| |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA |
FILED
FEB 08 2011
Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
Courts for the District of Columbia
|
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
SINGAPORE AIRLINES CARGO PTE LTD.,
Defendant.
|
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
|
Criminal No. 10-CR-00322 JDB
Filed: February 8, 2011
Violation: 15 U.S.C. §1 (Sherman Act)
|
PLEA AGREEMENT
The United States of America and Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd. ("defendant"), a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of Singapore, hereby enter into the following
Plea Agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure ("Fed.
R. Crim. P."):
RIGHTS OF DEFENDANT
- The defendant understands its rights:
- to be represented by an attorney;
- to be charged by Indictment;
- as a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Singapore, to
decline to accept service of the Summons in this case, and to contest the jurisdiction of
the United States to prosecute this case against it in the United States District Court for
the District of Columbia;
- to plead not guilty to any criminal charge brought against it;
- to have a trial by jury, at which it would be presumed not guilty of the charge and the United States would have to prove every essential element of the charged
offense beyond a reasonable doubt for it to be found guilty;
- to confront and cross-examine witnesses against it and to subpoena
witnesses in its defense at trial;
- to appeal its conviction if it is found guilty; and
- to appeal the imposition of the sentence against it.
AGREEMENT TO PLEAD GUILTY
AND WAIVE CERTAIN RIGHTS
- The defendant knowingly and voluntarily waives the rights set out in Paragraph
1(b)-(g) above, including all jurisdictional defenses to the prosecution of this case, and agrees
voluntarily to consent to the jurisdiction of the United States to prosecute this case against it in
the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The defendant also agrees to waive
any objection or defense it may have to the prosecution of the charged offense in the United
States District Court for the District of Columbia based on venue. The defendant also knowingly
and voluntarily waives the right to file any appeal, any collateral attack, or any other writ or
motion, including but not limited to an appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3742, that challenges the
sentence imposed by the Court if that sentence is consistent with or below the recommended
sentence in Paragraph 8 of this Plea Agreement, regardless of how the sentence is determined by
the Court. This agreement does not affect the rights or obligations of the United States as set
forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3742(b)-(c). Nothing in this paragraph, however, shall act as a bar to the
defendant perfecting any legal remedies it may otherwise have on appeal or collateral attack
respecting claims of ineffective assistance of counsel or prosecutorial misconduct. The
defendant agrees that there is currently no known evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel or
prosecutorial misconduct. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(b), the defendant will waive indictment
and plead guilty at arraignment to a one-count Information to be filed in the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia. The Information will charge that the defendant
participated in a combination and conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the
cargo rates charged to certain customers in the United States and elsewhere for certain
international air shipments, that began as early as February 2002 until at least February 14, 2006,
in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.
- The defendant, pursuant to the terms of this Plea Agreement, will plead guilty to
the criminal charge described in Paragraph 2 above and will make a factual admission of guilt to
the Court in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, as set forth in Paragraph 4 below.
FACTUAL BASIS FOR OFFENSE CHARGED
- Had this case gone to trial, the United States would have presented evidence
sufficient to prove the following facts against the defendant:
- For purposes of this Plea Agreement, the "relevant period" is that period that began
as early as February 2002 until at least February 14, 2006. During the relevant period, the
defendant was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Singapore. The defendant
has its principal place of business in Singapore. During the relevant period, the defendant
provided international air transportation services for cargo ("air cargo services") on routes to and
from the United States and employed more than 200, but less than 1000, individuals. For the
purposes of this Plea Agreement, "air cargo services" shall mean the shipment by air
transportation for any portion of transit of any good, property, mail, product, container or item,
such as heavy equipment, perishable commodities, and consumer goods. For its air cargo
services, the defendant charged its customers a rate that consisted of both a base rate and, at
times during the relevant period, various surcharges, such as a fuel surcharge and a security
surcharge. The amount of the base rate charged by the defendant could vary based on the type
and weight of the shipment, the origin and/or destination of the shipment, the nature of the goods
or products being shipped, and the time when the shipments were transported. The base rate and
surcharges charged to customers by the defendant are collectively referred to herein as the "cargo
rate." During the relevant period, the defendant's sales of air cargo services on certain routes
from the United States totaled approximately $85.6 million.
