UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
STATE OF ILLINOIS,
STATE OF COLORADO,
and
STATE OF INDIANA,
Plaintiffs,
v.
AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC.,
and
KERASOTES SHOWPLACE
THEATRES, LLC,
Defendants.
|
)
) ) ) ) )
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
)
|
Civil Action No: 10-0846
Judge:
Filed: 5/21/2010 |
HOLD SEPARATE STIPULATION AND ORDER
It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the undersigned parties, subject to
approval and entry by the Court, that:
I. Definitions
As used in this Hold Separate Stipulation and Order:
- "Acquirer" or "Acquirers" means the entity or entities to which AMC divests
the Divestiture Assets.
- "AMC" means defendant AMC Entertainment Holdings,
Inc., a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Kansas
City, Missouri, its successors and assigns, and its subsidiaries, divisions,
groups, affiliates, partnerships and joint ventures, and their directors,
officers, managers, agents, and employees.
- "Kerasotes" means defendant
Kerasotes Showplace Theatres, LLC, a Delaware corporation with its principal
place of business in Chicago, Illinois, its successors and assigns, and its
subsidiaries, divisions, groups, affiliates, partnerships and joint ventures,
and their directors, officers, managers, agents, and employees.
- "Divestiture Assets" means
the following theatre assets:
| |
Theatre |
Address |
1 |
AMC Cantera 30 |
28250 Diehl Road, Warrenville, IL, 60555 |
2 |
Kerasotes Showplace 12 (Bolingbrook) |
1221 West Boughton Road, Bolingbrook, IL
60440 |
3 |
Kerasotes Glen 10 |
1850 Tower Drive, Glenview, IL 60026 |
4 |
AMC Gardens 13 |
4999 Old Orchard Shopping Center, Skokie,
IL 60077 |
5 |
Kerasotes Colony Square 12 |
1164 West Dillon Road Louisville, CO 80027 |
6 |
Kerasotes Olde Town 14 |
5550 Wadsworth Boulevard Arvada, CO
80002 |
7 |
Kerasotes Showplace 12 (Glendale 10)
OR
AMC Castleton Square 14 |
6102 N. Rural Street Indianapolis, IN 46220
6020 East 82nd Street Indianapolis, IN 46250 |
8 |
AMC Greenwood 14 |
461 South Greenwood Park Drive,
Greenwood, IN 46142 |
|---|
The term "Divestiture Assets" includes:
- All tangible assets that comprise the business of operating mainstream
theatres that exhibit first-run, commercial movies, including but not
limited to real property and improvements, research and development activities,
all equipment, fixed assets, and fixtures, personal property, inventory,
office furniture, materials, supplies, and other tangible property, and
all assets used in connection with the Divestiture Assets; all licenses,
permits, and authorizations issued by any governmental organization relating
to the Divestiture Assets; all contracts (including management contracts),
teaming arrangements, agreements, leases, commitments, certifications,
and understandings relating to the Divestiture Assets, including supply
agreements; all customer lists (including loyalty club data at the option
of the Acquirer(s), copies of which may be retained by AMC at its option),
contracts, accounts, and credit records; all repair and performance records
and all other records relating to the Divestiture Assets;
- All intangible
assets used in the development, production, servicing, and sale of the
Divestiture Assets, including but not limited to all patents, licenses,
and sublicenses, intellectual property, copyrights, trademarks, trade
names, service marks, service names, technical information, computer
software (except Defendants' proprietary software), and related documentation,
know-how, trade secrets, drawings, blueprints, designs, design protocols,
specifications for materials, specifications for parts and devices, safety
procedures for the handling of materials and substances, all research
data concerning historic and current research and development relating
to Divestiture Assets, quality assurance and control procedures, design
tools and simulation capability, all manuals and technical information
Defendants provide to their own employees, customers, suppliers, agents,
or licensees, and all research data concerning historic and current research
and development efforts relating to the Divestiture Assets; provided,
however, that this term does not include assets that the Defendants do
not own or that AMC is not legally able to transfer.
II. Objectives
The Final Judgment filed in this case is meant to ensure AMC's prompt divestiture of the
Divestiture Assets for the purpose of establishing one or more viable competitors in the exhibition
of first-run, commercial motion pictures in mainstream theatres in order to remedy the effects that
the plaintiffs allege would otherwise result from AMC's acquisition of Kerasotes. This Hold
Separate Stipulation and Order ensures, prior to such divestitures, that the Divestiture Assets
remain independent, economically viable, and ongoing business concerns, and that competition is
maintained and not diminished during the pendency of the ordered divestitures.
III. Jurisdiction
The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and over each of the
parties hereto, and venue of this action is proper in the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia.
IV. Compliance with and Entry of Final Judgment
- The parties stipulate that a Final Judgment in the form attached hereto
as Exhibit A may be filed with and entered by the Court, upon the motion
of any party or upon the Court's own motion, at any time after compliance
with the requirements of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act ("APPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 16,
and without further notice to any party or other proceedings, provided that
the plaintiffs have not withdrawn their consent, which they may do at any
time before the entry of the proposed Final Judgment by serving notice thereof
on defendants and by filing that notice with the Court. Defendants agree
to arrange, at their expense, publication as quickly as possible of the newspaper
notice required by the APPA. The publication shall be arranged no later than
five (5) calendar days after Defendants' receipt from the United States of
the text of the notice and the identity of the newspaper within which the
publication shall be made. Defendants shall promptly send to plaintiff United
States (1) confirmation that publication of the newspaper notice has been
arranged, and (2) the certification of the publication prepared by the newspaper
within which the notice was published.
- Defendants shall abide by and comply
with the provisions of the proposed Final Judgment, pending the Judgment's
entry by the Court, or until expiration of time for all appeals of any Court
ruling declining entry of the proposed Final Judgment, and shall, from the
date of the signing of this Stipulation by the parties, comply with all the
terms and provisions of the proposed Final Judgment as though the same were
in full force and effect as an order of the Court.
- Defendants shall not consummate
the transaction sought to be enjoined by the Complaint herein before the
Court has signed this Hold Separate Stipulation and Order.
- This Stipulation
shall apply with equal force and effect to any amended proposed Final Judgment
agreed upon in writing by the parties and submitted to the Court.
- In the
event that (1) the plaintiffs have withdrawn their consent, as provided in
Section IV(A) above, or (2) the proposed Final Judgment is not entered pursuant
to this Stipulation, the time has expired for all appeals of any Court ruling
declining entry of the proposed Final Judgment, and the Court has not otherwise
ordered continued compliance with the terms and provisions of the proposed
Final Judgment, then the parties are released from all further obligations
under this Stipulation, and the making of this Stipulation shall be without
prejudice to any party in this or any other proceeding.
- Defendants represent
that the divestitures ordered in the proposed Final Judgment can and will
be made, and that Defendants will later raise no claim of mistake, hardship,
or difficulty of compliance as grounds for asking the Court to modify any
of the provisions contained therein.
V. Hold Separate Provisions
Until the divestitures required by the Final Judgment have been accomplished:
- AMC shall, except as is necessary to carry out their obligations under
this Hold Separate Stipulation and Order and the proposed Final Judgment,
or to comply with other legal obligations, take all steps necessary to ensure
that the Divestiture Assets will be maintained and operated as ongoing, economically
viable, and active competitors in the exhibition of first-run, commercial
motion pictures. AMC shall maintain the viability, marketability, and competitiveness
of the Divestiture Assets, and shall not cause the wasting or deterioration
of the Divestiture Assets, nor shall they cause the Divestiture Assets to
be operated in a manner inconsistent with applicable laws, nor shall they
sell, transfer, encumber, or otherwise impair the viability, marketability,
or competitiveness of the Divestiture Assets. AMC shall conduct the business
of the Divestiture Assets in the regular and ordinary course and in accordance
with past practice, except as otherwise approved by the United States, and
shall use their best efforts to preserve the existing relationships with
suppliers, customers, employees, and others having business relations with
the Divestiture Assets. AMC shall use its best efforts to keep the organization
and properties of each of the Divestiture Assets intact, including current
business operations, physical facilities, and working conditions. Within
twenty (20) days after the entry of the Hold Separate Stipulation and Order,
AMC will inform the United States of the steps taken to comply with the Hold
Separate Stipulation and Order.
- Defendants shall use all reasonable efforts
to maintain and increase the sales and revenues of the Divestiture Assets,
and shall maintain at 2009 or previously approved levels for 2010, whichever
are higher, all promotional, advertising, sales, technical assistance, marketing,
and merchandising support for the Divestiture Assets. Provided, however,
that Defendants are not obligated to maintain movie-specific promotions at
any particular level.
- AMC shall provide sufficient working capital and lines
and sources of credit to continue to maintain the Divestiture Assets as economically
viable and competitive, ongoing businesses, consistent with the requirements
of Sections V(A) and (B).
- Defendants shall take all steps necessary to ensure
that the Divestiture Assets are fully maintained in operable condition at
no less than their current capacity and sales, and shall maintain and adhere
to normal product and service improvement, upgrade, repair, and maintenance
schedules for the Divestiture Assets.
