Skip to main content

Taitz v. Colvin, No. 13-1878, 2014 WL 3739542 (D.Md. July 25, 2014) (Hollander, J.)

Date

Taitz v. Colvin, No. 13-1878, 2014 WL 3739542 (D.Md. July 25, 2014) (Hollander, J.)

Re: Request for Social Security application filed by third party

Disposition: Denying plaintiff's motion to reopen case, and for court to recuse and to transfer case to another judge on ground of actual conflict of interest

  • Litigation Considerations:  The court holds that "plaintiff has not established grounds to reopen this case under Rule 60 based on 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(5)(iii)."  The court disagrees with "plaintiff['s] assert[ion] that [Judge Hollander] had a duty to disclose that [she] was appointed by President Obama and to recuse [herself] because [her] appointment by President Obama created an actual conflict of interest in regard to the case."  Judge Hollander states that "[p]laintiff can rest assured that if any reasonable grounds existed for me to recuse myself from this case, I would have done so, if for no other reason than to avoid spending precious time on such frivolous filings."
Court Decision Topic(s)
District Court opinions
Litigation Considerations, Supplemental to Main Categories
Updated October 6, 2014