skip to content
About the Office of the Solicitor General
Former Solicitors General
OSG in Historical Context
Bibliography
Briefs
Type of Filing By Term
Subject/Client
Briefs 1982-1997
Help/Glossary
Supreme Court Decisions
Opportunities
Attorney Assistants
Bristow Fellows
Law Students
Summer Research Positions
Contact OSG
OSG FOIA
DOJ Home
Briefs 2003
No. 02-473: United States v. Banks - Reply (Merits)
No. 02-693: Lamie v. U.S. Trustee - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-763: Barnhart v. Thomas - Reply (Merits)
No. 02-763: Barnhart v. Thomas - Supplemental Brief (Merits)
No. 02-954: OIC v. Favish - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-954: OSC v. Favish - Joint Appendix (Merits)
No. 02-954: O.I.C. v. Favish - Reply (Merits)
No. 02-1183: United States v. Patane - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-1183: United States v. Patane - Joint Appendix (Merits)
No. 02-1183: United States v. Patane - Reply (Merits)
No. 02-1196: SEC v. Edwards - Reply Brief (Merits)
No. 02-1238 FCC v. Mo. Municipal League - Brief (Merits)
Nos. 02-1238: Nixon v. Missouri Municipal League - Reply Brief (Merits)
No. 02-1290: USPS v. Flamingo - Brief (merits)
No. 02-1290: USPS v. Flamingo Industries - Reply (Merits)
No. 02-1377: Doe v. Chao - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-1389: United States v. Galletti - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-1389: United States v. Galletti - Joint Appendix (Merits)
No. 02-1389: United States v. Galletti - Reply (Merits)
No. 02-1593: BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United States - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-1624: Elk Grove v. Newdow - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-1624: Elk Grove v. Newdow -Reply (Merits)
No. 02-1657: Scarborough v. Principi - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-1667: Tennessee v. Lane - Appendix (Merits)
No. 02-1667: Tennessee v. Lane - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-1674: McConnell v. FEC - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-1794: United States v. Flores-Montano - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-1794: United States v. Manuel Flores-Montano - Reply (Merits)
No. 02-6320: Fellers v. United States - Brief (Merits)
No. 02-658: Alaska v. EPA - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-44: Sabri v. United States - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-101: Norton v. SUWA - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-101: Norton v. SUWA - Joint Appendix (Merits)
No. 03-101: Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance - Reply (Merits)
No. 03-107: United States v. Lara - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-107: United States v. Lara - Reply (Merits)
No. 03-167: United States v. Benitez - Brief (Merits)
No.03-167: United States v. Benitez - Joint Appendix
No. 03-167: United States v. Benitez - Reply (Merits)
No. 03-218: Ashcroft v. ACLU - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-218: Ashcroft - ACLU - Reply (Merits)
Nos. 03-334 and 03-343: Rasul v. Bush Al Odah v. United States - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-339: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-339: Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain - Reply (Merits)
No. 03-358: DOT v. Public Citizen - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-358: DOT v. Public Citizen - Joint Appendix (Merits)
No. 03-358: DOT v. Public Citizen - Joint Appendix (Merits)
No. 03-358: DOT v. Public Citizen - Reply (Merits)
No. 03-475: Cheney v. U.S. District Court - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-475: Cheney v. U.S. District Court - Joint Appendix (Merits)
No. 03-475: Cheney v. U.S. District Court - Joint Appendix (Merits)
No. 03-0475: Cheney v. US DCDC - Reply (Merits)
No. 03-485: United States v. Alvarez-Machain - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-485: United States v. Alvarez-Machain - Reply (Merits)
No. 03-878: Crawford v. Martinez - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-892: Commissioner v. Banks, II and Commissioner v. Banaitis - Brief (merits)
No. 03-1027: Rumsfeld v. Padilla - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-1027: Rumsfeld v. Padilla - Joint Appendix (Merits)
No. 03-1027: Rumsfeld v. Padilla - Reply (Merits)
No. 03-5165: Thornton v. United States - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-6996: Hamdi v. Rumsfeld - Brief (Merits)
No. 03-7434: Benitez v. Mata - Brief (Merits)
Contact Us
|
Accessibility
|
A-Z Index
|
Site Map
|
Archive
|
Privacy Policy
|
Legal Policies and Disclaimers
FOIA
|
For DOJ Employees
|
Other Government Resources
|
Office of the Inspector General
|
USA.gov
|
No FEAR Act
