Compliance with Standards Governing Combined DNA Index System Activities at the Kansas City Police Crime Laboratory, Kansas City, Missouri
Report No. GR-50-05-001
Office of the Inspector General
The Office of the Inspector General, Audit Division, has completed an audit of compliance with standards governing Combined DNA Index System (CODIS) activities at the Kansas City, Missouri Police Crime Laboratory (Laboratory).1 The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) began the CODIS Program as a pilot project in 1990. The DNA Identification Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-322, hereafter referred to as the Act) formalized the FBI's authority to establish a national DNA index for law enforcement purposes. The Act specifically authorized the FBI to establish an index of DNA identification records of persons convicted of crimes, and analyses of DNA samples recovered from crime scenes. The Act further specified that the index include only DNA information that is based on analyses performed in accordance with standards issued by the FBI.
The FBI implemented CODIS as a distributed database with three hierarchical levels that enables federal, state, and local crime laboratories to compare DNA profiles electronically. The National DNA Index System (NDIS) is the highest level in the CODIS hierarchy and enables the laboratories participating in the CODIS Program to compare DNA profiles on a national level. The NDIS became operational in 1998 and is managed by the FBI as the nation's DNA database containing DNA profiles uploaded by participating states. DNA profiles originate at the local level, flow to the state and national levels, and are compared to determine if a convicted offender can be linked to a crime, or if crimes can be linked to each other.
The FBI provides CODIS software free of charge to any state or local law enforcement laboratory performing DNA analysis. A laboratory's profiles have to be uploaded to NDIS before the profiles benefit the system as a whole. Before a laboratory is allowed to participate at the national level a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) must be signed between the FBI and the applicable state laboratory. The MOU defines the responsibilities of each party, includes a sublicense for the use of the CODIS software, and delineates the standards laboratories must meet in order to utilize NDIS.2
The objective of the audit was to determine if the Kansas City, Missouri Laboratory was in compliance with standards governing CODIS activities. Specifically, we performed testing to determine if the: 1) Laboratory was in compliance with the NDIS participation requirements; 2) Laboratory was in compliance with the quality assurance standards issued by the FBI; and 3) Laboratory's DNA profiles in CODIS databases were complete, accurate, and allowable.
We determined that the Laboratory was in compliance with the standards governing CODIS activities for the areas we tested. We found the Laboratory to be in compliance with the NDIS participation requirements and quality assurance standards, and of the 100 DNA profiles reviewed, we determined that all the profiles were complete, accurate, and allowable for inclusion in NDIS.
However, our audit disclosed that the Laboratory did not have a detailed disaster recovery plan in its Safety Manual. Laboratory officials agreed with our suggestion to add more specific information to the disaster recovery plan. This issue is discussed in the Other Reportable Matters section of the report since it is not directly related to compliance with standards governing CODIS activities.
The results of our audit are discussed in the Findings and Other Reportable Matters sections of the report. Our audit scope and methodology are detailed in Appendix I of the report and the audit criteria are detailed in Appendix II of the report.
We discussed the results with Laboratory officials and included their comments as applicable. In addition, we requested written comments to a draft of our report from the FBI and the Laboratory and have included their responses in the final report.