IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY,
Defendant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criminal No.: 07-140 (RMU)
Filed: June 11, 2007
Count 1: False Statement (18 U.S.C. § 1001)
Count 2: False Statement (18 U.S.C. § 1001)
|
PLEA AGREEMENT
The United States of America and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company ("Defendant"),
a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, hereby
enter into the following Plea Agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C)
of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure ("Fed. R. Crim. P."):
RIGHTS OF DEFENDANT
1. The Defendant understands its rights:
- to be represented by an attorney;
- to be charged by Indictment;
- to plead not guilty to any criminal charge brought against it;
- to have a trial by jury, at which it would be presumed not guilty
of the charge and the United States would have to prove every essential
element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt for it to
be found guilty;
- to confront and cross-examine witnesses against it and to subpoena
witnesses in its defense at trial;
- to appeal its conviction if it is found guilty; and
- to appeal the imposition of sentence against it.
AGREEMENT TO PLEAD GUILTY
AND WAIVE CERTAIN RIGHTS
2. The Defendant knowingly and voluntarily waives the rights set out
in Paragraph 1(b)-(f) above. The Defendant also knowingly and voluntarily
waives the right to file any appeal, any collateral attack, or any other
writ or motion, including but not limited to an appeal under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3742, that challenges the sentence imposed by the Court if that
sentence is consistent with or below the recommended sentence in Paragraph
9 of this Plea Agreement, regardless of how the sentence is determined
by the Court. This agreement does not affect the rights or obligations
of the United States as set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3742(b)-(c). Pursuant
to Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(b), the Defendant will waive indictment and plead
guilty at arraignment to a two-count Information to be filed in the
United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Count I of
the Information will charge that the Defendant knowingly and willfully
falsified and concealed a material fact by trick, scheme, and device
and made a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement and
representation in connection with the submission of a settlement agreement
to the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") for advisory approval under
the terms of a consent decree, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
Count II of the Information will charge that the Defendant knowingly
and willfully made a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement
and representation in a certification submitted to the FTC, in violation
of 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
3. The Defendant, pursuant to the terms of this Plea Agreement, will
plead guilty to the criminal charges identified in Paragraph 2 above
and will make a factual admission of guilt to the Court in accordance
with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11.
FACTUAL BASES FOR OFFENSES CHARGED
4. Had this case gone to trial, the United States would have presented
evidence sufficient to prove the facts set forth in the Information
filed together with this Plea Agreement, including:
- For purposes of Count I of this Plea Agreement, the "relevant period"
is that period between January 1, 2006 and June 12, 2006, and before
the management changes made by Defendant on September 12, 2006. In
particular, on or about May 25, 2006, the Defendant entered into a
proposed settlement agreement with Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corporation
(collectively, "Apotex") to resolve certain patent litigation regarding
Plavix®, a brand name pharmaceutical (the "Settlement Agreement").
Under the terms of a consent decree between the Defendant and the
FTC, Defendant was required to submit the Settlement Agreement to
the FTC for advisory approval. Defendant filed the Settlement Agreement
with the FTC, an agency within the executive branch of the United
States, on May 30, 2006 and in connection therewith knowingly and
willfully falsified and concealed by trick, scheme and device a material
fact and made a materially false, fictitious and fraudulent statement
and representation in that Defendant failed to disclose certain information
that was material to the FTC and, therefore, operated as an incomplete
and false statement to the FTC, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
- For purposes of Count II of this Plea Agreement, the "relevant
period" is that period between January 1, 2006 and June 12, 2006,
and before the management changes made by Defendant on September 12,
2006. On or about May 25, 2006, the Defendant entered into the Settlement
Agreement with Apotex and submitted it to the FTC for advisory approval
on May 30, 2006. On or about June 8, 2006, the FTC requested a written
certification from the Defendant confirming that the Defendant "ha[d]
not made any representation, commitment, or promise to Apotex, whether
oral or written, that is not explicitly set forth in the [Settlement]
Agreement, including the representation that [the Defendant] would
not launch an authorized generic version of Plavix[®] during
Apotex's period of exclusivity." On or about June 12, 2006, Defendant
filed the requested written certification with the FTC and in connection
therewith knowingly and willfully made a materially false, fictitious
and fraudulent statement and representation in that the written certification
failed to disclose certain information that was material to the FTC
and, therefore, operated as an incomplete and false statement to the
FTC, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001.
