This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,    

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

NATIONAL ELECTRIC SIGN ASSOC.,   
MAURICE R. ELY,
JOHN K. LAMB,
SIDNEY C. FRASER,
and HENRY K. LAMBKE,

                  Defendants.


|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
Civil Action No.: 51C2064

JUDGE: Amy St. Eve

DATE STAMP: June 30, 2004

ORDER ESTABLISHING NOTICE AND PUBLIC COMMENT
PROCEDURES FOR MOTION TO TERMINATE FINAL JUDGMENT

International Sign Association ("ISA"), the successor in interest to defendant National Electric Sign Association, having moved for an Order terminating the Final Judgment entered by this Court in this case on April 5, 1954, and the United States, having tentatively consented to the motion and having proposed, and ISA having agreed, that notice of the motion and the United States' tentative consent to it be published at the expense of ISA, and that all interested persons be given an opportunity to submit comments concerning the proposed termination of the Final Judgment, and it appearing to the Court desirable to invite such comments, and in consideration of the Stipulation of the parties, it is

ORDERED that ISA shall publish at its own expense a notice in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A in two consecutive issues of (a) the Washington Post and (b) Signs of the Times, and file proof of such publication with the Court; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that copies of all comments received by the United States within sixty (60) days after the last publication of the notices required by this Order and any responses thereto shall be filed with this Court by the United States promptly after it receives such comments; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, that this Court will not rule upon ISA's motion until the United States has filed with the Court copies of any comments that it receives along with responses to those comments.

SO ORDERED, this _____ day of __________________, 2004.


  ___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE