668
Limited Criminal Jurisdiction Over Property Held
Proprietorially
| |
Although it has been continually emphasized in the preceding
material
that the United States may not exercise criminal jurisdiction over property
that
it holds only in a proprietorial capacity, it would be more accurate to
state
that the United States is not wholly without the power to protect its
property
and control its use. State jurisdiction "does not take from Congress the
power
to control their occupancy and use, to protect them from trespass and injury
and
to prescribe the conditions upon which others may obtain rights in them,
even
though this may involve the exercise in some measure of what is commonly
known
as the police power." See Utah Power & Light Co. v. United
States,
243 U.S. 389, 405 (1917) (finding constitutional authority in the Property
Clause, Art. IV, Sec. 3, cl. 1).
There are a number of specific statutes that are applicable
independently of 18 U.S.C. 7(3) and the acquisition of legislative
jurisdiction.
Included among these statutes is 18 U.S.C. § 1382 (entering military,
naval
or Coast Guard property). See United States v. Holmes, 414 F.
Supp. 831, 837 n. 9 (D.Md. 1976)(finding constitutional authority for 18
U.S.C.
§ 1382 in the Property Clause and/or the military power clauses,
Const.,
Art.
I, Sec. 8, cls. 12 and 14, aided by the Necessary and Proper Clause, Art. I,
Sec.
8, cl. 18).
On occasion, courts have upheld convictions for trespass and minor
police offenses that violated regulations made criminal by statute when the
offenses were committed on land and facilities held proprietorially finding
the
authority to punish the offense in the Property Clause and/or in the
specific
constitutional provision authorizing the performance of the function.
See,
e.g., United States v. Seward, 687 F.2d 1270, 1277 (10th Cir.
1982),
cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1147 (1983) (conviction for trespass on NRC
facility upheld on basis of Property Clause); United States v.
Gliatta,
580 F.2d 156 (5th Cir. 1978) (conviction of traffic offenses on postal
facility
upheld on basis of Property Clause and/or postal power, Art. 1, Sec. 8, cl.
7,
aided by the Necessary and Proper Clause).
[cited in USAM 9-20.100] | |