5. The Defendant agrees that the Information filed together with this
Plea Agreement is sufficient to charge the offenses in Counts I and
II and that the Information contains sufficient information for it to
understand the nature of those charges.
POSSIBLE MAXIMUM SENTENCE
6. The Defendant understands that the statutory maximum penalty which
may be imposed against it upon conviction for a violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 1001 is a fine in an amount equal to the greatest of:
- $500,000 (18 U.S.C. § 3571(c)(3));
- twice the gross pecuniary gain derived from the offense (18 U.S.C.
§ 3571(c) and (d)); or
- twice the gross pecuniary loss resulting from the offense (18 U.S.C.
§ 3571(c) and (d)).
7. In addition, the Defendant understands that:
- pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3561(c)(1), the Court may
impose a term of probation of at least one year, but not more than
five years;
- pursuant to §8B1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines
("U.S.S.G.," "Sentencing Guidelines," or "Guidelines") or 18 U.S.C.
§ 3563(b)(2) or 3663(a)(1)(A), the Court may order it to pay
restitution to the victims of the offenses; and
- pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(B), the Court is required
to order the Defendant to pay a $400 special assessment upon conviction
for each of the charged crimes.
SENTENCING GUIDELINES
8. The Defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory,
not mandatory, but that the Court must consider the Guidelines in effect
on the day of sentencing, along with the other factors set forth in
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), in determining and imposing sentence. The
Defendant understands that the Guidelines determinations will be made
by the Court by a preponderance of the evidence standard. The Defendant
understands that although the Court is not ultimately bound to impose
a sentence within the applicable Guidelines range, its sentence must
be reasonable based upon consideration of all relevant sentencing factors
set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
SENTENCING AGREEMENT
9. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C), the United States and
the Defendant agree that the appropriate disposition of this case is,
and agree to recommend jointly that the Court impose, a sentence requiring
the Defendant to pay to the United States a criminal fine of $1 million,
payable in full before the fifteenth (15th) day after the date of judgment
("the recommended sentence"). The parties further agree that the recommended
sentence set forth in this Plea Agreement is reasonable.
- The Defendant understands that the Court will order it to pay a
$400 special assessment per count, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(B),
in addition to any fine imposed.
- The parties agree that none of the factors requiring the imposition
of a term of probation that are contained in U.S.S.G. §8D1.1
are applicable in this case, and both parties will recommend that
no term of probation be imposed, but the Defendant understands that
the Court's denial of this request will not void this Plea Agreement.
- The United States and the Defendant jointly submit that this Plea
Agreement, together with the record that will be created by the United
States and the Defendant at the plea and sentencing hearings, including
the Information filed together with this Plea Agreement, and the further
disclosure described in Paragraph 10, will provide sufficient information
concerning the Defendant, the crime charged in this case, and the
Defendant's role in the crime to enable the meaningful exercise of
sentencing authority by the Court under 18 U.S.C. § 3553.
The United States and Defendant agree to request jointly that the
Court accept the Defendant's guilty plea and impose sentence on an
expedited schedule as early as the date of arraignment, based upon
the record provided by the Defendant and the United States, under
the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) and U.S.S.G. §6A1.1.
The parties agree that the Court's denial of the request to impose
sentence on an expedited schedule will not void this Plea Agreement.
10. Subject to the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the
Defendant described in Paragraph 13 of this Plea Agreement, and before
sentencing in the case, the United States will fully advise the Court
of the fact, manner, and extent of the Defendant's cooperation and its
commitment to prospective cooperation with the United States' investigation
and prosecutions, all material facts relating to the Defendant's involvement
in the charged offense, and all other relevant conduct.
11. The United States and the Defendant understand that the Court
retains complete discretion to accept or reject the recommended sentence
provided for in Paragraph 9 of this Plea Agreement.
- If the Court does not accept the recommended sentence, the United
States and the Defendant agree that this Plea Agreement, except for
Paragraph 11(b) below, shall be rendered void.
