W000054

Tuesday, November 06, 2001 9:55 AM
fund & charities

the fund is the taxpayer bailing out the airlines, which would go under if they had to defend, and lose, lawsuits over the crash.

the charities are donations from citizens for the suffering of their fellow citizens.

these are two different issues. one should not be subtracted from the other.

the major question is the charities-if their disbursements are unequal, based on access, knowledge of the system, membership in a certain group-then we see some people getting more than others. and that will happen-police and firefighters have certain monetary donations for those killed in the line of duty, which ordinary stockbrokers and shoe shine men do not. stockbrokers have better insurance than shoe shine men-so there will be inequities in the disbursement of charitable funds. some charities had structure in place to handle the donations, some have to start from scratch, with more errors and costs.

the fund should be disbursed equitably, whether an equal sum to all families, or by need(a bigger problem-if you have a $300000 mortgage and no insurance, and another guy has a $65000 mortgage covered by insurance, should the one who prepared for his demise responsibly get less than the spendthrift?)

the charities should be separate, but more effort made to be sure all families are contacted and advised of ALL the funds set up.

Individual Comment

Previous Next Back to Comments by Date Back to Comments by Date
(Graphical Version) (Text Only Version)