CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS
TITLE 12--BANKS AND BANKING
CHAPTER II--FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
SUBCHAPTER A--BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
PART 202--EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY (REGULATION B)
REGULATION B (EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY)
Current through October 1, 1999; 64 FR 53565
§ 202.1 Authority, scope and purpose.
- Authority and scope. This regulation is issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System pursuant to title VII (Equal Credit Opportunity Act) of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, as amended (15 USC 1601 et seq.). Except as otherwise provided herein, the regulation applies to all persons who are creditors, as defined in § 202.2(1). Information collection requirements contained in this regulation
have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under the provisions of 44 USC 3501 et seq. and have been assigned OMB No. 7100-0201.
- Purpose. The purpose of this regulation is to promote the availability of credit to all creditworthy applicants without regard to race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, or age (provided the applicant has the capacity to contract); to the fact
that all or part of the applicant's income derives from a public assistance program; or to the fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act. The regulation prohibits creditor practices that discriminate on the basis of any of these factors. The regulation also requires creditors to notify applicants of action taken on their applications; to report credit history in the names of both spouses on an account; to retain records of credit applications; to collect information about the applicant's race and other personal characteristics in applications for certain dwelling-related loans; and to provide applicants with copies of appraisal reports used in connection with credit transactions.
[58 FR 65661, Dec. 16, 1993]
§ 202.2 Definitions.
For the purposes of this regulation, unless the context indicates otherwise, the following definitions apply.
- Account means an extension of credit. When employed in relation to an account, the word use refers only to open-end credit.
- Act means the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (title VII of the Consumer Credit Protection Act).
- Adverse action.
- The term means:
- A refusal to grant credit in substantially the amount or on substantially the terms requested in an application unless the creditor makes a counteroffer (to grant credit in a different amount or on other terms) and the applicant uses or expressly accepts the credit offered;
- A termination of an account or an unfavorable change in the terms of an account that does not affect all or a substantial portion of a class of the creditor's accounts; or
- A refusal to increase the amount of credit available to an applicant who has made an application for an increase.
- The term does not include:
- A change in the terms of an account expressly agreed to by an applicant.
- Any action or forbearance relating to an account taken in connection with inactivity, default, or delinquency as to that account;
- A refusal or failure to authorize an account transaction at a point of sale or loan, except when the refusal is a termination or an unfavorable change in the terms of an account that does not affect all or a substantial portion of a class of the creditor's accounts, or when the refusal is a denial of an application for an increase in the amount of credit available under the account;
- A refusal to extend credit because applicable law prohibits the creditor from extending the credit requested; or
- A refusal to extend credit because the creditor does not offer the type of credit or credit plan requested.
- An action that falls within the definition of both paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section is governed by paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
- Age refers only to the age of natural persons and means the number of fully elapsed years from the date of an applicant's birth.
- Applicant means any person who requests or who has received an extension of credit from a creditor, and includes any person who is or may become contractually liable regarding an extension of credit. For purposes of § 202.7(d), the term includes guarantors, sureties, endorsers and similar parties.
- Application means an oral or written request for an extension of credit that is made in accordance with procedures established by a creditor for the type of credit requested. The term does not include the use of an account or line of credit to obtain an amount of credit that is within a previously established credit limit. A completed application means an application in connection with which a creditor has received all the information that the creditor regularly obtains and considers in evaluating
applications for the amount and type of credit requested (including, but not limited to, credit reports, any additional information requested from the applicant, and any approvals or reports by governmental agencies or other persons that are necessary to guarantee, insure, or provide security for the credit or collateral). The creditor shall exercise reasonable diligence in obtaining such information.
- Business credit refers to extensions of credit primarily for business or commercial (including agricultural) purposes, but excluding extensions of credit of the types described in § 202.3(a), (b), and (d).
- Consumer credit means credit extended to a natural person primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.
- Contractually liable means expressly obligated to repay all debts arising on an account by reason of an agreement to that effect.
- Credit means the right granted by a creditor to an applicant to defer payment of a debt, incur debt and defer its payment, or purchase property or services and defer payment therefor.
- Credit card means any card, plate, coupon book, or other single credit device that may be used from time to time to obtain money, property, or services on credit.
- Creditor means a person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly participates in the decision of whether or not to extend credit. The term includes a creditor's assignee, transferee, or subrogee who so participates. For purposes of §§ 202.4 and 202.5(a), the term also includes a person who, in the ordinary course of business, regularly refers applicants or prospective applicants to creditors, or selects or offers to select creditors to whom requests for credit may be made. A person is not a creditor regarding any violation of the act or this regulation committed by another creditor unless the person knew or had reasonable notice of the act, policy, or practice that constituted the violation before becoming involved in the credit transaction. The term does not include a person whose only participation in a credit transaction involves honoring a credit card.
- Credit transaction means every aspect of an applicant's dealings with a creditor regarding an application for credit or an existing extension of credit (including, but not limited to, information requirements; investigation procedures; standards of creditworthiness; terms of credit; furnishing of credit information; revocation, alteration, or termination of credit; and collection procedures).
- Discriminate against an applicant means to treat an applicant less favorably than other applicants.
- Elderly means age 62 or older.
- Empirically derived and other credit scoring systems.
- A credit scoring system is a system that evaluates an applicant's creditworthiness mechanically, based on key attributes of the applicant and aspects of the transaction, and that determines, alone or in conjunction with an evaluation of additional information about the applicant, whether an applicant is deemed creditworthy. To qualify as an empirically derived, demonstrably and statistically sound, credit scoring system, the system must be:
- Based on data that are derived from an empirical comparison of sample groups or the population of creditworthy and noncreditworthy applicants who applied for credit within a reasonable preceding period of time;
- Developed for the purpose of evaluating the creditworthiness of applicants with respect to the legitimate business interests of the creditor utilizing the system (including, but not limited to, minimizing bad debt losses and operating expenses in accordance with the creditor's business judgment);
- Developed and validated using accepted statistical principles and methodology; and
- Periodically revalidated by the use of appropriate statistical principles and methodology and adjusted as necessary to maintain predictive ability.
- A creditor may use an empirically derived, demonstrably and statistically sound, credit scoring system obtained from another person or may obtain credit experience from which to develop such a system. Any such system must satisfy the criteria set forth in paragraph (p)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section; if the creditor is unable during the development process to validate the system based on its own credit experience in
accordance with paragraph (p)(1) of this section, the system must be validated when sufficient credit experience becomes available. A system that fails this validity test is no longer an empirically derived, demonstrably and statistically sound, credit scoring system for that creditor.
- Extend credit and extension of credit mean the granting of credit in any form (including, but not limited to, credit granted in addition to any existing credit or credit limit; credit granted pursuant to an open-end credit plan; the refinancing or other renewal of credit, including the issuance of a new credit card in place of an expiring credit card or in substitution for an existing credit card; the consolidation of two or
more obligations; or the continuance of existing credit without any special effort to collect at or after maturity).
- Good faith means honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction.
- Inadvertent error means a mechanical, electronic, or clerical error that a creditor demonstrates was not intentional and occurred notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid such errors.
- Judgmental system of evaluating applicants means any system for evaluating the creditworthiness of an applicant other than an empirically derived, demonstrably and statistically sound, credit scoring system.
- Marital status means the state of being unmarried, married, or separated, as defined by applicable state law. The term "unmarried" includes persons who are single, divorced, or widowed.
- Negative factor or value, in relation to the age of elderly applicants, means utilizing a factor, value, or weight that is less favorable regarding elderly applicants than the creditor's experience warrants or is less favorable than the factor, value, or weight
assigned to the class of applicants that are not classified as elderly and are most favored by a creditor on the basis of age.
- Open-end credit means credit extended under a plan under which a creditor may permit an applicant to make purchases or obtain loans from time to time directly from the creditor or indirectly by use of a credit card, check, or other device.
- Person means a natural person, corporation, government or governmental subdivision or agency, trust, estate, partnership, cooperative, or association.
- Pertinent element of creditworthiness, in relation to a judgmental system of evaluating applicants, means any information about applicants that a creditor obtains and considers and that has a demonstrable relationship to a determination of creditworthiness.
- Prohibited basis means race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, or age (provided that the applicant has the capacity to enter into a binding contract); the fact that all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public assistance program; or the fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act or any state law upon which an exemption has been
granted by the Board.
- State means any State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States.
[54 FR 50485, Dec. 7, 1989]
§ 202.3 Limited exceptions for certain classes of transactions.
- Public utilities credit.--
- Definition. Public utilities credit refers to extensions of credit that involve public utility services provided through pipe, wire, or other connected facilities, or radio or similar transmission (including extensions of such facilities), if the charges for service, delayed payment, and any discount for prompt payment are filed with or regulated by a government unit.
- Exceptions. The following provisions of this regulation do not apply to public utilities credit:
- Section 202.5(d)(1) concerning information about marital status;
- Section 202.10 relating to furnishing of credit information; and
- Section 202.12(b) relating to record retention.
- Securities credit.--
- Definition. Securities credit refers to extensions of credit subject to regulation under section 7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or extensions of credit by a broker or dealer subject to regulation as a broker or dealer under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
- Exceptions. The following provisions of this regulation do not apply to securities credit:
- Section 202.5(c) concerning information about a spouse or former spouse;
- Section 202.5(d)(1) concerning information about marital status;
- Section 202.5(d)(3) concerning information about the sex of an applicant;
- Section 202.7(b) relating to designation of name, but only to the extent necessary to prevent violation of rules regarding an account in which a broker or dealer has an interest, or rules necessitating the aggregation of accounts of spouses for the purpose of determining controlling interests, beneficial interests, beneficial ownership, or purchase limitations and restrictions;
- Section 202.7(c) relating to action concerning open-end accounts, but only to the extent the action taken is on the basis of a change of name or marital status;
- Section 202.7(d) relating to the signature of a spouse or other person;
- Section 202.10 relating to furnishing of credit information; and
- Section 202.12(b) relating to record retention.
- Incidental credit.
- Definition. Incidental credit refers to extensions of consumer credit other than credit of the types described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section:
- That are not made pursuant to the terms of a credit card account;
- That are not subject to a finance charge (as defined in Regulation Z, 12 CFR 226.4); and
- That are not payable by agreement in more than four installments.
- Exceptions. The following provisions of this regulation do not apply to incidental credit:
- Section 202.5(c) concerning information about a spouse or former spouse;
- Section 202.5(d)(1) concerning information about marital status;
- Section 202.5(d)(2) concerning information about income derived from alimony, child support, or separate maintenance payments;
- Section 202.5(d)(3) concerning information about the sex of an applicant, but only to the extent necessary for medical records or similar purposes;
- Section 202.7(d) relating to the signature of a spouse or other person;
- Section 202.9 relating to notifications;
- Section 202.10 relating to furnishing of credit information; and
- Section 202.12(b) relating to record retention.
- Government credit.--
- Definition. Government credit refers to extensions of credit made to governments or governmental subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities.
- Applicability of regulation. Except for section 202.4, the general rule prohibiting discrimination on a prohibited basis, the requirements of this regulation do not apply to government credit.
[54 FR 50485, Dec. 7, 1989]
§ 202.4 General Rule Prohibiting Discrimination.
A creditor shall not discriminate against an applicant on a prohibited basis regarding any aspect of a credit transaction.
§ 202.5 Rules Concerning Taking of Applications.
- Discouraging applications. A creditor shall not make any oral or written statement, in advertising or otherwise, to applicants or prospective applicants that would discourage on a prohibited basis a reasonable person from making or pursuing an application.
- General rules concerning requests for information.
- Except as provided in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, a creditor may request any information in connection with an application. [FN1]
[FN1] This paragraph does not limit or abrogate any federal or state law regarding privacy, privileged information, credit reporting limitations, or similar restrictions on obtainable information.
- Required collection of information. Notwithstanding paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, a creditor shall request information for monitoring purposes as required by § 202.13 for credit secured by the applicant's dwelling. In addition, a creditor may obtain information required by a regulation, order, or agreement issued by, or entered into
with, a court or an enforcement agency (including the Attorney General of the United States or a similar state official) to monitor or enforce compliance with the act, this regulation, or other federal or state statute or regulation.
- Special purpose credit. A creditor may obtain information that is otherwise restricted to determine eligibility for a special purpose credit program, as provided in §§ 202.8(c) and (d).
- Information about a spouse or former spouse.
- Except as permitted in this paragraph, a creditor may not request any information concerning the spouse or former spouse of an applicant.
- Permissible inquiries. A creditor may request any information concerning an applicant's spouse (or former spouse under paragraph (c)(2)(v)) of this section.
- The spouse will be permitted to use the account;
- The spouse will be contractually liable on the account;
- The applicant is relying on the spouse's income as a basis for repayment of the credit requested;
- The applicant resides in a community property state or property on which the applicant is relying as a basis for repayment of the credit requested is located in such a state; or
- The applicant is relying on alimony, child support, or separate maintenance payments from a spouse or former spouse as a basis for repayment of the credit requested.
- Other accounts of the applicant. A creditor may request an applicant to list any account upon which the applicant is liable and to provide the name and address in which the account is carried. A creditor may also ask the names in which an applicant has previously received credit.
- Other limitations on information requests.
- Marital status. If an applicant applies for individual unsecured credit, a creditor shall not inquire about the applicant's marital status unless the applicant resides in a community property state or is relying on property located in such a state as a basis for repayment of the credit requested. If an application is for other than individual unsecured credit, a creditor may inquire about the applicant's marital status, but shall use only the terms "married," "unmarried," and "separated." A creditor may explain that the category "unmarried" includes single, divorced, and widowed persons.
- Disclosure about income from alimony, child support, or separate maintenance. A creditor shall not inquire whether income stated in an application is derived from alimony, child support, or separate maintenance payments unless the creditor discloses to the applicant that such income need not be revealed if the applicant does not want the creditor to consider it in determining the applicant's creditworthiness.
- Sex. A creditor shall not inquire about the sex of an applicant. An applicant may be requested to designate a title on an application form (such as Ms., Miss, Mr., or Mrs.) if the form discloses that the designation of a title is optional. An application form shall otherwise use only terms that are neutral as to sex.
- Childbearing, childrearing. A creditor shall not inquire about birth control practices, intentions concerning the bearing or rearing of children, or capability to bear children. A creditor may inquire about the number and ages of an applicant's dependents or about dependent-related financial obligations or expenditures, provided such information is requested without regard to sex, marital status, or any other prohibited basis.
- Race, color, religion, national origin. A creditor shall not inquire about the race, color, religion, or national origin of an applicant or any other person in connection with a credit transaction. A creditor may inquire about an applicant's permanent residence and immigration status.
- Written applications. A creditor shall take written applications for the types of credit covered by § 202.13(a), but need not take written applications for other types of credit.
§ 202.5a Rules on providing appraisal reports.
- Providing appraisals. A creditor shall provide a copy of the appraisal report used in
connection with an application for credit that is to be secured by a lien on a dwelling.
A creditor shall comply with either paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section.
- Routine delivery. A creditor may routinely provide a copy of the appraisal report to
an applicant (whether credit is granted or denied or the application is withdrawn).
- Upon request. A creditor that does not routinely provide appraisal reports shall
provide a copy upon an applicant's written request.
- Notice. A creditor that provides appraisal reports only upon request shall notify an
applicant in writing of the right to receive a copy of an appraisal report. The notice may
be given at any time during the application process but no later than when the creditor
provides notice of action taken under § 202.9 of this part. The notice shall specify that
the applicant's request must be in writing, give the creditor's mailing address, and state
the time for making the request as provided in paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section.
- Delivery. A creditor shall mail or deliver a copy of the appraisal report promptly
(generally within 30 days) after the creditor receives an applicant's request, receives
the report, or receives reimbursement from the applicant for the report, whichever is
last to occur. A creditor need not provide a copy when the applicant's request is
received more than 90 days after the creditor has provided notice of action taken on
the application under § 202.9 of this part or 90 days after the application is withdrawn.
- Credit unions. A creditor that is subject to the regulations of the National Credit
Union Administration on making copies of appraisals available is not subject to this
section.
- Definitions. For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the term dwelling means
a residential structure that contains one to four units whether or not that structure is
attached to real property. The term includes, but is not limited to, an individual
condominium or cooperative unit, and a mobile or other manufactured home. The
term appraisal report means the document(s) relied upon by a creditor in evaluating
the value of the dwelling.
[58 FR 65661, Dec. 16, 1993]
§ 202.6 Rules Concerning Evaluation of Applications.
- General rule concerning use of information. Except as otherwise provided in the
act and this regulation, a creditor may consider any information obtained, so long as
the information is not used to discriminate against an applicant on a prohibited basis.
[FN2]
[FN2] The legislative history of the act indicates that the Congress intended an "effects
test" concept, as outlined in the employment field by the Supreme Court in the cases of
Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), and Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422
U.S. 405 (1975), to be applicable to a creditor's determination of creditworthiness.
- Specific rules concerning use of information.
- Except as provided in the act and this regulation, a creditor shall not take a
prohibited basis into account in any system of evaluating the creditworthiness of
applicants.
- Age, receipt of public assistance.
- Except as permitted in this paragraph (b)(2), a creditor shall not take into account
an applicant's age (provided that the applicant has the capacity to enter into a binding
contract) or whether an applicant's income derives from any public assistance
program.
- In an empirically derived, demonstrably and statistically sound, credit scoring
system, a creditor may use an applicant's age as a predictive variable, provided that the
age of an elderly applicant is not assigned a negative factor or value.
- In a judgmental system of evaluating creditworthiness, a creditor may consider an
applicant's age or whether an applicant's income derives from any public assistance
program only for the purpose of determining a pertinent element of creditworthiness.
- In any system of evaluating creditworthiness, a creditor may consider the age of an
elderly applicant when such age is used to favor the elderly applicant in extending
credit.
- Childbearing, childrearing. In evaluating creditworthiness, a creditor shall not use
assumptions or aggregate statistics relating to the likelihood that any group of persons
will bear or rear children or will, for that reason, receive diminished or interrupted
income in the future.
- Telephone listing. A creditor shall not take into account whether there is a
telephone listing in the name of an applicant for consumer credit, but may take into
account whether there is a telephone in the applicant's residence.
- Income. A creditor shall not discount or exclude from consideration the income of
an applicant or the spouse of an applicant because of a prohibited basis or because the
income is derived from part-time employment or is an annuity, pension, or other
retirement benefit; a creditor may consider the amount and probable continuance of
any income in evaluating an applicant's creditworthiness. When an applicant relies on
alimony, child support, or separate maintenance payments in applying for credit, the
creditor shall consider such payments as income to the extent that they are likely to be
consistently made.
- Credit history. To the extent that a creditor considers credit history in evaluating
the creditworthiness of similarly qualified applicants for a similar type and amount of
credit, in evaluating an applicant's creditworthiness a creditor shall consider:
- The credit history, when available, of accounts designated as accounts that the
applicant and the applicant's spouse are permitted to use or for which both are
contractually liable;
- On the applicant's request, any information the applicant may present that tends to
indicate that the credit history being considered by the creditor does not accurately
reflect the applicant's creditworthiness; and
- On the applicant's request, the credit history, when available, of any account
reported in the name of the applicant's spouse or former spouse that the applicant can
demonstrate accurately reflects the applicant's creditworthiness.
- Immigration status. A creditor may consider whether an applicant is a permanent
resident of the United States, the applicant's immigration status, and any additional
information that may be necessary to ascertain the creditor's rights and remedies
regarding repayment.
- State property laws. A creditor's consideration or application of state property laws
directly or indirectly affecting creditworthiness does not constitute unlawful
discrimination for the purposes of the act or this regulation.
§ 202.7 Rules Concerning Extensions of Credit.
- Individual accounts. A creditor shall not refuse to grant an individual account to a
creditworthy applicant on the basis of sex, marital status, or any other prohibited basis.
- Designation of name. A creditor shall not refuse to allow an applicant to open or
maintain an account in a birth-given first name and a surname that is the applicant's
birth-given surname, the spouse's surname, or a combined surname.
- Action concerning existing open-end accounts.--
- Limitations. In the absence of evidence of the applicant's inability or unwillingness
to repay, a creditor shall not take any of the following actions regarding an applicant
who is contractually liable on an existing open-end account on the basis of the
applicant's reaching a certain age or retiring or on the basis of a change in the
applicant's name or marital status:
- Require a reapplication, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section;
- Change the terms of the account; or
- Terminate the account.
- Requiring reapplication. A creditor may require a reapplication for an open-end
account on the basis of a change in the marital status of an applicant who is
contractually liable if the credit granted was based in whole or in part on income of the
applicant's spouse and if information available to the creditor indicates that the
applicant's income may not support the amount of credit currently available.
- Signature of spouse or other person.
- Rule for qualified applicant. Except as provided in this paragraph, a creditor shall
not require the signature of an applicant's spouse or other person, other than a joint
applicant, on any credit instrument if the applicant qualifies under the creditor's
standards of creditworthiness for the amount and terms of the credit requested.
- Unsecured credit. If an applicant requests unsecured credit and relies in part upon
property that the applicant owns jointly with another person to satisfy the creditor's
standards of creditworthiness, the creditor may require the signature of the other
person only on the instrument(s) necessary, or reasonably believed by the creditor to
be necessary, under the law of the state in which the property is located, to enable the
creditor to reach the property being relied upon in the event of the death or default of
the applicant.
- Unsecured credit--community property states. If a married applicant requests
unsecured credit and resides in a community property state, or if the property upon
which the applicant is relying is located in such a state, a creditor may require the
signature of the spouse on any instrument necessary, or reasonably believed by the
creditor to be necessary, under applicable state law to make the community property
available to satisfy the debt in the event of default if:
- Applicable state law denies the applicant power to manage or control sufficient
community property to qualify for the amount of credit requested under the creditor's
standards of creditworthiness; and
- The applicant does not have sufficient separate property to qualify for the amount
of credit requested without regard to community property.
- Secured credit. If an applicant requests secured credit, a creditor may require the
signature of the applicant's spouse or other person on any instrument necessary, or
reasonably believed by the creditor to be necessary, under applicable state law to
make the property being offered as security available to satisfy the debt in the event of
default, for example, an instrument to create a valid lien, pass clear title, waive
inchoate rights or assign earnings.
- Additional parties. If, under a creditor's standards of creditworthiness, the personal
liability of an additional party is necessary to support the extension of the credit
requested, a creditor may request a cosigner, guarantor, or the like. The applicant's
spouse may serve as an additional party, but the creditor shall not require that the
spouse be the additional party.
- Rights of additional parties. A creditor shall not impose requirements upon an
additional party that the creditor is prohibited from imposing upon an applicant under
this section.
- Insurance. A creditor shall not refuse to extend credit and shall not terminate an
account because credit life, health, accident, disability, or other credit-related
insurance is not available on the basis of the applicant's age.
§ 202.8 Special Purpose Credit Programs.
- Standards for programs. Subject to the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section,
the act and this regulation permit a creditor to extend special purpose credit to
applicants who meet eligibility requirements under the following types of credit
programs:
- Any credit assistance program expressly authorized by federal or state law for the
benefit of an economically disadvantaged class of persons;
- Any credit assistance program offered by a not-for-profit organization, as defined
under section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, for the benefit
of its members or for the benefit of an economically disadvantaged class of persons; or
- Any special purpose credit program offered by a for-profit organization or in which
such an organization participates to meet special social needs, if:
- The program is established and administered pursuant to a written plan that
identifies the class of persons that the program is designed to benefit and sets forth the
procedures and standards for extending credit pursuant to the program; and
- The program is established and administered to extend credit to a class of persons
who, under the organization's customary standards of creditworthiness, probably
would not receive such credit or would receive it on less favorable terms than are
ordinarily available to other applicants applying to the organization for a similar type
and amount of credit.
- Rules in other sections.
- General applicability. All of the provisions of this regulation apply to each of the
special purpose credit programs described in paragraph (a) of this section unless
modified by this section.
- Common characteristics. A program described in paragraph (a)(2) or (a)(3) of this
section qualifies as a special purpose credit program only if it was established and is
administered so as not to discriminate against an applicant on any prohibited basis;
however, all program participants may be required to share one or more common
characteristics (for example, race, national origin, or sex) so long as the program was
not established and is not administered with the purpose of evading the requirements
of the act or this regulation.
- Special rule concerning requests and use of information. If participants in a special
purpose credit program described in paragraph (a) of this section are required to
possess one or more common characteristics (for example, race, national origin, or
sex) and if the program otherwise satisfies the requirements of paragraph (a) of this
section, a creditor may request and consider information regarding the common
characteristic(s) in determining the applicant's eligibility for the program.
- Special rule in the case of financial need. If financial need is one of the criteria
under a special purpose program described in paragraph (a) of this section, the
creditor may request and consider, in determining an applicant's eligibility for the
program, information regarding the applicant's martial status; alimony, child support,
and separate maintenance income; and the spouse's financial resources. In addition,
a creditor may obtain the signature of an applicant's spouse or other person on an
application or credit instrument relating to a special purpose program if the signature is
required by federal or state law.
§ 202.9 Notifications.
- Notification of action taken, ECOA notice, and statement of specific reasons--
- When notification is required. A creditor shall notify an applicant of action taken
within:
- 30 days after receiving a completed application concerning the creditor's approval
of, counteroffer to, or adverse action on the application;
- 30 days after taking adverse action on an incomplete application, unless notice is
provided in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section;
- 30 days after taking adverse action on an existing account; or
- 90 days after notifying the applicant of a counteroffer if the applicant does not
expressly accept or use the credit offered.
- Content of notification when adverse action is taken. A notification given to an
applicant when adverse action is taken shall be in writing and shall contain: a
statement of the action taken; the name and address of the creditor; a statement of
the provisions of section 701(a) of the Act; the name and address of the Federal
agency that administers compliance with respect to the creditor; and either:
- A statement of specific reasons for the action taken; or
- A disclosure of the applicant's right to a statement of specific reasons within 30
days, if the statement is requested within 60 days of the creditor's notification. The
disclosure shall include the name, address, and telephone number of the person or
office from which the statement of reasons can be obtained. If the creditor chooses to
provide the reasons orally, the creditor shall also disclose the applicant's right to have
them confirmed in writing within 30 days of receiving a written request for
confirmation from the applicant.
- Notification to business credit applicants. For business credit, a creditor shall
comply with the requirements of this paragraph in the following manner:
- With regard to a business that had gross revenues of $1,000,000 or less in its
preceding fiscal year (other than an extension of trade credit, credit incident to a
factoring agreement, or other similar types of business credit), a creditor shall comply
with paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section, except that:
- The statement of the action taken may be given orally or in writing, when adverse
action is taken;
- Disclosure of an applicant's right to a statement of reasons may be given at the
time of application, instead of when adverse action is taken, provided the disclosure is
in a form the applicant may retain and contains the information required by paragraph
(a)(2)(ii) and the ECOA notice specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section;
- For an application made solely by telephone, a creditor satisfies the requirements
of this paragraph by an oral statement of the action taken and of the applicant's right to
a statement of reasons for adverse action.
- With regard to a business that had gross revenues in excess of $1,000,000 in its
preceding fiscal year or an extension of trade credit, credit incident to a factoring
agreement, or other similar types of business credit, a creditor shall:
- Notify the applicant, orally or in writing, within a reasonable time of the action
taken; and
- Provide a written statement of the reasons for adverse action and the ECOA notice
specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section if the applicant makes a written request for
the reasons within 60 days of being notified of the adverse action.
- Form of ECOA notice and statement of specific reasons.
- ECOA notice. To satisfy the disclosure requirements of paragraph (a)(2) of this
section regarding section 701(a) of the Act, the creditor shall provide a notice that is
substantially similar to the following:
The federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating
against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex,
marital status, age (provided the applicant has the capacity to enter into a binding
contract); because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public
assistance program; or because the applicant has in good faith exercised any right
under the Consumer Credit Protection Act. The federal agency that administers
compliance with this law concerning this creditor is (name and address as specified by
the appropriate agency listed in Appendix A of this regulation).
- Statement of specific reasons. The statement of reasons for adverse action
required by paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section must be specific and indicate the
principal reason(s) for the adverse action. Statements that the adverse action was
based on the creditor's internal standards or policies or that the applicant failed to
achieve the qualifying score on the creditor's credit scoring system are insufficient.
- Incomplete applications.--
- Notice alternatives. Within 30 days after receiving application that is incomplete
regarding matters that an applicant can complete, the creditor shall notify the applicant
either:
- Of action taken, in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section; or
- Of the incompleteness, in accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
- Notice of incompleteness. If additional information is needed from an applicant,
the creditor shall send a written notice to the applicant specifying the information
needed, designating a reasonable period of time for the applicant to provide the
information, and informing the applicant that failure to provide the information
requested will result in no further consideration being given to the application. The
creditor shall have no further obligation under this section if the applicant fails to
respond within the designated time period. If the applicant supplies the requested
information within the designated time period, the creditor shall take action on the
application and notify the applicant in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
- Oral request for information. At its option, a creditor may inform the applicant
orally of the need for additional information; but if the application remains incomplete
the creditor shall send a notice in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of this section.
- Oral notifications by small-volume creditors. The requirements of this section
(including statements of specific reasons) are satisfied by oral notifications in the case
of any creditor that did not receive more than 150 applications during the preceding
calendar year.
- Withdrawal of approved application. When an applicant submits an application
and the parties contemplate that the applicant will inquire about its status, if the
creditor approves the application and the applicant has not inquired within 30 days
after applying, the creditor may treat the application as withdrawn and need not
comply with paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
- Multiple applicants. When an application involves more than one applicant,
notification need only be given to one of them, but must be given to the primary
applicant where one is readily apparent.
- Applications submitted through a third party. When an application is made on
behalf of an applicant to more than one creditor and the applicant expressly accepts or
uses credit offered by one of the creditors, notification of action taken by any of the
other creditors is not required. If no credit is offered or if the applicant does not
expressly accept or use any credit offered, each creditor taking adverse action must
comply with this section, directly or through a third party. A notice given by a third
party shall disclose the identify of each creditor on whose behalf the notice is given.
[54 FR 50485, Dec. 7, 1989]
§ 202.10 Furnishing of Credit Information.
- Designation of accounts. A creditor that furnishes credit information shall
designate:
- Any new account to reflect the participation of both spouses if the applicant's
spouse is permitted to use or is contractually liable on the account (other than as a
guarantor, surety, endorser, or similar party); and
- Any existing account to reflect such participation, within 90 days after receiving a
written request to do so from one of the spouses.
- Routine reports to consumer reporting agency. If a creditor furnishes credit
information to a consumer reporting agency concerning an account designated to
reflect the participation of both spouses, the creditor shall furnish the information in a
manner that will enable the agency to provide access to the information in the name of
each spouse.
- Reporting in response to inquiry. If a creditor furnishes credit information in
response to an inquiry concerning an account designated to reflect the participation of
both spouses, the creditor shall furnish the information in the name of the spouse
about whom the information is requested.
§ 202.11 Relation to State Law.
- Inconsistent state laws. Except as otherwise provided in this section, this
regulation alters, affects, or preempts only those state laws that are inconsistent with
the act and this regulation and then only to the extent of the inconsistency. A state law
is not inconsistent if it is more protective of an applicant.
- Preempted provisions of state law.
- A state law is deemed to be inconsistent with the requirements of the act and this
regulation and less protective of an applicant within the meaning of section 705(f) of
the act to the extent that the law:
- Requires or permits a practice or act prohibited by the act or this regulation;
- Prohibits the individual extension of consumer credit to both parties to a marriage
if each spouse individually and voluntarily applies for such credit;
- Prohibits inquiries or collection of data required to comply with the act or this
regulation;
- Prohibits asking or considering age in an empirically derived, demonstrably and
statistically sound, credit scoring system to determine a pertinent element of
creditworthiness, or to favor an elderly applicant; or
- Prohibits inquiries necessary to establish or administer as special purpose credit
program as defined by § 202.8.
- A creditor, state, or other interested party may request the Board to determine
whether a state law is inconsistent with the requirements of the act and this regulation.
- Laws on finance charges, loan ceilings. If married applicants voluntarily apply for
and obtained individual accounts with the same creditor, the accounts shall not be
aggregated or otherwise combined for purposes of determining permissible finance
charges or loan ceilings under any federal or state law. Permissible loan ceiling laws
shall be construed to permit each spouse to become individually liable up to the
amount of the loan ceilings, less the amount for which the applicant is jointly liable.