- If the Court does not accept the recommended sentence, the Defendant
will be free to withdraw its guilty plea (Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(5)
and (d)). If the Defendant withdraws its plea of guilty, this Plea
Agreement, the guilty plea, and any statement made in the course of
any proceedings under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 regarding the guilty plea
or this Plea Agreement or made in the course of plea discussions with
an attorney for the government shall not be admissible against the
Defendant in any criminal or civil proceeding, except as otherwise
provided in Fed. R. Evid. 410. In addition, the Defendant agrees that,
if it withdraws its guilty plea pursuant to this subparagraph of the
Plea Agreement, the statute of limitations period for any offense
referred to in Paragraph 15 of this Plea Agreement will be tolled
for the period between the date of the signing of the Plea Agreement
and the date the Defendant withdrew its guilty plea or for a period
of sixty (60) days after the date of the signing of the Plea Agreement,
whichever period is greater.
12. In light of the availability of civil causes of action that potentially
provide for recovery of any actual damages, the United States agrees
that it will not seek a restitution order for the offenses charged in
the Information.
DEFENDANT'S COOPERATION
13. The Defendant, its subsidiaries, and the Bristol-Myers Squibb
Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Holding Partnership, but not including Sanofi-Aventis,
Sanofi Synthelabo Inc., or any of their subsidiaries, (collectively,
"related entities") will cooperate fully and truthfully with the United
States in the prosecution of this case, the conduct of the current federal
investigation of violations of federal criminal laws involving the settlement
of litigation concerning the PLAVIX® patent, any other federal
investigation resulting therefrom, and any litigation or other proceedings
arising or resulting from any such investigation to which the United
States is a party ("Federal Proceeding"). The ongoing, full, and truthful
cooperation of the Defendant shall include, but not be limited to:
- producing to the United States all non-privileged documents, information,
and other materials, and documents, information, and other materials,
for which the Defendant has previously waived any applicable privilege,
wherever located, in the possession, custody, or control of the Defendant
or any of its related entities, requested by the United States in
connection with any Federal Proceeding;
- using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful
cooperation, as defined in Paragraph 14 of this Plea Agreement, of
the current and former directors, officers, and employees of the Defendant
or any of its related entities as may be requested by the United States,
but excluding Peter Dolan, Richard Willard, and Andrew Bodnar, including
making these persons available, at the Defendant's expense, for interviews
and the provision of testimony in grand jury, trial, and other judicial
proceedings in connection with any Federal Proceeding.
14. The ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of each person described
in Paragraph 13(b) above will be subject to the procedures and protections
of this paragraph, and shall include, but not be limited to:
- producing all non-privileged documents and documents for which
the Defendant has previously waived any applicable privilege, including
claimed personal documents, and other materials, wherever located,
requested by attorneys and agents of the United States;
- making himself or herself available for interviews, not at the
expense of the United States, upon the request of attorneys and agents
of the United States;
- responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United
States in connection with any Federal Proceeding, without falsely
implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information,
subject to the penalties of making false statements (18 U.S.C. §
1001) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, et seq.);
- otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any non-privileged
material or information and material or information for which the
Defendant has previously waived any applicable privilege, not requested
in (a) - (c) of this paragraph that he or she may have that is related
to any Federal Proceeding;
- when called upon to do so by the United States in connection with
any Federal Proceeding, testifying in grand jury, trial, and other
judicial proceedings fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to
the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false
statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18
U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and
obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, et seq.);
and
- agreeing that, if the agreement not to prosecute him or her in
this Plea Agreement is rendered void under Paragraph 16(c), the statute
of limitations period for any Relevant Offense as defined in Paragraph
16(a) will be tolled as to him or her for the period between the date
of the signing of this Plea Agreement and six (6) months after the
date that the United States gave notice of its intent to void its
obligations to that person under the Plea Agreement.
GOVERNMENT'S AGREEMENT
15 Upon acceptance of the guilty plea called for by this Plea Agreement
and the imposition of the recommended sentence, and subject to the cooperation
requirements of Paragraph 13 of this Plea Agreement, the United States
agrees that it will not bring further criminal charges against the Defendant
or any of its related entities for any act or offense committed before
the date of this Plea Agreement relating to conduct surrounding the
settlement of litigation with Apotex concerning the PLAVIX® patent.
