Slide 1
Remedies in High-Tech Industries
David A.Heiner
Vice President, Deputy General Counsel (Antitrust)
Microsoft Corporation
March 28, 2007
Presented at DOJ/FTC Hearings on Single Firm Conduct
Slide 2
Microsoft Remedies
1994 CD and EU
Undertaking |
- Licensing to computer manufacturers
|
2001 Consent Decree and
Litigated Final Judgment |
- Software integration, interoperability
|
Competitor Lawsuits |
- Damages, some conduct relief
|
Consumer Class Actions |
|
European Union Decision
March 2004 |
- Software integration, interoperability
|
Korean FTC Decision
February 2006 |
|
Slide 3
Overall Approach
Focus on creating or preserving competitive opportunities, rather than limiting defendantç´ efforts to deliver consumer value
U.S. Consent Decree
- Focused on creating competitive opportunities
- No ban on including new functionality (but governed by Rule of Reason)
- Consumers benefit from ability to choose integrated approach or separate programsor both
- Today: Broad distribution of competing software on new Windows PC
EU Decision
- Focused on removing useful functionality from Windows (Windows XP N)
- No uptake by any computer manufacturer
- Costs imposed, but little apparent benefit to anyone
Slide 4
Objective
Aim to create competitive opportunities, rather than engineer particular market outcomes
[D]
Slide 5
Assess Remedy and Liability Together
Careful consideration of remedy at outset may inform liability analysis, speed resolution
Windows Inegration Legal Analysis
- May create challenges for competitors, yet...
- Benefits for software developers, consumers; and
- Long history of product improvement through integration across many product categories
Settlement
- Seemingly impossible to fashion appropriate remedy to limit integration over time
- Renders cases difficult of impossible to settle
Liability
- Unlawful in Europe & Korea to fail to offer product (Windows XP N) for which there is no appreciable consumer demand?
Slide 6
Type of Remedy
Legal process generally best suited to contractual relief
Contracts
- Purview of lawyers
- Relatively easy to monitor (for defendants and enforcers)
Product Design
- May require considerable technical expertise to device & monitor remedy
- Difficult for lawyers to assess issues that may arise, even with expert help
- Agency lawyers likely to get drawn into detailed design decisions
Technology Sharing
- Technological complexity may lead to enforcement complexity
- Pricing may be particularly challenging for information goods
Slide 7
Cross-Border Considerations
High-tech markets often global in nature
Agency Cooperation
- Greater coordination on remedies with global reach
- Due respect for comity principles
Windows
- Central value proposition: enabling compatibility through uniformity
- Value threatened by varying approaches to integration issue
Compulsory Licensing
- Most onerous legal regime becomes de facto legal rule worldwide
Slide 8
|