2319
FIRREA Memorandum of UnderstandingOverview
| |
Introduction
The Introduction explains that the principal purpose of
the FIRREA MOU is to facilitate inter-agency coordination in
identifying, seizing, and disposing of forfeitable properties in order
to maximize FIRREA recoveries for the benefit of the American taxpayer.
To facilitate the identification of cases in which the use of criminal
or civil forfeiture may be appropriate, the Introduction calls
for periodic, local and regional meetings of federal prosecutors,
federal law enforcement, and federal financial institution regulatory
agency representatives to coordinate investigations. Additionally, each
regulatory agency is to designate a FIRREA MOU contact point at its
headquarters.
Minimizing Litigation
Section 1 (Minimizing Litigation) establishes as a basic
principle of inter-agency coordination that the departments and agencies
of the United States should not litigate against each other, i.e., that
the Government should not litigate against itself. Section 1 provides
that the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury will
give appropriate deference to both the legal and equitable claims of the
regulatory agencies and will seek to resolve those claims within the
Executive Branch.
Specifically, the Department of Justice will not prosecute
closed financial institutions. Additionally, in any "FIRREA forfeiture"
case, and in any forfeiture case in which a regulatory agency asserts
legal title to property seized for forfeiture, the agency's legal title
will be determined within the Executive Branch, not through the filing
of a claim in the forfeiture proceeding or the filing of a petition for
remission. (The term "FIRREA forfeiture" has been carefully defined in
footnote 2 of the FIRREA MOU. Most significantly, the definition
includes forfeitures of any property which is referred to in 18 U.S.C.
§ 981(a)(1)(C) or (D) and therefore, forfeitable under FIRREA,
regardless of whether the forfeiture is actually sought or obtained
under 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) or (D), or under some other statute,
as long as the property is designed as a FIRREA forfeiture before it is
forfeited.) There are minor exceptions in footnotes 4 and 5 of the
FIRREA MOU applicable in forfeitures other than FIRREA forfeitures for
petitions for remission or mitigation necessary to recover
non-legal property interests and for claims for expedited
settlement policy compliance. (Footnote 1. The term "FIRREA forfeiture"
has been carefully defined in footnote 2 of the FIRREA MOU. Most
significantly, the definition includes forfeitures of any property which
is referred to in 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) or (D) and therefore,
forfeitable under FIRREA, regardless of whether the forfeiture is
actually sought or obtained under 18 U.S.C. § 981 (a)(1)(C) or (D),
or under some other statute, as long as the property is designated as a
FIRREA forfeiture before it is forfeited.) The Department of Justice
also will assert regulatory agency legal claims against property in
forfeiture actions as necessary to preserve any priority of the
regulatory agency's interest from encroachment by other claims.
Custody of Seized Assets
Section 2 (Custody of Seized Assets) designates the
United States Marshals Service (USMS) or designated Treasury component
to be the primary custodians of assets pending FIRREA forfeiture.
Section 2 also incorporates Department of Justice and Department of the
Treasury pre-seizure planning procedures and provides that the
"pertinent regulatory agency" (as determined pursuant to footnote 8 of
the FIRREA MOU) will participate with federal prosecutors, the USMS or
designated Treasury component, and the seizing agency in pre-seizure
planning for FIRREA forfeitures. Footnote 9 of the FIRREA MOU designates
the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Secret Service
as the "seizing agencies."
Currency, negotiable instruments, and securities seized for
FIRREA forfeiture will be deposited by the USMS into the Department of
Justice Seized Asset Deposit Fund, or by the appropriate Department of
the Treasury component into the relevant Department of the Treasury
seized asset fund. Such assets will be designated as related to a FIRREA
forfeiture and will be invested in interest-bearing Treasury securities
pending disposition.
Methods of Recovery and Enforcement
Section 3 (Methods of Recovery and Enforcement) provides
guidance for the coordination of FIRREA forfeitures with other actions.
Priority consideration is to be given to maximizing recovery and
minimizing costs. Additionally, specific consideration is to be given to
avoiding duplicate actions by different agencies to recover the same
property.
Retention of Forfeited Property by Federal, State, and Local
Agencies
Section 4 (Retention of Forfeited Property by Federal, State,
and Local Agencies) provides that in FIRREA forfeitures there will
be no equitable transfers of forfeited assets to state or local agencies
and no retention of forfeited assets for official use by federal
agencies, except that the FBI and the Secret Service (the "seizing
agencies") may retain office and electronic communications equipment
valued at under one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) and motor vehicles
pursuant to standard procedures in the Attorney General's Guidelines
on Seized and Forfeited Property.