- During the relevant period, the defendant, through its officers and employees,
including high-level personnel of defendant, participated in a conspiracy with one or more
providers of air cargo services, a primary purpose of which was to suppress and eliminate
competition by fixing one or more components of the cargo rates charged to certain customers
for air cargo services. In furtherance of the conspiracy, the defendant, through its officers and
employees, engaged in discussions and attended meetings with representatives of one or more
providers of air cargo services. During these discussions and meetings, agreements were reached to fix one or more components of the cargo rates to be charged to certain purchasers of
certain air cargo services.
- During the relevant period, certain air cargo shipments transported by one or more of the conspirator carriers, and aircraft necessary to transport the air cargo shipments, as
well as payments for the air cargo shipments, traveled in interstate and foreign trade and
commerce. Certain of the business activities of the defendant and its co-conspirators in
connection with the sale and provision of air cargo services affected by this conspiracy were
within the flow of, and substantially affected, interstate and foreign trade and commerce.
POSSIBLE MAXIMUM SENTENCE
- The defendant understands that the statutory maximum penalty which may be
imposed against it upon conviction for a violation of Section One of the Sherman Antitrust Act is
a fine in an amount equal to the greatest of:
- $100 million (15 U.S.C. § 1);
- twice the gross pecuniary gain the conspirators derived from the crime (18 U.S.C. § 3571(c) and (d)); or
- twice the gross pecuniary loss caused to the victims of the crime by the conspirators (18 U.S.C. § 3571(c) and (d)).
- In addition, the defendant understands that:
- pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3561(c)(1), the Court may impose a term of probation of at least one year, but not more than five years;
- pursuant to §8B1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G.," "Sentencing Guidelines," or "Guidelines") or 18 U.S.C. § 3563(b)(2) or
3663(a)(3), the Court may order it to pay restitution to the victims of the offense; and
- pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(B), the Court is required to order the defendant to pay a $400 special assessment upon conviction for the charged crime.
SENTENCING GUIDELINES
- The defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory, not
mandatory, but that the Court must consider the Guidelines in effect on the day of sentencing,
along with the other factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), in determining and imposing
sentence. The defendant understands that the Guidelines determinations will be made by the
Court by a preponderance of the evidence standard. The defendant understands that although the
Court is not ultimately bound to impose a sentence within the applicable Guidelines range, its
sentence must be reasonable based upon consideration of all relevant sentencing factors set forth
in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Pursuant to U.S.S.G. §1B1.8, the United States agrees that
self-incriminating information that the defendant provides to the United States pursuant to this
Plea Agreement will not be used to increase the volume of affected commerce attributable to the
defendant or in determining the defendant's applicable Guidelines range, except to the extent
provided in U.S.S.G. §1B1.8(b).
SENTENCING AGREEMENT
- Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C), the United States and the defendant
agree that the appropriate disposition of this case is, and agree to recommend jointly that the
Court impose, a sentence requiring the defendant to pay to the United States a criminal fine of
$48 million, payable in installments as set forth below with interest accruing under 18 U.S.C. §
3612(f)(1)-(2) ("the recommended sentence"). The parties agree that there exists no aggravating
or mitigating circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by
the U.S. Sentencing Commission in formulating the Sentencing Guidelines justifying a departure
pursuant to U.S.S.G. §5K2.0. The parties agree not to seek or support any sentence outside of
the Guidelines range nor any Guidelines adjustment for any reason that is not set forth in this
Plea Agreement. The parties further agree that the recommended sentence set forth in this Plea
Agreement is reasonable.
- Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5, the defendant's culpability score is 7. This
number is calculated by starting with 5 points pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5(a); adding 3 points because the organization has more than 200, but less than 1000, employees and an
individual within high-level personnel of the organization participated in, condoned, or
was willfully ignorant of the offense, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 8C2.5(b)(3)(A); and
subtracting 1 point because the defendant clearly demonstrated recognition and
affirmative acceptance of responsibility for its criminal conduct, pursuant to U.S.S.G.
§8C2.5(g)(3). Accordingly, the minimum multiplier to be applied to the base fine is 1.4
and the maximum multiplier is 2.8, pursuant to U.S.S.G § 8C2.6;
- The base fine is 20% of the volume of commerce, pursuant to U.S.S.G. §
2R1.1(d)(1) and §8C2.4(a) and (b). The parties agree that the affected volume of
commerce attributable to the defendant for purposes of the Information is $85.6 million.
The base fine for relevant air cargo shipments from the United States is $17.12 million
(20% of $85.6 million). Applying the multipliers of 1.4 and 2.8 to this amount, the fine
range for the relevant air cargo shipments from the United States is $24 million to $48
million.
- The volume of affected commerce calculation in paragraph 8(b) above does not
include commerce related to the defendant's cargo shipments on routes into the United
States. The defendant takes the position that any agreements reached with competitors
with respect to cargo shipments on routes into the United States should not be included in
the defendant's volume of affected commerce calculation pursuant to U.S.S.G. §
2R1.1(d)(1). The United States disputes the defendant's position and contends that the
defendant's cargo shipments into the United States during the charged period violated the
U.S. antitrust laws. Moreover, the United States asserts that a Guidelines fine calculation
that fails to account for cargo shipments into the United States affected by the charged
cargo conspiracy would understate the seriousness of, and the harm caused to U.S.
victims by, the offense and would not provide just punishment.
- The parties recognize the complexity of litigating the issues set forth in
Paragraph 8(c) and the resulting burden on judicial and party resources, and agree that the
appropriate resolution of this issue is to impose a fine at the top of the Guidelines
sentencing range consistent with the timing of cooperation provided by the defendant in
this matter. The parties agree that the appropriate fine for the commerce affected by
defendant's participation in the charged conspiracy is $48 million payable as set forth in
paragraph 8 above.
- The United States and the defendant agree to recommend, in the interest of
justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3572(d)(1) and U.S.S.G. §8C3.2(b), that the fine be paid
in the following installments: within thirty (30) days of imposition of sentence -- $20
million (plus any accrued interest); and by April 29, 2011 -- $28 million (plus any
accrued interest); provided, however, that the defendant shall have the option at any time
before April 29, 2011, of prepaying the remaining balance (plus any accrued interest)
then owing on the fine.
- The defendant understands that the Court will order it to pay a $400 special
assessment, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(B), in addition to any fine imposed.
- Based on the defendant's improvements to its corporate compliance program,
the United States and the defendant will jointly recommend that no term of probation be
imposed, but the parties understand that the Court's denial of this request will not void
this Plea Agreement.
- The United States and the defendant jointly submit that this Plea Agreement,
together with the record that will be created by the United States and the defendant at the
plea and sentencing hearings, and the further disclosure described in Paragraph 9, will
provide sufficient information concerning the defendant, the crime charged in this case,
and the defendant's role in the crime to enable the meaningful exercise of sentencing
authority by the Court under 18 U.S.C. § 3553. The United States and defendant agree to
request jointly that the Court accept the defendant's guilty plea and impose sentence on
an expedited schedule as early as the date of arraignment, based upon the record provided
by the defendant and the United States, under the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P.
32(c)(1)(A)(ii) and U.S.S.G. §6A1.1. The Court's denial of the request to impose
sentence on an expedited schedule will not void this Plea Agreement.
- Subject to the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the defendant described in
Paragraph 12 of this Plea Agreement, and before sentencing in the case, the United States will
fully advise the Court and the Probation Office of the fact, manner, and extent of defendant's
cooperation and its commitment to prospective cooperation with the United States' investigation
and prosecutions, all material facts relating to the defendant's involvement in the charged
offense, and all other relevant conduct.
