1 1 2 3 4 5 ADDRESS ON HEALTH CARE FRAUD 6 U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL JANET RENO 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 WORLD TRADE CENTER 16 BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 17 THURSDAY, JUNE 6, 1996, 3:30 P.M. 18 19 20 21 22 2 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 ATTORNEY GENERAL RENO: Thank you, 3 Scott. 4 I met you a long time ago. And I 5 never thought I'd have the chance to deal with 6 you in this working relationship, but it has 7 been great. 8 And I so much appreciate the working 9 relationship that you and Don have. Don has 10 been a model for other U.S. Attorneys. And the 11 working relationship that you two have 12 developed is what I point to when I say "See, 13 that's the way you should do it." 14 I just want to tell you all how much 15 I appreciate your being here. I think it's 16 very important that we come together. And I 17 would just like -- because we make allusions to 18 the cost of health care fraud -- and I'd like 19 to just describe, from our perspective, the 20 impact that it's had. 21 Health care fraud and abuse not only 22 adds enormous financial costs to the system, 3 1 but I think so many of us are here today 2 because we recognize that it also impairs the 3 quality of health care for so many Americans. 4 No one knows for sure -- and I'm not 5 one to cite figures easily -- but of the 6 approximately $1 trillion spent on U.S. health 7 care in 1995, we can to some extent quantify 8 what we have recovered in fraud cases. The 9 numbers are staggering. 10 Recoveries from just four cases in 11 the past three years exceed $700 million. We 12 certainly don't catch everyone. The amount of 13 the fraud is obviously much more. 14 Everyone pays the price. 15 Beneficiaries of government health insurance 16 such as Medicare pay more for medical services 17 and equipment. Taxpayers pay more to cover 18 health care expenditures. And consumers of 19 private insurance pay higher premiums. 20 But perhaps even more significant 21 than the huge financial loss caused by health 22 care fraud, it also endangers the health of 4 1 patients by causing the rendering of 2 unnecessary or inappropriate treatment and by 3 corrupting, in some instances, the judgment of 4 medical professionals as to what care should be 5 provided. 6 It is painful to hear that some 7 health care providers are willing to subject 8 people to unnecessary care, to unnecessary 9 hospitalization, to unnecessary drugs, all 10 because these unscrupulous providers have put 11 profits before their patients' welfare. 12 We cannot allow this financial 13 inducement to corrupt the professional judgment 14 of professional medical providers, providers 15 who for so many years, the tradition of 16 Americans, we've been taught to trust these 17 people. 18 Decisions which physicians make day 19 in and day out -- whether and where to 20 hospitalize a patient, what laboratory tests to 21 order, what surgical procedures to perform, 22 what drug to prescribe and how long to keep a 5 1 patient in a facility -- affect the health and 2 well-being of all Americans. And allowing 3 these decisions to be corrupted is just plain 4 wrong. 5 Because of these concerns, because of 6 the tremendous impact of health care fraud, as 7 Scott has pointed out, I have made it one of 8 the highest priorities at the Department of 9 Justice since I have taken office. These cases 10 are very complex. They are very 11 time-consuming. They are very difficult to 12 prosecute. 13 And for that reason, we have made a 14 concentrated effort, along with the Department 15 of Health and Human Services, to make sure that 16 our U.S. Attorneys and our criminal division 17 are provided with the resources necessary to do 18 the job. 19 We have, at the same time, recognized 20 that the state Attorneys General and state 21 Medicaid units are on the front line and that 22 they are an extraordinarily effective ally in 6 1 our effort. 2 And so what we have tried to do is 3 build a partnership that Scott described, 4 working with state and local officials, to make 5 sure that we don't duplicate our efforts and 6 that we blend our efforts together so that 7 they're utilized in the most effective manner 8 possible. And I think that Massachusetts is an 9 example. 10 But I think it's important that we 11 work together to look at how we can prevent the 12 crime, whether it be youth violence or Medicare 13 or health care fraud. I want to do everything 14 I can to prevent the crime. I've never met 15 anybody that was the victim of a crime that 16 would have not preferred it to be prevented in 17 the first place. 18 Accordingly, the Justice Department 19 has tried to reach out to industry and to 20 develop means of preventing the crime in the 21 first place. 22 I have been so impressed, in the over 7 1 three years that I've been in office, by the 2 vast majority in the health care community that 3 has stood for good, sound health care, that 4 wants to develop the best standards, that wants 5 to do everything they can to avoid fraud, to 6 prevent fraud, and to hold those responsible 7 for it accountable. 8 And thus, I think it's so important 9 to see all of you coming together to see what 10 we can do to identify what caused the problem 11 in the first place. 12 I think it's important for us to look 13 at these fraud cases, see how it occurred, see 14 how it was permitted to occur, see what checks 15 and balances could be placed within your 16 systems to prevent its occurrence, and then to 17 work with state and local law enforcement and 18 to work with the federal government in 19 identifying those who do commit the fraud and 20 in holding them accountable in the most 21 cost-effective manner possible. 22 These partnerships are so important 8 1 if we are to succeed together. I want to thank 2 you therefore for being here today and for 3 participating. It is, to me, an example of the 4 private sector at its best -- committed, 5 involved, and determined to make a difference. 6 You all probably know more about 7 health care fraud than I do, but, again, I 8 think I have found, in the three years that 9 I've been in Washington, that people talk in 10 shorthand. And they think in terms of just 11 issues without really thinking about the impact 12 of the issues. So I'd like to describe to you 13 briefly what type of fraud we have seen in most 14 instances around the country. 15 You know as well as I that numerous 16 fraudulent schemes are perpetuated every day by 17 every different type of provider: Individual 18 physicians, multistate publicly traded 19 companies, medical equipment dealers, ambulance 20 companies, laboratories, nursing homes, health 21 care agencies they serve and those who provide 22 no health care at all but are really creative 9 1 in some of the scams that they can develop to 2 generate health care fraud. 3 Our findings indicate that false 4 billing is the most common fraud. Examples 5 include the submission of billings for services 6 that were never rendered or which were not 7 medically necessary and double billing for the 8 same service or equipment. 9 Other examples include up-coding -- 10 describing the service as more complicated and 11 thus more expensive -- and unbundling, which 12 consists of billing a single service as if it 13 were many services. 14 The department has pursued cases in 15 which large, respected hospitals submitted 16 duplicate and misleading bills for the same 17 services. We've pursued cases in which durable 18 medical equipment dealers use heavy-handed 19 telemarketing to offer ostensibly free braces 20 and wheelchairs to senior citizens who neither 21 wanted or needed the equipment, and cases in 22 which ambulance companies substantially 10 1 overbilled government programs and private 2 insurers for intensive care ambulances to 3 transport fully ambulatory patients to routine 4 follow-up medical appointments. 5 Another common scheme is the payment 6 of PIP effects for those patients. These are 7 pernicious for they corrupt the medical 8 provider's decision-making, often replacing 9 patient welfare for profit. 10 Kickbacks can lead to grossly 11 inappropriate medical care, including 12 unnecessary hospitalization, surgery, tests and 13 equipment. Kickbacks call into question the 14 exercise of medical judgment. Did the patient 15 get the care provided because she needed that 16 care or simply because someone made money? We 17 shouldn't have to ask that question. 18 Certain business arrangements, such 19 as self-referrals, also give rise to health 20 care fraud. Self-referrals occur, of course, 21 when doctors order tests from laboratories in 22 which the doctor has a financial interest. 11 1 Several studies, including one done 2 by the Government Accounting Office, have shown 3 that doctors refer patients for laboratory 4 tests 45 percent more often if they owned an 5 interest in a lab. This could mean unnecessary 6 medical care at great cost to us all. 7 Other health care fraud schemes 8 involve providing services by untrained 9 personnel, failure to supervise unlicensed 10 personnel, the distribution of unapproved 11 devices or drugs, and creating phony health 12 insurance companies or employment benefit plans 13 such as fraudulent multiple employer welfare 14 arrangements. 