- State and federal laws not affected. This section does not alter or annul any
provision of state property laws, laws relating to the disposition of decedents' estates,
or federal or state banking regulations directed only toward insuring the solvency of
financial institutions.
- Exemption for state-regulated transactions.
- Applications. A state may apply to the Board for an exemption from the
requirements of the act and this regulation for any class of credit transactions within
the state. The Board will grant such an exemption if the Board determines that:
- The class of credit transactions is subject to state law requirements substantially
similar to the act and this regulation or that applicants are afforded greater protection
under state law; and
- There is adequate provision for state enforcement.
- Liability and enforcement.
- No exemption will extend to the civil liability provisions of section 706 or the
administrative enforcement provisions of section 704 of the act.
- After an exemption has been granted, the requirements of the applicable state law
(except for additional requirements not imposed by federal law) will constitute the
requirements of the act and this regulation.
§ 202.12 Record Retention.
- Retention of prohibited information. A creditor may retain in its files information
that is prohibited by the act or this regulation in evaluating applications, without
violating the act or this regulation, if the information was obtained:
- From any source prior to March 23, 1977;
- From consumer reporting agencies, an applicant, or others without the specific
request of the creditor; or
- As required to monitor compliance with the act and this regulation or other federal
or state statutes or regulations.
- Preservation of records--
- Applications. For 25 months (12 months for business credit) after the date that a
creditor notifies an applicant of action taken on an application or of incompleteness,
the creditor shall retain in original form or a copy thereof:
- any application that it receives, any information required to be obtained concerning
characteristics of the applicant to monitor compliance with the act and this regulation
or other similar law, and any other written or recorded information used in evaluating
the application and not returned to the applicant at the applicant's request;
- A copy of the following documents if furnished to the applicant in written form (or,
if furnished orally, any notation or memorandum made by the creditor):
- The notification of action taken; and
- The statement of specific reasons for adverse action; and
- Any written statement submitted by the applicant alleging a violation of the act or
this regulation.
- Existing accounts. For 25 months (12 months for business credit) after the date
that a creditor notifies an applicant of adverse action regarding an existing account, the
creditor shall retain as to that account, in original form or a copy thereof:
- Any written or recorded information concerning the adverse action; and
- Any written statement submitted by the applicant alleging a violation of the act or
this regulation.
- Other applications. For 25 months (12 months for business credit) after the date
that a creditor receives an application for which the creditor is not required to comply
with the notification requirements of § 202.9, the creditor shall retain all written or
recorded information in its possession concerning the applicant, including any notation
of action taken.
- Enforcement proceedings and investigations. A creditor shall retain the
information specified in this section beyond 25 months (12 months for business credit)
if it has actual notice that it is under investigation or is subject to an enforcement
proceeding for an alleged violation of the act or this regulation by the Attorney General
of the United States or by an enforcement agency charged with monitoring that
creditor's compliance with the act and this regulation, or if it has been served with
notice of an action filed pursuant to section 706 of the Act and § 202.14 of this
regulation. The creditor shall retain the information until final disposition of the matter,
unless an earlier time is allowed by order of the agency or court.
- Special rule for certain business credit applications. With regard to a business with
gross revenues in excess of $1,000,000 in its preceding fiscal year, or an extension of
trade credit, credit incident to a factoring agreement or other similar types of business
credit, the creditor shall retain records for at least 60 days after notifying the applicant
of the action taken. If within that time period the applicant requests in writing the
reasons for adverse action or that records be retained, the creditor shall retain records
for 12 months.
- Self-tests. For 25 months after a self-test (as defined in § 202.15) has been
completed, the creditor shall retain all written or recorded information about the self-test. A creditor shall retain information beyond 25 months if it has actual notice that it
is under investigation or is subject to an enforcement proceeding for an alleged
violation, or if it has been served with notice of a civil action. In such cases, the
creditor shall retain the information until final disposition of the matter, unless an
earlier time is allowed by the appropriate agency or court order.
[54 FR 50486, Dec. 7, 1989; 62 FR 66418, Dec. 18, 1997]
§ 202.13 Information for Monitoring Purposes.
- Information to be requested. A creditor that receives an application for credit
primarily for the purchase or refinancing of a dwelling occupied or to be occupied by
the applicant as a principal residence, where the extension of credit will be secured by
the dwelling, shall request as part of the application the following information regarding
the applicant(s):
- Race or national origin, using the categories American Indian or Alaskan Native;
Asian or Pacific Islander; Black; White; Hispanic; Other (Specify);
- Sex;
- Marital status, using the categories married, unmarried, and separated; and
- Age.
"Dwelling" means a residential structure that contains one to four units, whether or not
that structure is attached to real property. The term includes, but is not limited to, an
individual condominium or cooperative unit, and a mobile or other manufactured
home.
- Obtaining of information. Questions regarding race or national origin, sex, marital
status, and age may be listed, at the creditor's option, on the application form or on a
separate form that refers to the application. The applicant(s) shall be asked but not
required to supply the requested information. If the applicant(s) chooses not to
provide the information or any part of it, that fact shall be noted on the form. The
creditor shall then also note on the form, to the extent possible, the race or national
origin and sex of the applicant(s) on the basis of visual observation or surname.
- Disclosure to applicant(s). The creditor shall inform the applicant(s) that the
information regarding race or national origin, sex, marital status, and age is being
requested by the federal government for the purpose of monitoring compliance with
federal statutes that prohibit creditors from discriminating against applicants on those
bases. The creditor shall also inform the applicant(s) that if the applicant(s) chooses
note to provide the information, the creditor is required to note the race or national
origin and sex on the basis of visual observation or surname.
- Substitute monitoring program. A monitoring program required by an agency
charged with administrative enforcement under section 704 of the act may be
substituted for the requirements contained in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c).
§ 202.14 Enforcement, Penalties and Liabilities.
- Administrative enforcement.
- As set forth more fully in section 704 of the act, administrative enforcement of the
act and this regulation regarding certain creditors is assigned to the Comptroller of the
Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Board of Directors of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Office of Thrift Supervision (acting directly or
through the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation), National Credit Union
Administration, Interstate Commerce Commission, Secretary of Agriculture, Farm
Credit Administration, Securities and Exchange Commission, Small Business
Administration, and Secretary of Transportation.
- Except to the extent that administrative enforcement is specifically assigned to
other authorities, compliance with the requirements imposed under the act and this
regulation is enforced by the Federal Trade Commission.
- Penalties and liabilities.
- Sections 706(a) and (b) and 702(g) of the act provide that any creditor that fails to
comply with a requirement imposed by the act or this regulation is subject to civil
liability for actual and punitive damages in individual or class actions. Pursuant to
sections 704(b), (c), and (d) and 702(g) of the act, violations of the act or regulations
also constitute violations of other federal laws. Liability for punitive damages is
restricted to nongovernmental entities and is limited to $10,000 in individual actions
and the lesser of $500,000 or 1 percent of the creditor's net worth in class actions.
Section 706(c) provides for equitable and declaratory relief and section 706(d)
authorizes the awarding of costs and reasonable attorney's fees to an aggrieved
applicant in a successful action.
- As provided in section 706(f), a civil action under the act or this regulation may be
brought in the appropriate United States district court without regard to the amount in
controversy or in any other court of competent jurisdiction within two years after the
date of the occurrence of the violation, or within one year after the commencement of
an administrative enforcement proceeding or of a civil action brought by the Attorney
General of the United States within two years after the alleged violation.
- If an agency responsible for administrative enforcement is unable to obtain
compliance with the act or this part, it may refer the matter to the Attorney General of
the United States. In addition, if the Board, the Comptroller of the Currency, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of Thrift Supervision, or the National
Credit Union Administration has reason to believe that one or more creditors engaged
in a pattern or practice of discouraging or denying applications in violation of the act or
this part, the agency shall refer the matter to the Attorney General. Furthermore, the
agency may refer a matter to the Attorney General if the agency has reason to believe
that one or more creditors violated section 701(a) of the act.
- On referral, or whenever the Attorney General has reason to believe that one or
more creditors engaged in a pattern or practice in violation of the act or this regulation,
the Attorney General may bring a civil action for such relief as may be appropriate,
including actual and punitive damages and injunctive relief.
- If the Board, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, the Office of Thrift Supervision, or the National Credit Union
Administration has reason to believe (as a result of a consumer complaint, conducting
a consumer compliance examination, or otherwise) that a violation of the act or this
part has occurred which is also a violation of the Fair Housing Act, and the matter is not
referred to the Attorney General, the agency shall notify:
- The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; and
- The applicant that the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development has been
notified and that remedies for the violation may be available under the Fair Housing
Act.
- Failure of compliance. A creditor's failure to comply with §§ 202.6(b)(6), 202.9,
202.10, 202.12 or 202.13 is not a violation if it results from an inadvertent error. On
discovering an error under §§ 202.9 and 202.10, the creditor shall correct it as soon as
possible. If a creditor inadvertently obtains the monitoring information regarding the
race or national origin and sex of the applicant in a dwelling-related transaction not
covered by § 202.13, the creditor may act on and retain the application without
violating the regulation.
[54 FR 53539, Dec. 29, 1989; 58 FR 65662, Dec. 16, 1993]
§ 202.15 Incentives for self-testing and self-correction.
- General rules--
- Voluntary self-testing and correction. The report or results of the self- test that a
creditor voluntarily conducts (or authorizes) are privileged as provided in this section.
Data collection required by law or by any governmental authority is not a voluntary self-test.
- Corrective action required. The privilege in this section applies only if the creditor
has taken or is taking appropriate corrective action.
- Other privileges. The privilege created by this section does not preclude the
assertion of any other privilege that may also apply.
- Self-test defined--
- Definition. A self-test is any program, practice, or study that:
- Is designed and used specifically to determine the extent or effectiveness of a
creditor's compliance with the act or this regulation; and
- Creates data or factual information that is not available and cannot be derived from
loan or application files or other records related to credit transactions.
- Types of information privileged. The privilege under this section applies to the
report or results of the self-test, data or factual information created by the self-test, and
any analysis, opinions, and conclusions pertaining to the self-test report or results. The
privilege covers workpapers or draft documents as well as final documents.
- Types of information not privileged. The privilege under this section does not apply
to:
- Information about whether a creditor conducted a self-test, the methodology used
or the scope of the self-test, the time period covered by the self-test, or the dates it was
conducted; or
- Loan and application files or other business records related to credit transactions,
and information derived from such files and records, even if it has been aggregated,
summarized, or reorganized to facilitate analysis.
- Appropriate corrective action--
- General requirement. For the privilege in this section to apply, appropriate
corrective action is required when the self-test shows that it is more likely than not that
a violation occurred, even though no violation has been formally adjudicated.
- Determining the scope of appropriate corrective action. A creditor must take
corrective action that is reasonably likely to remedy the cause and effect of a likely
violation by:
- Identifying the policies or practices that are the likely cause of the violation; and
- Assessing the extent and scope of any violation.
- Types of relief. Appropriate corrective action may include both prospective and
remedial relief, except that to establish a privilege under this section:
- A creditor is not required to provide remedial relief to a tester used in a self-test;
- A creditor is only required to provide remedial relief to an applicant identified by
the self-test as one whose rights were more likely than not violated; and
- A creditor is not required to provide remedial relief to a particular applicant if the
statute of limitations applicable to the violation expired before the creditor obtained the
results of the self-test or the applicant is otherwise ineligible for such relief.
- No admission of violation. Taking corrective action is not an admission that a
violation occurred.
-
- Scope of privilege. The report or results of a privileged self-test may not be
obtained or used:
- By a government agency in any examination or investigation relating to compliance
with the act or this regulation; or
- By a government agency or an applicant (including a prospective applicant who
alleges a violation of § 202.5(a)) in any proceeding or civil action in which a violation of
the act or this regulation is alleged.
- Loss of privilege. The report or results of a self-test are not privileged under
paragraph (d)(1) of this section if the creditor or a person with lawful access to the
report or results):
- Voluntarily discloses any part of the report or results, or any other information
privileged under this section, to an applicant or government agency or to the public;
- Discloses any part of the report or results, or any other information privileged under
this section, as a defense to charges that the creditor has violated the act or regulation;
or
- Fails or is unable to produce written or recorded information about the self-test
that is required to be retained under § 202.12(b)(6) when the information is needed to
determine whether the privilege applies. This paragraph does not limit any other
penalty or remedy that may be available for a violation of § 202.12.
- Limited use of privileged information. Notwithstanding paragraph (d)(1) of this
section, the self-test report or results and any other information privileged under this
section may be obtained and used by an applicant or government agency solely to
determine a penalty or remedy after a violation of the act or this regulation has been
adjudicated or admitted. Disclosures for this limited purpose may be used only for the
particular proceeding in which the adjudication or admission was made. Information
disclosed under this paragraph (d)(3) remains privileged under paragraph (d)(1) of this
section.
[62 FR 66419, Dec. 18, 1997]
Appendix A to Part 202--Federal Enforcement Agencies
The following list indicates the federal agencies that enforce Regulation B for particular
classes of creditors. Any questions concerning a particular creditor should be directed
to its enforcement agency. Terms that are not defined in the Federal Deposit Insurance
Act (12 U.S.C. 1813(s)) shall have the meaning given to them in the International
Banking Act of 1978 (12 U.S.C. 3101).
- National banks and federal branches and federal agencies of foreign banks
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Customer Assistance Unit
1301 McKinney
Avenue, Suite 3710
Houston, Texas 77010.
- State member banks, branches and agencies of foreign banks (other than federal branches, federal agencies, and insured state branches of foreign banks), commercial lending companies owned or controlled by foreign banks, and organizations operating under section 25 or 25A of the Federal Reserve Act
Federal Reserve Bank serving the district in which the institution is located.
- Nonmember insured banks and insured state branches of foreign banks
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Regional Director for the region in which the institution is located.
- Savings institutions insured under the Savings Association Insurance Fund of the FDIC and federally chartered saving banks insured under the Bank Insurance Fund of the FDIC (but not including state-chartered savings banks insured under the Bank Insurance Fund).
Office of Thrift Supervision Regional Director for the region in which the institution is located.
- Federal Credit Unions
Regional office of the National Credit Union Administration serving the area in which the federal credit union is located.
- Air Carriers
Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings
Department of Transportation
400 Seventh Street, SW
Washington, DC 20590.
- Creditors Subject to Interstate Commerce Commission
Office of Proceedings
Interstate Commerce Commission
Washington, DC 20523.
- Creditors Subject to Packers and Stockyards Act
Nearest Packers and Stockyards Administration area supervisor.
- Small Business Investment Companies
U.S. Small Business Administration
1441 L Street, NW.
Washington, DC 20416.
- Brokers and Dealers
Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, DC 20549.
- Federal Land Banks, Federal Land Bank Associations, Federal Intermediate Credit Banks, and Production Credit Associations
Farm Credit Administration
1501 Farm Credit Drive
McLean, Virginia 22102-5090.
- Retailers, Finance Companies, and All Other Creditors Not Listed Above
FTC Regional Office for region in which the creditor operates
or Federal Trade Commission
Equal Credit Opportunity
Washington, DC 20580.
[54 FR 53539, Dec. 29, 1989; 56 FR 51322, Oct. 11, 1991; 57 FR 20399, May 13, 1992; 63
FR 16394, April 3, 1998]
Appendix B to Part 202--Model Application Forms
This appendix contains five model credit application forms, each designated for use in
a particular type of consumer credit transaction as indicated by the bracketed caption
on each form. The first sample form is intended for use in open-end, unsecured
transactions; the second for closed-end, secured transactions; the third for closed-end
transactions, whether unsecured or secured; the fourth in transactions involving
community property or occurring in community property states; and the fifth in
residential mortgage transactions. The appendix also contains a model disclosure for
use in complying with § 202.13 for certain dwelling-related loans. All forms contained
in this appendix are models; their use by creditors is optional.
The use or modification of these forms is governed by the following instructions. A
creditor may change the forms: by asking for additional information not prohibited by §
202.5; by deleting any information request; or by rearranging the format without
modifying the substance of the inquiries. In any of these three instances, however, the
appropriate notices regarding the optional nature of courtesy titles, the option to
disclose alimony, child support, or separate maintenance, and the limitation
concerning marital status inquiries must be included in the appropriate places if the
items to which they relate appear on the creditor's form.
If a creditor uses an appropriate Appendix B model form, or modifies a form in
accordance with the above instructions, that creditor shall be deemed to be acting in
compliance with the provisions of paragraphs (c) and (d) of § 202.5 of this regulation.