- The United States and the defendant understand that the Court retains complete
discretion to accept or reject the recommended sentence provided for in Paragraph 8 of this Plea
Agreement.
- If the Court does not accept the recommended sentence, the United States and the defendant agree that this Plea Agreement, except for Paragraph 10(b) below,
shall be rendered void.
- If the Court does not accept the recommended sentence, the defendant will be free to withdraw its guilty plea (Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(5) and (d)). If the defendant
withdraws its plea of guilty, this Plea Agreement, the guilty plea, and any statement made
in the course of any proceedings under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 regarding the guilty plea or
this Plea Agreement or made in the course of plea discussions with an attorney for the
government shall not be admissible against the defendant in any criminal or civil
proceeding, except as otherwise provided in Fed. R. Evid. 410. In addition, the defendant
agrees that, if it withdraws its guilty plea pursuant to this subparagraph of the Plea
Agreement, the statute of limitations period for any offense referred to in Paragraph 14 of
this Plea Agreement shall be tolled for the period between the date of the signing of the
Plea Agreement and the date the defendant withdrew its guilty plea or for a period of
sixty (60) days after the date of the signing of the Plea Agreement, whichever period is
greater.
- In light of pending civil class action lawsuits filed against the defendant, which
potentially provide for a recovery of a multiple of actual damages, the United States agrees that it
will not seek restitution for the offense charged in the Information.
DEFENDANT'S COOPERATION
- The defendant and its subsidiaries will cooperate fully and truthfully with the
United States in the prosecution of this case, the conduct of the current federal investigation of
violations of federal antitrust and related criminal laws involving the sale of air cargo services,
any other federal investigation resulting therefrom, and any litigation or other proceedings arising or resulting from any such investigation to which the United States is a party ("Federal
Proceeding"). The ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the defendant and its subsidiaries
shall include, but not be limited to:
- producing to the United States all non-privileged documents, information, and
other materials (with translations into English), wherever located, in the possession,
custody, or control of defendant or its subsidiaries, requested by the United States in
connection with any Federal Proceeding; and
- using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation,
as defined in Paragraph 13 of this Plea Agreement, of the current and former directors,
officers, and employees of the defendant or any of its subsidiaries as may be requested by
the United States, but excluding Stephen Lek, including making these persons available
in the United States and at other mutually agreed-upon locations, at the defendant's
expense, for interviews and the provision of testimony in grand jury, trial, and other
judicial proceedings in connection with any Federal Proceeding.
- The ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of each person described in Paragraph
12(b) above will be subject to the procedures and protections of this paragraph, and shall
include, but not be limited to:
- producing in the United States and at other mutually agreed-upon locations all
non-privileged documents, including claimed personal documents, and other materials, wherever located, requested by attorneys and agents of the United States;
- making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States and
at other mutually agreed-upon locations, not at the expense of the United States, upon the
request of attorneys and agents of the United States;
- responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection
with any Federal Proceeding, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally
withholding any information, subject to the penalties of making false statements (18
U.S.C. § 1001) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, et seq.);
- otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any non-privileged
material or information not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph that he or she may
have that is related to any Federal Proceeding;
- when called upon to do so by the United States in connection with any Federal
Proceeding, testifying in grand jury, trial, and other judicial proceedings in the United
States fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C.
§ 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18
U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C.
§ 1503, et seq.); and
- agreeing that, if the agreement not to prosecute him or her in this Plea
Agreement is rendered void under Paragraph 15(c), the statute of limitations period for
any Relevant Offense as defined in Paragraph 15(a) shall be tolled as to him or her for the
period between the date of the signing of this Plea Agreement and six (6) months after
the date that the United States gave notice of its intent to void its obligations to that
person under the Plea Agreement.