15 The scope and variety of health care 16 fraud simply cannot be underestimated. As a 17 local prosecutor for 15 years, I was constantly 18 amazed at people's creativity in terms of their 19 ability to create fraud. But after having 20 served in this office for three years and 21 seeing what people can do around this nation, 22 nothing surprises me anymore. 12 1 And I think that's something that we 2 have got to think about as we consider what we 3 can do to prevent it. But what can we do? As 4 I've indicated, I have made this one of our top 5 priorities. And I'm very proud of our record. 6 But we can do more. What have we done to date? 7 In fiscal year 1995, the FBI expended 8 approximately 260 FBI agent work years on 9 health care fraud. This is up from 146 work 10 years at the end of fiscal year 1993. The FBI 11 had over 1,800 pending health care fraud cases 12 in fiscal year 1995, up from 1,000 in fiscal 13 year 1993. 14 Here in Massachusetts, the FBI has a 15 squad of 12 agents devoted just to the 16 investigation and prosecution of health care 17 fraud matters. 18 But I'm not satisfied with that. We 19 recently had a meeting of all of the criminal 20 chiefs from the 94 U.S. Attorneys' offices in 21 Washington. 22 One of their complaints -- 13 1 particularly those who worked in more rural 2 areas or were more remote from large urban 3 areas -- was the lack of FBI investigative 4 capacity to investigate these cases with 5 trained FBI personnel. We have immediately 6 moved to address that issue. Director Freed 7 met with the criminal chiefs. But we have got 8 to continue that effort. 9 And I see one gentleman shaking his 10 head. If you will let Don Stern know, we are 11 trying to fill those gaps to make sure that we 12 are as responsive as possible in this area. 13 To facilitate communication at the 14 local and state level, every United States 15 Attorney's office now has a criminal and civil 16 health care fraud coordinator. 17 Health care fraud working groups at 18 the national, regional, and local levels 19 coordinate the efforts of federal and state 20 prosecutors and investigators from the FBI, the 21 Health and Human Services office of the 22 Inspector General, the Defense Criminal 14 1 Investigative Service, and numerous other 2 agencies. 3 The state Attorneys General have just 4 been superb, not just here in Massachusetts, 5 but around the nation. And the Medicaid fraud 6 control unit and other state agencies are 7 critical to this effort as well. 8 In these groups, the investigators 9 meet regularly to make sure that we exchange 10 information and that we utilize our efforts to 11 work together to avoid the fragmentation and 12 the duplication that often hampers or, up until 13 recently, hampered these efforts. 14 We've tried to develop a good working 15 relationship with HHS. Donna Shalala and I 16 meet regularly on this issue. And I have tried 17 to support her, every step of the way, in 18 building up a capacity on the part of the HHS 19 Inspector General to handling these cases. 20 And I'm very gratified to learn from 21 so many U.S. Attorneys that the HHS IGs are 22 doing an incredible job with difficult 15 1 circumstances. And I expect that they will 2 have additional resources shortly. 3 Almost three years ago, we created an 4 interagency executive level health care fraud 5 policy group to develop national health care 6 fraud policy. 7 A year ago, the Department of HHS 8 initiated "Operation Restore Trust," an 9 intensified fraud and detection enforcement 10 effort targeting the home health care and 11 nursing home and durable medical equipment 12 industries in New York, Florida, Illinois, 13 Texas, and California. 14 The Department of Justice and the 15 U.S. Attorneys' offices in these states are 16 vigorously investigating and prosecuting these 17 cases. 18 And Don, what might be well is for 19 you and Scott to look to these states to see 20 what we can do to replicate any initiatives 21 that might be useful in the state of 22 Massachusetts as well. 16 1 A recent effort by HHS should enhance 2 our collaborative effort even more. The 3 Inspector General, this month, created the 4 Office of Litigation and Coordination to 5 improve coordination between the Justice 6 Department and HHS investigators, auditors, and 7 other enforcement agents in the fight against 8 fraud. 9 I just want to commend the Department 10 of Health and Human Services on this 11 initiative. What I find in so many instances 12 is that an investigator who may not be used to 13 handling criminal cases doesn't know what is 14 necessary to prepare a case and to present a 15 case to the United States Attorney's office. 16 And the United States Attorney's 17 office doesn't understand the problem that an 18 investigator in the field may be facing. If we 19 develop these collaborative efforts, we can do 20 so much to enhance what we're doing. 