[Proposed] Order Denying Comptel's Motion for Leave to Intervene, or in the Alternative to Participate as Amicus Curiae : U.S. v. SBC Communication, Inc. and AT&T Corp.; Verizon Communications Inc. and MCI, Inc.

This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                  Plaintiff,
                  v.

SBC Communications, Inc. and
AT&T Corp.,
                  Defendants.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Civil Action No.: 1:05CV02102 (EGS)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                  Plaintiff,
                  v.

Verizon Communications Inc. and
MCI, Inc.,
                  Defendants.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

Civil Action No.: 1:05CV02103 (EGS)

ORDER DENYING COMPTEL'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE, OR IN THE
ALTERNATIVE TO PARTIPATE AS AMICUS CURIAE

Upon consideration of COMPTEL's Motion for Leave to Intervene, or in the Alternative to Participate as Amicus Curiae, as well as all other relevant papers filed in relation to this motion, it is hereby ORDERED that COMPTEL's motion is DENIED.

Dated: _____________ _______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE