1529
True ThreatsSecret Service Protectees
| |
In Watts v. United States, 394 U.S. 705 (1969), the Supreme
Court limited the applicability of 18 U.S.C. § 871 to situations
involving
the communication of a "true threat." At a political rally Watts had said,
"If
they ever make me carry a rifle, the first man I want to get in my sight is
L.B.J." This, the court held, taken in context amounted to mere indulgence
in
political hyperbole, and such speech is within the protection of the First
Amendment. Following the principle announced in Watts, the Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia, in Alexander v. United States,
418
F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1969), held that neither idle talk nor mere jest
qualify as
a true threat. But see R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S.
377
(1992)(threats of violence are one of the categories of unprotected
speech).
[cited in USAM 9-65.200] | |