21 Thanks to increased resources, 22 targeted investigations and audits and the 17 1 better coordination among law enforcement, the 2 department's health care fraud enforcement 3 initiative has yielded some impressive results. 4 Since 1992, there has been a 210 5 percent increase in the number of defendants 6 convicted of health care fraud and a 205 7 percent increase in the number of criminal 8 cases filed. But we have got to do more. And 9 we're dedicated to making sure we have the 10 prosecutors and investigative capacity to 11 pursue all cases in the appropriate manner. 12 But we have formulated strategies not 13 just to investigate and prosecute health care 14 offenders, but to stop ongoing fraud and to 15 cease the proceeds of those activities before 16 additional harm can be inflicted on the health 17 care system. 18 The department's coordinated program 19 involves use of all available sanctions; 20 criminal, civil, and administrative. Civil 21 fraud cases as part of parallel proceedings 22 ensure that perpetrators of health care fraud 18 1 not only are punished for their wrongdoing but 2 also are forced to disclose their profits. 3 And when criminal prosecution is 4 defined, similar law actions ensure that law 5 enforcement addresses fraudulent schemes which 6 do not rise to the level of criminal 7 wrongdoing. 8 This is extremely important. In my 9 first visits to a number of the state and 10 federal task forces that were under way in the 11 country, one of the complaints was that the FBI 12 agents took the case just up to the point where 13 everyone concluded that the evidence was 14 insufficient to prosecute, but that there was 15 clearly sufficient wrongdoing to authorize a 16 civil proceeding. 17 We have been working with the FBI to 18 make sure that the FBI's capacity follows 19 through to the civil case so that we can follow 20 up with appropriate enforcement. 21 The number of civil health care fraud 22 cases filed has increased 114 percent between 19 1 1992 and 1995. And many civil health care 2 fraud cases have been resolved without the need 3 of litigation. 4 An increasing component of our health 5 care fraud initiative involves Qui Tam cases. 6 These are the suits filed by a private party or 7 a whistle blower on behalf of the United States 8 under the False Claims Act. It permits the 9 whistle blower to obtain up to 30 percent of 10 the recovery. 11 The number of Qui Tam cases involving 12 allegations of health care fraud increased from 13 37 in fiscal year 1993 to 100 in fiscal year 14 1995. 15 Now, I must make an admission. When 16 I was suddenly nominated and found myself 17 preparing for my confirmation hearing -- and 18 confirmation under my circumstances was done in 19 a very compressed time, a lot different these 20 days -- I had never heard of a Qui Tam action. 21 And I said "What's that?" I quickly 22 learned what it was. I quickly learned that it 20 1 had not been used very often. And quickly 2 resolved that we wanted to utilize it in the 3 most appropriate manner possible, ensuring 4 fairness, but ensuring that there was a check 5 and balance on the system. And I think we have 6 made progress. And we will continue this 7 effort. 8 In addition to our civil and criminal 9 enforcement, we coordinate with various 10 administrative remedies through HHS. In the 11 administrative proceedings, HHS can recover 12 double damages and impose a civil penalty of 13 $2,000 per false claim. It also has the power 14 to exclude providers from the Medicare and/or 15 Medicaid programs. 16 And in 1994, the department approved 17 a memorandum of understanding to permit HCFA to 18 initiate civil monetary penalty proceedings 19 administratively against nursing homes for 20 violation of the health and safety regulation. 21 This MOU accommodates HCFA's interest 22 in obtaining speedy compliance and the interest 21 1 of law enforcement in ensuring that a case that 2 may be appropriate for criminal or civil 3 prosecution is not compromised by a precipitous 4 administrative action. 5 Again, it's the hallmark of what 6 happens when people work together to make sure 7 they coordinate their efforts together. And I 8 think it has had a very fine effect. 9 Statistics or MOUs -- again, I never 10 really understood what an MOU was before I came 11 to Washington -- but I discovered that you 12 can't -- in some instances, you can't work 13 together unless you have an MOU. I said, "Why 14 can't you just talk together and work 15 together?" which is what we're trying to do. 16 And they don't convey the full intention of 17 what we're trying to do. 18 Our current caseload includes cases 19 and investigations of every type of provider, 20 including sole practitioners, as well as a 21 Fortune 500 corporation. 