[Redacted Text] [Redacted Text] Dear [Redacted Text] This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and [Redacted Text]"Applicant"), in connection with [Redacted Text] or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l, involving [Redacted Text] This Agreement is conditional and depends upon Applicant (1) establishing that it is eligible for leniency as it represents in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, and (2) cooperating in the Antitrust Division's investigation as required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement. After Applicant establishes that it is eligible to receive leniency and provides the required cooperation, the Antitrust Division will notify Applicant in writing that it has been granted unconditional leniency. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for Applicant in furtherance of the leniency application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work product privilege. Applicant represents that it is fully familiar with the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy dated August 10, 1993 (attached), which is incorporated by reference herein.1 [Foot-note 1] AGREEMENT 1. Eligibility: Applicant desires to report to the Antitrust Division, or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act involving ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). Applicant represents to the Antitrust Division that it is eligible to receive leniency in that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: 1 [foot note 1] For a further explanation of the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy and how the Division interprets the policy, see Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Antitrust Division's Leniency Program and Model Leniency Letters (November 19, 2008), available at [Redacted Text] ATR/FOIA-583 (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its participation in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the activity. Applicant agrees that it bears the burden of proving its eligibility to receive leniency, including the accuracy of the representations made in this paragraph, and that it fully understands the consequences that might result from a revocation of leniency as explained in paragraph 3 of this Agreement as used in this Agreement, discovery of the anticompetitive activity being reported means discovery by the authoritative representatives of Applicant for legal matters, either the board of directors or counsel representing Applicant 2. Cooperation: Applicant agrees to provide full, continuing, and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to Applicant relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents, information, or other materials in its possession, custody, or control, wherever located, not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product privilege, requested by the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers, and employees of Applicant (collectively "covered employees"), and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any info1mation they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of covered employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that covered employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, 2 ATR/FOIA-584 candidly, and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that covered employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which Applicant was a participant. However, Applicant is not required to pay restitution to victims whose antitrust injuries are independent of any effects on United States domestic commerce proximately caused by the anticompetitive activity being reported. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing, and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept Applicant into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in the attached Corporate Leniency Policy. Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against Applicant for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If at any time before Applicant is granted unconditional leniency the Antitrust Division determines that Applicant (1) contrary to its representations in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, is not eligible for leniency or (2) has not provided the cooperation required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program. Before the Antitrust Division makes a final determination to revoke Applicant's conditional leniency, the Division will notify counsel for Applicant in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding the potential revocation. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against Applicant in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, the Antitrust Division may use against Applicant in any such prosecution any documents, statements, or other information provided to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any of its current directors, officers, or employees. Applicant understands that the Antitrust Division's Leniency Program is an exercise of the Division's prosecutorial discretion, and Applicant agrees that it may not, and will not, seek judicial review of any Division decision to revoke its conditional -3- ATR/FOIA-585 leniency unless and until it has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers, And Employees: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to Applicant's full, continuing, and complete cooperation as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees that covered employees who admit to the Division their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at Applicant prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials, wherever located, not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work product privilege, requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information, subject to the penalties of making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) and obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.); (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) -(c) of this paragraph and not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work product privilege, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarat1ons in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. -4- ATR/FOIA-586 The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a covered employee fails to comply fully with his or her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any conditional leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution (hereinafter "conditional non-prosecution protection") granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. The Antitrust Division also reserves the right to revoke the conditional non-prosecution protection of this Agreement with respect to any covered employee who the Division determines caused Applicant to be ineligible for leniency under paragraph 1 of this Agreement, who continued to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported after Applicant took action to terminate its participation in the activity and notified the individual to cease his or her participation in the activity, or who obstructed or attempted to obstruct an investigation of the anti-competitive activity being reported at any time, whether the obstruction occurred before or after the date of this Agreement absent exigent circumstances, before the Antitrust Division makes a final determination to revoke an individual's conditional non-prosecution protection, the Division will notify counsel for such individual and Applicant's counsel in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional non-prosecution protection granted to the individual under this Agreement and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding the potential revocation. Should any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such individual criminally in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without limitation, and may use against such individual in such prosecution any documents, statements, or other information which was provided to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any of its current directors, officers, or employees, including such individual. Judicial review of any Antitrust Division decision to revoke any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement is not available unless and until the individual has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 5. [Redacted Text] Investigation: Applicant acknowledges that [Redacted Text] a separate investigation into or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l, in the [Redacted Text] and that some of its current and former directors, officers, or employees are, or may become, subjects, targets, or defendants in that separate investigations. Nothing in this Agreement limits the United States from criminally prosecuting Applicant or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees in connection with the [Redacted Text] The status of Applicant