This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

__________________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
STATE OF OHIO;
STATE OF ARIZONA;
STATE OF CALIFORNIA;
STATE OF COLORADO;
STATE OF FLORIDA;
COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY;
STATE OF MARYLAND;
STATE OF MICHIGAN;
STATE OF NEW YORK;
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA;
STATE OF TEXAS;
STATE OF WASHINGTON; and
STATE OF WISCONSIN,

                                        Plaintiffs,

                    v.

USA WASTE SERVICES, INC.;
DOME MERGER SUBSIDIARY; and
WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC.,

                                        Defendants.
__________________________________________
     
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|











Civil No. 1:98 CV 1616
Judge Ann Aldrich




Filed: 9/13/99



JOINT MOTION BY THE PARTIES FOR ENTRY OF A MODIFIED FINAL JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs and defendants hereby jointly move this Court for entry of a modified version of the proposed Final Judgment, originally filed herein on July 16, 1998. The Modified Final Judgment, filed on September 14, 1999, differs from the original proposal in one minor respect: it would eliminate defendants' contingent obligation to divest one (of several transfer stations) in the New York City, New York market.

The parties make this joint motion on the following grounds:

(a)          The United States has filed a Certificate of Compliance, certifying that it has fulfilled its statutory obligations under the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 16(b)-(h)) to provide notice, opportunity for public comment, and government response on the proposed settlement of this antitrust suit against defendant USA Waste Services, Inc.'s proposed acquisition of defendant Waste Management, Inc.

(b)          For the reasons fully set forth in the accompanying memoranda in support of the parties' Joint Motion, plaintiffs, the United States and the State of New York, and the defendants propose that the Court enter a modified version of the Judgment, which would eliminate the defendants' obligation to divest one New York City waste transfer station -- the Brooklyn (or "Scott Avenue") Transfer Station -- since the reasons for divesting this transfer station are no longer valid and the defendants have agreed to divest instead another New York City transfer station that the parties believe is more capable of alleviating the governments' competitive concerns. (Each of the other parties concurs in the motion to enter the proposed Modified Final Judgment.)

(c)          Entry of the Modified Final Judgment is in the public interest.

Dated: September 13, 1999.

                                                                                Respectfully submitted,


ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFFS

By: ___________/s/__________
Anthony E. Harris, Esq.
(Ill. Bar # 1133713)

U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
1401 H Street, NW, Suite 3000
Washington, DC  20530
(202) 307-6583

ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANTS

Peter J. Comodeca, Esquire (0051281)
Sanford E. Watson, II, Esquire (0040862)
Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP
800 Superior Avenue
Cleveland, OH  44114-2688


By: ___________/s/__________
James R. Weiss, Esquire
PRESTON GATES ELLIS & ROUVELAS MEEDS LLP
1735 New York Avenue, Suite 500
Washington, DC   20006-5209
(202) 662-8425
(Of Counsel)