22 Let me highlight a few cases which 22 1 illustrate our multipronged strategy for 2 punishing wrongdoers, recovering losses and 3 preventing future frauds: 4 One recent case prosecuted here in 5 Boston involved a Fortune 500 corporation, the 6 C.R. Bard, Inc. This case involved the sale 7 and distribution of heart catheters which had 8 not been approved for human use. 9 Such experimental testing in humans 10 was without either the patients' or doctors' 11 knowledge for the purpose of disaster checking, 12 trying out as-yet-unapproved catheters in 13 humans to see if they would experience any 14 unforeseen complications. 15 The corporation pleaded guilty to a 16 391-count criminal indiction charging it with 17 numerous federal crimes in the sale and 18 distribution of unapproved catheters, and paid 19 $61 million to the government in criminal fines 20 and civil settlement. 21 Last year, three former senior 22 executives were convicted of conspiring to 23 1 defraud the Food and Drug Administration in 2 connection with this fraud. 3 We have brought a similar 4 multipronged approach to other health care 5 fraud cases across the country. 6 For example, CareMark, Inc., 7 illustrates the dramatic results possible with 8 the coordinated efforts of federal and state 9 investigative agencies. 10 CareMark engaged in a broad pattern 11 of illegal activities in the form of infusion, 12 oncology, hemophilia, and human growth hormone 13 businesses. These activities included making 14 improper payments to doctors and others to 15 induce referrals, the submission of inflated 16 claims to Medicaid programs, and waiver of 17 co-payments. 18 As part of a global criminal and 19 civil settlement filed in Minnesota and Ohio, 20 CareMark pled guilty and paid $161 million in 21 fines, restitution, damages, and penalties for 22 the harm it caused to federal and state 24 1 insurance programs. 2 The amount paid by CareMark is one of 3 the largest ever obtained in a health care 4 fraud case. In addition, the government has 5 prosecuted individuals involved in CareMark's 6 fraud. 7 And as we try to define these 8 sentences, I want to make it clear to people 9 that there is going to be a significant cost 10 involved in perpetrating this fraud against the 11 American people. I think a significant 12 sentence in terms of dollars, in terms of 13 fines, can send a very critical message. 14 Some other recent cases that involve 15 companies which offer billing services to 16 health care providers: One such company was 17 Handle With Care, a billing service which 18 processed claims for nursing homes. They 19 systematically billed Medicare for services 20 that were not provided and expenses that were 21 not incurred. The government convicted the 22 operators of the company. 25 1 We then began the process of 2 recovering the money from the nursing homes 3 that submitted inflated claims which had been 4 prepared by the company. Within the past few 5 months, we have settled claims against three 6 facilities for over $2 million. And we are 7 continuing our efforts with other nursing 8 homes. 9 One final example of another recent 10 civil case involved clinical practices of the 11 University of Pennsylvania. As many of you 12 know firsthand, Part A of Medicare pays 13 teaching hospitals for the care provided to 14 Medicare recipients by residents. 15 Hospital attending physicians can 16 charge Part B in Medicare for services provided 17 to patients including when they are providing 18 close supervision of residents. 19 In the Penn case, we believe that 20 attending physicians routinely were billing 21 Medicare for services which were actually 22 provided by unsupervised residents. 26 1 The government also alleged that it 2 was harmed by doctors billing the Medicare 3 program for a higher and usually more expensive 4 level of services than were actually provided. 5 The Philadelphia U.S. Attorney's office 6 recently settled this case for over $30 7 million. 8 In addition, Penn implemented a 9 compliance program which requires a corporate 10 reorganization, five years of outside audits, 11 and a mandatory education program. 12 But because we suspect that this type 13 of mischarging is taking place at many teaching 14 hospitals, the government will be examining the 15 billing practices of other teaching hospitals. 16 These are but a few examples of the 17 department's past health care fraud enforcement 18 efforts across this country. 