News and Press Releases

Law School Admission Council Agrees To Systemic Reforms And $7.73 Million Payment To Settle Justice Department’s Nationwide Disability Discrimination Lawsuit

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 20, 2014

SAN FRANCISCO – The Justice Department filed a joint motion today for entry of a landmark consent decree to resolve allegations that the Law School Admission Council (LSAC) engaged in widespread and systemic discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Under the proposed consent decree, LSAC will pay $7.73 million in penalties and damages to compensate over 6,000 individuals nationwide who applied for testing accommodations on the Law School Admission Test (LSAT) over the past five years. The decree also requires comprehensive reforms to LSAC’s policies and ends its practice of “flagging,” or annotating, LSAT score reports for test takers with disabilities who receive extended time as an accommodation. These reforms will impact tens of thousands of test takers with disabilities for years to come.

The United States intervened in DFEH v. LSAC Inc., which was originally brought on behalf of California test takers in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The United States’ intervention expanded the case to ensure comprehensive and nationwide relief under Title III of the ADA for individuals with disabilities who request testing accommodations for the LSAT – a required examination for anyone seeking admission to an American Bar Association approved law school in the United States. The allegations in the complaint detail LSAC’s routine denial of testing accommodation requests, even in cases where applicants have a permanent physical disability or submitted thorough supporting documentation from qualified professionals and demonstrated a history of testing accommodations since childhood. Without the necessary accommodations, test takers with disabilities are denied an equal opportunity to demonstrate their aptitude and achievement level. The lawsuit further alleged that LSAC engages in discrimination prohibited by the ADA through its practice of flagging the LSAT score reports of individuals who received extended time as a testing accommodation, thereby identifying to law schools that the test taker is a person with a disability.

“This landmark agreement compels systemic reforms to LSAC’s treatment of test takers with disabilities and brings an end to LSAC’s stigmatizing practice of flagging the score reports of individuals with disabilities who require certain testing accommodations,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Jocelyn Samuels for the Civil Rights Division. “If entered by the court, this decree will impact tens of thousands of Americans with disabilities, opening doors to higher education that have been unjustly closed to them for far too long. We congratulate LSAC for signing this agreement, which will compensate victims of past discrimination and provide a model for the provision of testing accommodations to test takers with disabilities on standardized examinations.”

“The participation of the U.S. Attorney’s Office in this important litigation sends a strong message that no discrimination of any kind will be tolerated in this district,” said U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag for the Northern District of California. “We are fully committed to ensuring equal access to all opportunities society has to offer, including education.”

Under the consent decree, LSAC has agreed to:

  • put a permanent end to the practice of flagging the LSAT score reports of individuals with disabilities who take the LSAT with the common testing accommodation of extended time;
  • pay $7.73 million to be allocated for a civil penalty, compensation to individuals named in the United States’ and other plaintiffs’ complaints, and a nationwide victims’ compensation fund;
  • streamline its evaluation of requests for testing accommodations by automatically granting most testing accommodations that a candidate can show s/he has previously received for a standardized exam related to post-secondary admissions (such as the SAT, ACT or GED, among others); and
  • implement additional best practices for reviewing and evaluating testing accommodation requests as recommended by a panel of experts (to be created by the parties).

Individuals who applied for testing accommodations from LSAC between Jan. 1, 2009, and May 20, 2014 may be eligible to receive a monetary award from a nationwide victims’ compensation fund. The claims administrator for the fund has not yet been determined; this information will be posted on LSAC’s website following entry of the consent decree by the court. Questions about the victims’ compensation fund should be directed to the claims administrator.

For more information or for a copy of the consent decree, please visit the ADA website. Those interested in finding out more about the ADA may also call the Justice Department’s toll-free ADA Information Line at 800-514-0301 or 800-514-0383 (TDD).

Assistant U.S. Attorney Melanie Proctor prosecuted the case, with the assistance of Tiffani Chiu and Jonathan Birch. The U.S. Attorney’s Office partnered with attorneys from the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Rights Division in the U.S. Department of Justice to achieve this landmark settlement.

(LSAC joint motion )

(LSAC consent decree )

 

 

Return to Top

United States Attorneys 225th Anniversary
USAO Homepage
USAO Briefing Room
Stay Connected with Twitter
Justice 101
Northern California Most Wanted
Investor Fraud Summit

Bay Area Prescription Drug Abuse Summit
May 7, 2014

Investor Fraud Summit

Investor Fraud Summit
October 9, 2012

Bay Area Stop Bullying Summit

September 14, 2012

Victim Witness Assistance

Making sure that victims of federal crimes are treated with compassion, fairness and respect.

Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force

Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force

Community Outreach

Giving Back to the Community through a variety of venues & initiatives.

Law Enforcement Coordinating Committee

Training and seminars for Federal, State, and Local Law Enforcement Agencies.