N001559
Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:14 PM
(no subject)
our family and friends have reflected further on the proposed settlement and
see it rewards those that have been remiss in handling their financial
affairs--if you took out insurance you were penalized--if you were a high
income earner, and that income is lost to the family, too bad, there is
insufficient compensation. The limits on income are so low as to leave out
any reasonable compensation to high income earners no matter how young they
are.
How can $300- $500,000 possibly be called reasonable compensation to a
32 year old high earner, who truly had the potential of earning even more
than that in a month a few years down the road. While my daughter had the
benefit of a large insurance policy, she needs a stream of income and that
policy at today's "safe" investment rates simply will not provide it. If you
are going to come close to a fair "arbitrage" settlement,limits must be
raised--otherwise you will be inviting a messy ending to an already tortured
situation.
Respectfully submitted
Individual Comment