UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
ATLAS IRON PROCESSORS, INC.;
SUNSHINE METAL PROCESSING,
INC.;
ANTHONY J. GIORDANO, SR.;
ANTHONY J. GIORDANO, JR.;
DAVID GIORDANO; and
RANDOLPH J. WEIL,
Defendants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case No. 97-0853-CR-NESBITT
RESPONSE OF UNITED STATES
TO STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER
CONCERNING DEFENDANT
ANTHONY J. GIORDANO, JR. |
The United States of America (hereinafter "United States"), by and through the
undersigned counsel, files this response to the Standing Discovery Order issued in this case for
Anthony J. Giordano, Jr. (hereinafter "defendant"). This response is numbered to
correspond to that order.1
- There
are no written or recorded statements made by the defendant.
-
The defendant has not made any oral statements before or after arrest
in response to interrogation by a then known-to-be government agent
which the United States intends to offer at trial.
-
See paragraph A.2 above.
-
See paragraph A.1 above.
-
The United States is in the process of determining if the defendant
has a criminal record. If the defendant does have a criminal record,
the results will be forwarded to the defendant as soon as possible.
-
Books, papers, documents, etc., which the United States intends to use
as evidence at trial to prove its case-in-chief, or which were obtained
from or belong to the defendant, may be inspected by making an appointment
with the undersigned counsel. The United States is not in possession
of any documents that belong to the defendant. The United States, however,
does have in its possession documents produced by Atlas Iron Processors,
Inc. ("Atlas") pursuant to issued subpoenas duces tecum.
All of the documents and materials produced by Atlas are immediately
available to the defendant upon request. Subject to any protective orders
filed in the above- captioned case, materials covered under Rule 16
of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure also are immediately available
for inspection and copying by the defendant. These documents and materials
presently are located in Cleveland, Ohio, at the office of the undersigned
counsel, and can be made available for inspection and copying, by appointment,
upon request by the defendant.
-
There are no results or reports of physical or mental examinations,
or of scientific tests or experiments, which are material to the preparation
of the defense or are intended for use by the government as evidence
in chief at the trial.
- The United States requests the
disclosure and production of materials enumerated as items 1, 2 and
3 of Section B of the Standing Discovery Order. This request also is
made pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
- The United States is in the process
of determining what, if any, information or material exists which may
be favorable to the defendant on the issues of guilt or punishment within
the scope of Brady or Agurs. The United States will disclose
to the defendant the substance of this information and material, if
any, or make available to the defendant for inspection and copying this
information and material, if any, now known to be covered under Brady
or Agurs. The United States understands its obligation under
Brady and Agurs to be a continuing one.
- The United States is in the process
of determining the existence and substance of any payments, promises
of immunity, leniency, preferential treatment, or other inducements
made to prospective government witnesses, within the scope of Giglio
and Napue. The United States will disclose to the defendant the
substance of this information and material, if any, or make available
to the defendant this information or material for inspection and copying,
if any, now known to be covered under Giglio or Napue.
The United States understands its obligation under Giglio and
Napue to be a continuing one.
- The United States will supply the
defendant with the record of prior convictions of any informant who
will testify for the United States at trial.
- The defendant was not identified
in a photo spread or similar identification proceeding.
- The United States has advised its
agents and officers involved in this cases to preserve rough notes.
- The United States will advise the
defendant prior to trial of its intent, if any, to introduce during
its case-in-chief additional evidence pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence
404(b). Please be advised, however, that the United States does intend
to introduce against the defendant evidence that the defendant was aware
of, and directly participated in, collusive conduct in Cleveland, Ohio.
Finally, the defendant is hereby on notice that all evidence made available
to the defendant for inspection, as well as all statements disclosed
herein or in any future discovery or discovery letter, may be introduced
in the trial of this case.
- The defendant is not an aggrieved
person, as defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2510(11),
of any electronic surveillance.
- The United States has ordered transcribed
the Grand Jury testimony of all witnesses who will testify for the United
States at trial.
- There is no contraband seized in
this case.
