UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff
v.
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; EDWARD G. RENDELL, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; ESTELLE B. RICHMAN, COMMISSIONER, HEALTH DEPARTMENT; EPISCOPAL LONG TERM CARE, AS OPERATORS OF THE PHILADELPHIA NURSING HOME, Defendants
COMPLAINT
1. The Attorney General of the United States brings this
action on behalf of the United States of America, pursuant to the
Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act of 1980 ("CRIPA"),
42 U.S.C. § 1997, to enjoin the named Defendants from depriving
persons residing at the Philadelphia Nursing Home ("PNH") of
their legal rights, and of rights, privileges or immunities
secured or protected by the Constitution of the United States and
federal statutes.
2. The United States of America, through the United States
Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, also brings
this civil action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq., and alleges that the City of Philadelphia, PNH,
and Episcopal Long-Term Care, submitted or caused the submission
of false or fraudulent claims to the United States for payment
for care that was not adequately rendered to elderly individuals,
to individuals with developmental disabilities, and to
individuals with mental illness residing at PNH.
JURISDICTION, STANDING AND VENUE
3. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1345 and 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq.
4. The United States has standing to maintain this action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997a and 31 U.S.C. §§ 3730 and 3732.
5. The Attorney General has certified that all pre-filing
requirements specified in 42 U.S.C. § 1997b have been met. The
Certificate of the Attorney General is appended to this Complaint
and is incorporated herein.
6. Venue is proper in the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and (c). All claims set forth in the Complaint arose in said District.
PARTIES
7. Plaintiff is the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA acting for
itself, and on behalf of the Department of Health and Human
Services, Office of Inspector General, the Medicare Trust Fund,
the Medical Assistance Program, and the beneficiaries thereof.
8. Defendant CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ("City") owns PNH, a
nursing home housing individuals with special needs including the
elderly, those with developmental disabilities, and those with
mental illness, located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
9. Defendant EDWARD G. RENDELL is the Mayor of the City of
Philadelphia, and in this capacity heads the Executive Branch of
the City's government and, among other duties, reviews and
approves budget requests submitted by Executive Branch agencies.
He selects and appoints the Commissioner of the City's Health
Department.
10. Defendant ESTELLE B. RICHMAN is the Commissioner of the
City's Health Department and, in this capacity, exercises
administrative control of, and responsibility for, PNH.
11. Defendant EPISCOPAL LONG TERM CARE ("ELTC") is the
operator of PNH pursuant to a contract with the City, and is
responsible for the day-to-day operations of PNH.
12. The individual Defendants named in ¶¶ 9 and 10 above
are officers of the Executive Branch of the City of Philadelphia
and are sued in their official capacities.
13. PNH is an institution as that term is defined in 42 U.S.C. §§ 1997(1)(A), (1)(B)(i) and (1)(B)(v).
14. Defendants are legally responsible, in whole or in
part, for the operation of and conditions at PNH, as well as for
the care and treatment of persons residing at that institution.
15. At all relevant times, Defendants have acted or failed
to act, as alleged herein, under color of state law.
NURSING HOME REFORM ACT
16. The Nursing Home Reform Act (the "Act") mandates that
nursing facilities comply with federal requirements relating to
the provision of services. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396r et seq. See also
42 U.S.C. §§ 1395i-3 et seq. Specifically, in terms of the
quality of life for residents of nursing facilities, the Act
states that: "A nursing facility must care for its residents in
such a manner and in such an environment as will promote
maintenance or enhancement of the quality of life of each
resident." 42 U.S.C. § 1396r(b)(1)(A). See also 42 U.S.C. § 1395i-3(b)(1)(A); 42 C.F.R. § 483.15.
17. In addition, the Act mandates that a nursing facility:
provide services and activities to attain or
maintain the highest practicable physical, mental,
and psychosocial well-being of each resident, in
accordance with a written plan of care which --
(A) describes the medical, nursing, and
psychosocial needs of the resident and
how such needs will be met;...
42 U.S.C. § 1396r(b)(2)(A). See also 42 U.S.C. § 1395i-3(b)(2)(A); 42 C.F.R. § 483.25.
18. A duty is placed on the nursing facility to fulfill the
residents' care plans by providing, or arranging for the
provision of, inter alia, nursing and related services and
medically-related social services that attain or maintain the
highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being
of each resident, pharmaceutical services, and dietary services
that assure that the meals meet the daily nutritional and special
dietary needs of each resident, and treatment and services
required by residents with mental illness and/or mental
retardation. 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396r(b)(4)(A)(i-vii). See also 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395i-3(b)(4)(A)(i-vii).
19. The Act mandates that nursing homes that participate in
the Medical Assistance Program ("Medicaid") and the Medicare
Program meet certain specific requirements in order to qualify
for such participation. These requirements are set forth at 42 C.F.R. §§ 483.1 et seq. and "serve as the basis for survey activities for the purpose of determining whether a facility meets the requirements for participation in Medicare and
Medicaid." 42 C.F.R. § 483.1(b).
