While the mix of cases does not drastically change from the 1950s, cases aimed at protecting environmental values begin to arise. Attorneys must make creative use of what statutory provisions are available, as the extensive remedies of the major pollution statutes lay in the future.
Roger Marquis is Chief of the Section through most of this period, followed by Billingsley Hill. The work-life of the Appellate attorney is not much different from prior years, although jet travel makes getting to distant arguments easier. Appellate Section attorneys are permitted to fly first class, on the theory that this makes argument preparation easier. After Assistant Attorney General Ramsey Clark, booked in coach, notices an Appellate Section attorney in first class, he asks Section Chief Marquis to stop this practice. Marquis agrees that attorneys will fly home in coach, but successfully insists that first class travel should be permitted on the way to oral argument. When Clark becomes Attorney General, however, flying first class is banned.
Encouraged by AAG Clark, the Lands Division Journal begins publication in 1963, and is typically edited by members of the Appellate Section. Attorney General Robert Kennedy is reportedly impressed by this publication. During this period, male attorneys still wear white shirts and suits to work, and Elizabeth Dudley never comes to work without hat and gloves.
An Early Water Pollution Victory
- The United States invokes the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 to enjoin the unpermitted deposit of industrial waste into the Grand Calumet River, but the Seventh Circuit finds the statute inapplicable. Hugh Nugent and Roger Marquis participate in briefing to the Supreme Court, which reverses and finds that industrial waste that clogs a river channel constitutes an obstruction to navigation under the Act. United States v. Republic Steel Corp
., 362 U.S. 482 (1959).
An Important Mining Law Decision - After the Ninth Circuit rules that holders of an unpatented mining claim are entitled to enjoin administrative proceedings questioning the validity of the claim, the Section works on obtaining Supreme Court review, and Section Chief Roger Marquis is permitted by the Solicitor General to argue the matter in the Supreme Court. That Court issues a favorable decision in Best v. Humboldt Placer Mining Co., 371 U.S. 334 (1963), holding that administrative proceedings are the appropriate forum for resolving mining claims.
Defending Sovereign Immunity - Roger Marquis help obtain a Supreme Court ruling clarifying that the United States has not waived its immunity to suits from holders of water rights seeking to enjoin water storage and diversion in a federal reclamation project. Dugan v. Rank, 372 U.S. 609 (1963).
Bolstering Principles of Deference
- The Section loses an appeal challenging the Secretary of the Interior's rejection of certain applications for oil and gas leases on land within the Kenai National Moose Range in Alaska. The Section then works with the Office of the Solicitor General to obtain Supreme Court reversal of this decision, and obtains a key precedent requiring courts to give "great deference" to the Secretary's interpretation of statutes and Executive Orders. Udall v. Tallman
, 380 U.S. 1 (1965). Roger Marquis later receives an autographed copy of a book by Secretary Udall, commenting that, until reading our brief, he did not know the Secretary of the Interior had such vast power and authority.
An Important Ruling on the Navigational Servitude - Roger Marquis and Donald Mileur assist in obtaining Supreme Court review of an adverse Ninth Circuit ruling holding that the United States must pay in condemnation for the value of riparian land as a port site. The Court in United States v. Rands, 389 U.S. 121 (1967), holds that the Government's dominant navigational servitude precludes payment for that special value.
The Section Successfully Represents a Wildlife Agency Intervenor - In a Federal Power Commission licensing proceeding for a dam on the Snake River, the Secretary of the Interior is rebuffed in his attempt to raise issues regarding the damaging effects on salmon and steelhead. Bill Hill and Roger Marquis represent the Secretary before the D.C. Circuit, which upholds the Commission, and then in the Supreme Court, which reverses and holds that fishery impacts should have been considered. Udall v. F.P.C., 387 U.S. 428 (1967). This is the first case argued for the Lands Division by Louis Claiborne of the Solicitor General’s Office. Mr. Claiborne goes on to argue many Division cases, and his eloquence in both speech and writing become legendary.
Protecting National Forests From Invalid Mining Claims - Roger Marquis and George Hyde work with Solicitor General Griswold to obtain a ruling from the Supreme Court that quartzite deposits do not qualify as valuable mineral deposits because the stone could not be marketed at a profit. U.S. v. Coleman, 390 U.S. 599 (1968).