INTRODUCTION
Between February and June 1996, Named Plaintiffs
(defined below) filed thirteen administrative complaints
against the Boston Housing Authority ("BHA") with the United
States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD")
alleging violations of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601,
et seq. (the "HUD Administrative Action"). Named
Plaintiffs, who are Haitian, Hispanic, Trinidadian,
Nigerian, St. Thomian, Black, black African American, and
Hispanic, alleged that they, their families, and their
visitors were repeatedly subject to racial violence,
harassment and intimidation because of their race, color and
national origin by white tenants and others during Named
Plaintiffs' tenancies at two predominantly white BHA
developments -- Old Colony in South Boston and Bunker Hill
in Charlestown. This alleged harassment includes racially
motivated acts of physical violence and threats of physical
violence, destruction of property, racist graffiti, and
racist name-calling. Named Plaintiffs alleged that they
repeatedly complained about this racial harassment to the
BHA, and that the BHA failed to adequately investigate or
respond to their complaints.
On December 17, 1996, Named Plaintiffs filed a class
action in this Court against the BHA and the City of Boston
(the "City"), entitled Jane Doe No. 1, et al., v. The City
of Boston and The Boston Housing Authority (Civil Action No.
96-12540 RCL). Jane Doe No. 1 v. City of Boston asserted
claims against the BHA and the City for violations of the
Fair Housing Act as well as the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42
U.S.C. § 1981), the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. §
1983), Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §
2000d), the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments of the
United States Constitution, the Massachusetts Civil Rights
Act (M.G.L. c. 12, §11I), the Massachusetts Anti-Discrimination Law (M.G.L. c. 151B, §4(6)), the
Massachusetts Equal Rights Law (M.G.L. c. 93, §102), and
Article I of the Declaration of Rights of the Inhabitants of
the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. As in the HUD
Administrative Action, Named Plaintiffs alleged that the BHA
and the City failed to take effective measures to protect
Named Plaintiffs and similarly situated public housing
tenants from chronic acts of racial violence and
intimidation.
On February 16, 1999, after an investigation into the
thirteen administrative complaints, HUD issued a
Determination of Reasonable Cause and Charge of
Discrimination on behalf of nine Named Plaintiff families.
HUD concluded that it had reasonable cause to believe that
the BHA had discriminated against these nine families on the
basis of race, color or national origin. HUD issued
Determinations of No Reasonable Cause as to the remaining
four Named Plaintiff families.(1) The Determination of
Reasonable Cause, Charge of Discrimination, and
Determinations of No Reasonable Cause are attached as
Exhibit 1 to this Settlement Agreement and Order
("Agreement and Order").
On March 8, 1999, the BHA and Named Plaintiffs elected
to have the HUD Charges of Discrimination decided in federal
court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 3612(a).
HUD conducted a further review of the Boston Housing
Authority and as a result, on May 15, 1999, issued a report
entitled
"Assessment of the Boston Housing Authority's Response to Racial and Ethnic Harassment," a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit 2.
Pursuant to its authority under 42 U.S.C. 3612(o) and
3614(a), the United States Department of Justice, on July
26, 1999, filed a civil action in this Court against the BHA
entitled United States v. Boston Housing Authority (Civil
Action No. 99-11587-RCL), and moved to consolidate with Jane Doe
No. 1 v. City of Boston. United States v. Boston Housing
Authority asserted claims against the BHA for violations of
the Fair Housing Act. The United States alleged that the
BHA has engaged in a pattern or practice of resistance to
the full enjoyment of rights guaranteed by the Fair Housing
Act by tolerating pervasive and severe harassment of tenants
on the basis of race, color and national origin in two of
its Developments. Specifically, the United States'
complaint charges that the BHA's failure to act has made
housing unavailable because of race, color, and national
origin in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a); has
discriminated in the terms, conditions, privileges, services
and facilities of rental housing in violation of 42 U.S.C. §
3604(b); and has coerced, intimidated, threatened, and
interfered with individuals' exercise and enjoyment of equal
housing conditions in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 3617.
The BHA and the City deny the allegations contained in
the Civil Actions and the HUD Administrative Action.
However, the Parties agree that, in order to avoid
protracted and costly litigation, the Civil Actions should
be resolved on terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement and Order.
Accordingly, as indicated by the signatures appearing
below, the parties have consented to entry of this
Settlement Agreement and Order.