19 As we look to the future, we see the 20 growth of managed care. Notwithstanding our 21 best efforts, there will be those who prey on 22 any health care system the market produces, 27 1 fee-for-service or managed care. 2 Wherever there is money, unscrupulous 3 providers will shape schemes to fit the 4 particular form of reimbursement. To address 5 changing patterns of fraud, we established a 6 managed care and fraud working group. The 7 Department of Justice is committed to meeting 8 this challenge with vigorous enforcement. And 9 we will appreciate your suggestions and ideas. 10 As many of you know, Congress is 11 considering health care and health insurance 12 legislation. I hope that Congress will support 13 our fraud-fighting efforts by passing the 14 health care fraud provisions contained in those 15 bills. These provisions that strengthen our 16 criminal and civil tools by focusing them on 17 health care fraud, helping to streamline our 18 efforts and making them more efficient. 19 But no matter how successful the 20 department is in its efforts at enforcement 21 after the fraud has occurred, that will not 22 solve the problem. And we cannot do it alone. 28 1 Together we must focus on prevention and what 2 can be done to stop it. 3 We must work together not only to 4 punish the perpetrators of health care fraud 5 and to recover the monetary losses, but also to 6 prevent the crime. 7 We want to work with you. We want to 8 work with more insurance companies as they 9 shoulder their responsibilities as partners to 10 make referral of potential fraud to law 11 enforcement. 12 Similarly, more health care providers 13 should establish their own corporate compliance 14 programs to effectively eliminate fraudulent 15 behavior before they are under scrutiny by the 16 government. Let me elaborate on each of these 17 roles: 18 Many U.S. Attorneys and FBI agents 19 are reaching out aggressively to private 20 insurance providers for help in detecting, 21 investigating, and prosecuting fraud. And 22 indeed, today's conference I think is as a 29 1 result of that effort. 2 Let me also describe the effort of 3 another U.S. Attorney in which I think it gives 4 an example of what you can develop from here. 5 In 1994, he met with the chief 6 executive officers and other representatives of 7 the five leading health insurance companies in 8 Connecticut to discuss ways federal law 9 enforcement authorities can work with private 10 insurance companies to combat health care 11 fraud. 12 In 1995, that office sponsored a 13 health care fraud conference which included 14 participants from other law enforcement and the 15 private sector. 16 Over the past two years, the United 17 States Attorney and that district's FBI health 18 care fraud task force have met informally with 19 private insurers to facilitate the referral of 20 matters for investigation and prosecution. 21 These efforts have resulted in one 22 FBI agent assigned to work part-time out of 30 1 Aetna which is headquartered in Connecticut. 2 This agent essentially works side by side with 3 Aetna fraud investigators reviewing potential 4 referrals not only for prosecution in 5 Connecticut but throughout the country. 6 Similarly, efforts are underway to 7 place an FBI agent part-time at United Health 8 Care, formerly MetroHealth. Our hope and 9 expectation is that having an agent physically 10 present on-site at these insurance companies 11 will help law enforcement gain insight into how 12 the operations work that will facilitate their 13 cooperation with the company. 14 It will increase the number of 15 criminal referrals and help insurance 16 investigators learn to identify those matters 17 that are important for enforcement and 18 prosecution and help them prepare the case for 19 referral so that they will know exactly what's 20 necessary in order for the United States 21 attorney to prosecute. 22 The success of these projects depends 31 1 on private insurance companies reaffirming 2 their commitment to work with law enforcement. 3 And I feel confident, based on my conversations 4 with the industry representatives, that this is 5 going to happen. 6 Just as health insurers who pay for 7 health care services need to fight health care 8 fraud, so do health care providers. Compliance 9 programs produce major benefits for 10 corporations. 11 The principal benefit of successful 12 compliance programs is, of course, prevention 13 of violations altogether, thereby avoiding 14 entirely the possibility of fines, 15 imprisonment, damages, and debarment. 16 Another important benefit is the 17 early detection of the violation. Early 18 detection affords an organization the 19 opportunity to consider self-reporting and 20 cooperation with the government at a time in 21 the enforcement process far in advance of 22 conviction and sentencing, when actions have 32 1 potential for very favorable treatment. 