The nonprosecution terms of this paragraph do not apply to civil matters
of any kind, to any violation of the federal tax or securities laws,
to any crime of violence, or to any deferred prosecution agreements
to which the Defendant or its related entities may be a party.
16. The United States agrees to the following:
- Upon the Court's acceptance of the guilty plea called for by this
Plea Agreement and the imposition of the recommended sentence and
subject to the exceptions noted in Paragraph 16(c), the United
States will not bring criminal charges against any current or former
director, officer, or employee of the Defendant or its related entities
for any act or offense committed before the date of this Plea Agreement
and while that person was acting as a director, officer, or employee
of the Defendant or its related entities relating to conduct surrounding
the settlement of litigation with Apotex concerning the validity of
the PLAVIX® patent ("Relevant Offense"), except that the protections
granted in this paragraph shall not apply to Peter Dolan, Richard
Willard, and Andrew Bodnar;
- Should the United States determine that any current or former director,
officer, or employee of the Defendant or its related entities may
have information relevant to any Federal Proceeding, the United States
may request that person's cooperation under the terms of this Plea
Agreement by written request delivered to counsel for the individual
(with a copy to the undersigned counsel for the Defendant) or, if
the individual is not known by the United States to be represented,
to the undersigned counsel for the Defendant;
- If any person requested to provide cooperation under Paragraph
16(b) fails to comply with his or her obligations under Paragraph
14, then the terms of this Plea Agreement as they pertain to that
person, and the agreement not to prosecute that person granted in
this Plea Agreement, shall be rendered void;
- Except as provided in Paragraph 16(e), information provided by
a person described in Paragraph 16(b) to the United States under the
terms of this Plea Agreement pertaining to any Relevant Offense, or
any information directly or indirectly derived from that information,
may not be used against that person in a criminal case, except in
a prosecution for perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making a false
statement or declaration (18 U.S.C. §§ 1001, 1623),
or obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, et seq.);
- If any person who provides information to the United States under
this Plea Agreement fails to comply fully with his or her obligations
under Paragraph 14 of this Plea Agreement, the agreement in Paragraph
16(d) not to use that information or any information directly or indirectly
derived from it against that person in a criminal case shall be rendered
void;
- The nonprosecution terms of this paragraph do not apply to civil
matters of any kind, to any violation of the federal tax or securities
laws, or to any deferred prosecution agreements or civil injunctions
to which the Defendant or its related entities may be a party; and
- Documents provided under Paragraphs 13(a) and 14(a) shall be deemed
responsive to outstanding grand jury subpoenas issued to the Defendant
or any of its related entities.
17. The Defendant understands that it may be subject to administrative
action by federal or state agencies other than the United States Department
of Justice, Antitrust Division, based upon the conviction resulting
from this Plea Agreement, and that this Plea Agreement in no way controls
whatever action, if any, other agencies may take. However, the United
States agrees that, if requested, it will advise the appropriate officials
of any governmental agency considering such administrative action of
the fact, manner, and extent of the cooperation of the Defendant and
its related entities, both prior to and following disposition, as a
matter for that agency to consider before determining what administrative
action, if any, to take.
REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL
18. The Defendant has been represented by counsel and is fully satisfied
that its attorneys have provided competent legal representation. The
Defendant has thoroughly reviewed this Plea Agreement and acknowledges
that counsel has advised it of the nature of the charges, any possible
defenses to the charges, and the nature and range of possible sentences.
VOLUNTARY PLEA
19. The Defendant's decision to enter into this Plea Agreement and
to tender a plea of guilty is freely and voluntarily made and is not
the result of force, threats, assurances, promises, or representations
other than the representations contained in this Plea Agreement. The
United States has made no promises or representations to the Defendant
as to whether the Court will accept or reject the recommendations contained
within this Plea Agreement.