or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees as a subject, target, or defendant in the [Redacted Text] does not abrogate, limit, or otherwise affect Applicant's cooperation obligations under paragraph 2 -5- ATR/FOIA-587 above, including its obligation to use its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of covered employees, or the cooperation obligations of covered employees under paragraph 4 above. A failure of a covered employee to comply fully with his or her obligations described in paragraph 4 above includes, but is not limited to, regardless of any past or proposed cooperation, not making himself or herself available in the United States for interviews and testimony in trials, grand jury, or other proceedings upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because he or she has been, or anticipates being, charged, indicted, or arrested in the United States for violations of federal antitrust law involving the [Redacted Text] Such a failure also includes, but is not limited to, not responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because his or her responses may also relate to, or tend to incriminate him or her in, the [Redacted Text] failure to comply fully with his or her cooperation obligations further includes, but is not limited to, not producing in the United States all documents; including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because those documents may also relate to, or tend to incriminate him or her in, the [Redacted-Text] The cooperation obligations of paragraph 4 above do not apply to requests by attorneys and agents of the United States directed at [Redacted Text] if such requests are not, in whole or in part, made in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The Antitrust Division may use any documents, statements, or other information provided by Applicant or by any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement against Applicant or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees in any prosecution arising out of the [Redacted Text] as well as in any other prosecution. 6. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and Applicant, and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. This Agreement cannot be modified except in writing, signed by the Antitrust Division and Applicant. -6- ATR/FOIA-588 7. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and Applicant represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely [Redacted Text] -7- ATR/FOIA-589 [Redacted Text] [Redacted Text] Dear [Redacted Text] This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and [Redacted Text] in connection with [Redacted Text] or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section l of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § l, in the [Redacted Text] This Agreement is conditional and depends upon Applicant (1) establishing that it is eligible for leniency as it represents in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, and (2) cooperating in the Antitrust Division's investigation as required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement after Applicant establishes that it is eligible to receive leniency and provides the required cooperation, the Antitrust Division will notify Applicant in writing that it has been granted unconditional leniency. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for Applicant in furtherance of the leniency application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. Applicant represents that it is fully familiar with the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy dated August 10, 1993 (attached), which is incorporated by reference herein.1 [Foot-note 1] AGREEMENT l. Eligibility: Applicant desires to report to the Antitrust Division or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section l to the Sherman Act in the [Redacted Text] ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). Applicant represents to the Antitrust Division that it is eligible to receive leniency in that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: [Foot note 1] For a further explanation of the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy and how the Division interprets the policy, see Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Antitrust Division's Leniency Program and Model Leniency Letters (November 19, 2008), available at [Redacted Text] ATR/FOIA-590 (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its participation in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the activity. Applicant agrees that it bears the burden of proving its eligibility to receive leniency, including the accuracy of the representations made in this paragraph and that it fully understands the consequences that might result from a revocation of leniency as explained in paragraph 3 of this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, discovery of the anticompetitive activity being reported means discovery by the authoritative representatives of Applicant for legal matters; either the board of directors or counsel representing Applicant. 2. Cooperation: Applicant agrees to provide full, continuing, and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of an facts known to Applicant relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents, information, or other materials in its possession, custody, or control, wherever located, not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product privilege, requested by the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers, and employees of Applicant, and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers, and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers, and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly, and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers, and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and -2- ATR/FOIA-591 (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which Applicant was a participant. However, Applicant is not required to pay restitution to victims whose antitrust injuries are independent of any effects on United States domestic commerce proximately caused by the anticompetitive activity being reported. The cooperation requirements in subparagraphs (c) through (f) of paragraph 2 do not apply to former directors, officers, or employees of Applicant and [Redacted Text] 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of Applicant’s representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing, and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept Applicant into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in the attached Corporate Leniency Policy. Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against Applicant for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If at any time before Applicant is granted unconditional leniency the Antitrust Division determines that Applicant (1) contrary to its representations in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, is not eligible for leniency or (2) has not provided the cooperation required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program. Before the Antitrust Division makes a final determination to revoke Applicant's conditional leniency, the Division will notify counsel for Applicant in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding the potential revocation. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against Applicant, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, the Antitrust Division may use against Applicant in any such prosecution any documents, statements, or other information provided to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any of its current directors, officers, or employees. Applicant understands that the Antitrust Division's Leniency Program is an exercise of the Division's prosecutorial discretion, and Applicant agrees that it may not, and will not, seek judicial review of any Division decision to revoke its conditional leniency unless and until it has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers, And Employees: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to Applicant's full, continuing, and complete cooperation as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers, and employees of Applicant who admit 2 [Foot note 2] “Current directors, officers and employees" means those individuals employed by Applicant as of the date of this letter. Former directors, officers, and employees are not covered -3- ATR/FOIA-592 to the Division their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Division in its investigation of, the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at Applicant prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The non-prosecution protections granted in this paragraph do not apply to former directors, officers, or employees of Applicant [Redacted Text] Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States an documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials, wherever located, not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product