20. Federal regulations, when addressing quality of care
concerns, mandate that "[e]ach resident must receive and the
facility must provide the necessary care and services to attain
or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and
psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive
assessment and plan of care." 42 C.F.R. § 483.25.
21. As a pre-requisite to enrollment as a provider in the
Medicaid Program, PNH entered into a provider agreement and
agreed to the following provisions:
1. That the submission by, or on behalf of, the
Facility of any claim, either by hard copy or
electronic means, shall be certification that the
services or items from which payment is claimed
actually were provided to the person identified as
a medical assistance resident by the person or
entity identified as the Facility on the dates
indicated.
*******
5. That the Facility's participation in the
[Medicaid] Program is subject to the laws and
regulations effective as to the period of
participation, including all of those that may be
effective after the date of the agreement and that
the Facility has the responsibility to know the
law with respect to participation in the
[Medicaid] Program.
22. At all times relevant to this action, PNH was a
"provider" with a valid provider agreement with the Pennsylvania
Department of Public Welfare.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
COUNT I: CIVIL RIGHTS OF INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS ACT
23. The above paragraphs are incorporated herein by
reference as if fully set forth.
24. Defendants have failed to ensure the reasonable safety
and personal security of the PNH residents. Defendants have
failed to adequately supervise, monitor and protect the residents
from harm and risk of harm.
25. Defendants have failed to provide adequate basic care
and related services to PNH residents.
26. Defendants have failed to provide residents with
adequate, appropriate and meaningful activities.
27. Defendants have failed to ensure that PNH residents are
free from undue or unreasonable restraint and that restraints are
administered to PNH residents by appropriately qualified
professionals in keeping with accepted professional standards,
and are not used as punishment, in lieu of treatment, or for the
convenience of staff.
28. Defendants have failed to provide adequate mental
health care and services to PNH residents.
29. Defendants have failed to provide adequate medical and
health care and services to PNH residents and to ensure that
medications are prescribed and administered to PNH residents by
appropriately qualified professionals in keeping with accepted
professional standards, and are not used as punishment, in lieu
of treatment, or for the convenience of staff.
30. Defendants have failed to provide adequate nursing care
and services to PNH residents.
31. Defendants have failed to provide adequate physical and
occupational therapy services to PNH residents.
32. Defendants have failed to provide a sufficient number
of adequately trained professional and direct care staff to
render the essential care and treatment outlined above in
paragraphs 24 through 31.
33. Defendants have failed to ensure that PNH residents are
evaluated by appropriate professionals for placement in the most
integrated setting and appropriately placed into the most
integrated setting according to their individualized needs.
34. Defendants have failed to meet the requirements of the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq., and the regulations promulgated pursuant
thereto, by excluding the PNH residents, by reason of their
disability, from participation in or by denying them the benefits
of the services, programs, or activities of the City, or by
subjecting them to discrimination, and by failing to administer
services, programs, and activities in the most integrated setting
appropriate to their needs. For purposes of Title II of the ADA,
the Defendants are a "public entity," and the residents of PNH
are "qualified individual[s] with a disability."
35. Defendants have failed to meet the requirements of the
Medicaid Program established under Title XIX of the Social
Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396r et seq., and the regulations
promulgated pursuant thereto.
36. Defendants have failed to meet the requirements of the
Medicare Program established under Title XVIII of the Social
Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395i-3 et seq., and the regulations
promulgated pursuant thereto.
37. The acts and omissions alleged in paragraphs 24 through
36 infringe upon the PNH residents' legal rights and substantive
liberty interests and constitute resistance to their full
enjoyment of rights, privileges or immunities secured or
protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, and
deprive the PNH residents of such rights, privileges or
immunities.
38. Unless restrained by this Court, Defendants will
continue to engage in the conduct and practices set forth in
paragraphs 24 through 36 that deprive residents of PNH of their
legal rights under law and the rights, privileges, or immunities
secured or protected by the Constitution of the United States,
and cause irreparable harm to PNH residents.
COUNT II: FALSE CLAIMS ACT
39. The above paragraphs are incorporated herein by
reference as if fully set forth.
40. The United States charges that the Defendants submitted
or caused the submission of false or fraudulent claims to the
United States for payment for care that was not adequately
rendered to elderly individuals, to individuals with special
needs, to individuals with developmental disabilities, and to
individuals with mental illness residing at PNH.
41. PNH is a licensed long-term care (nursing) facility
under federal and state law and is certified to participate in
the Medicaid and Medicare Programs.
42. A synopsis of the factual basis for which this cause of
action is based is incorporated herein and is attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
43. The provision of adequate medical care, nursing care
and psychiatric care, pertaining to the appropriate use of
psychotropic drugs for PNH residents and monitoring for side-effects of these medications, was the responsibility of PNH
medical and nursing staff.
44. The provision of adequate wound care to PNH residents
was the responsibility of the PNH nursing and medical staff.
