skip to content
About the Office of the Solicitor General
Former Solicitors General
OSG in Historical Context
Bibliography
Briefs
Type of Filing By Term
Subject/Client
Briefs 1982-1997
Help/Glossary
Supreme Court Decisions
Opportunities
Attorney Assistants
Bristow Fellows
Law Students
Summer Research Positions
Contact OSG
OSG FOIA
DOJ Home
Briefs 2001
No. 00-1469: Bein v. United States - Opposition
No. 00-1558: Seldowitz v. OIG - Opposition
No. 00-1571: Walker v. Massanari - Opposition
No. 00-1598: Covey v. United States - Opposition
No. 00-1669: Fleetwood Homes v. Massanari - Opposition
No. 00-1693: Miranda v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 00-1715: Patel v. Heston - Opposition
No. 00-1719: Vasquez v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 00-1747: West Indies Transport Co. v. United States - Opposition
No. 00-1771: Williams v. United States - Opposition
No. 00-1786: Frey v. United States - Opposition
No. 00-1787: Barrios v. United States - Opposition
No. 00-1790: Diaz v. United States - Opposition
No. 00-1794: Louisiana Philharmonic Orchestra v. INS - Opposition
No. 00-1829: Advanced Stretchforming Int'l, Inc. v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 00-1867: Hong v. United States - Opposition
No. 00-1872: Neset v. United States - Opposition
No. 00-1889: Donohoo v. United States - Opposition
No. 00-1898: English v. United States - Opposition
No. 00-1920: Deerbrook Pavillion v. Thompson - Opposition
No. 00-1936: Newkirk v. United States - Response (Hold)
No. 01-05: United Steelworkers v. USA - Opposition
No. 01-15: Alee Cellular Communications v. FCC - Opposition
No. 01-25: Trenkler v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-30: Prieto v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-38: California v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-42: Corey v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-46: Maritime v. South Carolina State Ports Authority - Opposition
No. 01-62: Cox v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-71: Honeywell, Inc. & Johnson Controls - Opposition
No. 01-86: Drainage v. EPA - Opposition
No. 01-92: Petrochem Insulation, Inc. v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 01-94: Schaffer v. O'Neill - Opposition
No. 01-106: Avendano-ramirez v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-123: JSG Trading Corp. v. United States Department of Agriculture - Opposition
No. 01-126: Daniels v. Patenaude - Opposition
No. 01-131: Gisbrecht v. Massanari - Opposition
No. 01-134: Abbott v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-175: Williams v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-184: Blue Diamond - Massanari - Opposition
No. 01-190: Ogren v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-195: Leak v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-205: Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-213: Independent Petroleum Ass'n of America v. US Forest Service - Opposition
No. 01-220: Herrera v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-223: Consumer Fed'n of Am. v. FCC - Opposition
No. 01-226 and 01-230: Arapahoe County Public Airport Auth. v. FAA City of Greenwood Village v. FAA - Opposition
No. 01-236: Microsoft Corporation v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-238: BMW Corp. v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-252: Goetz v. DOA - Opposition
No. 01-280: Naperville Ready Mix, Inc. v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 01-283: State of Utah v. Evans - Motion to dismiss or affirm (Response)
No. 01-341: Brice v. Thompson - Opposition
No. 01-363: Busch v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n - Opposition
No. 01-372: Hannon v. United States Department of Justice - Opposition
No. 01-377: Wilson v. Atlas Wireline Services - Opposition
No. 01-387: Crompton fka Uniroyal v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-391: Ginn v. United States Trustee - Opposition
No. 01-403: Villarreal-Alarcon v. INS - Opposition
No. 01-421: Ocean Bulk v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-437: Dillon v. Powell - Opposition
No. 01-443: Bank of America v. FDIC - Opposition
No. 01-445: Wyandatte Nation v. Sac and Fox - Opposition
No. 01-446: Wellington Trade v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-455: Grass Valley Terrace v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-456: Holland America v. National Parks and Conservation Assoc. - Opposition
No. 01-475: James v. City of Dallas - Opposition
No. 01-508: Felt v. OTS - Opposition
No. 01-518: BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 01-526: Costo v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-529: Hoover v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-543: Global NAPS v. FCC - Opposition
No. 01-569: Kathy Lyons v. Agusta S.P.A. - Opposition
No. 01-571: Tampico v. United States - Response (Hold)
No. 01-573: Kentucky Retirement Systems v. EEOC - Opposition
No. 01-583: Fowlie v. United States - Response (Hold and Opposition)
No. 01-592: California Federal Bank, F.S.B. v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-618: Eldred v. Ashcroft - Opposition
No. 01-619: Bragg v. West Virginia Coal Ass'n - Opposition
No. 01-620: Building Ass'n of California v. Norton - Opposition
No. 01-639: Minority Media and Telecommunications Council v. MD/DC/DE Broadcasters Associations - Opposition
No. 01-652: Custer County Action Ass'n v. Garvey -Opposition
No. 01-664: American Federation of Government Employees v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-674: Yanco v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-681: Del Commercial v. Commissioner - Opposition
