______________________________________________________________________________

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                                                               CRM

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2013                                                                 (202) 514-2007

WWW.JUSTICE.GOV                                                                                    TTY (866) 544-5309

 

TEXAS LEADER OF LATIN KINGS STREET GANG SENTENCED IN INDIANA TO 262 MONTHS IN PRISON FOR RACKETEERING CONSPIRACY

 

WASHINGTON – A Texas leader of the Latin Kings street gang was sentenced today in Hammond, Ind., to serve 262 months in prison for racketeering conspiracy, announced Acting Assistant Attorney General Mythili Raman of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and U.S. Attorney David Capp of the Northern District of Indiana.

 

Dante Reyes, aka “DK,” 41, of Alton,Texas, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Rudy Lozano in the Northern District of Indiana.  In addition to his prison term, Reyes was sentenced to serve three years of supervised release.  On March 14, 2013, Reyes pleaded guilty to one count of racketeering conspiracy.

 

According to the third superseding indictment filed in this case, the Latin Kings is a nationwide gang that originated in Chicago and has branched out throughout the United States, including the state of Texas. The Latin Kings is a well-organized street gang that has well-defined leadership and is composed of regions that include multiple chapters. The third superseding indictment charges that the Latin Kings was responsible for more than 20 murders in southeast Chicago, northwest Indiana and Big Spring, Texas.

 

During a co-defendant’s trial, the government presented evidence of several murders committed by members of the Latin Kings.  In addition, cooperating defendants testified that the Latin Kings were responsible for distributing more than 150 kilograms of cocaine and 1,000 kilograms of marijuana over the course of the racketeering conspiracy.

 

During his guilty plea proceeding, Reyes acknowledged that he became a member of the Latin Kings at an early age and ultimately rose to the level of South Texas Regional Inca.  He admitted that he attended at least two meetings in Texas with other members of the Latin Kings leadership in order to solidify the relationship between the Latin Kings in Texas and Chicago. Reyes further admitted that on at least one occasion, he traveled to the Chicago area with other Latin Kings members to meet with local Latin Kings leadership.

 

According to court documents, Reyes distributed cocaine and marijuana to Latin Kings members in Texas.  He also distributed cocaine in Michigan through the use of couriers.  These couriers traveled from Texas by bus or other vehicles and passed through the Northern District of Indiana while en route.

 

Twenty-three Latin Kings members and associates have been indicted in this case.  Including Reyes, 21 defendants have pleaded guilty, one was convicted by jury and one remains a fugitive. 

 

This case was investigated by the FBI; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; the Drug Enforcement Administration; ICE Homeland Security Investigations; the National Gang Intelligence Center; the Chicago Police Department; the Houston Police Department; the Griffith, Ind., Police Department; the Highland, Ind., Police Department; the Hammond, Ind., Police Department; and the East Chicago Police Department.

 

The case is being prosecuted by Trial Attorney Joseph A. Cooley of the Criminal Division’s Organized Crime and Gang Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney David J. Nozick of the Northern District of Indiana.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Porter of the Northern District of Illinois and Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Haag of the Northern District of Texas, Lubbock Division, provided significant assistance.

 

The third superseding indictment is not evidence of guilt.  The defendant who has not been convicted is innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

 

# # #