45. The provision of adequate nutrition to PNH residents
was the responsibility of not only the PNH nutritionists and
dietary staff but included the PNH nursing and medical staff as
well.
46. The provision of a safe environment in which PNH
residents were free from any abuse, included all PNH disciplines,
including but not limited to PNH medical, nursing, and facility
management staff.
47. Defendants' agents and/or employees were responsible
for the provision of medical care, nursing care, psychiatric
care, appropriate medications and monitoring thereof, wound care,
nutritional services, and safe conditions for all of the PNH
residents.
48. Defendants' agents and/or employees billed the United
States (through the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare)
for care provided to the PNH residents for reimbursement by the
Medicaid Program. Defendants' agents and/or employees billed the
United States for care provided to the PNH residents for
reimbursement by the Medicare Program.
49. Defendants' agents and/or employees submitted or caused
to be submitted false or fraudulent claims to the Medicaid and
Medicare Programs for payment or approval of the provision of
medical care, nursing care, psychiatric care, appropriate
medications and monitoring thereof, wound care, nutritional
services, and safe conditions that were not adequately rendered
to PNH residents for the time period January 1995 through
December 1996.
50. Defendant City of Philadelphia, as licensee for PNH,
was responsible for the care rendered to residents at PNH and
submitted or caused to be submitted the repeated submission of
false or fraudulent claims for payment or approval to the
Medicaid and Medicare Programs, for the provision of medical
care, nursing care, psychiatric care, appropriate medications and
monitoring thereof, wound care, nutritional services, and safe
conditions that were not adequately rendered to PNH residents for
the period January 1995 through December 1996. 31 U.S.C. § 3729.
51. Defendants knowingly did not ascertain the truth or
falsity of the claims for services submitted or caused to be
submitted to the Medicaid and Medicare Programs, for payment or
approval on behalf of PNH residents, all of whom were Medicaid
recipients and/or Medicare beneficiaries. 31 U.S.C. § 3729.
52. Defendants acted in reckless disregard and/or
deliberate ignorance of the care and services ordered and
actually provided to PNH residents when billing the Medicaid and
Medicare Programs. 31 U.S.C. § 3729.
53. Upon information and belief, the United States alleges
that the care rendered to the residents identified in Exhibit A
was representative of the care rendered to residents of PNH. The
claims for reimbursement for the care of these residents would
thus constitute false claims actionable under the False Claims
Act to the same extent as the claims for the individuals
identified in Exhibit A.
54. The United States was damaged as a result of the
conduct described above.
COUNT III: UNJUST ENRICHMENT
55. The above paragraphs are incorporated herein by
reference as if fully set forth.
56. The conduct described in the foregoing paragraphs
caused all Defendants to receive, directly or indirectly,
benefits from the United States.
57. Under the circumstances described in the foregoing
paragraphs, as between the United States and each Defendant in
this Count, retention by each Defendant of the benefits conferred
by the United States would be unjust.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, the United States of America, prays,
with regard to Count I of this Complaint, that this Court enter
an order permanently enjoining Defendants, their agents,
employees, subordinates, successors in office, and all those
acting in concert or participation with them from continuing the
acts, practices and omissions at PNH set forth in paragraphs
24 through 36 above, and to require Defendants to take such
action as will provide legal and constitutional conditions of
care to persons who reside at PNH. The United States further
prays that this Court grant such other and further equitable
relief as it may deem just and proper.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, the United States of America, demands
and prays, with regard to Count II of this Complaint, that
judgment be entered in its favor and against the Defendants,
jointly and severally, as follows:
a. an amount equal to the number of false or fraudulent
claims that will be proven at trial, multiplied as provided
for in 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a), and imposition of $10,000.00 per
claim;
b. three times that total amount of damages sustained by
the United States because of the acts complained of;
c. costs of this action;
d. such other and further relief as the Court shall deem
proper.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, the United States of America, demands
and prays, with regard to Count III of this Complaint, that
judgment be entered in its favor and against the Defendants,
jointly and severally, as follows:
a. an amount equal to the gain to the Defendants as a
result of the activities complained of;
b. interest according to law;
c. costs of this action; and
d. such other and further relief as this Court may deem
proper.
Respectfully submitted,
__________________________
JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States
BILL LANN LEE, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division
MICHAEL R. STILES, U.S. Attorney, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
STEVEN H. ROSENBAUM, Chief, Special Litigation Section
ROBINSUE FROHBOESE, Deputy Chief, Special Litigation Section
RICHARD J. FARANO, Senior Trial Attorney, Special Litigation Section
Civil Rights Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 66400
Washington, DC 20035-6400
(202) 307-3116
JAMES G. SHEEHAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Chief, Civil Division, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
DAVID R. HOFFMAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney
Eastern District of Pennsylvania
615 Chestnut Street
Suite 1250
Philadelphia, PA 19106
(215) 451-5337
Updated July 25, 2008