|
|
|
Slide 1 Regulations on Single-Firm
Hideo NAKAJIMA September 12, 2006
Slide 2 Regulations on Single-Firm Conduct in Japan Statutory Framework of
No entrepreneur shall effect private monopolization
Slide 3 Statutory Framework Private Monopolization (1) Business activities, by which any entrepreneur excludes or controls the business activities of other entrepreneurs, thereby causing, contrary to the public interest, a substantial restraint of competition in any particular field of trade (Section 2)
Slide 4 Statutory Framework Private Monopolization (2) "Substantial restraint of competition" A situation in which competition itself has significantly lessened and thereby a specific firm or firms can control the market by determining freely, to some extent, prices, qualities, volumes, and various other terms on its or their own volition (December 9, 1953, Tokyo High Court)
Slide 5 Statutory Framework Private Monopolization (3) Measures against Private Monopolization
Slide 6 Statutory Framework Unfair Trade Practices (1) Any act which tends to impede fair competition and which is
designated by the Fair Trade Commission (Section 2 (9))
Slide 7 Statutory Framework Unfair Trade Practices (2) Measures against Unfair Trade Practices An order of elimination measures
Slide 8 Enforcement of Regulations on Single-Firm Conduct
Slide 9 Enforcement - Private Monopolization Case 1: Paramount Bed Co., Ltd. (1998) » Market on the hospital beds ordered by the Tokyo Metropolitan Gov. » Paramount -- around 90% share in the market
<Paramount's conducts>
Slide 10 Enforcement - Private Monopolization Case 2: Hokkaido Shimbun Press (2000)
<Hokkaido Shimbun's conducts>
Slide 11 Enforcement - Unfair Trade Practices (For determining whether any specific single-firm conduct falls under Unfair Trade Practices, or tends to impede fair competition) < 1 > » Various factors including the structure and development of the relevant market, the differences of the supply costs, market position of the concerned retailer, and subjective intentions for setting price differentials would need to be taken into accounts in a comprehensive way. (April 27, 2005, Tokyo High Court)
Slide 12 Enforcement - Unfair Trade Practices (For determining whether any specific single-firm conduct falls under Unfair Trade Practices, or tends to impede fair competition) < 2 > » Those relevant factors such as intentions, objectives, and details of the concerned conduct, actual competitive relationship, and situations of the market should be taken into account in a comprehensive way (December 14, 1989, Supreme Court)
Slide 13 Enforcement - Unfair Trade Practices Case 3: Microsoft KK (1998)
<MSKK's conducts>
Slide 14 Discussion in the AMA Study Group AMA Study Group
Established in Cabinet Office in 2005 as a private discussion body under Chief Cabinet Secretary, based on a supplementary provision of the 2005 Amendments to the AMA, for further review of the AMA Issue related to single-firm conduct regulations
Scope of unlawful conducts subject to administrative surcharges
|