2 When a corporation discloses 3 wrongdoing, makes full restitution, and takes 4 swift disciplinary action against the employees 5 engaged in misconduct, the federal interest in 6 prosecuting the corporation is significantly 7 influenced. 8 In the C. R. Bard case that I 9 mentioned earlier, a compliance program was 10 imposed as part of the settlement agreement. 11 Under this compliance agreement, the 12 corporation agreed to create a new upper-level 13 management position, a compliance office with 14 the direct report to the CEO, agreed to hire a 15 consultant to monitor compliance, and to 16 provide, for a number of years, unlimited 17 access to government regulators the compliance 18 officer's reports. 19 Another example of compliance 20 agreement imposed as part of a national global 21 settlement is the National Medical Enterprise 22 case. Here, the company settled health care 33 1 fraud charges arising out of activities at its 2 facilities. 3 In this settlement, it resulted in 4 payments of $379 million in criminal fines, 5 civil damages, and restitution. Significantly, 6 as part of the settlement, NME must file an 7 annual compliance report with HHS for a period 8 of five years. Sanctions such as these should 9 remind us as well that an ounce of prevention 10 can be worth so very much. 11 As many of you know, the sentencing 12 guidelines create further clear incentives for 13 corporations to establish strong self-policing 14 and disclosure programs. The guidelines 15 provide lower fines for companies that develop 16 effective compliance programs, report 17 misconduct, and provide corporate assistance to 18 government investigators. 19 The guidelines also require courts to 20 impose a compliance program where one does not 21 exist. A judge's compliance program may be far 22 more stringent and costly than the program a 34 1 company develops on its own and may involve 2 substantial government or court monitoring. 3 Bear this in mind: If you are the 4 officer of a corporation, if you design and run 5 your own compliance program and if it is 6 effective, if you have a few employees who 7 commit fraud and your corporation gets 8 prosecuted, the compliance program that you 9 have may be what gives you an advantage -- if 10 it's effective. 11 The system that is imposed may be far 12 more onerous. If you do not have an effective 13 program, then a compliance program will be 14 imposed by the court or by the department as 15 part of a plea agreement. 16 A corporation can't be put in jail, 17 but its liberty can be restricted. And it can 18 be subject to a compliance program that you 19 might not prefer. And you might be able to 20 develop early on, one that is far more 21 effective for your interests. We look forward 22 to working with you in every way possible to 35 1 prevent the problem in the first place. 2 HHS is also putting renewed emphasis 3 on corporate compliance programs in recognition 4 that exclusion from program participation is 5 not always appropriate or necessary. 6 As part of "Operation Restore Trust," 7 a formal voluntary disclosure program was 8 instituted to encourage certain providers to 9 report activities that could constitute 10 potential fraud to the government. This HHS 11 program rewards self-compliance measures taken 12 by providers in those industries. 13 Although Massachusetts is not one of 14 the five states within "Operation Restore 15 Trust," the concept can still apply. And as 16 I've indicated, Don and Scott may be able to 17 learn much from the examples of the five states 18 where this program has been in place. 19 Where a company is aware that some of 20 its employees has committed fraud, it should 21 come forward to disclose, make amends with the 22 government and proceed forward. 36 1 We understand that it is hard for an 2 organization to step up and acknowledge prior 3 wrongdoing, yet doing so can, in fact, help 4 ensure the continued health of the organization 5 and participation as a provider to persons 6 insured by government and health insurance 7 programs. 8 Making a voluntary disclosure should 9 be part of your calculus as an executive if you 10 discover one or more of your employees has 11 engaged in criminal conduct. 12 And let me give you another example. 13 I don't know whether it's true in this 14 industry, but in most of the industries that I 15 have been involved in where I have prosecuted 16 an employee who stole from a company or who 17 committed fraud, that company -- embarrassed to 18 report the case -- just fired the employee and 19 went on about its business. 20 That employee then went to another 21 person in the same industry, got hired, and did 22 the same thing. If we turn our back on it, if 37 1 we're too embarrassed to report it, if we're 2 too embarrassed to come forward, we're only 3 going to perpetuate this problem throughout the 4 entire industry to the disadvantage of 5 everybody concerned. 