VIOLATION OF PLEA AGREEMENT
20. The Defendant agrees that, should the United States determine
in good faith, during the period that any Federal Proceeding is pending,
that the Defendant or any of its related entities have failed to provide
full and truthful cooperation, as described in Paragraph 13 of this
Plea Agreement, or has otherwise violated any provision of this Plea
Agreement, the United States will notify counsel for the Defendant in
writing by personal or overnight delivery or facsimile transmission
and may also notify counsel by telephone of its intention to void any
of its obligations under this Plea Agreement (except its obligations
under this paragraph), and the Defendant and its related entities shall
be subject to prosecution for any federal crime of which the United
States has knowledge including, but not limited to, the substantive
offenses relating to the investigation resulting in this Plea Agreement.
The Defendant and its related entities agree that, in the event that
the United States is released from its obligations under this Plea Agreement
and brings criminal charges against the Defendant or its related entities
for any offense referred to in Paragraph 15 of this Plea Agreement,
the statute of limitations period for such offense will be tolled for
the period between the date of the signing of this Plea Agreement and
six (6) months after the date the United States gave notice of its intent
to void its obligations under this Plea Agreement.
21. The Defendant understands and agrees that in any further prosecution
of it or its related entities resulting from the release of the United
States from its obligations under this Plea Agreement, because of the
Defendant's or its related entities' violation of the Plea Agreement,
any documents, statements, information, testimony, or evidence provided
by it, its related entities, or current or former directors, officers,
or employees of it or its related entities to attorneys or agents of
the United States, federal grand juries, or courts, and any leads derived
therefrom, may be used against it or its related entities in any such
further prosecution. In addition, the Defendant unconditionally waives
its right to challenge the use of such evidence in any such further
prosecution, notwithstanding the protections of Fed. R. Evid. 410.
ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT
22. This Plea Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the
United States and the Defendant concerning the disposition of the criminal
charges in this case. This Plea Agreement cannot be modified except
in writing, signed by the United States and the Defendant.
23. The undersigned is authorized to enter this Plea Agreement on
behalf of the Defendant as evidenced by the Resolution of the Board
of Directors of the Defendant attached to, and incorporated by reference
in, this Plea Agreement.
24. The undersigned attorneys for the United States have been authorized
by the Attorney General of the United States to enter this Plea Agreement
on behalf of the United States.
25. A facsimile signature shall be deemed an original signature for
the purpose of executing this Plea Agreement. Multiple signature pages
are authorized for the purpose of executing this Plea Agreement.
DATED: May 31, 2007
|
BY: _______________/s/________________
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
By: Sandra Leung, Esq.
General Counsel
BY: _______________/s/________________
Mary Jo White, Esq.
Lorin Reisner, Esq.
Counsel for Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
|
BY: _______________/s/________________
John Terzaken, Trial Attorney
Brent Snyder, Trial Attorney
Portia Brown, Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
1401 H Street, N.W., Suite 3700
Washington, D.C. 20530
Tel.: (202) 307-6694
Fax: (202) 514-6525 |
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY
CERTIFICATION
I, Joan E. Gumas, Assistant Secretary of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
(the "Company"), a corporation organized under the laws of the State
of Delaware, hereby certify that the following is a true and exact copy
of a resolution taken from a special meeting of the Board of Directors
of said corporation, on the 30th day of May, 2007:
WHEREAS, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company ("BMS") has engaged in discussions
with the U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division ("DOJ") in
connection with an investigation by the DOJ into the proposed settlement
of the Plavix patent litigation,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of BMS has discussed the investigation
with counsel and has determined that resolution of the investigation
on the terms and conditions discussed with the Board and as contained
in the Plea Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A would be in the
best interests of BMS and BMS's stockholders,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Sandra Leung, Mary Jo White and
Lorin L. Reisner are each authorized to sign the attached Plea Agreement
on behalf of BMS and to take such other action as may be required
by BMS pursuant to the Plea Agreement or deemed necessary or appropriate
to carry out the intent of the foregoing resolutions and that all
steps heretofore taken to effect the purposes of the foregoing resolutions
are hereby approved, ratified and confirmed.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto placed my hand and the
seal of the corporation on this 30th day of May, 2007.
| |
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY |
|
|
_______________/s/________________
Joan E. Gumas
Assistant Secretary |
|