DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text (as defined below), in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This Agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text redacted text subsidiaries, redacted text redacted text desire to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; ATR/FOIA-354 (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text (collectively "covered employees"), and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported; (d) facilitating the ability of covered employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that covered employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that covered employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported. The commitments in this paragraph do not apply to any acts or offenses occurring after redacted text The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any -2- ATR/FOIA-355 statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that covered employees who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported. The commitments in this paragraph do not apply to any acts or offenses occurring after redacted text Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a covered employee fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be -3- ATR/FOIA-356 void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. redacted text acknowledges that it is redacted text separate investigations into redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. and related statutes, in the redacted text (as used in this paragraph, redacted text excludes redacted text relating to the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported but does not exclude redacted text redacted text and that some redacted text current and former directors, officers, or employees are, or may become, subjects, targets, or defendants in those separate investigations. Nothing in this Agreement limits the United States from initiating a criminal prosecution against redacted text or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees in connection with the redacted text The status of redacted text or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees as a subject, target, or defendant in the redacted text does not abrogate or affect redacted text cooperation obligations under paragraph 2 above, including its obligation to use its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of covered employees, or the cooperation obligations of covered employees under paragraph 4 above. A failure of a covered employee to comply fully with his or her obligations described in paragraph 4 above includes, but is not limited to, regardless of any past or proposed cooperation, not making himself or herself available in the United States for interviews and testimony in trials and grand jury or other proceedings upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported because he or she has been, or anticipates being, charged, indicted, or arrested in the United States for violations of federal antitrust and related statutes involving the redacted text Such failure also includes, but is not limited to, not responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported because his or her responses may also relate to, or tend to incriminate him or her in, the redacted text Failure to comply fully with his or her cooperation obligations further includes, but is not limited to, not producing in the United States all documents, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported because those documents may also relate to, or tend to incriminate him or her in, redacted text redacted text The cooperation obligations of Paragraph 4 above do not apply to requests by attorneys and agents of the United States directed at redacted text redacted text if such requests are not, in whole or in part, made in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported. The Antitrust Division may use any documents, statements, or other information provided by redacted text or by any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees to the Antitrust Division pursuant to -4- ATR/FOIA-357 this Agreement against redacted text or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees, directly or indirectly, in any prosecution arising out of the redacted text 6. redacted text redacted text this Agreement shall continue to be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of redacted text Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, any determination by the Antitrust Division that redacted text has violated this Agreement subsequent to any redacted text shall not operate to deprive redacted text of the benefits and protections of this Agreement if redacted text redacted text has not violated the Agreement and vice-versa. 7. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. -5- ATR/FOIA-358 8. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each part hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -6- ATR/FOIA-359 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; ATR/FOIA-360 (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text 2 ATR/FOIA-361 redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a)-(c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 3 ATR/FOIA-362 1623) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text 4 ATR/FOIA-363 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This Agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; ATR/FOIA-364 (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or -2- ATR/FOIA-365 other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter -3- ATR/FOIA-366 prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-367 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-produet privilege, except to the extent set forth in paragraph 2 (h) & (i) below. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"), redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; ATR/FOIA-368 (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers and employees to appear for interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews, grand jury appearances, and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant; (h) waiving any attorney-client privilege and attorney work product privilege that may exist for contemporaneous legal advice or services that redacted text may have received with regard to any communications or agreements between redacted text relating to the redacted text redacted text redacted text and (i) using its best efforts to ensure that any attorneys retained or employed by redacted text to provide legal advice or services in connection with the communications or agreements described in paragraph 2(h) above, cooperate fully and provide all requested information to the Antitrust Division. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate -2- ATR/FOIA-369 Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. -3- ATR/FOIA-370 The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -4- ATR/FOIA-371 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Re: redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text subsidiaries redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. Moreover, consistent with Division policy, the Division agrees that it will not disclose to redacted text information obtained from redacted text redacted text AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and 1 ATR/FOIA-372 (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division at redacted text expense; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 2 ATR/FOIA-373 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current and former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he 3 ATR/FOIA-374 or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. 4 ATR/FOIA-375 redacted text The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text 5 redacted text ATR/FOIA-376 redacted text DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text redacted text redacted text Re: redacted text Dear Sirs: redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible Redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, with respect to redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosure made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the amnesty application will constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act with respect to redacted text redacted text (“the anticompetitive activity being reported”). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity, and Redacted text ATR/FOIA-377 redacted text (b) did not coerce any party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of the directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that the directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported, respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearance and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that the directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 2 ATR/FOIA-378 redacted text (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making themselves available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and 3 ATR/FOIA-379 redacted text (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply to fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text 4 ATR/FOIA-380 redacted text redacted text 5 ATR/FOIA-381 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text subsidiaries redacted text in connection with possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text This Agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for redacted text in furtherance of the leniency application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody, or control, wherever located, ATR/FOIA-382 requested by the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers, and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers, and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers, and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly, and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers, and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing, and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into -2- ATR/FOIA-383 the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer, or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution, 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers, And Employees: Subject to redacted text full continuing, and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of -3- ATR/FOIA-384 other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. redacted text acknowledges that it is redacted text a separate investigation into redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. 