Disposition of Property in FIRREA Forfeitures
Section 5 (Disposition of Property in FIRREA Forfeitures)
establishes administrative procedures for the disposition of property
forfeited in FIRREA forfeitures in order to facilitate the distribution
of such property by the Department of Justice and the Department of the
Treasury in a manner consistent with the multiple provisions of 18
U.S.C. § 981(e). In particular, subsections 5(c)(i)-(v) establish
priorities (absent in section 981(e)) to govern the distribution of
FIRREA forfeiture proceeds, "unless compelling circumstances dictate
otherwise." In abbreviated form, the distribution priorities are as
follows:
first, as provided in an Order or Declaration of Forfeiture or
in any petition for remission or mitigation ruling that specifies
distribution (- - this provision effectively grants priority to innocent
owners, including co-owners and secured creditors, who file successful
claims in the judicial proceeding or meritorious petitions for
remission);
second, to any federal agency (including any regulatory agency) that
incurred expenses (- - these expenses include such out-of-pocket costs
as payments for storage, maintenance, notices by publication, and costs
related to the sale of the property);
third, to reimburse regulatory agencies for payments to claimants or
creditors of the financial institution affected by the underlying
offense and to reimburse the appropriate insurance fund for losses
suffered by the fund as a result of receivership or liquidation pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 981(e)(3) or (7);
fourth, as provided by any outstanding order issued by any regulatory
agency pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(e)(4) (- - such order direct
restitution to a financial institution for losses suffered);
fifth, to the extent that there are any proceeds remaining, such
proceeds may be distributed to any eligible victims pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 981(e)(6) (restoration of forfeited property to any victim
of an offense described in section 981(a)(1)(C)), and then to the
Department of Justice Assets Forfeiture Fund or the Department of the
Treasury Forfeiture Fund.
Subsection 5(c)(v) also provides that if a regulatory agency is
entitled to a share of such net proceeds pursuant to the provisions of
18 U.S.C. § 981(e)(5) (transfers of forfeited property based upon
the agency's contribution of resources to the investigation, seizure,
and forfeiture), it shall make written request to the appropriate
official to obtain such a share and that the decision granting or
denying such transfer will be made in writing by the official authorized
to make transfer decisions for equitable sharing purposes in such cases.
Subsection 5(d) limits the purposes for which the regulatory agencies
may expend forfeiture proceeds received through transfers pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 981(e)(5).
Other Financial Institution Forfeiture Cases
Section 6 (Other Financial Institution Forfeiture Cases)
establishes procedures for cases involving the forfeiture of property
that is forfeitable under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C)
but which are not classified under the FIRREA MOU as FIRREA forfeiture
cases. In such cases, standard procedures for the custody and
disposition of forfeited property will apply, except in two situations.
First, if a regulatory agency is entitled to remission or
mitigation of forfeited assets, subsection 6(b)(i) provides procedures
for transfers to the regulatory agency by a written decision after the
agency submits a written request containing the information required for
petitions for remission or mitigation.
Second, if a regulatory agency is eligible for transfer of 981(e)(1) or
(5), the procedures set forth in subsections 5(c)(v) pursuant to section
981(e)(5) will apply.
Statistical Data on FIRREA Cases
Section 7 (Statistical Data on FIRREA Cases) establishes
procedures for reporting information on FIRREA recoveries generally, and
forfeitures in particular, to the Executive Office for United States
Attorneys (EOUSA) for development of accurate data on FIRREA recoveries.
Subsection 7(a) provides that the regulatory agencies will
report to EOUSA on recoveries obtained through activities including, but
not limited to, forfeitures and that the USMS and designated Treasury
component will report to EOUSA on the inventory of property seized for
FIRREA forfeiture.
Subsection 7(b) provides that the Consolidated Asset Tracking System
(CATS), through the Department of Justice Executive Office for Asset
Forfeiture and the Department of the Treasury Executive Office for Asset
Forfeiture, will provide EOUSA information about forfeitures which
originate as seizures by one of the CATS participating agencies.
Statistics on FIRREA forfeitures which do not originate as seizures by
one of the CATS participating agencies will be provided by the other
seizing agencies, the United States Attorneys' Offices, and the Fraud
Section.
Effective Date and Retroactive Application by Consent
Section 8 (Effective Date and Retroactive Application by
Consent) will establish a basic starting date for application of the
FIRREA MOU. The FIRREA MOU will be applicable to forfeiture actions
commenced on or after that date, but it also may be applied by consent
to then pending forfeiture actions. For agencies that sign the FIRREA
MOU after it goes into effect, the FIRREA MOU will apply to forfeiture
actions commenced on or after the signing date, but it also may be
applied by consent to forfeiture actions that are pending on the
agency's signing date.
[cited in USAM 9-119.500]
| |