- Defendants shall not, except as part
of a divestiture approved by the United States in accordance with the terms
of the proposed Final Judgment, remove, sell, lease, assign, transfer, pledge,
or otherwise dispose of any of the Divestiture Assets.
- Defendants shall maintain,
in accordance with sound accounting principles, separate, accurate, and complete
financial ledgers, books, and records that report on a periodic basis, such
as the last business day of every month, consistent with past practices,
the assets, liabilities, expenses, revenues, and income of the Divestiture
Assets.
- Defendants shall take no action that would jeopardize, delay, or
impede the sale of the Divestiture Assets.
- Defendants' employees with primary
responsibility for the operation of the Divestiture Assets shall not be transferred
or reassigned to other areas within the company except for transfer bids
initiated by employees pursuant to Defendants' regular, established job posting
policy. Defendants shall provide the United States with ten (10) calendar
days notice of such transfer.
- Defendants shall appoint a person or persons
to oversee the Divestiture Assets, who will be responsible for Defendants'
compliance with this Section. This person or persons shall have complete
managerial responsibility for the Divestiture Assets, subject to the provisions
of this Final Judgment, and shall make all pricing and discounting decisions
independent of Defendants. In the event such person is unable to perform
his duties, Defendants shall appoint, subject to the approval of the United
States, a replacement within ten (10) working days. Should Defendants fail
to appoint a replacement acceptable to the United States within this time
period, the United States shall appoint a replacement.
- Defendants shall take
no action that would interfere with the ability of any trustee appointed
pursuant to the Final Judgment to complete the divestitures pursuant to the
Final Judgment to an Acquirer or Acquirers acceptable to the United States.
VI. Duration of Hold Separate and Asset Preservation Agreement
Defendant's obligations under Section V of the Hold Separate Stipulation and Order shall
remain in effect until (1) consummation of the divestitures required by the proposed Final
Judgment or (2) further order of the Court. If the United States voluntarily dismisses the
Complaint in this matter, Defendants are released from all further obligations under this Hold
Stipulation and Order.
ORDER
It is SO ORDERED this ___ day of __________ 2010.
|
|
_______________________________ United States District Judge
|
FOR PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
_______________/s/________________
Gregg I. Malawer (DC Bar No. 481685)
Nina Hale
Bennett Matelson (DC Bar No. 454551)
Creighton J. Macy
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 5th Street., N.W.
Suite 4000
Washington, DC 20530
Telephone: (202) 616-5943
Fax: (202) 514-7308
E-mail: gregg.malawer@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff the United States
Dated: May 21, 2010
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF ILLINOIS: Lisa Madigan, Attorney General
_______________/s/________________
By: Robert Pratt
Chief, Antitrust Bureau
Office of the Attorney General
State of Illinois
100 West Randolph Street
13th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Telephone: (312) 814-3722
Fax: (312) 814-4209
E-mail: RPratt@atg.state.il.us
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF
COLORADO: John Suthers, Attorney General
_______________/s/________________
By: Devin Laiho
Assistant Attorney General
Antitrust Enforcement
Office of the Colorado Attorney General
1525 Sherman St., Seventh Floor
Denver, Colorado 80203
Telephone: (303) 866-5079
Fax: (303) 866-5691
E-mail: Devin.Laiho@state.co.us
|
Office of the Colorado Attorney General
1525 Sherman St., Seventh Floor
Denver, Colorado 80203
Telephone: (303) 866-5079
Fax: (303) 866-5691
E-mail: Devin.Laiho@state.co.us
FOR PLAINTIFF STATE OF INDIANA:
Greg Zoeller, Attorney General
_______________/s/________________
By: Abigail Lawlis Kuzma
Director and Chief Counsel
Consumer Protection Division
Office of the Indiana Attorney General
Indiana Government Center South
302 W. Washington, 5th Floor
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Telephone: (317) 234-6843
Fax: (317) 232-7979
E-mail: AKuzuma@atg.in.gov
FOR DEFENDANT AMC:
_______________/s/________________
Deborah Feinstein
Michael B. Bernstein
Arnold & Porter LLP
555 Twelfth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004-1206
Telephone: (202) 942-5015
Fax: (202) 942-5999
E-mail: Deborah.Feinstein@aporter.com
FOR DEFENDANT KERASOTES:
_______________/s/________________
Marc E. Raven
Sidley Austin LLP
One South Dearborn
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: (312) 853-7162
Fax: (312) 853-7036
E-mail: mraven@sidley.com
|
|