TOTAL NET DEPOSITS TO THE FUND BY STATE OF DEPOSIT**
As of September 30, 2004

State or Territory FY 2004
ALABAMA $2,747,266
ALASKA $538,826
ARIZONA $7,857,014
ARKANSAS $3,293,252
CALIFORNIA $90,704,585
COLORADO $15,767,443
CONNECTICUT $3,661,222
DELAWARE $0
D.C. $5,557,974
FLORIDA(1) $45,732,101
GEORGIA $16,575,414
GUAM $465,173
HAWAII $4,869,628
IDAHO(2) ($7,236,356)
ILLINOIS $7,933,837
INDIANA $2,858,697
IOWA $4,339,431
KANSAS $6,569,966
KENTUCKY $3,787,067
LOUISIANA $2,533,224
MAINE $718,738
MARYLAND(3) $16,795,161
MASSACHUSETTS $7,497,253
MICHIGAN $9,466,103
MINNESOTA $2,089,752
MISSISSIPPI $3,866,023
MISSOURI $18,224,914
MONTANA $246,072
NEBRASKA $4,992,904
NEVADA $2,720,737
NEW HAMPSHIRE $2,533,644
NEW JERSEY $5,858,275
NEW MEXICO $2,983,279
NEW YORK $104,142,601
NORTH CAROLINA $8,978,874
NORTH DAKOTA $2,205,877
OHIO $8,946,260
OKLAHOMA $12,128,148
OREGON $1,601,887
PENNSYLVANIA $3,856,798
PUERTO RICO $10,343,859
RHODE ISLAND $810,130
SOUTH CAROLINA $7,762,810
SOUTH DAKOTA $8,305
TENNESSEE $6,128,519
TEXAS(4) $42,023,279
UTAH $1,336,769
VERMONT $2,110,119
VIRGIN ISLAND $3,905
VIRGINIA $6,769,963
WASHINGTON $5,819,898
WEST VIRGINIA $1,058,855
WISCONSIN $4,781,389
WYOMING $172,274
OTHER (5) ($2,818,053)
INVESTMENT INCOME : $12,392,108
 
GRAND TOTAL $537,113,193

Notes:
** These figures represent official accounting transactions. They do not reflect total forfeiture activity for any jurisdiction.

(1) Deposits include cases handled by the Southern District of Florida, U.S. Marshals Service, where the initial seizure originated out of the following judicial districts: Northern Alabama, Southern Georgia, and Middle North Carolina.

(2) Negative deposits recorded for Idaho were due to large refunds of monies transferred to the Treasury Forfeiture Fund (TFF) for participation by TFF member agencies in forfeitures that led to deposits in a prior fiscal year.

(3) Deposits include cases handled by the District of Maryland, U.S. Marshals Service, where the initial seizure originated out of the following judicial districts: Deleware, Western Michigan, Western Missouri and Western Virginia.

(4) Deposits include cases handled by the Southern District of Texas, U.S. Marshals Service, where the initial seizure originated out of the following judicial districts: Western Louisiana and Northern Mississippi.

(5) The "Other" line comprises transactions, either deposits or refunds, where a district has not been identified. An example is a transfer from the TFF to the AFF resulting from participation of Department components in seizures that led to the forfeiture of assets, or a payment(s) to an individual or organizations for assets forfeited and deposited into the AFF and subsequently returned to them through a settlement agreement or by court order.

Return to FY2004 Asset Forfeiture Funds Reports