The Honorable James Oberstar XX 231 Federal Building XX Duluth, MN 55802 Duluth, MN XX July, 26, 1993 Re: Letter of 7-11-93 John W. Whitehouse Dear Mr. Oberstar, Thank you for responding to my concern, and affording copy of the letter you received from Commander Whitehouse. However Sir, with all due respect to all parties concerned, I am of the supported position that the response from Commander Whitehouse is, as with the Federal reg. in question, lacking reasonable research and concern for the elderly and handicapped. In response to the letter from Commander Whitehouse, paragraph three, and I quote: "XXXX suggestion, although understandable, is not practical as it would be difficult to enforce. Bridge tenders are located at such a distance that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to identify vessels with handicap designations"............ Sir, again with all due respect ...... I checked with Supervisor Mr. Steve Douville of the Duluth Aerial Bridge, and with Mr. Dick Maron of the Grassy Point Bridge here in Duluth. Both, as suspected, carry as required equipment, binoculars. I fail to understand where "distance" could create a problem for "verifying legitimate handicapped vessel operators". I still further fail to understand why this federal reg. failed to incorporate considerations for the handicapped and elderly? Sir, I may stand corrected, but isn't it federal law that considerations for the handicapped be of concern? Sir, I am of the supported position that a void of handicap designation for concerned vessels will indeed create, in itself, wide spread abuse among vessel owners. With this present "void", a bridge owner must error on the side of caution, and except the word of the vessel operator that he/she is handicapped, without any means of varification. I thank you again Mr. Oberstar, for your continued concern over this issue. Also Sir, might someone review the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990? Sincerely, XX 01-02687