This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

         Plaintiff,

                  v.

COMPUTER ASSOCIATES
INTERNATIONAL, INC. and
PLATINUM TECHNOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

         Defendants.
___________________________________________________

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
Civil Action No. 1:99CV01318

JUDGE: Gladys Kessler

DATE STAMP: 10/05/1999



PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT

Pursuant to Section 2(b) of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act ("APPA"), 15 U.S.C. I15(b)-(h), plaintiff, the United States of America, moves for entry of the proposed Amended Final Judgment (attached hereto) in this civil antitrust proceeding. The Amended Final Judgment may be entered at this time without further hearing if the Court determines that entry is in the public interest. The Competitive Impact Statement filed by plaintiff in this matter on June 8. 1999 explains why entry of the proposed Final Judgment would be in the public interest. A Certificate of Compliance with Provisions of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, setting forth the steps taken by the parties to comply with all applicable provisions of the APPA and certifying that the statutory waiting period has expired has been filed simultaneously with this Motion.

As required by law, the public, including affected competitors and customers, has had opportunity to comment on the proposed Amended Final Judgment. No comments were received. Therefore, there have been no claims that the proposed Amended Final Judgment is outside the zone of settlements consistent with the public interest.

Conclusion

The Court should find that the proposed Amended Final Judgment is in the public interest and should enter the proposed Amended Final Judgment without further hearings. Defendants have informed plaintiff that they consent to the entry of the Amended Final Judgment in this matter.

    Respectfully submitted,


  _______________/s/________________
Kent Brown (VA Bar No. 18300)
Kenneth W. Gaul (D.C. Bar No. 415456)

Attorneys, Antitrust Division
Computers & Finance Section
U.S. Department of Justice
600 E. Street, N.W., Suite 9500
Washington, D.C. 20530
(202) 307-6200

Dated: October 5, 1999


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that he is employed by the United States Department of Justice, and is a person of such age and discretion to be competent to serve papers. The undersigned further certifies that he has caused true copies of the PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT to be served upon the person in the manner stated below:

Counsel for Computer Associates International, Inc. and PLATINUM technology International, inc.

Richard L. Rosen, Esq.
Arnold & Porter
555 12th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20004

(by hand delivery)

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed in Washington, D.C., this____ day of October, 1999.


_______________/s/________________
Steven J. Duplicki