The United States Attorneys’ Manual is currently undergoing maintenance. If you are unable to access specific content, please contact the webmaster.

You are here

1093. Multiplicity

One court has held that the solicitation and conspiracy statutes are not multiplicitous. United States v. Holveck, 867 F. Supp. 969, 976-77 (D.Kan. 1994). Applying the rule of statutory construction in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932), the court ruled that a §  371 conspiracy and a § 373 solicitation each requires proof of different elements. For a defendant to be found guilty of solicitation, the Government need not prove that an agreement or conspiracy existed between the defendants. Likewise, a conspiracy charge does not require proof of a serious effort to induce another person to commit a Federal offense. United States v. Holveck, 867 F. Supp. at 977. Further, the legislative history of § 373 does not show that Congress intended it to be charged only when a conspiracy is not charged. Prosecutors may decide, in the exercise of their discretion, not to charge a § 373 solicitation when a § 371 conspiracy can be proven. However, there is no legal impediment to charging both offenses in an indictment relating to the same criminal conduct.

[updated January 1998] [cited in USAM 9-60.500]

Updated May 27, 2015