IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ELOUISE PEPION COBELL, et al., Appellees, ) 1 V. ) 1 ) ) 1 GALE A. NORTON, as Secretary of the Interior, et al, Appellants ) 1 1 1 Pursuant to Rule 27, Fed. R. App. P., appellants hereby request that the above-captioned appeal be held in abeyance. 1. This case arises out of claims for an accounting of funds held in trust for the benefit of individual Indians. The case has previously been before this Court in Cobell v. Norton, 334 F.3d 1128 (D.C. Cir. 2003), and Cobell v. Norton, 240 F.3d 1081 (D.C. Cir. 2001). In the ruling at issue on this appeal, the district court entered a preliminary injunction requiring the Department of Interior to disconnect from the Internet all Information Technology Systems that house or access Individual Indian Trust Data. The ruling did not require immediate disconnection, however, and it provided that the court would not require disconnection if the government certifies to the court's satisfaction that a system is essential for the protection against fires or threats to life or property, or that a system NO. 03-5262 either (a) does not house or access Individual Indian Trust Data, or (b) is secure from Internet access by unauthorized users. The court entered this preliminary injunction on July 28, 2003. The court has not yet evaluated the certifications submitted by the government pursuant to the preliminary injunction or ordered the Department of Interior to disconnect systems from the Internet. 2. On September 25, 2003, after a 44-day trial, the district court issued a "structural injunction" that precludes implementation of the historical accounting plan developed by the Department of Interior and asserts judicial control over virtually all aspects of the management of Individual Indian Money accounts. The 18-page structural injunction was accompanied by a 272-page opinion addressing historical accounting and a 79-page opinion addressing trust reform generally. See Cobell v. Norton, No. 96-1285, 2003 WL 22211405 (D.D.C. S e p t ; 2 5 ; 2 0 0 3 ) = The structural injunction is appealable as of right under 28 V.S.C. 1292(a) (1). The decisicx whether ts appeal rests with the Solicitor General of the United States. A notice of appeal would be due luove&er 24 , o o 3 . 3. The preliminary injunction and the structural injunction are closely related, and in the government's view, the injunctions exceed the district court's jurisdiction for many of -2- the same reasons. The government thus requests that the above- captioned appeal be held in abeyance whiie the Soiicitor Generai determines whether to appeal from the structural injunction. If an appeal is taken from that ruling, it may be appropriate to consolidate the two appeals for briefing and argument. Respectfully submitted, GREGORY G. KATSAS Deputy Assistant Attorney u G A A c L a I r * n m n Y - ? l ROBERT E. KOPP MARK B. STERN 1'HUlVMS bi. Baii'Dk' ----.-- CHARLES SCARBOROUGH ALISA B. KLEIN ( 2 0 2 ) 514-5089 Attorneys, ADpellate Staff Civil Division, Room 9108 Department of Justice 601 D Street, N.W. Washinston, D.C. 20530 OCTOBER 2 0 0 3 - 3 - n-....-.t 4 t , - t (202) 785-4166 Dennis Marc Gingold CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 29th day of October, 2003, I caused copies of the foregoing motion to be sent to the Court and to the following by hand delivery: The Honorable Royce C. Lamberth United States District Court United States Courthouse ml, i i i i ~ u ' -A aiiu - - A ~ u i i ~ ~ ~ c I u L - i u i i 4 hn n v c . , N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Keith M. Harper Native American Rights Fund 1712 N Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-2976 and to the following by federal express, overnight mail: Elliott H. Levitas Law Office of Elliott H. Levitas 1100 Peachtree Street Suite 2800 Atlanta, GA 30309-4530 (404) 815-6450 and to the following by regular, first class mail: Law Office of Dennis i"7arc Ginyoid 607 14th Street, N.W., Box 6 Washington, D.C. 20005 Earl Old Person (pro se) Blackfeet Tribe P . O . Box 850 Browning, MT 59417 Alisa B. Klein