UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PLAINTIFF,
V.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.A. NO. 98-1232
|
|
STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.,
PLAINTIFFS,
V.
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
DEFENDANT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.A. NO. 98-1223
|
|
MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFF,
V.
DENNIS C. VACCO, ET AL.,
COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANTS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WASHINGTON, D.C.
FEBRUARY 23, 1999
2:09 P.M. (P.M.
SESSION)
VOLUME 59
|
TRANSCRIPT OF TRIAL
BEFORE THE HONORABLE THOMAS P.
JACKSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
| 1 | CONVERSATION, IT WAS AN E-MAIL.
|
| 2 | Q. SO, IN EACH OF THE CASES WHERE YOU REPORTED ON A
|
| 3 | MEETING OR A CONVERSATION, YOU WOULD HAVE SENT AN E-MAIL
|
| 4 | TO YOUR SUPERIORS AT MICROSOFT; CORRECT?
|
| 5 | A. YES, BEYOND, YOU KNOW, "MET WITH APPLE YESTERDAY; IT
|
| 6 | WAS FINE."
|
| 7 | Q. IF IT WAS JUST THAT, YOU WOULD DO IT ORALLY. IF IT
|
| 8 | WAS SOMETHING MORE, YOU WOULD SEND AN E-MAIL?
|
| 9 | A. YES, THATS TRUE. I WAS JUST TRYING TO BE VERY
|
| 10 | CLEAR.
|
| 11 | Q. I APPRECIATE THAT.
|
| 12 | NOW, MR. ENGSTROM, AT SOME POINT YOU DELETED ALL
|
| 13 | OF YOUR E-MAILS RELATING TO ANY CONVERSATIONS OR MEETINGS
|
| 14 | THAT YOU HAD WITH APPLE THAT OCCURRED PRIOR TO THE END OF
|
| 15 | MAY OF 1998; CORRECT?
|
| 16 | A. NO. WHAT I DO IS I DELETE MAIL THAT IS TWO MONTHS
|
| 17 | OLD ON A REGULAR BASIS BECAUSE I WORK ON A HARD DISK ON A
|
| 18 | LAPTOP. THE MACHINE IS FAIRLY OLD, THE REASON FOR THAT
|
| 19 | BEING I TEND TO TEST THE SOFTWARE MY GROUP IS PRODUCING,
|
| 20 | AND I LIKE TO MAKE SURE THAT IT RUNS ON WHAT A CUSTOMER'S
|
| 21 | MACHINE IS TYPICALLY TO BE. SO, AS A ROUTINE BASIS, I
|
| 22 | DELETE ALL MAIL, YOU KNOW, TWO MONTHS OLD.
|
| 23 | Q. ITS THE CASE, ISN'T IT, THAT NO E-MAIL AUTHORED BY
|
| 24 | YOU THAT REPORTS ON ANY MEETINGS OR ANY CONVERSATIONS
WITH
|
| 25 | APPLE BEFORE THE END OF MAY 1998 WAS PRODUCED TO THE
|
19
| 1 | GOVERNMENT AS PART OF THIS LITIGATION?
|
| 2 | A. I'M NOT SURE OF THAT, ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.
|
| 3 | Q. ARE YOU AWARE OF ANY E-MAILS REPORTING ON
|
| 4 | CONVERSATIONS OR MEETINGS WITH APPLE THAT WERE
PRODUCED
|
| 5 | BEFORE MAY, THE END OF MAY, 1998?
|
| 6 | A. NO, I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY.
|
| 7 | Q. AND YOU DON'T REFER TO OR ATTACH ANY IN YOUR
WRITTEN
|
| 8 | DIRECT TESTIMONY, DO YOU, SIR?
|
| 9 | A. NO.
|
| 10 | Q. NOW, IN YOUR TESTIMONY YOU STATE THAT OVER TIME YOU
|
| 11 | HAVE ENGAGED IN DISCUSSIONS WITH APPLE AND WITH OTHER
|
| 12 | DEVELOPERS OF MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE CONCERNING WHAT YOU
CALL
|
| 13 | "STANDARDIZATION"; IS THAT RIGHT?
|
| 14 | A. YES.
|
| 15 | Q. AND ONE OF THE COMPANIES THAT YOU'VE TALKED TO OVER
|
| 16 | TIME ABOUT MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE IS INTEL; CORRECT, SIR?
|
| 17 | A. YES.
|
| 18 | Q. IN FACT, YOU'VE HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH INTEL ABOUT
|
| 19 | SUN'S JAVA MULTIMEDIA API'S, HAVE YOU NOT?
|
| 20 | A. YES.
|
| 21 | Q. AND SUN'S JAVA MULTIMEDIA API'S ARE A JAVA-BASED FORM
|
| 22 | OF MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY THAT, IN SOME WAYS, ACCOMPLISHES
|
| 23 | SIMILAR THINGS TO MICROSOFTS MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY OR
|
| 24 | APPLE'S MULTIMEDIA TECHNOLOGY; IS THAT GENERALLY TRUE?
|
| 25 | A. ITS GENERALLY TRUE. I'M ACTUALLY NOT SURE HOW THEY
|
|