Appendix C to Part 202--Sample Notification Forms
This appendix contains nine sample notification forms. Forms C-1 through C-4 are
intended for use in notifying an applicant that adverse action has been taken on an
application or account under § 202.9(a)(1) and (2)(i) of this regulation. Form C-5 is a
notice of disclosure of the right to request specific reasons for adverse action under §
202.9(a)(1) and (2)(ii). For C-6 is designed for use in notifying an applicant, under §
202.9(c)(2), that an application is incomplete. Forms C-7 and C-8 are intended for use
in connection with applications for business credit under § 202.9(a)(3). Form C-9 is
designed for use in notifying an applicant of the right to receive a copy of an appraisal
under § 202.5a.
Form C-1 contains the Fair Credit Reporting Act disclosure as required by sections
615(a) and (b) of that act. Forms C-2 through C-5 contain only the section 615(a)
disclosure (that a creditor obtained information from a consumer reporting agency that
played a part in the credit decision). A creditor must provide the 615(a) disclosure
when adverse action is taken against a consumer based on information from a
consumer reporting agency. A creditor must provide the section 615(b) disclosure
when adverse action is taken based on information from an outside source other than
a consumer reporting agency. In addition, a creditor must provide the 615(b)
disclosure if the creditor obtained information from an affiliate other than information
in a consumer report or other than information concerning the affiliate's own
transactions or experiences with the consumer. Creditors may comply with the
disclosure requirements for adverse action based on information in a consumer report
obtained from an affiliate by providing either the 615(a) or 615(b) disclosure.
The sample forms are illustrative and may not be appropriate for all creditors. They
were designed to include some of the factors that creditors most commonly consider.
If a creditor chooses to use the checklist of reasons provided in one of the sample
forms in this appendix and if reasons commonly used by the creditor are not provided
on the form, the creditor should modify the checklist by substituting or adding other
reasons. For example, if "inadequate down payment" or "no deposit relationship with
us" are common reasons for taking adverse action on an application, the creditor ought
to add or substitute such reasons for those presently contained on the sample forms.
If the reasons listed on the forms are not the factors actually used, a creditor will not
satisfy the notice requirement by simply checking the closest identifiable factor listed.
For example, some creditors consider only references from banks or other depository
institutions and disregard finance company references altogether; their statement of
reasons should disclose "insufficient bank references," not "insufficient credit
references." Similarly, a creditor that considers bank references and other credit
references as distinct factors should treat the two factors separately and disclose them
as appropriate. The creditor should either add such other factors to the form or check
"other" and include the appropriate explanation. The creditor need not, however,
describe how or why a factor adversely affected the application. For example, the
notice may say "length of residence" rather than "too short a period of residence."
A creditor may design its own notification forms or use all or a portion of the forms
contained in this appendix. Proper use of Forms C-1 through C-4 will satisfy the
requirements of § 202.9(a)(2)(i). Proper use of Forms C-5 and C-6 constitutes full
compliance with § § 202.9(a)(2)(ii) and 202.9(c)(2), respectively. Proper use of Forms
C-7 and C-8 will satisfy the requirements of § 202.9(a)(2)(i) and (ii), respectively, for
applications for business credit. Proper use of Form C-9 will satisfy the requirements of
§ 202.5a of this part.
FORM C-6 --
SAMPLE NOTICE OF INCOMPLETE APPLICATION AND REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION
Creditor's name
Address
Telephone number
Date
Dear Applicant:
Thank you for your application for credit. The following information is needed
to make a decision on your application:
__________________________________________________ We need to receive this
information by (date). If we do not receive it by that date, we will
regrettably be unable to give further consideration to your credit request.
Sincerely,
FORM C-7--SAMPLE NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN AND STATEMENT OF REASONS
(BUSINESS CREDIT)
Creditor's name
Creditor's address
Date
Dear Applicant: Thank you for applying to us for credit. We have given your request
careful consideration, and regret that we are unable to extend credit to you at this time
for the following reasons:
(Insert appropriate reason, such as Value or type of collateral not sufficient Lack of
established earnings record Slow or past due in trade or loan payments)
Sincerely,
Notice: The federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from
discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national
origin, sex, marital status, age (provided the applicant has the capacity to enter into a
binding contract); because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public
assistance program; or because the applicant has in good faith exercised any right
under the Consumer Credit Protection Act. The federal agency that administers
compliance with this law concerning this creditor is [name and address as specified by
the appropriate agency listed in appendix A].
FORM C-8--SAMPLE DISCLOSURE OF RIGHT TO REQUEST SPECIFIC REASONS FOR
CREDIT DENIAL GIVEN AT TIME OF APPLICATION (BUSINESS CREDIT)
Creditor's name
Creditor's address
If your application for business credit is denied, you have the right to a written
statement of the specific reasons for the denial. To obtain the statement, please
contact [name, address and telephone number of the person or office from which the
statement of reasons can be obtained] within 60 days from the date you are notified of
our decision. We will send you a written statement of reasons for the denial within 30
days of receiving your request for the statement.
Notice: The federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from
discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national
origin, sex, marital status, age (provided the applicant has the capacity to enter into a
binding contract); because all or part of the applicant's income derives from any public
assistance program; or because the applicant has in good faith exercised any right
under the Consumer Credit Protection Act. The federal agency that administers
compliance with this law concerning this creditor is [name and address as specified by
the appropriate agency listed in appendix A].
Form C-9--Sample Disclosure of Right to Receive a Copy of an Appraisal
You have the right to a copy of the appraisal report used in connection with your
application for credit. If you wish a copy, please write to us at the mailing address we
have provided. We must hear from you no later than 90 days after we notify you about
the action taken on your credit application or you withdraw your application.
[In your letter, give us the following information:]
[54 FR 50486, Dec. 7, 1989; 58 FR 65662, Dec. 16, 1993; 63 FR 16394, April 3, 1998]
Appendix D to Part 202--Issuance of Staff Interpretations
Official Staff Interpretations
Officials in the Board's Division of Consumer and Community Affairs are authorized to
issue official staff interpretations of this regulation. These interpretations provide the
protection afforded under section 706(e) of the act. Except in unusual circumstances,
such interpretations will not be issued separately but will be incorporated in an official
commentary to the regulation, which will be amended periodically.
Requests for Issuance of Official Staff Interpretations
A request for an official staff interpretation should be in writing and addressed to the
Director, Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551. The request should contain a
complete statement of all relevant facts concerning the issue, including copies of all
pertinent documents.
Scope of Interpretations
No staff interpretations will be issued approving creditor's forms or statements. This
restriction does not apply to forms or statements whose use is required or sanctioned
by a government agency.
Supplement I to Part 202--Official Staff Interpretations
[Reg. B; ECO-1]
Following is an official staff interpretation of Regulation B issued under authority
delegated by the Federal Reserve Board to officials in the Division of Consumer and
Community Affairs. References are to sections of the regulation or the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.).
Introduction
1. Official status. Section 706(e) of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act protects a creditor
from civil liability for any act done or omitted in good faith in conformity with an
interpretation issued by a duly authorized official of the Federal Reserve Board. This
commentary is the means by which the Division of Consumer and Community Affairs
of the Federal Reserve Board issues official staff interpretations of Regulation B. Good-faith compliance with this commentary affords a creditor protection under section
706(e) of the act.
2. Issuance of interpretations. Under Appendix D to the regulation, any person may
request an official staff interpretation. Interpretations will be issued at the discretion of
designated officials and incorporated in this commentary following publication for
comment in the Federal Register. Except in unusual circumstances, official staff
interpretations will be issued only by means of this commentary.
3. Status of previous interpretations. Interpretations of Regulation B previously issued
by the Federal Reserve Board and its staff have been incorporated into this
commentary as appropriate. All other previous Board and staff interpretations, official
and unofficial, are superseded by this commentary.
4. Footnotes. Footnotes in the regulation have the same legal effect as the text of the
regulation, whether they are explanatory or illustrative in nature.
5. Comment designations. The comments are designated with as much specificity as
possible according to the particular regulatory provision addressed. Each comment in
the commentary is identified by a number and the regulatory section or paragraph that
it interprets. For example, comments to § 202.2(c) are further divided by
subparagraph, such as comment 2(c)(1)(ii)-1 and comment 2(c)(2)(ii)-1.
Section 202.1--Authority, Scope, and Purpose
1(a) Authority and scope.
1. Scope. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B apply to all credit--commercial as well as personal--without regard to the nature or type of the credit or
the creditor. If a transaction provides for the deferral of the payment of a debt, it is
credit covered by Regulation B even though it may not be a credit transaction covered
by Regulation Z (Truth in Lending). Further, the definition of creditor is not restricted to
the party or person to whom the obligation is initially payable, as is the case under
Regulation Z. Moreover, the act and regulation apply to all methods of credit
evaluation, whether performed judgmentally or by use of a credit scoring system.
2. Foreign applicability. Regulation B generally does not apply to lending activities that
occur outside the United States. The regulation does apply to lending activities that
take place within the United States (as well as the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and
any territory or possession of the United States), whether or not the applicant is a
citizen.
3. Board. The term "Board," as used in this regulation, means the Board of Governors
of the Federal Reserve System.
Section 202.2--Definitions
2(c) Adverse action.
Paragraph 2(c)(1)(i)
1. Application for credit. A refusal to refinance or extend the term of a business or
other loan is adverse action if the applicant applied in accordance with the creditor's
procedures.
Paragraph 2(c)(1)(ii)
1. Move from service area. If a credit card issuer terminates the open-end account of a
customer because the customer has moved out of the card issuer's service area, the
termination is "adverse action" for purposes of the regulation unless termination on this
ground was explicitly provided for in the credit agreement between the parties. In
cases where termination is adverse action, notification is required under § 202.9.
2. Termination based on credit limit. If a creditor terminates credit accounts that have
low credit limits (for example, under $400) but keeps open accounts with higher credit
limits, the termination is adverse action and notification is required under § 202.9.
Paragraph 2(c)(2)(ii)
1. Default--exercise of due-on-sale clause. If a mortgagor sells or transfers mortgaged
property without the consent of the mortgagee, and the mortgagee exercises its
contractual right to accelerate the mortgage loan, the mortgagee may treat the
mortgagor as being in default. An adverse action notice need not be given to the
mortgagor or the transferee. (See comment 2(e)-1 for treatment of a purchaser who
requests to assume the loan.)
2. Current delinquency or default. The term adverse action does not include a
creditor's termination of an account when the accountholder is currently in default or
delinquent on that account. Notification in accordance with § 202.9 of the regulation
generally is required, however, if the creditor's action is based on a past delinquency or
default on the account.
Paragraph (2)(c)(2)(iii)
1. Point-of-sale transactions. Denial of credit at point of sale is not adverse action
except under those circumstances specified in the regulation. For example, denial, at
point of sale is not adverse action in the following situations:
. A credit cardholder presents an expired card or a card that has been reported to the
card issuer as lost or stolen.
. The amount of a transaction exceeds a cash advance or credit limit.
. The circumstances (such as excessive use of a credit card in a short period of time)
suggests that fraud is involved.
. The authorization facilities are not functioning.
. Billing statements have been returned to the creditor for lack of a forwarding address.
2. Application for increase in available credit. A refusal or failure to authorize an
account transaction at the point of sale or loan is not adverse action, except when the
refusal is a denial of an application, submitted in accordance with the creditor's
procedures, for an increase in the amount of credit.
Paragraph 2(c)(2)(v)
1. Terms of credit versus type of credit offered. When an applicant applies for credit
and the creditor does not offer the credit terms requested by the applicant (for
example, the interest rate, length of maturity, collateral, or amount of downpayment), a
denial of the application for that reason is adverse action (unless the creditor makes a
counteroffer that is accepted by the applicant) and the applicant is entitled to
notification under § 202.9.
2(e) Applicant.
1. Request to assume loan. If a mortgagor sells or transfers the mortgaged property
and the buyer makes an application to the creditor to assume the mortgage loan, the
mortgagee must treat the buyer as an applicant unless its policy is not to permit
assumptions.
2(f) Application.
1. General. A creditor has the latitude under the regulation to establish its own
application process and to decide the type and amount of information it will require
from credit applicants.
2. "Procedures established." The term refers to the actual practices followed by a
creditor for making credit decisions as well as its stated application procedures. For
example, if a creditor's stated policy is to require all applications to be in writing on the
creditor's application form, but the creditor also makes credit decisions based on oral
requests, the creditor's established procedures are to accept both oral and written
applications.
3. When an inquiry becomes an application. A creditor is encouraged to provide
consumers with information about loan terms. However, if in giving information to the
consumer the creditor also evaluates information about the applicant, decides to
decline the request, and communicates this to the applicant, the creditor has treated
the inquiry as an application and must then comply with the notification requirements
under § 202.9. Whether the inquiry becomes an application depends on how the
creditor responds to the applicant, not on what the applicant says or asks.
4. Examples of inquiries that are not applications. The following examples illustrate
situations in which only an inquiry has taken place:
. When a consumer calls to ask about loan terms and an employee explains the
creditor's basic loan terms, such as interest rates, loan to value ratio, and debt to
income ratio.
. When a consumer calls to ask about interest rates for car loans, and, in order to
quote the appropriate rate, the loan officer asks for the make and sale price of the car
and amount of the down-payment, then gives the consumer the rate.
. When a consumer asks about terms for a loan to purchase home and tells the loan
officer her income and intended down-payment, but the loan officer only explains the
creditor's loan to value ratio policy and other basic lending policies, without telling the
consumer whether she qualifies for the loan.
. When a consumer calls to ask about terms for a loan to purchase vacant land and
states his income, the sale price of the property to be financed, and asks whether he
qualifies for a loan, and the employee responds by describing the general lending
policies, explaining that he would need to look at all of the applicant's qualifications
before making a decision, and offering to send an application form to the consumer.
5. Completed Application--diligence requirement. The regulation defines a completed
application in terms that give a creditor the latitude to establish its own information
requirements. Nevertheless, the creditor must act with reasonable diligence to collect
information needed to complete the application. For example, the creditor should
request information from third parties, such as a credit report, promptly after receiving
the application. If additional information is needed from the applicant, such as an
address or telephone number needed to verify employment, the creditor should
contact the applicant promptly. (But see comment 9(a)(1)-3, which discusses the
creditors' option to deny an application on the basis of incompleteness.)
2(g) Business credit.
1. Definition. The test for deciding whether a transaction qualifies as business credit is
one of primary purpose. For example, an open-end credit account used for both
personal and business purposes is not business credit unless the primary purpose of
the account is business-related. A creditor may rely on an applicant's statement of the
purpose for the credit requested.
2(j) Credit.
1. General. Regulation B covers a wider range of credit transactions than Regulation Z
(Truth in Lending). For purposes of Regulation B a transaction is credit if there is a
right to defer payment of a debt--regardless of whether the credit is for personal or
commercial purposes, the number of installments required for repayment, or whether
the transaction is subject to a finance charge.
2(l) Creditor.
1. Assignees. The term "creditor" includes all persons participating in the credit
decision. This may include an assignee or a potential purchaser of the obligation who
influences the credit decision by indicating whether or not it will purchase the
obligation if the transaction is consummated.
2. Referrals to creditors. For certain purposes, the term "creditor" includes persons
such as real estate brokers who do not participate in credit decisions but who regularly
refer applicants to creditors or who select or offer to select creditors to whom credit
requests can be made. These persons must comply with § 202.4, the general rule
prohibiting discrimination, and with § 202.5(a), on discouraging applications.
2(p) Empirically derived and other credit scoring systems.
1. Purpose of definition. The definition under § 202.2(p)(1) through (iv) sets the
criteria that a credit system must meet in order for the system to use age as a
predictive factor. Credit systems that do not meet these criteria are judgmental
systems and may consider age only for the purpose of determining a "pertinent
element of creditworthiness." (Both types of systems may favor an elderly applicant.
See § 202.6(b)(2).)
2. Periodic revalidation. The regulation does not specify how often credit scoring
systems must be revalidated. To meet the requirements for statistical soundness, the
credit scoring system must be revalidated frequently enough to assure that it continues
to meet recognized professional statistical standards. To ensure that predictive ability
is being maintained, creditors must periodically review the performance of the system.