privilege, requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information, subject to the penalties of making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C: § 1503 et seq.); (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a)-(c) of this paragraph and not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product privilege, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (l8 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer, or employee of Applicant fails to comply fully with his or her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall he void, and any conditional leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution (hereinafter "conditional non-prosecution protection") granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. The Antitrust by the attached Corporate Leniency Policy and are not afforded conditional leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution protection under this Agreement. -4 ATR/FOIA-593 Division also reserves the right to revoke the conditional non-prosecution protection of this Agreement with respect to any current director, officer, or employee of Applicant who the Division determines caused Applicant to be ineligible for leniency under paragraph 1 of this Agreement, who continued to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported after Applicant took action to terminate its participation in the activity and notified the individual to cease his or her participation in the activity, or who obstructed or attempted to obstruct an investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported at any time. Whether the obstruction occurred before or after the date of this Agreement. Absent exigent circumstances, before the Antitrust Division makes a final determination to revoke an individual's conditional non-prosecution protection, the Division will notify counsel for such individual and Applicant's counsel in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional non-prosecution protection granted to the individual under this Agreement and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding the potential revocation. Should any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such individual criminally, without limitation, and may use against such individual in such prosecution any documents, statements, or other information which was provided to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any of its current directors, officers, or employees, including such individual. Judicial review of any Antitrust Division decision to revoke any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement is not available unless and until the individual has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and Applicant, and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. This Agreement cannot be modified except in writing, signed by the Antitrust Division and Applicant. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and Applicant represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. -5- ATR/FOIA-594 The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely, [Redacted Text] -6- ATR/FOIA-595 [Redacted Text] [Redacted Text] Re: [Redacted Text] Dear [Redacted Text] This letter confirms that [Redacted Text] has met all of the conditions of the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy and the attached Conditional Leniency Agreement between [Redacted Text] and the Antitrust Division dated [Redacted Text] regarding the following [Redacted Text] Therefore, [Redacted Text] leniency application is hereby granted. Sincerely, [Redacted Text] ATR/FOIA-596 [Redacted Text] [Redacted Text] Dear [Redacted Text] This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and [Redacted Text] "Applicant"), in connection with [Redacted Text] or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the [Redacted Text] involving the [Redacted Text] This Agreement is conditional and depends upon Applicant (1) establishing that it is eligible for leniency as it represents in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, and (2) cooperating in the Antitrust Division's investigation as required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement. After Applicant establishes that it is eligible to receive leniency and provides the required cooperation, the Antitrust Division will notify Applicant in writing that it has been granted unconditional leniency. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for Applicant in furtherance of the leniency application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege. Applicant represents that it is fully familiar with the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy dated August 10, 1993 (attached), which is incorporated by reference herein.1 [Foot note 1] 1 [foot note 1] For a further explanation of the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy and how the Division interprets the policy, see Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Antitrust ATR/FOIA-597 AGREEMENT 1. Eligibility: Applicant desires to report to the Antitrust Division [Redacted Text] or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act in the [Redacted Text] involving the [Redacted Text] "the anticompetitive activity being reported"). Applicant represents to the Antitrust Division that it is eligible to receive leniency in that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its participation in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the activity. Applicant agrees that it bears the burden of proving its eligibility to receive leniency, including the accuracy of the representations made in this paragraph and that it fully understands the consequences that might result from a revocation of leniency as explained in paragraph 3 of this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, discovery of the anticompetitive activity being reported means discovery by the authoritative representatives of Applicant for legal matters, either the board of directors or counsel representing Applicant. 2. Cooperation: Applicant agrees to provide full, continuing, and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts knowledge to Applicant relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents, information, or other materials in its possession, custody, or control, wherever located [Redacted Text] not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product privilege, requested by the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of covered employees as defined herein and encouraging such persons Division's Leniency Program and Model Leniency Letters (November 19, 2008), available at [Redacted Text] -2- ATR/FOIA-598 voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of covered employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that covered employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly, and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that covered employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which Applicant was a participant. However, Applicant is not required to pay restitution to victims whose antitrust injuries are independent of any effects on United States domestic commerce proximately caused by the anticompetitive activity being reported. A covered employee is any person who is a director, officer, or employee of [Redacted Text] as of the date of this letter, and any director, officer or employee of [Redacted Text] Covered employees include, but are not limited to, The cooperation requirements in subparagraphs (c) through (f) of paragraph 2 [Redacted Text] 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing, and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept Applicant into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in the attached Corporate Leniency Policy. Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against Applicant for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If at any time before Applicant is granted unconditional leniency the Antitrust Division -3- ATR/FOIA-599 determines that Applicant (1) contrary to its representations in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, is not eligible for leniency or (2) has not provided the cooperation required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program. Before the Antitrust Division makes a final determination to revoke Applicant's conditional leniency, the Division will notify counsel for Applicant in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding the potential revocation. