Skip to main content
Case Document

Plaintiff United States's Explanation of Consent Decree Procedures

Date
Document Type
Explanation of Consent Decree Procedures
This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE
OF ALABAMA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF KANSAS,
STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF NORTH   
DAKOTA, and STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA,   

                  Plaintiffs,

                  v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., and   
ALLTEL CORPORATION,

                  Defendants.


|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         

Case No.: 1:08-cv-01878
Assigned to: Sullivan, Emmet G.
Assign. Date: 10/30/2008
Description: Antitrust

Filed: 10/30/2008



PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES'S
EXPLANATION OF CONSENT DECREE PROCEDURES

Plaintiff United States submits this short memorandum summarizing the procedures regarding the Court's entry of the proposed Final Judgment. This Judgment would settle this case pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 16(b)-(h) (the "APPA"), which applies to civil antitrust cases brought and settled by the United States.

1. Today, plaintiffs United States and the states of Alabama, California, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota have filed a Complaint, proposed Final Judgment, and Preservation of Assets Stipulation and Order, between the parties by which they have agreed that the Court may enter the proposed Final Judgment following compliance with the APPA. Plaintiff United States has also filed a Competitive Impact Statement relating to the proposed Final Judgment.

2. The APPA requires that plaintiff United States publish the proposed Final Judgment and the Competitive Impact Statement in the Federal Register and in certain newspapers at least sixty days prior to entry of the proposed Final Judgment. The notice will inform members of the public that they may submit comments about the proposed Final Judgment to the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (see 15 U.S.C. §§ 16(b)-(c)).

3. During the sixty-day period, plaintiff United States will consider, and at the close of that period respond to, any comments that it has received, and it will publish the comments and plaintiff United States' responses in the Federal Register.

4. After the expiration of the sixty-day period, plaintiff United States will file with the Court the comments and plaintiff United States' responses, and it may ask the Court to enter the proposed Final Judgment (unless plaintiffs have decided to withdraw their consent to entry of the Judgment, as permitted by Section IV.A of the Preservation of Assets Stipulation and Order) (see 15 U.S.C. § 16(d)).

5. After compliance with the APPA, 15 U.S.C. §§ 16(e)-(f), the Court may enter the proposed Final Judgment without a hearing, provided that it concludes that the Final Judgment is in the public interest and that the United States has not withdrawn its consent.

Dated: October 30, 2008 Respectfully submitted,



FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES:

_______________/s/________________
Hillary B. Burchuk (DC Bar No. 366755)
Lawrence M. Frankel (DC Bar No. 441532)
Attorneys, Telecommunications & Media
Enforcement Section
U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
City Center Building
1401 H Street, N.W., Suite 8000
Washington, D.C. 20530
(202) 514-5621
Facsimile: (202) 514-6381

Updated April 18, 2023