Return to the USDOJ/OIG Home Page
Return to the Table of Contents

The Federal Bureau of Prisons Inmate Release Preparation and Transitional Reentry Programs

Report No. 04-16
March 2004
Office of the Inspector General


Appendix IV
Analysis of the Occupational Education
Goals and Outcomes FY 2001 Through FY 2002

For the institutions included in our audit, we reviewed the occupational goals and outcomes for FY 1999 through FY 2002 reported in each institution’s Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.  (The BOP did not require its institutions to establish occupational goals for FY 2002 because of a change in the format of the Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services; however, we used the FY 2002 occupational projected outcomes reported in the FY 2001 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services as the FY 2002 occupational goals for our analysis.)

The following schedules provide the details of our analysis of the occupational goals and outcomes reported by each institution in its Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services for FY 2001 through FY 2002.  Those institutions for which the occupational goal and/or outcome is shown as “---“ in the following schedules did not include a goal and/or outcome in their Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.  Further, unless noted otherwise, those institutions for which the occupational goal and/or outcome is shown as “N/A“ did not submit an Program Report for Education and Recreation Services because the institution was not open and/or fully operational during the fiscal year.

Occupational Education Completion Goals and Outcomes FY 2001
Institution Security Level Goal49 Outcome Percent of
Occupational
Goal Achieved50
FPC Yankton Minimum 35 103 294.29%
FPC Montgomery Minimum 100 282 282.00%
FPC Nellis Minimum 7 10 142.86%
FPC Seymour Johnson Minimum 10 11 110.00%
FCI Morgantown Minimum 200 201 100.50%
FPC Duluth Minimum 31 30 96.77%
FPC Allenwood Minimum 50 45 90.00%
FPC Bryan Minimum 214 181 84.58%
FPC Pensacola Minimum 100 75 75.00%
FPC Alderson Minimum 262 109 41.60%
FPC Eglin Minimum 160 39 24.38%
FCI Fort Dix Low 755 1,969 260.79%
FCI Lompoc Low 245 444 181.22%
FCI Milan Low 133 205 154.14%
FCI Loretto Low 200 296 148.00%
FCI Sandstone Low 40 52 130.00%
FCI Texarkana Low 150 187 124.67%
FCI Yazoo City Low 225 263 116.89%
FCI Bastrop Low 250 289 115.60%
FCI Beaumont Low 270 301 111.48%
FCI Dublin Low 56 62 110.71%
FCI Forrest City Low 50 55 110.00%
FCI Safford Low 100 108 108.00%
FCI La Tuna Low 225 235 104.44%
FCI Tallahassee Low 183 183 100.00%
FCI Petersburg Low 130 129 99.23%
FCI Ashland Low 253 247 97.63%
FCI Big Spring Low 628 593 94.43%
FCI Danbury Low 217 185 85.25%
FCI Butner Low 305 227 74.43%
FCI Allenwood Low 90 59 65.56%
FCI Waseca Low 69 24 34.78%
FCI Elkton Low 260 82 31.54%
FCI Seagoville Low 710 133 18.73%
FCI Schuylkill Medium 125 271 216.80%
FCI Greenville Medium 40 73 182.50%
FCI Fairton Medium 200 330 165.00%
FCI Beckley Medium 402 628 156.22%
FCI Talladega Medium 100 154 154.00%
FCI Oxford Medium 54 78 144.44%
FCI Cumberland Medium 50 69 138.00%
FCI Marianna Medium 125 172 137.60%
FCI Miami Medium 143 189 132.17%
FCI Phoenix Medium 160 194 121.25%
FCI Edgefield Medium 180 214 118.89%
FCI Butner Medium 140 160 114.29%
FCI El Reno Medium 210 225 107.14%
FCI Memphis Medium 158 152 96.20%
FCI Terminal Island Medium 153 137 89.54%
FCI McKean Medium 175 153 87.43%
FCI Jesup Medium 170 147 86.47%
FCI Pekin Medium 110 92 83.64%
FCI Tucson Medium 30 24 80.00%
FCI Englewood Medium 20 15 75.00%
FCI Three Rivers Medium 151 112 74.17%
FCI Ray Brook Medium 75 55 73.33%
FCI Florence Medium 128 93 72.66%
FCI Beaumont Medium 220 153 69.55%
FCI Estill Medium 360 231 64.17%
FCI Otisville Medium 200 108 54.00%
FCI Sheridan Medium 475 256 53.89%
FCI Manchester Medium 155 80 51.61%
FCI Allenwood Medium 71 36 50.70%
FCI Oakdale Medium 405 132 32.59%
FCI Petersburg Medium N/A N/A ------
FCI Victorville Medium N/A 19 ------
USP Lewisburg High 160 258 161.25%
USP Terre Haute High 40 64 160.00%
USP Atlanta High 50 76 152.00%
USP Lompoc High 245 336 137.14%
USP Leavenworth High 32 28 87.50%
USP Allenwood High 210 180 85.71%
USP Marion High 150 126 84.00%
USP Beaumont High 266 103 38.72%
USP Florence High 245 51 20.82%
USP Atwater High N/A N/A ------
USP Lee High N/A N/A ------
USP Pollock High N/A N/A ------
ADX Florence Maximum N/A51 N/A ------
FCC Coleman N/A52 203 166 81.77%