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against Applicant, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, the Antitrust Division may use against Applicant in any such prosecution any documents, statements, or other information provided to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any of its covered employees. Applicant understands that the Antitrust Division's Leniency Program is an exercise of the Division's prosecutorial discretion, and Applicant agrees that it may not, and will not, seek judicial review of any Division decision to revoke its conditional leniency unless and until it has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 4. Non Prosecution Protection For Covered Employees: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to Applicant's full, continuing, and complete cooperation as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees that covered employees who admit to the Division their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Division in its investigation of, the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at Applicant prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The non-prosecution protections granted in this paragraph do not apply to [Redacted Text] Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials, wherever located [Redacted Text] not privileged under the attorney client privilege or work-product privilege, requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; -4- ATR/FOIA-600 (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information, subject to the penalties of making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.); (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a)-( c) of this paragraph and not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product privilege, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a covered employee fails to comply fully with his or her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any conditional leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution ('hereinafter "conditional non-prosecution protection") granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. The Antitrust Division also reserves the right to revoke the conditional non-prosecution protection of this Agreement with respect to any covered employee who the Division determines caused Applicant to be ineligible for leniency under paragraph 1 of this Agreement, who continued to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported after Applicant took action to terminate its participation in the activity and notified the individual to cease his or her participation in the activity, or who obstructed or attempted to obstruct an investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported at any time, whether the obstruction occurred before or after the date of this Agreement. Absent exigent circumstances, before the Antitrust Division makes a final determination to revoke an individual's conditional non prosecution protection, the Division will notify counsel for such individual and Applicant's counsel in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional non-prosecution protection granted to the individual under this Agreement and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding the potential revocation. Should any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement Be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such individual criminally in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without limitation, and may use against such individual in such prosecution any documents, statements, or other information which was -5- ATR/FOIA-601 Provided to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any of its covered employees, including such individual. Judicial review of any Antitrust Division decision to revoke any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement is not available unless and until the individual has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 5. [Redacted Text] Investigation: Applicant acknowledges that [Redacted Text] a separate investigation into [Redacted Text] or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, involving [Redacted Text] 2 [Foot note 2] [Redacted Text]and that some of its current and former directors, officers, or employees are, or may become, subjects, targets, or defendants in that separate investigation. Nothing in this Agreement limits the United States from criminally prosecuting Applicant or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees in connection with the [Redacted Text] The status of Applicant or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees [Redacted Text] does not abrogate, limit, or otherwise affect Applicant's cooperation obligations under paragraph 2 above, including its obligation to use its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of covered employees, or the cooperation obligations of covered employees under paragraph 4 above. A failure of a covered employee to comply fully with his or her obligations described in paragraph 4 above includes, but is not limited to, regardless of any past or proposed cooperation, not making himself or herself available in the United States for interviews and testimony in trials, grand jury, or other proceedings upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because he or she has been, or anticipates being, charged, indicted, or arrested in the United States for violations of federal antitrust law involving the [Redacted Text] Such a failure also includes, but is not limited to, not responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because his or her responses may also relate to, or tend to will incriminate him or her in, the [Redacted Text] failure to comply fully with his or her cooperation obligations further includes, but is not limited to, not producing in the United States all documents, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because those documents may also relate to, or tend to incriminate him or her in, the [Redacted Text] The cooperation obligations of paragraph 4 above do not apply to requests by attorneys and agents of the United States directed at [Redacted Text] in connection with [Redacted Text] if such requests are not, in whole or in part, made in connection with [Foot note 2][Redacted Text] -6 ATR/FOIA-602 the anticompetitive activity being reported. The Antitrust Division may use any documents, statements, or other information provided by Applicant or by any of its covered employees to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement against Applicant or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees in any prosecution arising out of the [Redacted Text]as well as in any other prosecution. 6. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and Applicant, and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. This Agreement cannot be modified except in writing signed by the Antitrust Division and Applicant 7. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and Applicant represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely, [Redacted Text] -7 ATR/FOIA-603 [Redacted Text] [Redacted Text] Dear: [Redacted Text] This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of justice and [Redacted Text] (“Applicant"), in connection with [Redacted Text] or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, involving [Redacted Text], hereinafter referred to as [Redacted Text] This Agreement is conditional and depends upon Applicant (1) establishing that it is eligible for leniency as it represents in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, and (2) cooperation in the Antitrust Division’s investigation as required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement. After Applicant establishes that it eligible to receive leniency and provides the required cooperation, the Antitrust Division will notify Applicant in writing that it has been granted unconditional leniency. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for applicant in furtherance of the leniency application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney client privilege or the work product privilege. Applicant represents that it is fully familiar with the Antitrust Division’s Corporate Leniency Policy dated August 10, 1993 (attached), which is incorporated by reference herein, 1 [Footnote 1] [Foot note 1] For a further explanation of the Antitrust Division’s Corporate Leniency Program and Model Leniency Letters (November 19, 2008), available at [Redacted Text] ATR/FOIA-604 AGREEMENT 1. Eligibility: Applicant desires to report to the Antitrust Division [Redacted Text] or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act involving [Redacted Text] ("the anticompetitive activity being”). Applicant represents to the Antitrust Division that it is eligible to receive leniency in that, in connection with the anti-competitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its participation in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b)did not coerce any other party to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the activity. Applicant agrees that it bears the burden of providing its eligibility to receive leniency, including the accuracy of the representation made in this paragraph and that it fully understands the consequences that might result from a revocation of leniency as explained in paragraph 3 of this agreement. As used in this Agreement, discovery of the authoritative representatives of Applicant for legal matters, either the board of directors or counsel representing Applicant. 