5-9.000 - Law and Policy Section
5-9.001 | Establishment |
5-9.100 | Area of Responsibility |
5-9.120 | Statutes Administered |
5-9.200 | Organization |
5-9.300 | Supervision and Handling of the Law and Policy Section Cases—Requests for Instructions |
5-9.320 | Actions Not Subject to Direct Referral to United States Attorneys |
5-9.321 | Prior Authorization Needed to Initiate Action |
5-9.500 | General Procedures in District Court Litigation |
5-9.600 | Settlement and Dismissal of Cases |
5-9.620 | Transmittal of Compromise Offer to Policy Legislation, and Special Litigation Section; Recommendations With Respect to |
5-9.630 | Authority of United States Attorneys to Settle or Dismiss Direct Referral Cases |
5-9.001 - Establishment
The Law and Policy Section was created on March 16, 1979, by Environment and Natural Resources Division Directive No. 4-79
[updated June 2015]
5-9.100 - Area of Responsibility
The Law and Policy Section performs policy planning for the Division including review of existing policy and programs, analysis and initiation of new policy, revision of management systems and integration of policy changes in budget submissions. This Section also drafts proposed legislation, reviews and reports on bills of interest to the Division, and develops litigation programs designed to meet new nonroutine problems. Most of the special litigation is developed when a client agency presents a legal problem of a unique nature that has not been previously dealt with in the routine program of the Division. In this regard, the Law and Policy Section is also responsible for the filing ofamicus curiae briefs in cases involving issues which affect the Environment and Natural Resources Division's areas of responsibility, unless those cases are specifically assigned to the Appellate Section. The Law and Policy Section also tracks citizen enforcement actions under the Clean Water Act and Clean Air Act, reviews proposed consent judgments in such actions, handles the Division's FOIA requests and congressional correspondence, and advises the Division on ethics matters.
[cited in ENRD Resource Manual 2]
[updated June 2015]
5-9.120 - Statutes Administered
The Law and Policy Section is not limited to a specific area of statutory responsibility. Rather, the Section supervises and conducts litigation arising under numerous federal statutes, as well as under treaties and agreements with Indians, Executive Orders, regulations of the various departments and agencies, the common law, and the laws of the various States. The Law and Policy Section has sole responsibility for litigating cases arising under the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979, 49 U.S.C. App. § 2101. In addition, the Section is responsible for administering and/or conducting congressionally mandated studies and reports, such as those required by section 301(e) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act 1978, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2021 and 1901et seq., and the Asbestos School Hazard Detection and Control Act of 1980, 20 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.
[updated June 2015]
5-9.200 - Organization
The Section is administered by a Chief and an Assistant Chief. The work of the Section is assigned among staff attorneys according to experience and workload.
5-9.300 - Supervision and Handling of the Law and Policy Section Cases—Requests for Instructions
All requests for instructions and guidance relating to the prosecution or defense of actions under the jurisdiction of the Law and Policy Section shall be referred to the Chief of the Law and Policy Section of the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530 (202-514-1442).
[updated June 2015]
5-9.320 - Actions Not Subject to Direct Referral to United States Attorneys
Responsibility for handling of cases under the supervision of the Law and Policy Section is assigned by the Chief of the Section under the provisions of USAM 5-1.322 through 5-1.326.
[updated June 2015]
5-9.321 - Prior Authorization Needed to Initiate Action
No case under the supervision of the Law and Policy Section may be initiated by a United States Attorney without the prior authorization of the Assistant Attorney General, who shall sign the complaint prior to its being filed. See USAM 5-1.302.
[updated June 2015]
5-9.500 - General Procedures in District Court Litigation
The general instructions set forth in USAM 5-5.100 et seq., with respect to handling of litigation apply in every respect to the litigation of the Law and Policy Section.
[updated June 2015]
5-9.600 - Settlement and Dismissal of Cases
No claim or case under the jurisdiction of the Law and Policy Section may be settled or dismissed without specific or delegated authority from the Attorney General. See USAM 5-5.210 et seq.
[cited in USAM 5-8.600]
[updated June 2015]
5-9.620 - Transmittal of Compromise Offer to Policy Legislation, and Special Litigation Section; Recommendations With Respect to
Where compromise in a case other than a direct referral case is offered to a United States Attorney, he shall require the offeror to reduce the proposal to writing and to submit with it a cashier's or certified check, bank draft, or money order for the amount offered, drawn or endorsed unconditionally to the order of the Treasurer of the United States. Where a large sum is involved, a token deposit is acceptable. The United States Attorney then shall forward to the Department the written offer, this recommendation and the reasons therefor, and a statement of the debtor's financial status.
The recommendation should be guided by the principles that compromise offers cannot be accepted unless (a) there is doubt as to whether judgment can be secured for an amount larger than that offered in compromise, (b) there is doubt as to whether an amount larger than that offer can be collected, although a judgment has been or can be secured, or (c) the probable cost of collection exceeds the difference between the amount recoverable and the amount offered.
The financial statement need not be forwarded where the offer is recommended for acceptance solely because there is doubt as to whether judgment can be secured for an amount larger than that offered or because the probable cost of collection exceeds the difference between the amount offered and the amount recoverable.
5-9.630 - Authority of United States Attorneys to Settle or Dismiss Direct Referral Cases
The authority of United States Attorneys to settle or dismiss direct referral cases under the supervision of the Law and Policy Section is set forth in USAM 5-5.230.
[updated June 2015]