This could be done, for example, by analyzing the loan portfolio to determine the
delinquency rate for each score interval, or by analyzing population stability over time
to detect deviations of recent applications from the applicant population used to
validate the system. If this analysis indicates that the system no longer predicts risk
with statistical soundness, the system must be adjusted as necessary to reestablish its
predictive ability. A creditor is responsible for ensuring its system is validated and
revalidated based on the creditor's own data when it becomes available.
3. Pooled data scoring systems. A scoring system or the data from which to develop
such a system may be obtained from either a single credit grantor or multiple credit
grantors. The resulting system will qualify as an empirically derived, demonstrably and
statistically sound, credit scoring system provided the criteria set forth in paragraph
(p)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section are met.
4. Effects test and disparate treatment. An empirically derived, demonstrably and
statistically sound, credit scoring system may include age as a predictive factor
(provided that the age of an elderly applicant is not assigned a negative factor or value).
Besides age, no other prohibited basis may be used as a variable. Generally, credit
scoring systems treat all applicants objectively and thus avoid problems of disparate
treatment. In cases where a credit scoring system is used in conjunction with
individual discretion, disparate treatment could conceivably occur in the evaluation
process. In addition, neutral factors used in credit scoring systems could nonetheless
be subject to challenge under the effects test. (See comment 6(a)-2 for a discussion of
the effects test).
2(w) Open-end credit.
1. Open-end real estate mortgages. The term "open-end credit" does not include
negotiated advances under an open-end real estate mortgage or a letter of credit.
2(z) Prohibited basis.
1. Persons associated with applicant. "Prohibited basis" as used in this regulation
refers not only to certain characteristics--the race, color, religion, national origin, sex,
marital status, or age--of an applicant (or officers of an applicant in the case of a
corporation) but also to the characteristics of individuals with whom an applicant is
affiliated or with whom the applicant associates. This means, for example, that under
the general rule stated in § 202.4, a creditor may not discriminate against an applicant
because of that person's personal or business dealings with members of a certain
religion, because of the national origin of any persons associated with the extension of
credit (such as the tenants in the apartment complex being financed), or because of
the race of other residents in the neighborhood where the property offered as collateral
is located.
2. National origin. A creditor may not refuse to grant credit because an applicant
comes from a particular country but may take the applicant's immigration status into
account. A creditor may also take into account any applicable law, regulation, or
executive order restricting dealings with citizens (or the government) of a particular
country or imposing limitations regarding credit extended for their use.
3. Public assistance program. Any federal, state, or local governmental assistance
program that provides a continuing, periodic income supplement, whether premised
on entitlement or need, is "public assistance" for purposes of the regulation. The term
includes (but is not limited to) Aid to Families with Dependent Children, food stamps,
rent and mortgage supplement or assistance programs, Social Security and
Supplemental Security Income, and unemployment compensation. Only physicians,
hospitals, and others to whom the benefits are payable need consider Medicare and
Medicaid as public assistance.
Section 202.3--Limited Exceptions for Certain Classes of Transactions
1. Scope. This section relieves burdens with regard to certain types of credit for which
full application of the procedural requirements of the regulation is not needed. All
classes of transactions remain subject to the general rule given in § 202.4, barring
discrimination on a prohibited basis, and to any other provision not specifically
excepted.
3(a) Public utilities credit.
1. Definition. This definition applies only to credit for the purchase of a utility service,
such as electricity, gas, or telephone service. Credit provided or offered by a public
utility for some other purpose--such as for financing the purchase of a gas dryer,
telephone equipment, or other durable goods, or for insulation or other home
improvements--is not excepted.
2. Security deposits. A utility company is a creditor when it supplies utility service and
bills the user after the service has been provided. Thus, any credit term (such as a
requirement for a security deposit) is subject to the regulation.
3. Telephone companies. A telephone company's credit transactions qualify for the
exceptions provided in § 202.3(a)(2) only if the company is regulated by a government
unit or files the charges for service, delayed payment, or any discount for prompt
payment with a government unit.
3(c) Incidental credit.
1. Examples. If a service provider (such as a hospital, doctor, lawyer or retailer) allows
the client or customer to defer the payment of a bill, this deferral of debt is credit for
purposes of the regulation, even though there is no finance charge and no agreement
for payment in installments. Because of the exceptions provided by this section,
however, these particular credit extensions are excepted from compliance with certain
procedural requirements as specified in the regulation.
3(d) Government credit.
1. Credit to governments. The exception relates to credit extended to (not by)
governmental entities. For example, credit extended to a local government by a
creditor in the private sector is covered by this exception, but credit extended to
consumers by a federal or state housing agency does not qualify for special treatment
under this category.
Section 202.4--General Rule Prohibiting Discrimination
1. Scope of section. The general rule stated in § 202.4 covers all dealings, without
exception, between an applicant and a creditor, whether or not addressed by other
provisions of the regulation. Other sections of the regulation identify specific practices
that the Board has decided are impermissible because they could result in credit
discrimination on a basis prohibited by the act. The general rule covers, for example,
application procedures, criteria used to evaluate creditworthiness, administration of
accounts, and treatment of delinquent or slow accounts. Thus, whether or not
specifically prohibited elsewhere in the regulation, a credit practice that treats
applicants differently on a prohibited basis violates the law because it violates the
general rule. Disparate treatment on a prohibited basis is illegal whether or not it
results from a conscious intent to discriminate. Disparate treatment would be found,
for example, where a creditor requires a minority applicant to provide greater
documentation to obtain a loan than a similarly situated nonminority applicant.
Disparate treatment also would be found where a creditor waives or relaxes credit
standards for a nonminority applicant but not for a similarly situated minority applicant.
Treating applicants differently on a prohibited basis is unlawful if the creditor lacks a
legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for its action, or if the asserted reason is found to
be a pretext for discrimination.
Section 202.5--Rules Concerning Taking of Applications
5(a) Discouraging applications.
1. Potential applicants. Generally, the regulation's protections apply only to persons
who have requested or received an extension of credit. In keeping with the purpose of
the act--to promote the availability of credit on a nondiscriminatory basis § 202.5(a)
covers acts or practices directed at potential applicants. Practices prohibited by this
section include:
. A statement that the applicant should not bother to apply, after the applicant states
that he is retired.
. Use of words, symbols, models or other forms of communication in advertising that
express, imply or suggest a discriminatory preference or a policy of exclusion in
violation of the act.
. Use of interview scripts that discourage applications on a prohibited basis.
2. Affirmative advertising. A creditor may affirmatively solicit or encourage members
of traditionally disadvantaged groups to apply for credit, especially groups that might
not normally seek credit from that creditor.
5(b) General rules concerning requests for information.
1. Requests for information. This section governs the types of information that a
creditor may gather. Section 202.6 governs how information may be used.
Paragraph 5(b)(2)
1. Local laws. Information that a creditor is allowed to collect pursuant to a "state"
statute or regulation includes information required by a local statute, regulation, or
ordinance.
2. Information required by Regulation C. Regulation C generally requires creditors
covered by the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) to collect and report
information about the race or national origin and sex of applicants for home
improvement loans and home purchase loans, including some types of loans not
covered by § 202.13. Certain creditors with assets under $30 million, though covered
by HMDA, are not required to collect and report these data; but they may do so at their
option under HMDA, without violating the ECOA or Regulation B.
3. Collecting information on behalf of creditors. Loan brokers, correspondents, or
other persons do not violate the ECOA or Regulation B if they collect information that
they are otherwise prohibited from collecting, where the purpose of collecting the
information is to provide it to a creditor that is subject to the Home Mortgage Disclosure
Act or another federal or state statute or regulation requiring data collection.
5(d) Other limitations on information requests.
Paragraph 5(d)(1)
1. Indirect disclosure of prohibited information. The fact that certain credit-related
information may indirectly disclose marital status does not bar a creditor from seeking
such information. For example, the creditor may ask about:
. The applicant's obligation to pay alimony, child support, or separate maintenance.
. The source of income to be used as the basis for repaying the credit requested,
which could disclose that it is the income of a spouse.
. Whether any obligation disclosed by the applicant has a co-obligor, which could
disclose that the co-obligor is a spouse or former spouse.
. The ownership of assets, which could disclose the interest of a spouse.
Paragraph 5(d)(2)
1. Disclosure about income. The sample application forms in Appendix B to the
regulation illustrate how a creditor may inform an applicant of the right not to disclose
alimony, child support, or separate maintenance income.
2. General inquiry about source of income. Since a general inquiry about the source of
income may lead an applicant to disclose alimony, child support, or separate
maintenance, a creditor may not make such an inquiry on an application form without
prefacing the request with the disclosure required by this paragraph.
3. Specific inquiry about sources of income. A creditor need not give the disclosure if
the inquiry about income is specific and worded in a way that is unlikely to lead the
applicant to disclose the fact that income is derived from alimony, child support or
separate maintenance payments. For example, an application form that asks about
specific types of income such as salary, wages, or investment income need not include
the disclosure.
5(e) Written applications.
1. Requirement for written applications. The requirement of written applications for
certain types of dwelling-related loans is intended to assist the federal supervisory
agencies in monitoring compliance with the ECOA and the Fair Housing Act. Model
application forms are provided in Appendix B to the regulation, although use of a
printed form of any kind is not required. A creditor will satisfy the requirement by
writing down the information that it normally considers in making a credit decision.
The creditor may complete the application on behalf of an applicant and need not
require the applicant to sign the application.
2. Telephone applications. A creditor that accepts applications by telephone for
dwelling-related credit covered by § 202.13 can meet the requirements for written
applications by writing down pertinent information that is provided by the applicant(s).
3. Computerized entry. Information entered directly into and retained by a
computerized system qualifies as a written application under this paragraph. (See the
commentary to section 202.13(b), Applications through electronic media and
Applications through video.)
Section 202.5a--Rules on Providing Appraisal Reports
5a(a) Providing appraisals.
1. Coverage. This section covers applications for credit to be secured by a lien on a
dwelling, as that term is defined in § 202.5a(c), whether the credit is for a business
purpose (for example, a loan to start a business) or a consumer purpose (for example,
a loan to finance a child's education).
2. Renewals. If an applicant requests that a creditor renew an existing extension of
credit, and the creditor obtains a new appraisal report to evaluate the request, this
section applies. This section does not apply to a renewal request if the creditor uses
the appraisal report previously obtained in connection with the decision to grant credit.
5a(a)(2)(i) Notice.
1. Multiple applicants. When an application that is subject to this section involves
more than one applicant, the notice about the appraisal report need only be given to
one applicant, but it must be given to the primary applicant where one is readily
apparent.
5a(a)(2)(ii) Delivery.
1. Reimbursement. Creditors may charge for photocopy and postage costs incurred in
providing a copy of the appraisal report, unless prohibited by state or other law. If the
consumer has already paid for the report--for example, as part of an application fee--the creditor may not require additional fees for the appraisal (other than photocopy
and postage costs).
5a(c) Definitions.
1. Appraisal reports. Examples of appraisal reports are:
i. A report prepared by an appraiser (whether or not licensed or certified), including
written comments and other documents submitted to the creditor in support of the
appraiser's estimate or opinion of value.
ii. A document prepared by the creditor's staff which assigns value to the property, if a
third-party appraisal report has not been used.
iii. An internal review document reflecting that the creditor's valuation is different from
a valuation in a third party's appraisal report (or different from valuations that are
publicly available or valuations such as manufacturers' invoices for mobile homes).
2. Other reports. The term "appraisal report" does not cover all documents relating to
the value of the applicant's property. Examples of reports not covered are:
i. Internal documents, if a third-party appraisal report was used to establish the value
of the property.
ii. Governmental agency statements of appraised value.
iii. Valuations lists that are publicly available (such as published sales prices or
mortgage amounts, tax assessments, and retail price ranges) and valuations such as
manufacturers' invoices for mobile homes.
Section 202.6--Rules Concerning Evaluation of Applications
6(a) General rule concerning use of information.
1. General. When evaluating an application for credit, a creditor generally may
consider any information obtained. However, a creditor may not consider in its
evaluation of creditworthiness any information that it is barred by § 202.5 from
obtaining.
2. Effects test. The effects test is a judicial doctrine that was developed in a series of
employment cases decided by the Supreme Court under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq.), and the burdens of proof for such employment cases
were codified by Congress in the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-2).
Congressional intent that this doctrine apply to the credit area is documented in the
Senate Report that accompanied H.R. 6516, No. 94-589, pp. 4-5; and in the House
Report that accompanied H.R. 6516, No. 94-210, p. 5. The act and regulation may
prohibit a creditor practice that is discriminatory in effect because it has a
disproportionately negative impact on a prohibited basis, even though the creditor has
no intent to discriminate and the practice appears neutral on its face, unless the
creditor practice meets a legitimate business need that cannot reasonably be achieved
as well by means that are less disparate in their impact. For example, requiring that
applicants have incomes in excess of a certain amount to qualify for an overdraft line of
credit could mean that women and minority applicants will be rejected at a higher rate
than men and non-minority applicants. If there is a demonstrable relationship between
the income requirement and creditworthiness for the level of credit involved, however,
use of the income standard would likely be permissible.
6(b) Specific rules concerning use of information.
Paragraph 6(b)(1)
1. Prohibited basis--marital status. A creditor may not use marital status as a basis for
determining the applicant's creditworthiness. However, a creditor may consider an
applicant's marital status for the purpose of ascertaining the creditor's rights and
remedies applicable to the particular extension of credit. For example, in a secured
transaction involving real property, a creditor could take into account whether state law
gives the applicant's spouse an interest in the property being offered as collateral.
Except to the extent necessary to determine rights and remedies for a specific credit
transaction, a creditor that offers joint credit may not take the applicants' marital status
into account in credit evaluations. Because it is unlawful for creditors to take marital
status into account, creditors are barred from applying different standards in evaluating
married and unmarried applicants. In making credit decisions, creditors may not treat
joint applicants differently based on the existence, the absence, or the likelihood of a
marital relationship between the parties.
2. Prohibited basis--special purpose credit. In a special purpose credit program, a
creditor may consider a prohibited basis to determine whether the applicant possesses
a characteristic needed for eligibility. (See § 202.8.)
Paragraph 6(b)(2)
1. Favoring the elderly. Any system of evaluating creditworthiness may favor a credit
applicant who is age 62 or older. A credit program that offers more favorable credit
terms to applicants age 62 or older is also permissible; a program that offers more
favorable credit terms to applicants at an age lower than 62 is permissible only if it
meets the special-purpose credit requirements of § 202.8.
2. Consideration of age in a credit scoring system. Age may be taken directly into
account in a credit scoring system that is "demonstrably and statistically sound," as
defined in section 202.2(p), with one limitation: applicants 62 years or older must be
treated at least as favorably as applicants who are under 62. If age is scored by
assigning points to an applicant's age category, elderly applicants must receive the
same or a greater number of points as the most favored class of nonelderly applicants.
i. Age-split scorecards. A creditor may segment the population into scorecards based
on the age of an applicant. In such a system, one card covers a narrow age range (for
example, applicants in their twenties or younger) who are evaluated under attributes
predictive for that age group. A second card covers all other applicants who are
evaluated under the attributes predictive for that broad class. When a system uses a
card covering a wide age range that encompasses elderly applicants, the credit scoring
system does not score age. Thus, the system does not raise the issue of assigning a
negative factor or value to the age of elderly applicants. But if a system segments the
population by age into multiple scorecards, and includes elderly applicants in a
narrower age range, the credit scoring system does score age. To comply with the act
and regulation in such a case, the creditor must ensure that the system does not assign
a negative factor or value to the age of elderly applicants as a class.
3. Consideration of age in a judgmental system. In a judgmental system, defined in §
202.2(t), a creditor may not take age directly into account in any aspect of the credit
transaction. For example, the creditor may not reject an application or terminate an
account because the applicant is 60 years old. But a creditor that uses a judgmental
system may relate the applicant's age to other information about the applicant that the
creditor considers in evaluating creditworthiness. For example:
. A creditor may consider the applicant's occupation and length of time to retirement
to ascertain whether the applicant's income (including retirement income) will support
the extension of credit to its maturity.
. A creditor may consider the adequacy of any security offered when the term of the
credit extension exceeds the life expectancy of the applicant and the cost of realizing
on the collateral could exceed the applicant's equity. (An elderly applicant might not
qualify for a 5 percent down, 30-year mortgage loan but might qualify with a larger
downpayment or a shorter loan maturity.)