2. Cooperation: Applicant agrees to provide full, continuing, and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to Applicant relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly; and without requirement of subpoena, all documents; information, or other information its possession, custody; or control, wherever located, not Privileged under the attorney-client privilege or attorney work- product privilege, requested by the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity befog reported, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthfu1l cooperation of the current directors; officers, and employees of Applicant(collectively "covered employees”), and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; ATR/FOIA-605 (d) facilitating the ability of covered employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that covered employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly, and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearance and at trial, (f) using its best efforts to ensure that covered employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either to falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division; to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which Applicant is not a participant. However, Applicant is not required to pay restitution to victims whose antitrust injuries are independent of any effects United States domestic commerce proximately caused by the anticompetitive activity being reported. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of Applicant’s representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing, and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept Applicant into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in the attached Corporate Leniency Policy. Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against Applicant for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If at any time before Applicant is granted unconditional leniency the Antitrust Division determines that Applicant (1) contrary to its representations in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, is not eligible for leniency or (2) has not provided the cooperation required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program. Before the Antitrust Division makes a final determination to revoke Applicant’s conditional leniency, the Division will notify counsel, for Applicant in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding revocation. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against Applicant in connection with ATR/FOIA-606 Anticompetitive activity being reported, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, the Antitrust Division may use against Applicant in any such prosecution any documents, statements, or other information provided to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any of its current directors, officers, or employees, Applicant understand that the Antitrust Division’s Leniency Program is an exercise of the Division’s prosecutorial discretion, and Applicant agrees that it may not, and will not, seek judicial review of any Division decision to revoke its conditional leniency unless and until it has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers, and Employees: Subject to verification of Applicant’s representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to Applicant’s full, continuing, and complete cooperation as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees that covered employees who admit to the Division their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at Applicant prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials; wherever located, not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or the work-product privilege, requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information subjected to the penalties of making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C, § 1503 et seq:); (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any material; or information, not requested in (a) -{c) of this paragraph and not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product privilege, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and ATR/FOIA-607 (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621, making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a covered employee fails to comply fully with his or her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any conditional leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution (hereinafter "conditional non-prosecution protection") granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. The Antitrust Division also reserves the right to revoke the conditional non-prosecution protection of this Agreement with respect to any covered employee who the Division determines caused Applicant to be ineligible for leniency under paragraph 1 of this Agreement, who continued to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported after Applicant took action to terminate its participation in the activity and notified the individual to cease his or her participation in the activity, or who obstructed or attempted to obstruct an investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported at any time, whether the obstruction occurred before or after the date of this Agreement. Absent exigent circumstances, before the Antitrust Division makes a final detem1ination to revoke an individual's conditional prosecution protection, the Division will notify counsel for such individual and Applicant's counsel in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional non prosecution protection granted to the individual under this Agreement and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding the potential revocation. Should any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such individual criminally, without limitation, and may use against such individual in such prosecution any documents, statements; or other information which was provided to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any covered employees, including such individual. Judicial review of any Antitrust Division decision to revoke any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement is not available unless and until the individual has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 5. [Redacted Text] Investigation: Applicant acknowledges that [Redacted Text] a separate investigation into [Redacted Text] or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the [Redacted Text] and that some of its current directors, officers, or employees are, ATR/FOIA-608 or may become subjects, targets, or defendants in that separate investigation. Nothing in this Agreement limits the United States from criminally prosecuting Applicant or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees in connection with the [Redacted Text] the status of Applicant or any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees as a subject, target, or defendant in the [Redacted Text] does not abrogate, limit or otherwise affect Applicant’s cooperation obligations under paragraph 2 above, including its obligation to use its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of covered employees, or the cooperation obligations of covered employees under paragraph 4 above. A failure of a covered employee to comply fully with his or her obligations described in paragraph 4 above includes, but is not limited to, regardless of any past or proposed cooperation, not making himself or herself available in the United States for interviews and testimony in trials, grand jury, or other proceedings upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because he or she has been, or anticipates being, charged, indicted, or arrested in the United States for violations of federal antitrust law involving the [Redacted Text] Such a failure also includes, but is not limited to, not responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because his or her responses may also relate to, or tend to incriminate him or her in, the [Redacted Text] Failure to comply fully with his or her cooperation obligations further includes, but is not limited to, not producing in the United States all documents, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported because those documents may also relate to, or tend to incriminate him or her in the [Redacted Text] The cooperation obligations of paragraph 4 above do not apply to requests by attorneys and agents of the United States directed at [Redacted Text] if such requests are not, in whole or in part, made in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The Antitrust Division may use any documents, statements, or other information provided by Applicant or by any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees to the Division at any pursuant to this Agreement against Applicant or an of its current or former directors, officers, or employees in any prosecution arising out of the [Redacted Text] as well as in any other prosecution. 6. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and Applicant, and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. This Agreement cannot be modified except in writing, signed by the Antitrust Division and Applicant. 7. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and applicant represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. ATR/FOIA-609 The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely, [Redacted Text] ATR/FOIA-610 [Redacted Text] [Redacted Text] Dear [Redacted Text] This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and [Redacted Text] in connection with [Redacted Text] or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in the [Redacted Text] This Agreement is conditional and depends upon [Redacted Text] satisfying the conditions set forth below. After all of these conditions are met, the Division will notify [Redacted Text] in writing that the application has been granted. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for [Redacted Text] in furtherance of the amnesty application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work- product privilege. AGREEMENT 1. Representations: [Redacted Text] desires to report to the Antitrust Division [Redacted Text] or other conduct violative of the Sherman Act in the [Redacted Text] ("the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported"), [Redacted Text] the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, and nothing herein shall be deemed to apply to [Redacted Text] represents to the Antitrust Division that, in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its part in the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the activity and was not the leader' in, or the originator of, the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported. 2. Cooperation: [Redacted Text] agrees to provide full, continuing and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to [Redacted Text] relating to the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents or other items in its possession, custody or control, wherever located, requested by the Antitrust Division, to the extent not already produced; ATR/FOIA-611 (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full and truthful cooperation of the current and former directors, officers and employees of [Redacted Text] (collectively "Covered Employees"), and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported [Redacted Text] (d) facilitating the ability of Covered Employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Antitrust Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that Covered Employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported respond completely, candidly and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that Covered Employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, in which [Redacted Text] was a participant. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of [Redacted Text] representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing and complete cooperation as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept [Redacted Text] into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in an Antitrust Division policy statement dated August 10, 1993 (attached). Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against [Redacted Text] for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of [Redacted Text] the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. If the Antitrust Division at any time determines that [Redacted Text] has violated this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of into the Corporate Leniency Program. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of [Redacted Text] into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, any documentary or other information provided by [Redacted Text] as well as any statements or other information provided by any current or former director, officer or employee of [Redacted Text] to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement, may be used against [Redacted Text] in any such prosecution. -2- ATR/FOIA-612 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Corporate Directors, Officers And Employees: Subject to [Redacted Text] full, continuing and complete cooperation, the Antitrust Division agrees that Covered Employees who admit their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Antitrust Division in its investigation of the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at [Redacted Text] prior to the date of this letter in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information; (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) -(c) of this paragraph, that he or she may have relevant to the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503), in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of [Redacted Text] the Antitrust Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a Covered Employee fails to comply fully with his/her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any leniency, immunity or non-prosecution granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. Should any leniency, immunity or non- prosecution granted be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such person criminally in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported, and any statements or other information provided by such person to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement may be used against him/her in such prosecution. 5. [Redacted Text] Investigation: [Redacted Text] in connection with a separate investigation into possible [Redacted Text] or other conduct violative of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and related statutes, in the [Redacted Text] -3- ATR/FOIA-613 [Redacted Text] and certain of [Redacted Text] current, and former directors, officers; or employees are, or may become, subjects, targets; or defendants in that separate investigation. Nothing in this Agreement limits the United States from initiating a criminal non-prosecution against any of these current or former directors, officers, or employees of [Redacted Text] in connection with the [Redacted Text] The status of any of [Redacted Text] current or former directors, officers, or employees as a subject, target, or defendant in the [Redacted Text] does not abrogate or affect [Redacted Text] cooperation obligations under paragraph 2 above, including its obligation to use its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of Covered Employees, or the cooperation obligations of Covered Employees under paragraph 4 above. A failure of a covered employee to comply fully with his or her obligations described in paragraph 4 above includes, but is not limited to, regardless of any past or proposed cooperation, not making himself or herself available in the United States for interviews and testimony in trials and grand jury or other proceedings upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported because he or she has been, or anticipates being, charged, indicted, or arrested in the United States for violations of federal antitrust law and related statutes involving the [Redacted Text] Such failure also includes, but is not limited to, not responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported because his or her responses may also relate to, or tend to incriminate him or her in, the [Redacted Text] Failure to comply fully with his or her cooperation obligations further includes, but is not limited to, not producing in the United States all documents, including personal documents and records, and other materials requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported because those documents may also relate to, or tend to incriminate him or her in, the [Redacted Text] The cooperation obligations of Paragraph 4 above do not apply to requests by attorneys and agents of the United States directed at [Redacted Text] if such requests are not, in whole or in part, made in connection with the Anticompetitive Activity Being Reported. The Antitrust Division may use any documents, statements, or other information provided by [Redacted Text] or by any of its current or former directors, officers, or employees to the Antitrust Division pursuant to this Agreement against any of the current or former directors, officers, or employees of [Redacted Text] directly or indirectly, in any prosecution arising out of the [Redacted Text] 6. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and [Redacted Text] and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein; provided however, this letter does not alter or modify [Redacted Text] and the United States. -4 ATR/FOIA-614 7. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, -5 7. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely yours, -5 [Redacted Text] [Redacted Text] Re: Dear [Redacted Text] This letter confirms that [Redacted Text] have met all of the conditions of the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy and the Conditional Leniency Agreement between [Redacted Text] and the Antitrust Division dated regarding the [Redacted Text] industry. Therefore, [Redacted Text] leniency application is hereby granted. Sincerely, [Redacted Text] ATR/FOIA-617 [Redacted Text] [Redacted Text] Dear [Redacted Text] This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and [Redacted Text] "Applicant"), in connection with [Redacted Text] or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, involving [Redacted Text] This Agreement is conditional and depends upon Applicant (1) establishing that it is eligible for leniency as it represents in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, and (2) cooperating in the Antitrust Division's investigation as required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement. After Applicant establishes that it is eligible to receive leniency and provides the required cooperation, the Antitrust Division will notify Applicant in writing that it has been granted unconditional leniency. Itis further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for Applicant in furtherance of the leniency application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney client privilege or the work-product privilege. Applicant represents that it is fully familiar with the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy dated August 10, 1993 (attached), which is incorporated by reference herein. 1 [Foot note 1] The "date of this Agreement" or "date of this letter" as used herein both mean the date that the Antitrust Division executes this letter. AGREEMENT 1. Eligibility: Applicant desires to report to the Antitrust Division [Redacted Text] or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act involving [Redacted Text] ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). Applicant represents to the Antitrust [Foot note 1] For a further explanation of the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy and how the Division interprets the policy, see Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Antitrust Division's Leniency Program and Model Leniency Letters (November 19, 2008), available at [Redacted Text] ATR/FOIA-618 Division that it is eligible to receive leniency in that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its participation in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the activity. Applicant agrees that it bears the burden of proving its eligibility to receive leniency, including the accuracy of the representations made in this paragraph and that it fully understands the consequences that might result from a revocation of leniency as explained in paragraph 3 of this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, discovery of the anticompetitive activity being reported means discovery by the authoritative representatives of Applicant for legal matters, either the board of directors or counsel representing Applicant. 2. Cooperation: Applicant agrees to provide full, continuing, and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to Applicant relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents, information, or other materials in its possession, custody, or control, wherever located, not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product privilege, requested by the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current directors. officers and employees of Applicant [Redacted Text] ''covered employees"), and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of covered employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Division; (e) using its best efforts to ensure that covered employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly, and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that covered employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive -2 ATR/FOIA-619 activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which Applicant was a participant. However, Applicant is not required to pay restitution to victims whose antitrust injuries are independent of any effects on United States domestic commerce proximately caused by the anticompetitive activity being reported. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing, and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept Applicant into Part A of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in the attached Corporate Leniency Policy. Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against Applicant for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. Ifat any time before Applicant is granted unconditional leniency the Antitrust Division determines that Applicant (1) contrary to its representations in paragraph l of this Agreement, is not eligible for leniency or (2) has not provided the cooperation required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program. Before the Antitrust Division makes a final determination to revoke Applicant's conditional leniency, the Division will notify counsel for Applicant in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding the potential revocation. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against Applicant, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, the Antitrust Division may use against Applicant in any such prosecution any documents, statements, or other information provided to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any of its covered employees. Applicant understands that the Antitrust Division's Leniency Program is an exercise of the Division's prosecutorial discretion, and Applicant agrees that it may not, and will not, seek judicial review of any Division decision to revoke its conditional leniency unless and until it has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection For Covered Employees: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to Applicant's full, continuing, and complete cooperation as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees that covered employees who admit to the Division their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Division in its investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at Applicant prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The non-prosecution protections granted in this paragraph do not apply to former directors, officers, or employees of Applicant who are not covered employees. -3- ATR/FOIA-208 Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials, wherever located, not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product privilege, requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information, subject to the penalties of making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) and obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.); (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or inf01wation, not requested in (a) -(c) of this paragraph and not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product privilege, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a covered employee fails to comply fully with his or her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any conditional leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution (hereinafter "conditional non-prosecution protection") granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. The Antitrust Division also reserves the right to revoke the conditional non-prosecution protection of this Agreement with respect to any covered employee who the Division determines caused Applicant to be ineligible for leniency under paragraph 1 of this Agreement, who continued to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported after Applicant took action to terminate its participation in the activity and notified the individual to cease his or her participation in the activity, or who obstructed or attempted to obstruct an investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported at any time, whether the obstruction occurred before or after the date of this Agreement. Absent exigent circumstances, before the Antitrust Division makes a final determination to revoke an individual's conditional prosecution protection, the Division will notify counsel for such individual and Applicant's -4 ATR/FOIA-621 counsel in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional non-prosecution protection granted to the individual under this Agreement and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding the potential revocation. Should any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such individual criminally, without limitation, and may use against such individual in such prosecution any documents, statements; or other information which was provided to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any covered employees, including such individual. Judicial review of any Antitrust Division decision to revoke any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement is not available unless and until the individual has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and Applicant, and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether oral or written, relating to the subject matter herein. This Agreement cannot be modified except in writing, signed by the Antitrust Division and Applicant. 