1531
Conditional ThreatSecret Service Protectees
| |
The use of conditional language is pertinent in evaluating the
"threat"
content of a statement for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 871. Such
evaluation
must
take the full context of an alleged threat into consideration. Alexander
v.
United States, 418 F.2d 1203 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Motive of the defendant
may
well be germane to the inquiry. Other factors for consideration would
include
such matters as audience reaction, intoxication, a history of mental illness
unaccompanied by dangerous propensities, and capability of or preparations
by the
defendant to act upon his/her words.
The United States Attorney should not decline prosecution on the
ground
of a lack of a defendant's subjective intent to carry out a threat. If a
prospective defendant's conduct reasonably appears to amount to a serious
expression of intent to inflict harm, action to prosecute should follow
immediately. The need for prompt action in this type of case indicates use
of
the complaint procedure unless some special circumstances require direct
resort
to the grand jury.
[cited in USAM 9-65.200] | |