. A creditor may consider the applicant's age to assess the significance of the length of
the applicant's employment (a young applicant may have just entered the job market)
or length of time at an address (an elderly applicant may recently have retired and
moved from a long-term residence).
As the examples above illustrate, the evaluation must be made in an individualized,
case-by-case manner; and it is impermissible for a creditor, in deciding whether to
extend credit or in setting the terms and conditions, to base its decision on age or
information related exclusively to age. Age or age-related information may be
considered only in evaluating other "pertinent elements of creditworthiness" that are
drawn from the particular facts and circumstances concerning the applicant.
4. Consideration of age in a reverse mortgage. A reverse mortgage is a home- secured
loan in which the borrower receives payments from the creditor, and does not become
obligated to repay these amounts (other than in the case of default) until the borrower
dies, moves permanently from the home or transfers title to the home, or upon a
specified maturity date. Disbursements to the borrower under a reverse mortgage
typically are determined by considering the value of the borrower's home, the current
interest rate, and the borrower's life expectancy. A reverse mortgage program that
requires borrowers to be age 62 or older is permissible under section 202.6(b)(2)(iv).
In addition, under section 202.6(b)(2)(iii), a creditor may consider a borrower's age to
evaluate a pertinent element of creditworthiness, such as the amount of the credit or
monthly payments that the borrower will receive, or the estimated repayment date.
5. Consideration of age in a combined system. A creditor using a credit scoring system
that qualifies as "empirically derived" under § 202.2(p) may consider other factors (such
as credit report or the applicant's cash flow) on a judgmental basis. Doing so will not
negate the classification of the credit scoring component of the combined system as
"demonstrably and statistically sound." While age could be used in the credit scoring
portion, however, in the judgmental portion age may not be considered directly. It may
be used only for the purpose of determining a "pertinent element of creditworthiness."
(See comment 6(b)(2)-3.)
6. Consideration of public assistance. When considering income derived from a public
assistance program, a creditor may take into account, for example:
. The length of time an applicant will likely remain eligible to receive such income.
. Whether the applicant will continue to qualify for benefits based on the status of the
applicant's dependents (such as Aid to Families with Dependent Children or Social
Security payments to a minor).
. Whether the creditor can attach or garnish the income to assure payment of the debt
in the event of default.
Paragraph 6(b)(5)
1. Consideration of an individual applicant. A creditor must evaluate income derived
from part-time employment, alimony, child support, separate maintenance, retirement
benefits, or public assistance (all referred to as "protected income") on an individual
basis, not on the basis of aggregate statistics, and must assess its reliability or
unreliability by analyzing the applicant's actual circumstances, not by analyzing
statistical measures derived from a group.
2. Payments consistently made. In determining the likelihood of consistent payments
of alimony, child support, or separate maintenance, a creditor may consider factors
such as whether payments are received pursuant to a written agreement or court
decree; the length of time that the payments have been received; whether the
payments are regularly received by the applicant; the availability of court or other
procedures to compel payment; and the creditworthiness of the payor, including the
credit history of the payor when it is available to the creditor.
3. Consideration of income. A creditor need not consider income at all in evaluating
creditworthiness. If a creditor does consider income, there are several acceptable
methods, whether in a credit scoring or a judgmental system:
. A creditor may score or take into account the total sum of all income stated by the
applicant without taking steps to evaluate the income.
. A creditor may evaluate each component of the applicant's income, and then score
or take into account reliable income separately from income that is not reliable, or the
creditor may disregard that portion of income that is not reliable before aggregating it
with reliable income.
. A creditor that does not evaluate all income components for reliability must treat as
reliable any component of protected income that is not evaluated.
In considering the separate components of an applicant's income, the creditor may not
automatically discount or exclude from consideration any protected income. Any
discounting or exclusion must be based on the applicant's actual circumstances.
4. Part-time employment, sources of income. A creditor may score or take into
account the fact that an individual applicant has more than one source of earned
income--a full-time and a part-time job or two part-time jobs. A creditor may also score
or treat earned income from a secondary source differently than earned income from a
primary source. However, the creditor may not score or otherwise take into account
the number of sources for protected income--for example, retirement income, social
security, alimony. Nor may the creditor treat negatively the fact that an applicant's only
earned income is derived from a part-time job.
Paragraph 6(b)(6)
1. Types of credit references. A creditor may restrict the types of credit history and
credit references that it will consider, provided that the restrictions are applied to all
credit applicants without regard to sex, marital status, or any other prohibited basis.
However, on the applicant's request, a creditor must consider credit information not
reported through a credit bureau when the information relates to the same types of
credit references and history that the creditor would consider if reported through a
credit bureau.
Paragraph 6(b)(7)
1. National origin--immigration status. The applicant's immigration status and ties to
the community (such as employment and continued residence in the area) could have
a bearing on a creditor's ability to obtain repayment. Accordingly, the creditor may
consider and differentiate, for example, between a noncitizen who is a long-time
resident with permanent resident status and a noncitizen who is temporarily in this
country on a student visa.
2. National origin--citizenship. Under the regulation a denial of credit on the ground
that an applicant is not a United States citizen is not per se discrimination based on
national origin.
Section 202.7--Rules Concerning Extensions of Credit
7(a) Individual accounts.
1. Open-end credit--authorized user. A creditor may not require a creditworthy
applicant seeking an individual credit account to provide additional signatures.
However, the creditor may condition the designation of an authorized user by the
account holder on the authorized user's becoming contractually liable for the account,
as long as the creditor does not differentiate on any prohibited basis in imposing this
requirement.
2. Open-end credit--choice of authorized user. A creditor that permits an account
holder to designate an authorized user may not restrict this designation on a prohibited
basis. For example, if the creditor allows the designation of spouses as authorized
users, the creditor may not refuse to accept a non-spouse as an authorized user.
3. Overdraft authority on transaction accounts. If a transaction account (such as a
checking account or NOW account) includes an overdraft line of credit, the creditor
may require that all persons authorized to draw on the transaction account assume
liability for any overdraft.
7(b) Designation of name.
1. Single name on account. A creditor may require that joint applicants on an account
designate a single name for purposes of administering the account and that a single
name be embossed on any credit card(s) issued on the account. But the creditor may
not require that the name be the husband's name. (See § 202.10 for rule governing the
furnishing of credit history on accounts held by spouses.)
7(c) Action concerning existing open-end accounts.
Paragraph 7(c)(1)
1. Termination coincidental with marital status change. When an account holder's
marital status changes, a creditor generally may not terminate the account unless it has
evidence that the account holder is unable or unwilling to repay. But the creditor may
terminate an account on which both spouses are jointly liable, even if the action
coincides with a change in marital status, when one or both spouses:
. Repudiate responsibility for future charges on the joint account.
. Request separate accounts in their own names.
. Request that the joint account be closed.
2. Updating information. A creditor may periodically request updated information from
applicants but may not use events related to a prohibited basis--such as an applicant's
retirement, reaching a particular age, or change in name or marital status--to trigger
such a request.
Paragraph 7(c)(2)
1. Procedure pending reapplication. A creditor may require a reapplication from a
contractually liable party, even when there is no evidence of unwillingness or inability
to repay, if (1) the credit was based on the qualifications of a person who is no longer
available to support the credit and (2) the creditor has information indicating that the
account holder's income by itself may be insufficient to support the credit. While a
reapplication is pending, the creditor must allow the account holder full access to the
account under the existing contract terms. The creditor may specify a reasonable time
period within which the account holder must submit the required information.
7(d) Signature of spouse or other person.
1. Qualified applicant. The signature rules assure that qualified applicants are able to
obtain credit in their own names. Thus, when an applicant requests individual credit, a
creditor generally may not require the signature of another person unless the creditor
has first determined that the applicant alone does not qualify for the credit requested.
2. Unqualified applicant. When an applicant applies for individual credit but does not
alone meet a creditor's standards, the creditor may require a cosigner, guarantor or the
like--but cannot require that it be the spouse. (See commentary to § 202.7(d)(5) and
(6).)
Paragraph 7(d)(1)
1. Joint applicant. The term "joint applicant" refers to someone who applies
contemporaneously with the applicant for shared or joint credit. It does not refer to
someone whose signature is required by the creditor as a condition for granting the
credit requested.
Paragraph 7(d)(2)
1. Jointly owned property. If an applicant requests unsecured credit, does not own
sufficient separate property, and relies on joint property to establish creditworthiness,
the creditor must value the applicant's interest in the jointly owned property. A creditor
may not request that a nonapplicant joint owner sign any instrument as a condition of
the credit extension unless the applicant's interest does not support the amount and
terms of the credit sought.
i. Valuation of applicant's interest. In determining the value of an applicant's interest in
jointly owned property, a creditor may consider factors such as the form of ownership
and the property's susceptibility to attachment, execution, severance, or partition; the
value of the applicant's interest after such action; and the cost associated with the
action. This determination must be based on the form of ownership prior to or at
consummation, and not on the possibility of a subsequent change. For example, in
determining whether a married applicant's interest in jointly owned property is
sufficient to satisfy the creditor's standards of creditworthiness for individual credit, a
creditor may not consider that the applicant's separate property may be transferred into
tenancy by the entirety after consummation. Similarly, a creditor may not consider the
possibility that the couple may divorce. Accordingly, a creditor may not require the
signature of the nonapplicant spouse in these or similar circumstances.
ii. Other options to support credit. If the applicant's interest in jointly owned property
does not support the amount and terms of credit sought, the creditor may offer the
applicant other options to provide additional support for the extension of credit. For
example--
A. Requesting an additional party (see § 202.7(d)(5));
B. Offering to grant the applicant's request on a secured basis (see § 202.7(d)(4)); or
C. Asking for the signature of the joint owner on an instrument that ensures access to
the property in the event of the applicant's death or default, but does not impose
personal liability unless necessary under state law (e.g., a limited guarantee). A
creditor may not routinely require, however, that a joint owner sign an instrument
(such as a quitclaim deed) that would result in the forfeiture of the joint owner's
interest in the property.
2. Need for signature--reasonable belief. A creditor's reasonable belief as to what
instruments need to be signed by a person other than the applicant should be
supported by a thorough review of pertinent statutory and decisional law or an opinion
of the state attorney general.
Paragraph 7(d)(3)
1. Residency. In assessing the creditworthiness of a person who applies for credit in a
community property state, a creditor may assume that the applicant is a resident of the
state unless the applicant indicates otherwise.
Paragraph 7(d)(4)
1. Creation of enforceable lien. Some state laws require that both spouses join in
executing any instrument by which real property is encumbered. If an applicant offers
such property as security for credit, a creditor may require the applicant's spouse to
sign the instruments necessary to create a valid security interest in the property. The
creditor may not require the spouse to sign the note evidencing the credit obligation if
signing only the mortgage or other security agreement is sufficient to make the
property available to satisfy the debt in the event of default. However, if under state
law both spouses must sign the note to create an enforceable lien, the creditor may
require them to do so.
2. Need for signature--reasonable belief. Generally, a signature to make the secured
property available will only be needed on a security agreement. A creditor's
reasonable belief that, to assure access to the property, the spouse's signature is
needed on an instrument that imposes personal liability should be supported by a
thorough review of pertinent statutory and decisional law or an opinion of the state
attorney general.
3. Integrated instruments. When a creditor uses an integrated instrument that
combines the note and the security agreement, the spouse cannot be required to sign
the integrated instrument if the signature is only needed to grant a security interest. But
the spouse could be asked to sign an integrated instrument that makes clear--for
example, by a legend placed next to the spouse's signature--that the spouse's signature
is only to grant a security interest and that signing the instrument does not impose
personal liability.
Paragraph 7(d)(5)
Qualifications of additional parties. In establishing guidelines for eligibility of
guarantors, cosigners, or similar additional parties, a creditor may restrict the
applicant's choice of additional parties but may not discriminate on the basis of sex,
marital status or any other prohibited basis. For example, the creditor could require
that the additional party live in the creditor's market area.
2. Reliance on income of another person--individual credit. An applicant who requests
individual credit relying on the income of another person (including a spouse in a
noncommunity property state) may be required to provide the signature of the other
person to make the income available to pay the debt. In community property states,
the signature of a spouse may be required if the applicant relies on the spouse's
separate income. If the applicant relies on the spouse's future earnings that as a matter
of state law cannot be characterized as community property until earned, the creditor
may require the spouse's signature, but need not do so--even if it is the creditor's
practice to require the signature when an applicant relies on the future earnings of a
person other than a spouse. (See § 202.6(c) on consideration of state property laws.)
3. Renewals. If the borrower's creditworthiness is reevaluated when a credit
obligation is renewed, the creditor must determine whether an additional party is still
warranted and, if not, release the additional party.
Paragraph 7(d)(6)
1. Guarantees. A guarantee on an extension of credit is part of a credit transaction and
therefore subject to the regulation. A creditor may require the personal guarantee of
the partners, directors, or officers of a business, and the shareholders of a closely held
corporation, even if the business or corporation is creditworthy. The requirement must
be based on the guarantor's relationship with the business or corporation, however,
and not on a prohibited basis. For example, a creditor may not require guarantees only
for women-owned or minority-owned businesses. Similarly, a creditor may not require
guarantees only from the married officers of a business or married shareholders of a
closely held corporation.
2. Spousal guarantees. The rules in § 202.7(d) bar a creditor from requiring a signature
of a guarantor's spouse just as they bar the creditor from requiring the signature of an
applicant's spouse. For example, although a creditor may require all officers of a
closely held corporation to personally guarantee a corporate loan, the creditor may not
automatically require that spouses of married officers also sign the guarantee. If an
evaluation of the financial circumstances of an officer indicates that an additional
signature is necessary, however, the creditor may require the signature of a spouse in
appropriate circumstances in accordance with § 202.7(d)(2).
7(e) Insurance.
1. Differences in terms. Differences in the availability, rates, and other terms on which
credit-related casualty insurance or credit life, health, accident, or disability insurance
is offered or provided to an applicant does not violate Regulation B.
2. Insurance information. A creditor may obtain information about an applicant's age,
sex, or marital status for insurance purposes. The information may only be used,
however, for determining eligibility and premium rates for insurance, and not in
making the credit decision.
Section 202.8--Special Purpose Credit Programs
8(a) Standards for programs.
1. Determining qualified programs. The Board does not determine whether individual
programs qualify for special purpose credit status, or whether a particular program
benefits an "economically disadvantaged class of persons." The agency or creditor
administering or offering the loan program must make these decisions regarding the
status of its program.
2. Compliance with a program authorized by federal or state law. A creditor does not
violate Regulation B when it complies in good faith with a regulation promulgated by a
government agency implementing a special purpose credit program under §
202.8(a)(1). It is the agency's responsibility to promulgate a regulation that is consistent
with federal and state law.
3. Expressly authorized. Credit programs authorized by federal or state law include
programs offered pursuant to federal, state or local statute, regulation or ordinance, or
by judicial or administrative order.
4. Creditor liability. A refusal to grant credit to an applicant is not a violation of the act
or regulation if the applicant does not meet the eligibility requirements under a special
purpose credit program.
5. Determining need. In designing a special-purpose program under § 202.8(a), a for-profit organization must determine that the program will benefit a class of people who
would otherwise be denied credit or would receive it on less favorable terms. This
determination can be based on a broad analysis using the organization's own research
or data from outside sources including governmental reports and studies. For
example, a bank could review Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data along with
demographic data for its assessment area and conclude that there is a need for a
special-purpose credit program for low-income minority borrowers.
6. Elements of the program. The written plan must contain information that supports
the need for the particular program. The plan also must either state a specific period of
time for which the program will last, or contain a statement regarding when the
program will be reevaluated to determine if there is a continuing need for it.
8(b) Rules in other sections.
1. Applicability of rules. A creditor that rejects an application because the applicant
does not meet the eligibility requirements (common characteristic or financial need,
for example) must nevertheless notify the applicant of action taken as required by §
202.9.
8(c) Special rule concerning requests and use of information.
1. Request of prohibited information. This section permits a creditor to request and
consider certain information that would otherwise be prohibited by §§ 202.5 and 202.6
to determine an applicant's eligibility for a particular program.
2. Examples. Examples of programs under which the creditor can ask for and
consider information related to prohibited basis are:
. Energy conservation programs to assist the elderly, for which the creditor must
consider the applicant's age.
. Programs under a Minority Enterprise Small Business Investment Corporation, for
which a creditor must consider the applicant's minority status.
8(d) Special rule in the case of financial need.
