DOJ Seal U. S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Re: redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text , in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text For purposes of this letter, redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text subsidiaries redacted text redacted text redacted text desire to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; ATR/FOIA-101 (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging these persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text -2- ATR/FOIA-102 without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. redacted text full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his or her obligations herein, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute that person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by that person -3- ATR/FOIA-103 to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him or her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-104 redacted text DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice redacted text Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the activity upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or originator of, the activity. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: redacted text ATR/FOIA-105 redacted text (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the reported activity; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the complete, candid and truthful cooperation of its current directors, officers and employees, and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information relevant to possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of 15 U.S.C. § 1 in the redacted text (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews, and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of any redacted text or other conduct violative of 15 U.S.C. § 1 in the redacted text redacted text in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported in the redacted text The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. 2 ATR/FOIA-106 redacted text If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current director, officer or employee of redacted text redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of, the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported in the redacted text redacted text Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) making his relevant personal documents and records available in the United States to attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself available in the United States to attorneys and agents of the United States for interviews; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of 15 U.S.C. § 1 in the redacted text without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise giving the United States access to knowledge or information he may have relevant to redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of 15 U.S.C. § 1 in the redacted text and redacted text 3 ATR/FOIA-107 redacted text (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of 15 U.S.C. § 1 in the redacted text The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. 4 ATR/FOIA-108 redacted text The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text redacted text ATR/FOIA-109 redacted text DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text (“the anticompetitive activity being reported”). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the antitcompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; ATR/FOIA-110 redacted text (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current director, -2- ATR/FOIA-111 redacted text officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the antitcompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the antitcompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. § 401-402), and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting officers or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. -3- ATR/FOIA-112 redacted text 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text redacted text ATR/FOIA-113 redacted text DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and your client, redacted text ("Applicant"), in connection with possible anticompetitive conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon Applicant satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify Applicant in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for Applicant in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: Applicant desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible anticompetitive conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). Applicant represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, redacted text did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the activity. 2. Cooperation: Applicant agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making redacted text available for interviews in the United States upon the reasonable request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; ATR/FOIA-114 redacted text (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that redacted text may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. 3. Individual Leniency: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to Applicant's full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept Applicant into the Individual Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1994 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against Applicant for any act or offense redacted text may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that Applicant has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Individual Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Individual Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against Applicant, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary information, statements or other information provided by Applicant to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against Applicant in any such prosecution. 4. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and Applicant, and supersedes all prior understandings if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division. -2- ATR/FOIA-115 redacted text The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely, redacted text -3- ATR/FOIA-116 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text redacted text Gentlemen: This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section One of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the activity upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the activity. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the reported activity; ATR/FOIA-117 redacted text (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the complete, candid and truthful cooperation of its current directors, officers and employees, and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information relevant to possible redacted text or other conduct violative of 15 U.S.C. § 1 in the redacted text redacted text (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews, and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of 15 U.S.C. § 1 in the redacted text redacted text in which redacted text subsidiaries, was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text or any of redacted text subsidiaries for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported in the redacted text The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust -2- ATR/FOIA-118 redacted text Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text , as well as any statements or other information provided by any current director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text including those who are former employees redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported in the redacted text Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) making his relevant personal documents and records available in the United States to attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself available in the United States to attorneys and agents of the United States for interviews; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of Section One of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise giving the United States access to knowledge or information he may have relevant to possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of Section One of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C § 1, in the redacted text redacted text and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of Section One of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text -3- ATR/FOIA-119 redacted text The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority and Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-120 DOJ Seal U. S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 in the redacted text This Agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text "the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; ATR/FOIA-121 (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. -2- ATR/FOIA-122 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. -3- ATR/FOIA-123 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-124 redacted text DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. Agreement 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; redacted text ATR/FOIA-125 redacted text (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current -2- redacted text ATR/FOIA-126 redacted text director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement maybe revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution -3- redacted text ATR/FOIA-127 redacted text 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. This letter is not applicable to illegal redacted text conduct. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- redacted text ATR/FOIA-128 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; ATR/FOIA-129 (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews, and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in the attached Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993. Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the -2- ATR/FOIA-130 Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter -3- ATR/FOIA-131 prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-132 redacted text DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear Sirs: This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. It is understood that the amnesty application process began redacted text AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; ATR/FOIA-133 redacted text (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to redacted text in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter -2- ATR/FOIA-134 redacted text initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement and including any statements made to the Antitrust Division by any officer or employee of redacted text on redacted text may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to redacted text in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted -3- ATR/FOIA-135 redacted text to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement and including any statement made by any officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division on redacted text may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-136 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C § l, in the redacted text redacted text This Agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2, Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; ATR/FOIA-137 (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3, Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the -2- ATR/FOIA-138 Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4, Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted -3- ATR/FOIA-139 to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-140 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text redacted text in connection with possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; ATR/FOIA-141 (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews, and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any -2- ATR/FOIA-142 documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, -3- ATR/FOIA-143 the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-144 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This Agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: ATR/FOIA-145 (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, -2- ATR/FOIA-146 the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection for Corporate Directors, Officers and Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and -3- ATR/FOIA-147 (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority and Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. -4- ATR/FOIA-148 The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -5- ATR/FOIA-149