The U.S. Department of Justice seal, The United States Department of Justice
Search Antitrust


How and Why the Per Se Rule Against Price-Fixing Went Wrong

Sheldon Kimmel, EAG 06-7, March 2006
Forthcoming in Supreme Court Economic Review (2008).

Most scholars believe the Supreme Court dropped its per se rule against price-fixing in Appalachian Coals (1933), re-instituting that rule in Socony-Vacuum (1940), but that the rule ignored "reasonableness" until BMI (1979), and that Maricopa (1982) relied on Socony to step back from "reasonableness" again. However, the view that Socony's per se rule had nothing to do with "reasonableness" came from unreasonably ignoring Socony's comments on Appalachian Coals, which came from misunderstanding Appalachian Coals by ignoring the economic implications of the facts the district court found. Those implications show that Appalachian Coals, Socony, and BMI all gave the same price-fixing rule.

Get Antitrust Division Updates

Sign up for E-Mail Updates

Subscribe to News Feeds

Follow us @JusticeATR

To view PDF files on this website you need the free Adobe Reader.