6 HHS is planning additional steps in 7 the future to promote corporate responsibility. 8 It plans to issue model compliance plans, each 9 tailored to specific health care provider types 10 and targeted use of permissive exclusion. 11 I know that the HHS Inspector General 12 is eager to work with the industry and to 13 develop industry best practices. And I have 14 pledged to support HHS efforts in every way. 15 Many of your companies have vigorous 16 antifraud programs. And I applaud you for 17 those efforts. When you detect the fraud, many 18 of you refer the matters. Without that 19 information, we could not do our job. I 20 continue to urge you to work with us in every 21 way possible. I would appreciate your 22 suggestions. 38 1 I know Don Stern would appreciate any 2 suggestions as to what the federal government 3 can do to be more supportive, in terms of the 4 development of prevention policy and procedure 5 while, at the same time, making more effective 6 our enforcement efforts across Massachusetts 7 and throughout the country. 8 But the final point that I'd like to 9 throw out to you, and hope that we may generate 10 some ideas as to what we can do, was first 11 raised in a meeting with U.S. Attorneys and 12 industry representatives in Des Moines, Iowa, a 13 year and a half ago when everyone involved 14 pointed out to me that health care fraud can 15 balloon very quickly, that it is not something 16 that just climbs gradually, and that the moment 17 somebody learns how to do it, the fraud, the 18 dollars and the loss just rise dramatically. 19 So it is very, very important that we try our 20 best to prevent the fraud in the first place. 21 I would hope that the U.S. Attorney's 22 office working with all of you could share 39 1 information about the type of fraud that we 2 have seen occur, sit down with your 3 professionals, with your compliance people, 4 look at how the fraud happened in the first 5 place, see what checks and balances were 6 missing that permitted it to happen, and then 7 what could be done to provide those checks and 8 balances to prevent it from happening. 9 As I mentioned earlier, people's 10 ability to defraud others boggles the 11 imagination. And nothing surprises me anymore. 12 What so often occurs is that we just 13 don't think something is possible. We don't 14 think somebody could be that avaricious. We 15 don't think somebody could prey on frail and 16 elderly people in so vile a manner. And so we 17 don't take steps to stop it. 18 I think my brother pointed out 19 once -- he had not been a poacher, but he had 20 liked to go out in the Everglades, in the 21 wilds. And he knew a little bit about poaching 22 habits. And he said, "It's good to watch a 40 1 poacher in action before you become a game 2 warden because you can then think like a 3 poacher." 4 We've got to have people in place 5 that can think like the people that defraud so 6 that we can develop the systems within our 7 companies that can prevent it and make these 8 people know that somebody is watching so that 9 they don't even try it in the first place. 10 I would look forward to hearing from 11 Don what we have been able to do in developing 12 an ability to analyze, so that we might share 13 with you that information and so that you may 14 utilize it to develop checks and balances 15 within the system, within your technology that 16 can prevent it from happening in the first 17 place. 18 This has been an extraordinary three 19 and a half years for me. The challenges of 20 this office have been many and they have been 21 complex. But after these three and a half 22 years, I have never, ever been so sure of my 41 1 faith in this country, of the private sector 2 working with government at all levels to 3 effectively address the problems that we face. 4 We do this best when we communicate 5 together, when we work together, when we 6 realize that each of us has something to 7 contribute to the solution of the problem. 8 I come here today. But I would ask 9 you to consider something that Don Stern will 10 tell you I ask at each U.S. Attorney's office 11 when I go out to visit. And I will leave you 12 with one question. And I hope you will convey 13 the answer to Don or write to me: If you were 14 Attorney General of the United States, what 15 would you do to improve health care fraud 16 enforcement in this nation? What would you do 17 to support your efforts at prevention and 18 compliance? What would you do to make the 19 Justice Department's efforts more effective? 20 Thank you very much. 21 (Whereupon, the address was 22 concluded)