviewed the provisions of the U.S.S.G. that may apply in this case.
I have carefully reviewed every part of this Plea Agreement with him. To my
knowledge, his decision to enter into this Plea Agreement is an informed and
voluntary one.
|
DATED: March 4, 2002
|
_______________/s/________________
Ray V. Hartwell, Esq.
Hunton & Williams
1900 K St., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
Attorney for Patrick Stainton
|
|