1. Request of prohibited information. This section permits a creditor to request and
consider certain information that would otherwise be prohibited by §§ 202.5 and 202.6,
and to require signatures that would otherwise be prohibited by § 202.7(d).
2. Examples. Examples of programs in which financial need is a criterion are:
. Subsidized housing programs for low- to moderate-income households, for which a
creditor may have to consider the applicant's receipt of alimony or child support, the
spouse's or parents' income, etc.
. Student loan programs based on the family's financial need, for which a creditor may
have to consider the spouse's or parents' financial resources.
3. Student loans. In a guaranteed student loan program, a creditor may obtain the
signature of a parent as a guarantor when required by federal or state law or agency
regulation, or when the student does not meet the creditor's standards of
creditworthiness. (See § 202.7(d)(1) and (5).) The creditor may not require an
additional signature when a student has a work or credit history that satisfies the
creditor's standards.
Section 202.9--Notifications
1. Use of the term adverse action. The regulation does not require that a creditor use
the term adverse in communicating to an applicant that a request for an extension of
credit has not been approved. In notifying an applicant of adverse action as defined by
§ 202.2(c)(1), a creditor may use any words or phrases that describe the action taken
on the application.
2. Expressly withdrawn applications. When an applicant expressly withdraws a credit
application, the creditor is not required to comply with the notification requirements
under § 202.9. (The creditor must, however, comply with the record retention
requirements of the regulation. See § 202.12(b)(3).)
3. When notification occurs. Notification occurs when a creditor delivers or mails a
notice to the applicant's last known address or, in the case of an oral notification, when
the creditor communicates the credit decision to the applicant.
4. Location of notice. The notifications required under § 202.9 may appear on either or
both sides of a form or letter.
5. Prequalification and preapproval programs. Whether a creditor must provide a
notice of action taken for a prequalification or preapproval request depends on the
creditor's response to the request, as discussed in the commentary to section 202.2(f).
For instance, a creditor may treat the request as an inquiry if the creditor provides
general information such as loan terms and the maximum amount a consumer could
borrow under various loan programs, explaining the process the consumer must follow
to submit a mortgage application and the information the creditor will analyze in
reaching a credit decision. On the other hand, a creditor has treated a request as an
application, and is subject to the adverse action notice requirements of § 202.9 if, after
evaluating information, the creditor decides that it will not approve the request and
communicates that decision to the consumer. For example, if in reviewing a request
for prequalification, a creditor tells the consumer that it would not approve an
application for a mortgage because of a bankruptcy in the consumer's record, the
creditor has denied an application for credit.
9(a) Notification of action taken, ECOA notice, and statement of specific reasons.
Paragraph 9(a)(1)
1. Timing of notice--when an application is complete. Once a creditor has obtained all
the information it normally considers in making a credit decision, the application is
complete and the creditor has 30 days in which to notify the applicant of the credit
decision. (See also comment 2(f)-5.)
2. Notification of approval. Notification of approval may be express or by implication.
For example, the creditor will satisfy the notification requirement when it gives the
applicant the credit card, money, property, or services requested.
3. Incomplete application--denial for incompleteness. When an application is
incomplete regarding matters that the applicant can complete and the creditor lacks
sufficient data for a credit decision, the creditor may deny the application giving as the
reason for denial that the application is incomplete. The creditor has the option,
alternatively, of providing a notice of incompleteness under § 202.9(c).
4. Incomplete application--denial for reasons other than incompleteness. When an
application is missing information but provides sufficient data for a credit decision, the
creditor may evaluate the application and notify the applicant under this section as
appropriate. If credit is denied, the applicant must be given the specific reasons for the
credit denial (or notice of the right to receive the reasons); in this instance the
incompleteness of the application cannot be given as the reason for the denial.
5. Length of counteroffer. Section 202.9(a)(1)(iv) does not require a creditor to hold a
counteroffer open for 90 days or any other particular length of time.
6. Counteroffer combined with adverse action notice. A creditor that gives the
applicant a combined counteroffer and adverse action notice that complies with §
202.9(a)(2) need not send a second adverse action notice if the applicant does not
accept the counteroffer. A sample of a combined notice is contained in form C-4 of
Appendix C to the regulation.
7. Denial of a telephone application. When an application is conveyed by means of
telephone and adverse action is taken, the creditor must request the applicant's name
and address in order to provide written notification under this section. If the applicant
declines to provide that information, then the creditor has no further notification
responsibility.
Paragraph 9(a)(3)
1. Coverage. In determining the rules in this paragraph that apply to a given business
credit application, a creditor may rely on the applicant's assertion about the revenue
size of the business. (Applications to start a business are governed by the rules in §
202.9(a)(3)(i).) If an applicant applies for credit as a sole proprietor, the revenues of
the sole proprietorship will determine which rules in the paragraph govern the
application. However, if an applicant applies for business purpose credit as an
individual, the rules in paragraph 9(a)(3)(i) apply unless the application is for trade or
similar credit.
2. Trade credit. The term trade credit generally is limited to a financing arrangement
that involves a buyer and a seller--such as a supplier who finances the sale of
equipment, supplies, or inventory; it does not apply to an extension of credit by a bank
or other financial institution for the financing of such items.
3. Factoring. Factoring refers to a purchase of accounts receivable, and thus is not
subject to the act or regulation. If there is a credit extension incident to the factoring
arrangement, the notification rules in § 202.9(a)(3)(ii) apply as do other relevant
sections of the act and regulation.
4. Manner of compliance. In complying with the notice provisions of the act and
regulation, creditors offering business credit may follow the rules governing consumer
credit. Similarly, creditors may elect to treat all business credit the same (irrespective
of revenue size) by providing notice in accordance with § 202.9(a)(3)(i).
5. Timing of notification. A creditor subject to § 202.9(a)(3)(ii)(A) is required to notify a
business credit applicant, orally or in writing, of action taken on an application within a
reasonable time of receiving a completed application. Notice provided in accordance
with the timing requirements of § 202.9(a)(1) is deemed reasonable in all instances.
9(b) Form of ECOA notice and statement specific reasons.
Paragraph 9(b)(1)
1. Substantially similar notice. The ECOA notice sent with a notification of a credit
denial or other adverse action will comply with the regulation if it is "substantially
similar" to the notice contained in § 202.9(b)(1). For example, a creditor may add a
reference to the fact that the ECOA permits age to be considered in certain scoring
systems, or add a reference to a similar state statute or regulation and to a state
enforcement agency.
Paragraph 9(b)(2)
1. Number of specific reasons. A creditor must disclose the principal reasons for
denying an application or taking other adverse action. The regulation does not
mandate that a specific number of reasons be disclosed, but disclosure of more than
four reasons is not likely to be helpful to the applicant.
2. Source of specific reasons. The specific reasons disclosed under § 202.9(a)(2) and
(b)(2) must relate to and accurately describe the factors actually considered or scored
by a creditor.
3. Description of reasons. A creditor need not describe how or why a factor adversely
affected an applicant. For example, the notice may say "length of residence" rather
than "too short a period of residence."
4. Credit scoring system. If a creditor bases the denial or other adverse action on a
credit scoring system, the reasons disclosed must relate only to those factors actually
scored in the system. Moreover, no factor that was a principal reason for adverse
action may be excluded from disclosure. The creditor must disclose the actual reasons
for denial (for example, "age of automobile") even if the relationship of that factor to
predicting creditworthiness may not be clear to the applicant.
5. Credit scoring--method for selecting reasons. The regulation does not require that
any one method be used for selecting reasons for a credit denial or other adverse
action that is based on a credit scoring system. Various methods will meet the
requirements of the regulation. One method is to identify the factors for which the
applicant's score fell furthest below the average score for each of those factors
achieved by applicants whose total score was at or slightly above the minimum passing
score. Another method is to identify the factors for which the applicant's score fell
furthest below the average score for each of those factors achieved by all applicants.
These average scores could be calculated during the development or use of the
system. Any other method that produces results substantially similar to either of these
methods is also acceptable under the regulation.
6. Judgmental system. If a creditor uses a judgmental system, the reasons for the
denial or other adverse action must relate to those factors in the applicant's record
actually reviewed by the person making the decision.
7. Combined credit scoring and judgmental system. If a creditor denies an application
based on a credit evaluation system that employs both credit scoring and judgmental
components, the reasons for the denial must come from the component of the system
that the applicant failed. For example, if a creditor initially credit scores an application
and denies the credit request as a result of that scoring, the reasons disclosed to the
applicant must relate to the factors scored in the system. If the application passes the
credit scoring stage but the creditor then denies the credit request based on a
judgmental assessment of the applicant's record, the reasons disclosed must relate to
the factors reviewed judgmentally, even if the factors were also considered in the
credit scoring component.
8. Automatic denial. Some credit decision methods contain features that call for
automatic denial because of one or more negative factors in the applicant's record
(such as the applicant's previous bad credit history with that creditor, the applicant's
declaration of bankruptcy, or the fact that the applicant is a minor). When a creditor
denies the credit request because of an automatic- denial factor, the creditor must
disclose that specific factor.
9. Combined ECOA-FCRA disclosures. The ECOA requires disclosure of the principal
reasons for denying or taking other adverse action on an application for an extension of
credit. The Fair Credit Reporting Act requires a creditor to disclose when it has based
its decision in whole or in part on information from a source other than the applicant or
from its own files. Disclosing that a credit report was obtained and used to deny the
application, as the FCRA requires, does not satisfy the ECOA requirement to disclose
specific reasons. For example, if the applicant's credit history reveals delinquent credit
obligations and the application is denied for that reason, to satisfy § 202.9(b)(2) the
creditor must disclose that the application was denied because of the applicant's
delinquent credit obligations. To satisfy the FCRA requirement, the creditor must also
disclose that a credit report was obtained and used to deny credit. Sample forms C-1
through C-5 of Appendix C of the regulation provide for the two disclosures.
9(c) Incomplete applications.
Paragraph 9(c)(2)
1. Reapplication. If information requested by a creditor is submitted by an applicant
after the expiration of the time period designated by the creditor, the creditor may
require the applicant to make a new application.
Paragraph 9(c)(3)
1. Oral inquiries for additional information. If the applicant fails to provide the
information in response to an oral request, a creditor must send a written notice to the
applicant within the 30-day period specified in § 202.9(c)(1) and (c)(2). If the applicant
does provide the information, the creditor shall take action on the application and
notify the applicant in accordance with § 202.9(a).
9(g) Applications submitted through a third party.
1. Third parties. The notification of adverse action may be given by one of the
creditors to whom an application was submitted. Alternatively, the third party may be a
noncreditor.
2. Third-party notice--enforcement agency. If a single adverse action notice is being
provided to an applicant on behalf of several creditors and they are under the
jurisdiction of different federal enforcement agencies, the notice need not name each
agency; disclosure of any one of them will suffice.
3. Third-party notice--liability. When a notice is to be provided through a third party, a
creditor is not liable for an act or omission of the third party that constitutes a violation
of the regulation if the creditor accurately and in a timely manner provided the third
party with the information necessary for the notification and maintains reasonable
procedures adapted to prevent such violations.
Section 202.10--Furnishing of Credit Information
1. Scope. The requirements of § 202.10 for designating and reporting credit
information apply only to consumer credit transactions. Moreover, they apply only to
creditors that opt to furnish credit information to credit bureaus or to other creditors;
there is no requirement that a creditor furnish credit information on its accounts.
2. Reporting on all accounts. The requirements of § 202.10 apply only to accounts held
or used by spouses. However, a creditor has the option to designate all joint accounts
(or all accounts with an authorized user) to reflect the participation of both parties,
whether or not the accounts are held by persons married to each other.
3. Designating accounts. In designating accounts and reporting credit information, a
creditor need not distinguish between accounts on which the spouse is an authorized
user and accounts on which the spouse is a contractually liable party.
4. File and index systems. The regulation does not require the creation or
maintenance of separate files in the name of each participant on a joint or user
account, or require any other particular system of recordkeeping or indexing. It
requires only that a creditor be able to report information in the name of each spouse
on accounts covered by § 202.10. Thus, if a creditor receives a credit inquiry about the
wife, it should be able to locate her credit file without asking the husband's name.
10(a) Designation of accounts.
1. New parties. When new parties who are spouses undertake a legal obligation on an
account, as in the case of a mortgage loan assumption, the creditor should change the
designation on the account to reflect the new parties and should furnish subsequent
credit information on the account in the new names.
2. Request to change designation of account. A request to change the manner in
which information concerning an account is furnished does not alter the legal liability
of either spouse upon the account and does not require a creditor to change the name
in which the account is maintained.
Section 202.11--Relation to State Law
11(a) Inconsistent state laws.
1. Preemption determination--New York. Effective November 11, 1988, the Board has
determined that the following provisions in the state law of New York are preempted
by the federal law:
. Article 15, section 296a(1)(b)--Unlawful discriminatory practices in relation to credit
on the basis of race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, marital status, or disability.
This provision is preempted to the extent that it bars taking a prohibited basis into
account when establishing eligibility for certain special-purpose credit programs.
. Article 15, section 296a(1)(c)--Unlawful discriminatory practice to make any record or
inquiry based on race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, marital status, or disability.
This provision is preempted to the extent that it bars a creditor from requesting and
considering information regarding the particular characteristics (for example, race,
national origin, or sex) required for eligibility for special-purpose credit programs.
2. Preemption determination--Ohio. Effective July 23, 1990, the Board has determined
that the following provision in the state law of Ohio is preempted by the federal law:
. Section 4112.021(B)(1)--Unlawful discriminatory practices in credit transactions. This
provision is preempted to the extent that it bars asking or favorably considering the age
of an elderly applicant; prohibits the consideration of age in a credit scoring system;
permits without limitation the consideration of age in real estate transactions; and
limits the consideration of age in special-purpose credit programs to certain
government- sponsored programs identified in the state law.
Section 202.12--Record Retention
12(a) Retention of prohibited information.
1. Receipt of prohibited information. Unless the creditor specifically requested such
information, a creditor does not violate this section when it receives prohibited
information from a consumer reporting agency.
2. Use of retained information. Although a creditor may keep in its files prohibited
information as provided in § 202.12(a), the creditor may use the information in
evaluating credit applications only if permitted to do so by § 202.6.
12(b) Preservation of records.
1. Copies. A copy of the original record includes carbon copies, photocopies,
microfilm or microfiche copies, or copies produced by any other accurate retrieval
system, such as documents stored and reproduced by computer. A creditor that uses a
computerized or mechanized system need not keep a written copy of a document (for
example, an adverse action notice) if it can regenerate all pertinent information in a
timely manner for examination or other purposes.
2. Computerized decisions. A creditor that enters information items from a written
application into a computerized or mechanized system and makes the credit decision
mechanically, based only on the items of information entered into the system, may
comply with § 202.12(b) by retaining the information actually entered. It is not required
to store the complete written application, nor is it required to enter the remaining items
of information into the system. If the transaction is subject to § 202.13, however, the
creditor is required to enter and retain the data on personal characteristics in order to
comply with the requirements of that section.
Paragraph 12(b)(3)
1. Withdrawn and brokered applications. In most cases, the 25-month retention
period for applications runs from the date a notification is sent to the applicant granting
or denying the credit requested. In certain transactions, a creditor is not obligated to
provide a notice of the action taken. (See, for example, comment 9-2.) In such cases,
the 25-month requirement runs from the date of application, as when:
. An application is withdrawn by the applicant.
. An application is submitted to more than one creditor on behalf of the applicant, and
the application is approved by one of the other creditors.
Paragraph 12(b)(6) Self-tests
1. The rule requires all written or recorded information about a self-test to be retained
for 25 months after a self-test has been completed. For this purpose, a self-test is
completed after the creditor has obtained the results and made a determination about
what corrective action, if any, is appropriate. Creditors are required to retain
information about the scope of the self-test, the methodology used and time period
covered by the self-test, the report or results of the self-test including any analysis or
conclusions, and any corrective action taken in response to the self-test.
Section 202.13--Information for Monitoring purposes
13(a) Information to be requested.
1. Natural person. Section 202.13 applies only to applications from natural persons.
2. Principal residence. The requirements of § 202.13 apply only if an application
relates to a dwelling that is or will be occupied by the applicant as the principal
residence. A credit application related to a vacation home or a rental unit is not
covered. In the case of a two- to four-unit dwelling, the application is covered if the
applicant intends to occupy one of the units as a principal residence.
