Return to the USDOJ/OIG Home Page
Return to the Table of Contents

The Federal Bureau of Prisons Inmate Release Preparation and Transitional Reentry Programs

Report No. 04-16
March 2004
Office of the Inspector General


Appendix VI
Analysis of the ESL Goals and Outcomes
FY 2001 Through FY 2002

For the institutions included in our audit, we reviewed the ESL goals and outcomes for FY 1999 through FY 2002 reported in each institution’s Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.  (The BOP did not require its institutions to establish ESL goals for FY 2002 because of a change in the format of the Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services; however, we used the FY 2002 ESL projected outcomes reported in the FY 2001 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services as the FY 2002 ESL goals for our analysis.)

The following schedules provide the details of our analysis of the ESL goals and outcomes reported by each institution in its Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services for FY 2001 through FY 2002.  Those institutions for which the ESL goal and/or outcome is shown as “---“ in the following schedules did not include a goal and/or outcome in their Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.  Further, unless noted otherwise, those institutions for which the ESL goal and/or outcome is shown as “N/A“ did not submit an Program Report for Education and Recreation Services because the institution was not open and/or fully operational during the fiscal year.

ESL Completion Goals and Outcomes FY 2001
Institution Security Level Goal61 Outcome Percent of ESL
Goal Achieved62
FPC Bryan Minimum 7 22 314.29%
FPC Allenwood Minimum 5 9 180.00%
FPC Montgomery Minimum 10 17 170.00%
FPC Pensacola Minimum 10 17 170.00%
FPC Yankton Minimum 3 4 133.33%
FPC Eglin Minimum 11 12 109.09%
FPC Alderson Minimum 1 1 100.00%
FPC Duluth Minimum 1 0 0.00%
FCI Morgantown Minimum 1 0 0.00%
FPC Nellis Minimum 4 0 0.00%
FPC Seymour Johnson Minimum 1 0 0.00%
FCI Tallahassee Low 35 52 148.57%
FCI Seagoville Low 15 22 146.67%
FCI Elkton Low 40 50 125.00%
FCI Loretto Low 20 25 125.00%
FCI Safford Low 20 25 125.00%
FCI Texarkana Low 60 74 123.33%
FCI La Tuna Low 40 44 110.00%
FCI Fort Dix Low 80 87 108.75%
FCI Waseca Low 30 29 96.67%
FCI Allenwood Low 45 36 80.00%
FCI Sandstone Low 10 7 70.00%
FCI Petersburg Low 15 10 66.67%
FCI Yazoo City Low 40 26 65.00%
FCI Forrest City Low 45 26 57.78%
FCI Big Spring Low 50 28 56.00%
FCI Butner Low 10 5 50.00%
FCI Lompoc Low 70 33 47.14%
FCI Bastrop Low 20 9 45.00%
FCI Beaumont Low 30 13 43.33%
FCI Dublin Low 20 8 40.00%
FCI Danbury Low 30 9 30.00%
FCI Ashland Low 20 4 20.00%
FCI Milan Low 5 0 0.00%
FCI Talladega Medium 5 11 220.00%
FCI Sheridan Medium 10 19 190.00%
FCI Oakdale Medium 30 48 160.00%
FCI El Reno Medium 10 13 130.00%
FCI Pekin Medium 10 12 120.00%
FCI McKean Medium 5 6 120.00%
FCI Florence Medium 25 29 116.00%
FCI Manchester Medium 12 13 108.33%
FCI Phoenix Medium 20 20 100.00%
FCI Jesup Medium 15 14 93.33%
FCI Ray Brook Medium 15 14 93.33%
FCI Otisville Medium 25 22 88.00%
FCI Terminal Island Medium 20 16 80.00%
FCI Allenwood Medium 15 12 80.00%
FCI Butner Medium 5 4 80.00%
FCI Memphis Medium 35 27 77.14%
FCI Cumberland Medium 15 11 73.33%
FCI Beckley Medium 10 7 70.00%
FCI Greenville Medium 10 6 60.00%
FCI Estill Medium 5 3 60.00%
FCI Miami Medium 15 8 53.33%
FCI Three Rivers Medium 20 10 50.00%
FCI Oxford Medium 6 3 50.00%
FCI Victorville Medium 25 12 48.00%
FCI Marianna Medium 15 7 46.67%
FCI Englewood Medium 30 12 40.00%
FCI Beaumont Medium 30 8 26.67%
FCI Edgefield Medium 8 1 12.50%
FCI Fairton Medium 10 1 10.00%
FCI Schuylkill Medium 15 1 6.67%
FCI Tucson Medium 1 0 0.00%
FCI Petersburg Medium N/A N/A ------
USP Terre Haute High 10 15 150.00%
USP Lompoc High 15 9 60.00%
USP Lewisburg High 10 6 60.00%
USP Allenwood High 5 3 60.00%
USP Atlanta High 10 4 40.00%
USP Leavenworth High 10 4 40.00%
USP Florence High 15 2 13.33%
USP Beaumont High 3 0 0.00%
USP Marion High 2 0 0.00%
USP Pollock High N/A 1 ------
USP Atwater High N/A N/A ------
USP Lee High N/A N/A ------
ADX Florence Maximum 1 0 0.00%
FCC Coleman N/A63 45 107 237.78%




