This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Department of Justice, Antitrust Division   
325 7th Street, N.W., Suite 300
Washington, DC 20530,

                  Plaintiff,

                  v.

BAIN CAPITAL, LLC
111 Huntington Ave.
Boston, MA 02199,

and

THOMAS H. LEE PARTNERS, L.P.
100 Federal St. 35th Fl.
Boston, MA 02110,

and

CLEAR CHANNEL
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
200 E. Basse Rd.
San Antonio, TX 78209,

                  Defendants.


|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-00245

Filed: Feb. 13, 2008
Assigned to: Robertson, James
Assign. Date: 2/13/2008
Description: Antitrust

PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES'
EXPLANATION OF CONSENT DECREE PROCEDURES

Plaintiff United States of America ("United States") submits this memorandum summarizing the procedures for entry of the proposed Final Judgment as set forth by the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 16(b)-(h) (the "APPA"), which applies in civil antitrust cases brought and settled by the United States. As described below, the APPA provides that certain events must occur prior to the Court signing and entering the proposed Final Judgment to resolve this case.

1. Today, Plaintiff has filed a Complaint, proposed Final Judgment, Competitive Impact Statement, and Hold Separate Stipulation and Order between the parties ("Stipulation and Order").

2. Defendants have agreed in the Stipulation and Order that they will abide by the terms of the proposed Final Judgment in the interim and also follow certain procedures described in the Stipulation and Order between consummation of their merger and the divestitures required by the proposed Final Judgment. At this time, we ask that the Court sign only the Stipulation and Order.

3. The Stipulation and Order also contains the parties' agreement that, after compliance with the APPA, the Court may enter the proposed Final Judgment. The APPA requires that Plaintiff publish the proposed Final Judgment and the Competitive Impact Statement in the Federal Register and in certain newspapers at least sixty (60) days prior to entry of the proposed Final Judgment. The notice will inform members of the public that they may submit comments about the proposed Final Judgment to the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (see 15 U.S.C. §§ 16(b)-(c)).

4. During the sixty-day period, Plaintiff will consider, and at the close of that period respond to, any comments that it has received, and it will publish the comments and Plaintiff's responses in the Federal Register.

5. After the expiration of the sixty-day period, Plaintiff will file with the Court the comments and Plaintiff's responses, and Plaintiff either will ask the Court to enter the Final Judgment (subject to any proposed revisions) or will withdraw its consent to entry of the Final Judgment, as provided in Paragraph IV(A) of the Stipulation and Order (see 15 U.S.C. § 16(d)).

6. If Plaintiff requests that the Court enter the Final Judgment after compliance with the APPA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 16(e)-(f), then the Court may enter the Final Judgment without a hearing, provided that the Court concludes that the Final Judgment is in the public interest.


Dated: February 13, 2008 Respectfully submitted,


  FOR PLAINTIFF:

_______________/s/________________

Daniel McCuaig (D.C. Bar No. 478199)
Trial Attorney
United States Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
325 7th St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20530
Telephone No.: 202-307-0520
Facsimile No.: 202-514-7308