No. 01-684: CIT v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-694: Sterling Co. v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-714: Utah v. Evans - Response (Motion to dismiss or Affirm)
No. 01-717: Riverdale Mills Corp. v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-722: Photogrammetric Data Servs. v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-742: Bulgin v. United States - Reply (Petition)
No. 01-752: Daniels v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-762: Gallego v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-766: Rickey Brownlee v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-791: St. Paul v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-805: Fox v. United States - Response (Hold and Opposition)
No. 01-816: Pegg v. United States - Response (Hold)
No. 01-836: O'Connor v. United States - Response (hold)
No. 01-837: Slonimsky v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-904: Alanis v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-932: Crater v. Lucent - Opposition
No. 01-939: Swonger v. Surface Transportation Board - Opposition
No. 01-954: Wilson v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-968: National Association of State Utility v. FCC - Opposition
No. 01-978: Henderson v. Mainella - Opposition
No. 01-983: Leggett v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1020: Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1024: Thompson v. Colorado - Opposition
No. 01-1030: Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner - Opposition
No. 01-1042: Pickett v. Petroleum Helicopters - Opposition
No. 01-1044: Magic Chefs v. HUD - Opposition
No. 01-1048: Audain v. United States - Response (Hold)
No. 01-1051: Saunders v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1058: Peebles v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1060: Bishop v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1080: Trans Union v. FIC - Opposition
No. 01-1100: Eastern Minerals International, Inc. v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1104: Hansen v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1111: Hoffmann v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1113: Hagen v. United States - Hold and Opposition
No. 01-1145: Rith Energy v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1157: McCoy v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1158: Jazz Photo Co. v. Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd - Response (No Position)
No. 01-1160: Compro-Tax v. IRS - Opposition
No. 01-1165: Beharry v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1171: Burton v. Tampa House Authority - Opposition
No. 01-1186: Vinyard v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1188: Bhutani v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1191: Washington Hospital v. Snowden - Opposition
No. 01-1208: Bradley v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1209: Boeing v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1220: Walker v. Bain - Opposition
No. 01-1223: DICO v. United States - Opposition
Nos. 01-1224 and 01-1226: Truckee-Carson v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1234: Cohen v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1243: Borden Ranch v. United States Army Corps of Engineers - Opposition
No. 01-1247: Wisconsin v. EPA - Opposition
No. 01-1277: Krilich v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1283: McMasters v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1292: Epilepsy Found. v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 01-1332: Satellite Broadcasting v. FCC - Opposition
No. 01-1340: Hohn v. United States - Response (GVR)
No. 01-1348: Hukkanen-Campbell v. CIR - Opposition
No. 01-1357: Ohio EPA v. Nihiser and United States - Opposition
No. 01-1360: Scarborough v. Principi - Opposition
No. 01-1362: Elagamy v. INS - Opposition
No. 01-1368: Nevada Department of Human Resources v. Hibbs - Opposition
No. 01-1372: Minnesota Senior Fed'n v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1376: Fuji Photo Film Co. v. Jazz Photo Corp. - Opposition
No. 01-1380: Sinyard v. CIR - Opposition
No. 01-1384: Michigan Peat v. EPA - Opposition
No. 01-1392: USA Polymer v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 01-1404: Lilly v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1410: Delong v. HHS - Opposition
No. 01-1417: Presutti v. FDIC - Opposition
No. 01-1429: Amalfitano v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1446: Forman v. Small - Opposition
No. 01-1477: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. MCI - Opposition
No. 01-1490: Westmoreland Coal. v. Ramsey - Opposition
No. 01-1492: Mylan v. Thompson - Opposition
No. 01-1495: Jordan v. Thompson - Opposition
No. 01-1500: Clay v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1519: Adams v. Bush - Opposition
No. 01-1534: Kornwolf v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1536: Boswell v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1545: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. Arecibo, Inc. - Opposition
No. 01-1559: Massaro v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1569: International Longshoreman's Association v. NLRB - Opposition
No. 01-1584: Nationsbank v. United States - Opposition
No. 01-1588: Brosius v. Warden - Oppositition
No. 01-1617: Atwood v. Burlington Northern - Opposition
No. 01-8272: Haney v. United States - Response
No. 01-8780: Emerson v. United States - Response
Contact Us
|
Accessibility
|
A-Z Index
|
Site Map
|
Archive
|
Privacy Policy
|
Legal Policies and Disclaimers
FOIA
|
For DOJ Employees
|
Other Government Resources
|
Office of the Inspector General
|
USA.gov
|
No FEAR Act
