Justice News

Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, August 26, 2013
Justice Department Sues South Dakota Drug Manufacturer for Improperly Producing Sterile Eye Drops

The government filed suit in the U.S. District Court for South Dakota against Dakota Laboratories LLC and its owner, Charles L. Voellinger, Sr., to block them from violating the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) in connection with their alleged violations of Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMP).  The alleged violations concerned problems with the manufacture of eye drops that may have caused the products to be non-sterile.  The Justice Department filed the suit on behalf of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

“Consumers must be able to trust that drugs presented as sterile are, in fact, sterile,” said Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Division.  “We cannot take the chance that a manufacturer’s failure to establish proper controls for sterile drug production could result in products becoming contaminated, placing consumers at risk of infection and potentially serious injury.”

In conjunction with the filing of the complaint, Dakota Laboratories agreed to settle the litigation and be bound by a Consent Decree of Permanent Injunction that prohibits them from committing violations of the FDCA.  The consent decree also acknowledges that Dakota Laboratories is no longer in operation, and requires that if they wish to resume manufacturing drug products in the future, the FDA first must determine that Dakota Laboratories’ manufacturing practices have come into compliance with the law.  The proposed consent decree, along with the complaint, has been filed with the court and is awaiting judicial approval.

The government’s action resulted from a series of inspections of Dakota Laboratories’ Mitchell, S. D., manufacturing facility, which revealed that Dakota Laboratories failed to establish and implement appropriate procedures for preventing microbiological contamination of drug products.  They allegedly lacked sufficient control over the environment in their sterile processing area to prevent products from becoming contaminated and failed to establish and implement appropriate laboratory procedures for determining whether batches of eye drops conformed to their safety specifications.

Compliance with CGMP requirements ensures that drugs meet the safety requirements of the law and have the identity, strength, quality and purity that the drugs purport to possess.  FDA regulations, which establish the minimum CGMP requirements applicable to human drugs, require manufacturers to control all aspects of the processes and procedures by which drugs are manufactured to prevent the production of unsafe and ineffective products.

After the inspections of Dakota Laboratories in 2010 and 2011, FDA warned them that their conduct violated the FDCA.  In 2012, a third FDA inspection documented the continuing nature of Dakota Laboratories’ CGMP violations.  Consequently, the government filed its complaint and settled with Dakota Laboratories.

The complaint was filed by the Department of Justice’s Consumer Protection Branch, Civil Division; the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of South Dakota and FDA’s Office of the General Counsel.  A complaint is merely a set of allegations that, if the case were to proceed to trial, the government would need to prove by a preponderance of the evidence.

13-956