15 U.S.C. § 1, and related statutes, in the redacted text and that some of redacted text current and former directors, officers, or employees are, or may become, subjects, targets, or defendants in that separate investigation. Nothing in this Agreement limits the United States from initiating a criminal prosecution against redacted text or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees in connection with redacted text The status of redacted text or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees as a subject, target, or defendant in the redacted text does not abrogate or affect redacted text redacted text cooperation obligations under paragraph 2 above, including its obligation to use its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of covered employees, or the cooperation obligations of covered employees under paragraph 4 above. A failure of a covered employee to comply fully with his or her obligations described in paragraph 4 above includes, but is not limited to, regardless of any past or proposed cooperation, not making himself or herself available in the United States for interviews and testimony in trials and grand jury or other proceedings upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because he or she has been, or anticipates being, charged, indicted, or arrested in the United States for violations of federal antitrust and related statutes involving redacted text Such failure also includes, but is not limited to, not responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because his or her responses may also relate to, or tend to incriminate him or her in redacted text Failure to comply fully with his or her cooperation obligations further includes, but is not limited to, not producing in the United States all documents, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because those documents may also relate to, or tend to incriminate him or her in, the redacted text The cooperation obligations of Paragraph 4 above do not apply to requests by attorneys and agents of the United States directed at redacted text redacted text if such requests are not, in whole or in part, made in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The Antitrust Division may use any documents, statements, or other information provided by redacted text or by any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement against redacted text or any of its current or former directors, officers, or -4- ATR/FOIA-385 employees, directly or inderectly, in any prosecution arising out of redacted text redacted text 6. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. 7. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. redacted text Sincerely yours. redacted text -5- ATR/FOIA-386 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear Sirs: This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and the following redacted text redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by redacted text (including counsel) in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. It is understood that the amnesty application process began redacted text AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. ATR/FOIA-387 2. Cooperation: redacted text agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text was a participant. -2- ATR/FOIA-388 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept redacted text into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text for any act or offense it may have committed prior to redacted text in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text redacted text has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text redacted text without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to redacted text full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers and employees of redacted text who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text prior to redacted text in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; -3- ATR/FOIA-389 (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer or employee of redacted text fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual during the amnesty application process or under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division during the amnesty application process or pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in any such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written relating to the subject matter herein, including the letter of redacted text to redacted text and redacted text dated redacted text redacted text 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on -4- ATR/FOIA-390 behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text -5- ATR/FOIA-391 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text This agreement is conditional and depends upon redacted text satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the division will notify redacted text in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: redacted text desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). redacted text represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported and was not the leader in, or originator of, the anticompetitive activity being reported. 2. Cooperation: redacted text subsidiary redacted text subsidiary"), agrees to provide full, continuing and complete ATR/FOIA-392 cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to redacted text redacted text subsidiary relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of a subpoena, all documents not privileged under U.S. law or other items in the possession, custody, or control of redacted text subsidiary requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; (c) securing the complete, candid, and truthful cooperation of redacted text redacted text which shall include, but not be limited to: (i) the voluntary provision to the Antitrust Division by redacted text redacted text of any information redacted text may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (ii) the apparance of redacted text for such interviews or testimony relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; and (iii) the provision of testimony by redacted text when requested by the Antitrust Divsion, in grand jury, trial, or other proceedings in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) using its best efforts to secure the complete, candid, and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers, and employees, of redacted text subsidiary and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (e) facilitating the ability of current and former directors, officers, and employees of redacted text subsidiary to appear for such interviews or testimony relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers, and employees of redacted text subsidiary, who provide information to the Antitrust Division respond completely, -2- ATR/FOIA-393 candidly, and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews, grand jury appearances, and at trial; (g) using its best efforts to ensure that current and former directors, officers, and employees of redacted text subsidiary, who provide information to the Antitrust Division make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (h) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which redacted text subsidiary, was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of redacted text representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees to accept redacted text into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against redacted text subsidiary, for any act or offense they may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that redacted text subsidiary has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of redacted text redacted text into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against redacted text subsidiary, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by redacted text subsidiary, as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer, or employee of redacted text subsidiary, to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against redacted text subsidiary in any such prosecution. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection for Corporate Directors, Officers, and Employees: Subject to redacted text subsidiary's, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that current and former directors, officers, and employees of redacted text subsidiary, who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at redacted text subsidiary, prior to the date of this letter in -3- ATR/FOIA-394 connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) making his relevant personal documents and records available in the United States to attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making himself available in the United States to attorneys and agents of the United States for interviews; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise giving the United States access to knowledge or information he may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial, grand jury, or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621) and making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of redacted text the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current or former director, officer, or employee of redacted text subsidiary, fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and redacted text and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. -4- ATR/FOIA-395 6. Authority and Capacity: The Antitrust Division and redacted text represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. -5- ATR/FOIA-396 The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, redacted text redacted text Attachment -6- ATR/FOIA-397 DOJ Seal U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division redacted text redacted text Dear redacted text This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and redacted text ("Applicant") in connection with possible redacted text or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the redacted text redacted text This Agreement is conditional and depends upon Applicant satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify Applicant in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for Applicant in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: Applicant desires to report to the Antitrust Division possible redacted text redacted text or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the redacted text redacted text ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). Applicant represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, redacted text did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the activity. 2. Cooperation: Applicant agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States; (b) making redacted text available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without ATR/FOIA-398 falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph, that redacted text may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. 3. Individual Leniency: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to Applicant's full, continuing and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept Applicant into the Individual Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1994 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against Applicant for any act or offense redacted text may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that Applicant has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Individual Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Individual Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against Applicant, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary information, statements or other information provided by Applicant to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against Applicant in any such prosecution. 4. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and Applicant, and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division. -2- ATR/FOIA-399 The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely, redacted text -3- ATR/FOIA-400