3. Temporary financing. An application for temporary financing to construct a dwelling
is not subject to § 202.13. But an application for both a temporary loan to finance
construction of a dwelling and a permanent mortgage loan to take effect upon the
completion of construction is subject to § 202.13.
4. New principal residence. A person can have only one principal residence at a time.
However, if a person buys or builds a new dwelling that will become that person's
principal residence within a year or upon completion of construction, the new dwelling
is considered the principal residence for purposes of § 202.13.
5. Transactions not covered. The information-collection requirements of this section
apply to applications for credit primarily for the purchase or refinancing of a dwelling
that is or will become the applicant's principal residence. Therefore, applications for
credit secured by the applicant's principal residence but made primarily for a purpose
other than the purchase or refinancing of the principal residence (such as loans for
home improvement and debt consolidation) are not subject to information-collection
requirements. An application for an open-end home equity line of credit is not subject
to this section unless it is readily apparent to the creditor when the application is taken
that the primary purpose of the line is for the purchase or refinancing of a principal
dwelling.
6. Refinancings. A refinancing occurs when an existing obligation is satisfied and
replaced by a new obligation undertaken by the same borrower. A creditor that
receives an application to refinance an existing extension of credit made by that
creditor for the purchase of the applicant's dwelling may request the monitoring
information again but is not required to do so if it was obtained in the earlier
transaction.
7. Data collection under Regulation C. See comment 5(b)(2)-2.
13(b) Obtaining of information.
1. Forms for collecting data. A creditor may collect the information specified in §
202.13(a) either on an application form or on a separate form referring to the
application.
2. Written applications. The regulation requires written applications for the types of
credit covered by § 202.13. A creditor can satisfy this requirement by recording in
writing or by means of computer the information that the applicant provides orally and
that the creditor normally considers in a credit decision.
3. Telephone, mail applications. If an applicant does not apply in person for the credit
requested, a creditor does not have to complete the monitoring information. For
example:
. When a creditor accepts an application by telephone, it does not have to request the
monitoring information.
. When a creditor accepts an application by mail, it does not have to make a special
request to the applicant if the applicant fails to complete the monitoring information on
the application form sent to the creditor.
If it is not evident on the face of the application that it was received by mail or
telephone, the creditor should indicate on the form or other application record how the
application was received.
4. Applications through electronic media. If an applicant applies through an electronic
medium (for example, the Internet or a facsimile) without video capability that allows
the creditor to see the applicant, the creditor may treat the application as if it were
received by mail or telephone.
5. Applications through video. If a creditor takes an application through a medium that
allows the creditor to see the applicant, the creditor treats the application as taken in
person and must note the monitoring information on the basis of visual observation or
surname, if the applicant chooses not to provide the information.
6. Applications through loan-shopping services. When a creditor receives an
application through an unaffiliated loan-shopping service, it does not have to request
the monitoring information for purposes of the ECOA or Regulation B. Creditors subject
to the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act should be aware, however, that data collection
may be called for under Regulation C which generally requires creditors to report,
among other things, the sex and race or national origin of an applicant on brokered
applications or applications received through a correspondent.
7. Inadvertent notation. If a creditor inadvertently obtains the monitoring information
in a dwelling related transaction not covered by § 202.13, the creditor may process and
retain the application without violating the regulation.
13(c) Disclosure to applicant(s).
1. Procedures for providing disclosures. The disclosures to an applicant regarding the
monitoring information may be provided in writing. Appendix B contains a sample
disclosure. A creditor may devise its own disclosure so long as it is substantially
similar. The creditor need not orally request the applicant to provide the monitoring
information if it is requested in writing.
13(d) Substitute monitoring program.
1. Substitute program. An enforcement agency may adopt, under its established
rulemaking or enforcement procedures, a program requiring creditors under its
jurisdiction to collect information in addition to that required by this section.
Section 202.14--Enforcement, penalties and liabilities
14(c) Failure of compliance.
1. Inadvertent errors. Inadvertent errors include, but are not limited to, clerical
mistake, calculation error, computer malfunction, and printing error. An error of legal
judgment is not an inadvertent error under the regulation.
2. Correction of error. For inadvertent errors that occur under §§ 202.12 and 202.13,
this section requires that they be corrected prospectively only.
Section 202.15--Incentives for Self-testing and Self-correction
15(a) General Rules
15(a)(1) Voluntary Self-Testing and Correction
1. Activities required by any governmental authority are not voluntary self- tests. A
governmental authority includes both administrative and judicial authorities for federal,
state, and local governments.
15(a)(2) Corrective Action Required
1. To qualify for the privilege, appropriate corrective action is required when the results
of a self-test show that it is more likely than not that there has been a violation of the
ECOA or this regulation. A self-test is also privileged when it identifies no violations.
2. In some cases, the issue of whether certain information is privileged may arise
before the self-test is complete or corrective actions are fully under way. This would
not necessarily prevent a creditor from asserting the privilege. In situations where the
self-test is not complete, for the privilege to apply the lender must satisfy the
regulation's requirements within a reasonable period of time. To assert the privilege
where the self-test shows a likely violation, the rule requires, at a minimum, that the
creditor establish a plan for corrective action and a method to demonstrate progress in
implementing the plan. Creditors must take appropriate corrective action on a timely
basis after the results of the self-test are known.
3. A creditor's determination about the type of corrective action needed, or a finding
that no corrective action is required, is not conclusive in determining whether the
requirements of this paragraph have been satisfied. If a creditor's claim of privilege is
challenged, an assessment of the need for corrective action or the type of corrective
action that is appropriate must be based on a review of the self-testing results, which
may require an in camera inspection of the privileged documents.
15(a)(3) Other privileges
1. A creditor may assert the privilege established under this section in addition to
asserting any other privilege that may apply, such as the attorney- client privilege or the
work product privilege. Self-testing data may still be privileged under this section,
whether or not the creditor's assertion of another privilege is upheld.
15(b) Self-test Defined
15(b)(1) Definition
Paragraph 15(b)(1)(i)
1. To qualify for the privilege, a self-test must be sufficient to constitute a determination
of the extent or effectiveness of the creditor's compliance with the act and Regulation
B. Accordingly, a self-test is only privileged if it was designed and used for that
purpose. A self-test that is designed or used to determine compliance with other laws
or regulations or for other purposes is not privileged under this rule. For example, a
self-test designed to evaluate employee efficiency or customers' satisfaction with the
level of service provided by the creditor is not privileged even if evidence of
discrimination is uncovered incidentally. If a self-test is designed for multiple purposes,
only the portion designed to determine compliance with the ECOA is eligible for the
privilege.
Paragraph 15(b)(1)(ii)
1. The principal attribute of self-testing is that it constitutes a voluntary undertaking by
the creditor to produce new data or factual information that otherwise would not be
available and could not be derived from loan or application files or other records
related to credit transactions. Self- testing includes, but is not limited to, the practice of
using fictitious applicants for credit (testers), either with or without the use of matched
pairs. A creditor may elect to test a defined segment of its business, for example, loan
applications processed by a specific branch or loan officer, or applications made for a
particular type of credit or loan program. A creditor also may use other methods of
generating information that is not available in loan and application files, such as
surveying mortgage loan applicants. To the extent permitted by law, creditors might
also develop new methods that go beyond traditional pre-application testing, such as
hiring testers to submit fictitious loan applications for processing.
2. The privilege does not protect a creditor's analysis performed as part of processing
or underwriting a credit application. A creditor's evaluation or analysis of its loan files,
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data, or similar types of records (such as broker or loan
officer compensation records) does not produce new information about a creditor's
compliance and is not a self-test for purposes of this section. Similarly, a statistical
analysis of data derived from existing loan files is not privileged.
15(b)(3) Types of Information not Privileged
Paragraph 15(b)(3)(i)
1. The information listed in this paragraph is not privileged and may be used to
determine whether the prerequisites for the privilege have been satisfied. Accordingly,
a creditor might be asked to identify the self-testing method, for example, whether pre-application testers were used or data were compiled by surveying loan applicants.
Information about the scope of the self test (such as the types of credit transactions
examined, or the geographic area covered by the test) also is not privileged.
Paragraph 15(b)(3)(ii)
1. Property appraisal reports, minutes of loan committee meetings or other documents
reflecting the basis for a decision to approve or deny an application, loan policies or
procedures, underwriting standards, and broker compensation records are examples
of the types of records that are not privileged. If a creditor arranges for testers to
submit loan applications for processing, the records are not related to actual credit
transactions for purposes of this paragraph and may be privileged self-testing records.
15(c) Appropriate Corrective Action
1. The rule only addresses what corrective actions are required for a creditor to take
advantage of the privilege in this section. A creditor may still be required to take other
actions or provide additional relief if a formal finding of discrimination is made.
15(c)(1) General Requirement
1. Appropriate corrective action is required even though no violation has been formally
adjudicated or admitted by the creditor. In determining whether it is more likely than
not that a violation occurred, a creditor must treat testers as if they are actual
applicants for credit. A creditor may not refuse to take appropriate corrective action
under this section because the self-test used fictitious loan applicants. The fact that a
tester's agreement with the creditor waives the tester's legal right to assert a violation
does not eliminate the requirement for the creditor to take corrective action, although
no remedial relief for the tester is required under paragraph 15(c)(3).
15(c)(2) Determining the Scope of Appropriate Corrective Action
1. Whether a creditor has taken or is taking corrective action that is appropriate will be
determined on a case-by-case basis. Generally, the scope of the corrective action that
is needed to preserve the privilege is governed by the scope of the self-test. For
example, a creditor that self-tests mortgage loans and discovers evidence of
discrimination may focus its corrective actions on mortgage loans, and is not required
to expand its testing to other types of loans.
2. In identifying the policies or practices that are the likely cause of the violation, a
creditor might identify inadequate or improper lending policies, failure to implement
established policies, employee conduct, or other causes. The extent and scope of a
likely violation may be assessed by determining which areas of operations are likely to
be affected by those policies and practices, for example, by determining the types of
loans and stages of the application process involved and the branches or offices where
the violations may have occurred.
3. Depending on the method and scope of the self-test and the results of the test,
appropriate corrective action may include one or more of the following:
i. If the self-test identifies individuals whose applications were inappropriately
processed, offering to extend credit if the application was improperly denied and
compensating such persons for out-of-pocket costs and other compensatory damages;
ii. Correcting institutional polices or procedures that may have contributed to the likely
violation, and adopting new policies as appropriate;
iii. Identifying and then training and/or disciplining the employees involved;
iv. Developing outreach programs, marketing strategies, or loan products to serve
more effectively segments of the lender's markets that may have been affected by the
likely discrimination; and
v. Improving audit and oversight systems to avoid a recurrence of the likely violations.
15(c)(3) Types of Relief
Paragraph 15(c)(3)(ii)
1. The use of pre-application testers to identify policies and practices that illegally
discriminate does not require creditors to review existing loan files for the purpose of
identifying and compensating applicants who might have been adversely affected.
2. If a self-test identifies a specific applicant that was subject to discrimination on a
prohibited basis, in order to qualify for the privilege in this section the creditor must
provide appropriate remedial relief to that applicant; the creditor would not be
required under this paragraph to identify other applicants who might also have been
adversely affected.
Paragraph 15(c)(3)(iii)
1. A creditor is not required to provide remedial relief to an applicant that would not be
available by law. An applicant might also be ineligible from obtaining certain types of
relief due to changed circumstances. For example, a creditor is not required to offer
credit to a denied applicant if the applicant no longer qualifies for the credit due to a
change in financial circumstances, although some other type of relief might be
appropriate.
15(d)(1) Scope of Privilege
1. The privilege applies with respect to any examination, investigation or proceeding
by federal, state, or local government agencies relating to compliance with the Act or
this regulation. Accordingly, in a case brought under the ECOA, the privilege
established under this section preempts any inconsistent laws or court rules to the
extent they might require disclosure of privileged self-testing data. The privilege does
not apply in other cases, for example, litigation filed solely under a state's fair lending
statute. In such cases, if a court orders a creditor to disclose self-test results, the
disclosure is not a voluntary disclosure or waiver of the privilege for purposes of
paragraph 15(d)(2); creditors may protect the information by seeking a protective
order to limit availability and use of the self-testing data and prevent dissemination
beyond what is necessary in that case. Paragraph 15(d)(1) precludes a party who has
obtained privileged information from using it in a case brought under the ECOA,
provided the creditor has not lost the privilege through voluntarily disclosure under
paragraph 15(d)(2).
15(d)(2) Loss of Privilege
Paragraph 15(d)(2)(i)
1. Corrective action taken by a creditor, by itself, is not considered a voluntary
disclosure of the self-test report or results. For example, a creditor does not disclose
the results of a self-test merely by offering to extend credit to a denied applicant or by
inviting the applicant to reapply for credit. Voluntary disclosure could occur under this
paragraph, however, if the creditor disclosed the self-test results in connection with a
new offer of credit.
2. Disclosure of self-testing results to an independent contractor acting as an auditor or
consultant for the creditor on compliance matters does not result in loss of the
privilege.
Paragraph 15(d)(2)(ii)
1. The privilege is lost if the creditor discloses privileged information, such as the
results of the self-test. The privilege is not lost if the creditor merely reveals or refers to
the existence of the self-test.
Paragraph 15(d)(2)(iii)
1. A creditor's claim of privilege may be challenged in a court or administrative law
proceeding with appropriate jurisdiction. In resolving the issue, the presiding officer
may require the creditor to produce privileged information about the self-test.
Paragraph 15(d)(3) Limited use of Privileged Information
1. A creditor may be required to produce privileged documents for the purpose of
determining a penalty or remedy after a violation of the ECOA or Regulation B has been
formally adjudicated or admitted. A creditor's compliance with this requirement does
not evidence the creditor's intent to forfeit the privilege.
Appendix B--Model Application Forms
1. FHLMC/FNMA form--residential loan application. The uniform residential loan
application form (FHLMC 65/FNMA 1003), including supplemental form (FHLMC
65A/FNMA 1003A), prepared by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the
Federal National Mortgage Association and dated May 1991 may be used by creditors
without violating this regulation even though the form's listing of race or national origin
categories in the "Information for Government Monitoring Purposes" section differs
from the classifications currently specified in § 202.13(a)(1). The classifications used
on the FNMA-FHLMC form are those required by the U.S. Office of Management and
Budget for notation of race and ethnicity by federal programs in their administrative
reporting and statistical activities. Creditors that are governed by the monitoring
requirements of Regulation B (which limits collection to applications primarily for the
purchase or refinancing of the applicant's principal residence) should delete, strike, or
modify the data-collection section on the form when using it for transactions not
covered by § 202.13(a) to ensure that they do not collect the information. Creditors that
are subject to more extensive collection requirements by a substitute monitoring
program under § 202.13(d) or by the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) may use
the form as issued, in compliance with the substitute program or HMDA.
2. FHLMC/FNMA form--home-improvement loan application. The home-improvement
and energy loan application form (FHLMC 703/FNMA 1012), prepared by the Federal
Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal National Mortgage Association and
dated October 1986, complies with the requirements of the regulation for some
creditors but not others because of the form's section on "Information for Government
Monitoring Purposes." Creditors that are governed by § 202.13(a) of the regulation
(which limits collection to applications primarily for the purchase or refinancing of the
applicant's principal residence) should delete, strike, or modify the data collection
section on the form when using it for transactions not covered by § 202.13(a) to assure
that they do not collect the information. Creditors that are subject to more extensive
collection requirements by a substitute monitoring program under § 202.13(d) may use
the form as issued, in compliance with that substitute program.
Appendix C--Sample Notification Forms
Form C-9. Creditors may design their own form, add to, or modify the model form to
reflect their individual policies and procedures. For example, a creditor may want to
add:
i. A telephone number that applicants may call to leave their name and the address to
which an appraisal report should be sent.
ii. A notice of the cost the applicant will be required to pay the creditor for the
appraisal or a copy of the report.
[52 FR 10733, April 3, 1987; 53 FR 11045, April 5, 1988; 54 FR 9416, March 7, 1989; 55
FR 12472, April 4, 1990; 55 FR 14830, April 19, 1990; 56 FR 14462, April 10, 1991; 56 FR
16265, April 22, 1991; 57 FR 12203, April 9, 1992; 60 FR 29967-29969, June 7, 1995; 61
FR 50950, Sept. 30, 1996; 62 FR 66419, Dec. 18, 1997]
Updated July 25, 2008