N001902

Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:05 PM
Fund inadequacies

It is my understanding that the Victim?s Compensation Fund was designed to provide victims? families with an alternative to suing the airlines, thus acting as an ?out of court? settlement. Using this as a basis, there are a number of questionable attributes of the fund.

When someone settles out of court, I do not believe that his/her age, marital status or income is a factor in determining the amount to be awarded. If two people were killed in a car accident, one should not receive more money than the next simply because he/she made more money than the other. Also, a victim?s insurance policy and pension plan would never be figured into a court settlement equation. I strongly feel that every victim should be treated as equal. All of the factors that are being juggled around in order to try to come up with a ?fair? amount for each family are completely subjective and open to much debate.

Under the guidelines as I understand them, the most monetarily beneficial characteristics a victim could possess include youth, money, dependent children and little or no pension/insurance funds. At first glance, it may seem logical and even ?fair? to use these criteria. However, after further reflection, one could make a case for why each of these factors should not necessarily dictate payment of more money. For example, one could argue that just because someone was younger and had many years to work, doesn?t mean should be awarded more money. Some hypothetical reasons might include that his/her spouse is also likely to be young and more able to earn a living in the future, and even, perhaps more likely to re-marry at some point. Furthermore, no matter how many family members someone may have left behind, that does not make it any easier for those who mourn. In fact, some may contend that having children, although a financial responsibility, may actually serve to ease the burden and suffering, which may otherwise had to have been tackled alone.

While it is impossible to begin to grasp the incredible number of diverse situations families are in, I will share my own story as an example. I lost my father,      , who worked for the       of       for 35 years. He and my mother had been together since the age of 12 and had been married for 35 years. 25 years old, I am the middle child of three, with my younger brother at 20 and my older brother at 26. My father, who had just turned 55 years of age had planned on retiring within months. Unfortunately, by the funds? standards, my father has more than a couple factors working against qualifying us for funds. To start, he didn?t make a lot of money, relatively speaking (around $60,000). Because of his age, he would not have worked many more years. Since he did work for        for 35 years, he had a reasonably generous pension, which he had worked so hard for his whole life. According to our calculations, our family?s total payment under the rules as they stand would give us a $100,000 payment. When figures ranging in the millions are being discussed, a number so significantly lower comes as a harsh reality. I doubt anyone would disagree that this is not nearly enough to live on for any significant period of time, nor is it a reasonable or ?fair? compensation for my father?s life. With the fund set up as is, we are not given a choice. With today?s life expectancies and our culture?s lifestyle, it is accurate to say that a major part of his life was just beginning. Now, in my mother?s eyes, her life has ended as well.

The fund?s foundation and guidelines are simply insulting and hurtful in so many ways and to so many people. One should never have to look up on a chart to figure out how much their loved one is ?worth,? especially when their value is listed side by side for comparison with the ?worth? of others who were lost in the same tragic, devastating manner.

A set amount should be divided equally among the victims. This is not about who needs more to live on or who would have made more money in their lifetime. This is about trying to give a sense of closure and worth to all of the families. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Individual Comment
Staten Island, NY

Previous Next Back to Comments by Date Back to Comments by Date
(Graphical Version) (Text Only Version)