GOVERNMENT'S AGREEMENT
- Upon acceptance of the guilty plea called for by this Plea Agreement and the
imposition of the recommended sentence, and subject to the cooperation requirements of
Paragraph 12 of this Plea Agreement, the United States agrees that it will not bring further
criminal charges against the defendant or any of its subsidiaries for any act or offense committed
before the date of this Plea Agreement that was undertaken in furtherance of an antitrust
conspiracy involving the sale of air cargo services. The nonprosecution terms of this paragraph
do not apply to civil matters of any kind, to any violation of the federal tax or securities laws, or
to any crime of violence.
- The United States agrees to the following:
- Upon the Court's acceptance of the guilty plea called for by this Plea Agreement
and the imposition of the recommended sentence and subject to the exceptions noted in
Paragraph 15(c), the United States will not bring criminal charges against any current or
former director, officer, or employee of the defendant or its subsidiaries for any act or
offense committed before the date of this Plea Agreement and while that person was
acting as a director, officer, or employee of the defendant or its subsidiaries that was
undertaken in furtherance of an antitrust conspiracy involving the sale of air cargo
services ("Relevant Offense"), except that the protections granted in this paragraph shall
not apply to Stephen Lek;
- Should the United States determine that any current or former director, officer,
or employee of the defendant or its subsidiaries may have information relevant to any
Federal Proceeding, the United States may request that person's cooperation under the
terms of this Plea Agreement by written request delivered to counsel for the individual
(with a copy to the undersigned counsel for the defendant) or, if the individual is not
known by the United States to be represented, to the undersigned counsel for the
defendant;
- If any person requested to provide cooperation under Paragraph 15(b) fails to
comply with his or her obligations under Paragraph 13, then the terms of this Plea
Agreement as they pertain to that person, and the agreement not to prosecute that person
granted in this Plea Agreement, shall be rendered void;
- Except as provided in Paragraph 15(e), information provided by a person
described in Paragraph 15(b) to the United States under the terms of this Plea Agreement
pertaining to any Relevant Offense, or any information directly or indirectly derived from
that information, may not be used against that person in a criminal case, except in a
prosecution for perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making a false statement or declaration
(18 U.S.C. §§ 1001, 1623), or obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, et seq.);
- If any person who provides information to the United States under this Plea
Agreement fails to comply fully with his or her obligations under Paragraph 13 of this
Plea Agreement, the agreement in Paragraph 15(d) not to use that information or any
information directly or indirectly derived from it against that person in a criminal case
shall be rendered void;
- The nonprosecution terms of this paragraph do not apply to civil matters of any
kind, to any violation of the federal tax or securities laws, or to any crime of violence; and
- Documents provided under Paragraphs 12(a) and 13(a) shall be deemed responsive to outstanding grand jury subpoenas issued to defendant or any of its
subsidiaries.
- The United States agrees that when any person travels to the United States for
interviews, grand jury appearances, or court appearances pursuant to this Plea Agreement, or for
meetings with counsel in preparation therefor, the United States will take no action, based upon
any Relevant Offense, to subject such person to arrest, detention, or service of process, or to
prevent such person from departing the United States. This paragraph does not apply to an
individual's commission of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements (18 U.S.C. §
1001), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C.
§ 1623), obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, et seq.), or contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) in
connection with any testimony or information provided or requested in any Federal Proceeding.
- The defendant understands that it may be subject to administrative action by
federal or state agencies other than the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division,
based upon the conviction resulting from this Plea Agreement, and that this Plea Agreement in
no way controls whatever action, if any, other agencies may take. However, the United States
agrees that, if requested, it will advise the appropriate officials of any governmental agency
considering such administrative action of the fact, manner, and extent of the cooperation of the
defendant and its subsidiaries as a matter for that agency to consider before determining what
administrative action, if any, to take.
REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL
- The defendant has been represented by counsel and is fully satisfied that its
attorneys have provided competent legal representation. The defendant has thoroughly reviewed
this Plea Agreement and acknowledges that counsel has advised it of the nature of the charge,
any possible defenses to the charge, and the nature and range of possible sentences.
VOLUNTARY PLEA
- The defendant's decision to enter into this Plea Agreement and to tender a plea of
guilty is freely and voluntarily made and is not the result of force, threats, assurances, promises,
or representations other than the representations contained in this Plea Agreement. The United
States has made no promises or representations to the defendant as to whether the Court will
accept or reject the recommendations contained within this Plea Agreement.
VIOLATION OF PLEA AGREEMENT
- The defendant agrees that, should the United States determine in good faith,
during the period that any Federal Proceeding is pending, that the defendant or any of its
subsidiaries have failed to provide full and truthful cooperation, as described in Paragraph 12 of
this Plea Agreement, or has otherwise violated any provision of this Plea Agreement, the United
States will notify counsel for the defendant in writing by personal or overnight delivery or
facsimile transmission and may also notify counsel by telephone of its intention to void any of its
obligations under this Plea Agreement (except its obligations under this paragraph), and the
defendant and its subsidiaries shall be subject to prosecution for any federal crime of which the
United States has knowledge including, but not limited to, the substantive offense relating to the
investigation resulting in this Plea Agreement. The defendant and its subsidiaries agree that, in
the event that the United States is released from its obligations under this Plea Agreement and
brings criminal charges against the defendant or its subsidiaries for any offense referred to in
Paragraph 14 of this Plea Agreement, the statute of limitations period for such offense shall be
tolled for the period between the date of the signing of this Plea Agreement and six (6) months
after the date the United States gave notice of its intent to void its obligations under this Plea
Agreement.
- The defendant understands and agrees that in any further prosecution of it or its subsidiaries resulting from the release of the United States from its obligations under
this Plea Agreement, because of the defendant's or its subsidiaries' violation of the Plea
Agreement, any documents, statements, information, testimony, or evidence provided by it, its
subsidiaries, or current or former directors, officers, or employees of it or its subsidiaries to
attorneys or agents of the United States, federal grand juries, or courts, and any leads derived
therefrom, may be used against it or its subsidiaries in any such further prosecution. In addition,
the defendant unconditionally waives its right to challenge the use of such evidence in any such
further prosecution, notwithstanding the protections of Fed. R. Evid. 410.
ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT
- This Plea Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the United States and the defendant concerning the disposition of the criminal charge in this case.
This Plea Agreement cannot be modified except in writing, signed by the United States and the
defendant.
- The undersigned is authorized to enter this Plea Agreement on behalf of the
defendant as evidenced by the Resolution of the Board of Directors of the defendant attached to,
and incorporated by reference in, this Plea Agreement.
- The undersigned attorneys for the United States have been authorized by the
Attorney General of the United States to enter this Plea Agreement on behalf of the United
States.
- A facsimile signature shall be deemed an original signature for the purpose of
executing this Plea Agreement. Multiple signature pages are authorized for the purpose of
executing this Plea Agreement.
| DATED as of November 29, 2010 |
Respectfully submitted, |
|
BY:_______________/s/________________
Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd.
By: Brenton Wu
Its: Vice President, Legal
BY:_______________/s/________________
Karen E. Silverman
Catherine E. Palmer
Ashley M. Bauer
Latham & Watkins LLP
505 Montgomery Street
Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: (415) 391-0600
Fax: (415) 395-8095
Counsel for Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd.
|
BY:_______________/s/________________
Mark R. Rosman, Assistant Chief
Brent Snyder, Trial Attorney
Mark C. Grundvig, Trial Attorney
Kathryn M. Hellings, Trial Attorney
Matthew Lunder, Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
450 5th Street, NW
Suite 11300
Washington, D.C. 20530
Tel.: (202) 616-3186
Fax: (202) 514-6525
Brooks Mackintosh
Rochelle Bozman
Atlanta Field Office
Antitrust Division
|
|