Occupational Education Completion Goals and Outcomes FY 2002
Institution Security Level Goal53 Outcome Percent of
Occupational
Goal Achieved54
FPC Yankton Minimum 20 111 555.00%
FPC Seymour Johnson Minimum 25 34 136.00%
FPC Pensacola Minimum 76 84 110.53%
FPC Duluth Minimum 31 29 93.55%
FCI Morgantown Minimum 260 222 85.38%
FPC Nellis Minimum 10 8 80.00%
FPC Alderson Minimum 137 105 76.64%
FPC Bryan Minimum 232 161 69.40%
FPC Eglin Minimum 44 26 59.09%
FPC Allenwood Minimum 49 N/A55 ------
FPC Montgomery Minimum --- 153 ------
FCI Waseca Low 27 61 225.93%
FCI Texarkana Low 142 190 133.80%
FCI Sandstone Low 36 47 130.56%
FCI Danbury Low 202 253 125.25%
FCI Safford Low 125 134 107.20%
FCI Forrest City Low 32 34 106.25%
FCI Fort Dix Low 652 685 105.06%
FCI Petersburg Low 146 153 104.79%
FCI Elkton Low 41 41 100.00%
FCI Bastrop Low 330 326 98.79%
FCI Beaumont Low 321 316 98.44%
FCI Allenwood Low 111 104 93.69%
FCI Big Spring Low 538 494 91.82%
FCI Tallahassee Low 207 185 89.37%
FCI Dublin Low 118 103 87.29%
FCI Butner Low 253 203 80.24%
FCI Lompoc Low 575 454 78.96%
FCI Seagoville Low 169 132 78.11%
FCI Milan Low 227 175 77.09%
FCI Loretto Low 260 84 32.31%
FCI Ashland Low 256 82 32.03%
FCI La Tuna Low 296 71 23.99%
FCI Yazoo City Low 242 55 22.73%
FCI Tucson Medium 20 43 215.00%
FCI Miami Medium 215 435 202.33%
FCI Oxford Medium 82 163 198.78%
FCI Sheridan Medium 304 429 141.12%
FCI McKean Medium 132 166 125.76%
FCI Cumberland Medium 82 96 117.07%
FCI Estill Medium 222 250 112.61%
FCI Florence Medium 97 107 110.31%
FCI Butner Medium 150 161 107.33%
FCI Talladega Medium 125 132 105.60%
FCI Phoenix Medium 196 191 97.45%
FCI Beaumont Medium 191 180 94.24%
FCI Victorville Medium 80 73 91.25%
FCI Pekin Medium 72 64 88.89%
FCI El Reno Medium 235 205 87.23%
FCI Allenwood Medium 97 84 86.60%
FCI Three Rivers Medium 136 111 81.62%
FCI Terminal Island Medium 212 170 80.19%
FCI Fairton Medium 371 294 79.25%
FCI Oakdale Medium 152 115 75.66%
FCI Englewood Medium 64 48 75.00%
FCI Ray Brook Medium 54 39 72.22%
FCI Marianna Medium 235 160 68.09%
FCI Beckley Medium 392 256 65.31%
FCI Otisville Medium 196 121 61.73%
FCI Greenville Medium 227 116 51.10%
FCI Jesup Medium 163 81 49.69%
FCI Manchester Medium 135 64 47.41%
FCI Schuylkill Medium 310 98 31.61%
FCI Edgefield Medium 249 54 21.69%
FCI Memphis Medium --- 220 ------
FCI Petersburg Medium N/A N/A ------
USP Beaumont High 110 236 214.55%
USP Terre Haute High 60 127 211.67%
USP Leavenworth High 52 68 130.77%
USP Atlanta High 99 77 77.78%
USP Pollock High 120 81 67.50%
USP Allenwood High 202 126 62.38%
USP Lompoc High 414 207 50.00%
USP Lewisburg High 351 174 49.57%
USP Florence High 56 7 12.50%
USP Marion High 125 14 11.20%
USP Atwater High N/A N/A ------
USP Lee High N/A 0 ------
ADX Florence Maximum N/A56 N/A ------
FCC Coleman N/A57 178 239 134.27%


Footnotes
  1. The BOP changed the format of its Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services in FY 2001. The current year goals are no longer included in the report. Therefore, for our analysis we used the FY 2001 goals reported in the FY 2000 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.
  2. The percentage of goal achieved is equal to the outcome divided by the goal.
  3. The ADX Florence is a maximum security institution. Because of the unique mission of the institution the ADX Florence does not offer occupational education programs.
  4. The FY 2001 occupational goals for FCI Coleman (Low Security), FCI Coleman (Medium Security), and USP Coleman were combined in a single FY 2000 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services report for the Federal Correctional Complex, and the FY 2001 occupational outcomes were combined in a single FY 2001 report.
  5. The BOP changed the format of its Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services in FY 2001. The current year goals are no longer included in the report. Further, the BOP did not require its institutions to establish goals for FY 2002. Therefore, for our analysis we used the FY 2002 projected outcomes reported in the FY 2001 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.
  6. The percentage of goal achieved is equal to the outcome divided by the goal.
  7. The FPC Allenwood did not submit a FY 2002 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services because the institution was merged with FCI Allenwood (Medium) in FY 2002.
  8. The ADX Florence is a maximum security institution. Because of the unique mission of the institution the ADX Florence does not offer occupational education programs.
  9. The FY 2002 occupational projected outcomes for FCI Coleman (Low Security), FCI Coleman (Medium Security), and USP Coleman were combined in a single FY 2001 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services report for the Federal Correctional Complex and the FY 2002 occupational outcomes were combined in a single FY 2002 report.