- There are no vehicles, vessels,
etc., involved in this case.
- The United States is aware of no
latent fingerprints or palm prints which have been identified by a government
expert as those of the defendant.
- The United States intends to make
every possible effort in good faith to stipulate to all facts or points
of law the truth and existence of which is not contested and the early
resolution of which will expedite the trial.
- Counsel for the defendant may contact
the undersigned to arrange for a pretrial conference. Following the
conference, the United States is prepared to collaborate on a written
statement to the Court setting forth the discovery exchanged and any
stipulations reached.
The United States is aware of its continuing duty to disclose such newly discovered
additional information required by the Standing Discovery Order, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure, materials or information covered under Brady, Agurs,
Giglio, and Napue, and the obligation to assure a fair trial.
In addition to the request made above by the United States pursuant to Section B of the
Standing Discovery Order and Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and in
accordance with Rule 12.1, 12.2 and 12.3 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United
States demands Notice of Alibi, Insanity and Public Authority defenses; the approximate time,
date, and place of the offense is set forth in the Indictment.
WILLIAM J. OBERDICK
Acting Chief
Cleveland Field Office
|
_______________________________
By: RICHARD T. HAMILTON, JR.
Court I.D. No. A5500338
PAUL A. BINDER
Court I.D. No. A5500339
IAN D. HOFFMAN
Court I.D. No. A5500343
Trial Attorneys,
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
Plaza 9 Building
55 Erieview Plaza, Suite 700
Cleveland, OH 44114-1816
Phone:(216) 522-4107
FAX: (216) 522-8332 |
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the following:
-
RESPONSE OF UNITED STATES TO STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER CONCERNING DEFENDANT
ATLAS IRON PROCESSORS, INC.;
-
RESPONSE OF UNITED STATES TO STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER CONCERNING DEFENDANT
ANTHONY J. GIORDANO, SR.;
-
RESPONSE OF UNITED STATES TO STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER CONCERNING DEFENDANT
ANTHONY J. GIORDANO, JR.;
-
RESPONSE OF UNITED STATES TO STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER CONCERNING DEFENDANT
DAVID GIORDANO; AND
-
RESPONSE OF UNITED STATES TO STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER CONCERNING DEFENDANT
RANDOLPH J. WEIL.
were sent Federal Express to the Office of the Clerk of Court on this 15th day of December,
1997. Copies of the above-captioned pleadings were also served upon the defendants via regular
U.S. mail on this 15th day of December, 1997.
Benedict P. Kuehne, Esq.
Sale & Kuehne
Nationsbank Tower, Suite 3550
100 Southeast 2nd Street
Miami, FL 33131-2154
Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg,
Eaton, Meadow, Olin & Manos, L.P.A.
City National Bank Building
25 West Flagler Street
Miami, FL 33130-1780
William T. Doyle, Esq.
2000 Standard Building
Cleveland, OH 44113-1701
|
Ralph E. Cascarilla, Esq.
Walter & Haverfield
1300 Terminal Tower
Cleveland, OH 44113-2253
Patrick M. McLaughlin, Esq.
Mansour, Gavin, Gerlack &
Perwin, P.A.
55 Public Square, Suite 800
2150 Illuminating Building
Cleveland, OH 44113-1994
|
WILLIAM J. OBERDICK
Acting Chief
Cleveland Field Office
|
______________________________
RICHARD T. HAMILTON, JR
Court I.D. No. A5500338
Trial Attorney,
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
Plaza 9 Building
55 Erieview Plaza, Suite 700
Cleveland, OH 44114-1816
Phone:(216) 522-4107
FAX: (216) 522-8332 |
FOOTNOTES
1. On December 11, 1997, the undersigned
counsel called the Clerk of Court's office in the Southern District
of Florida to find out if the Standing Discovery Order was entered in
the above-captioned case since all of the defendants have not yet been
arraigned, nor have all of the defendants in this matter retained counsel
who have filed permanent appearances. The United States learned that
the Standing Discovery Order was, in fact, issued on December 2, 1997.
|