ESL Completion Goals and Outcomes FY 2002
Institution Security Level Goal64 Outcome Percent of ESL
Goal Achieved65
FPC Eglin Minimum 12 17 141.67%
FPC Alderson Minimum 3 3 100.00%
FPC Bryan Minimum 25 6 24.00%
FPC Pensacola Minimum 20 4 20.00%
FPC Duluth Minimum 1 0 0.00%
FPC Montgomery Minimum --- 18 ------
FPC Yankton Minimum --- 1 ------
FCI Morgantown Minimum --- 0 ------
FPC Nellis Minimum --- 0 ------
FPC Seymour Johnson Minimum --- 0 ------
FPC Allenwood Minimum 8 N/A66 ------
FCI Safford Low 25 41 164.00%
FCI Waseca Low 30 42 140.00%
FCI Dublin Low 10 14 140.00%
FCI Big Spring Low 35 44 125.71%
FCI Texarkana Low 60 72 120.00%
FCI Loretto Low 20 24 120.00%
FCI Lompoc Low 50 53 106.00%
FCI Petersburg Low 10 9 90.00%
FCI Danbury Low 15 13 86.67%
FCI La Tuna Low 50 40 80.00%
FCI Yazoo City Low 35 28 80.00%
FCI Fort Dix Low 100 79 79.00%
FCI Forrest City Low 25 19 76.00%
FCI Seagoville Low 30 22 73.33%
FCI Butner Low 15 11 73.33%
FCI Bastrop Low 15 8 53.33%
FCI Tallahassee Low 40 21 52.50%
FCI Elkton Low 45 23 51.11%
FCI Allenwood Low 40 15 37.50%
FCI Sandstone Low 10 3 30.00%
FCI Beaumont Low 30 7 23.33%
FCI Ashland Low 5 0 0.00%
FCI Milan Low --- 0 ------
FCI Three Rivers Medium 12 23 191.67%
FCI Miami Medium 30 55 183.33%
FCI Greenville Medium 4 6 150.00%
FCI Allenwood Medium 12 16 133.33%
FCI Phoenix Medium 20 24 120.00%
FCI Beaumont Medium 5 6 120.00%
FCI Ray Brook Medium 4 4 100.00%
FCI Florence Medium 28 27 96.43%
FCI Sheridan Medium 40 36 90.00%
FCI El Reno Medium 15 12 80.00%
FCI Englewood Medium 10 7 70.00%
FCI Cumberland Medium 15 10 66.67%
FCI Fairton Medium 3 2 66.67%
FCI Marianna Medium 8 5 62.50%
FCI Jesup Medium 15 8 53.33%
FCI Talladega Medium 10 5 50.00%
FCI Otisville Medium 20 9 45.00%
FCI Terminal Island Medium 20 8 40.00%
FCI Oakdale Medium 25 8 32.00%
FCI Victorville Medium 30 6 20.00%
FCI Schuylkill Medium 10 2 20.00%
FCI Tucson Medium 10 2 20.00%
FCI Beckley Medium 28 5 17.86%
FCI Manchester Medium 15 2 13.33%
FCI Pekin Medium 15 1 6.67%
FCI Estill Medium 5 0 0.00%
FCI Memphis Medium --- 15 ------
FCI McKean Medium --- 5 ------
FCI Oxford Medium --- 1 ------
FCI Butner Medium --- 0 ------
FCI Edgefield Medium --- 0 ------
FCI Petersburg Medium N/A N/A ------
USP Lompoc High 8 15 187.50%
USP Allenwood High 5 7 140.00%
USP Terre Haute High 20 25 125.00%
USP Pollock High 4 3 75.00%
USP Florence High 12 3 25.00%
USP Atlanta High 4 0 0.00%
USP Atwater High 1 0 0.00%
USP Beaumont High 5 0 0.00%
USP Leavenworth High --- 3 ------
USP Lee High N/A 3 ------
USP Marion High --- 1 ------
USP Lewisburg High 10 --- ------
ADX Florence Maximum --- 0 ------
FCC Coleman N/A67 100 53 53.00%


Footnotes
  1. The BOP changed the format of its Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services in FY 2001. The current year goals are no longer included in the report. Therefore, for our analysis we used the FY 2001 goals reported in the FY 2000 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.
  2. The percentage of goal achieved is equal to the outcome divided by the goal.
  3. The FY 2001 ESL goals for FCI Coleman (Low Security), FCI Coleman (Medium Security), and USP Coleman were combined in a single FY 2000 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services report for the Federal Correctional Complex and the FY 2001 ESL outcomes were combined in a single FY 2001 report.
  4. The BOP changed the format of its Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services in FY 2001. The current year goals are no longer included in the report. Further, the BOP did not require its institutions to establish goals for FY 2002. Therefore, for our analysis we used the FY 2002 projected outcomes reported in the FY 2001 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services.
  5. The percentage of goal achieved is equal to the outcome divided by the goal.
  6. The FPC Allenwood did not submit a FY 2002 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services because the institution was merged with FCI Allenwood (Medium) in FY 2002.
  7. The FY 2002 ESL projected outcomes for FCI Coleman (Low Security), FCI Coleman (Medium Security), and USP Coleman were combined in a single FY 2001 Annual Program Report for Education and Recreation Services report for the Federal Correctional Complex and the FY 2002 ESL outcomes were combined in a single FY 2002 report.