6. Authority And Capacity: The Antitrust Division and Applicant represent and warrant each to the other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity necessary to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely, [Redacted Text] -5 ATR/FOIA-622 [Redacted Text] [Redacted Text] Dear [Redacted Text] This letter sets forth the terms and conditions of an agreement between the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice and [Redacted Text] ("Applicant"), in connection with or other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, in [Redacted Text] This Agreement is conditional and depends upon Applicant (1) establishing that it is eligible for leniency as it represents in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, and (2) cooperating in the Antitrust Division's investigation as required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement. After Applicant establishes that it is eligible to receive leniency and provides the required cooperation, the Antitrust Division will notify Applicant in writing that it has been granted unconditional leniency. It is further agreed that disclosures made by counsel for Applicant in furtherance of the leniency application will not constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege or the work-product protection. Applicant represents that it is fully familiar with the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy dated August 10, 1993 (attached), which is incorporated by reference herein. 1 AGREEMENT 1. Eligibility: Applicant desires to report to the Antitrust Division) [Redacted Text] other conduct constituting a criminal violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act in the [Redacted Text] (defined as [Redacted Text] ("the anticompetitive activity being reported"). Applicant represents to the [Foot note 1] For a further explanation of the Antitrust Division's Corporate Leniency Policy and how the Division interprets the policy, see Frequently Asked Questions Regarding the Antitrust Division's Leniency Program and Model Leniency Letters (November 19, 2008), available at [Redacted Text] ATR/FOIA-623 Antitrust Division that it is eligible to receive leniency in that, in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, it: (a) took prompt and effective action to terminate its participation in the anticompetitive activity being reported upon discovery of the activity; and (b) did not coerce any other party to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported and was not the leader in, or the originator of, the activity. Applicant agrees that it bears the burden of proving its eligibility to receive leniency, including the accuracy of the representations made in this paragraph and that it fully understands the consequences that might result from a revocation of leniency as explained in paragraph 3 of this Agreement. As used in this Agreement, discovery of the anticompetitive activity being reported means discovery by the authoritative representatives of Applicant for legal matters, either the board of directors or counsel representing Applicant. 2. Cooperation: Applicant agrees to provide full, continuing, and complete cooperation to the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) providing a full exposition of all facts known to Applicant relating to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) providing promptly, and without requirement of subpoena, all documents, information, or other materials in its possession, custody, or control, wherever located, not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection, requested by the Antitrust Division in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, to the extent not already produced; (c) using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the current directors, officers, and employees of Applicant, and encouraging such persons voluntarily to provide the Antitrust Division with any information they may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; (d) facilitating the ability of current directors, officers, and employees to appear for such interviews or testimony in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported as the Antitrust Division may require at the times and places designated by the Division; -2- ATR/FOIA-624 (e) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers, and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported respond completely, candidly, and truthfully to all questions asked in interviews and grand jury appearances and at trial; (f) using its best efforts to ensure that current directors, officers, and employees who provide information to the Antitrust Division relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported make no attempt either falsely to protect or falsely to implicate any person or entity; and (g) making all reasonable efforts, to the satisfaction of the Antitrust Division, to pay restitution to any person or entity injured as a result of the anticompetitive activity being reported, in which Applicant was a participant. However, Applicant is not required to pay restitution to victims whose antitrust injuries are independent of any effects on United States domestic commerce proximately caused by the anticompetitive activity being reported. 3. Corporate Leniency: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to its full, continuing, and complete cooperation, as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees conditionally to accept Applicant into Part B of the Corporate Leniency Program, as explained in the attached Corporate Leniency Policy. Pursuant to that policy, the Antitrust Division agrees not to bring any criminal prosecution against Applicant for any act or offense it may have committed prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. Ifat any time before Applicant is granted unconditional leniency the Antitrust Division determines that Applicant (1) contrary to its representations in paragraph 1 of this Agreement, is not eligible for leniency or (2) has not provided the cooperation required by paragraph 2 of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be void, and the Antitrust Division may revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program. Before the Antitrust Division makes a final determination to revoke Applicant's conditional leniency, the Division will notify counsel for Applicant in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding the potential revocation. Should the Antitrust Division revoke the conditional acceptance of Applicant into the Corporate Leniency Program, the Antitrust Division may thereafter initiate a criminal prosecution against Applicant, without limitation. Should such a prosecution be initiated, the Antitrust Division may use against Applicant in any such prosecution any documents, statements, or other information provided to the ATR/FOIA-625 Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any of its current directors, officers, or employees. Applicant understands that the Antitrust Division's Leniency Program is an exercise of the Division's prosecutorial discretion, and Applicant agrees that it may not, and will not, seek judicial review of any Division decision to revoke its conditional leniency unless and until it has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 4. Non-Prosecution Protection for Corporate Directors, Officers, and Employees: Subject to verification of Applicant's representations in paragraph 1 above, and subject to Applicant's full, continuing, and complete cooperation as described in paragraph 2 above, the Antitrust Division agrees that current directors, officers, and employees of Applicant who admit to the Division their knowledge of, or participation in, and fully and truthfully cooperate with the Division in its investigation of, the anticompetitive activity being reported, shall not be prosecuted criminally by the Antitrust Division for any act or offense committed during their period of employment at Applicant prior to the date of this letter in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The non-prosecution protections granted in this paragraph do not apply to former directors, officers, or employees of Applicant. Such full and truthful cooperation shall include, but not be limited to: (a) producing in the United States all documents and records, including personal documents and records, and other materials, wherever located, not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection, requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (b) making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported; (c) responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information, subject to the penalties of making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.); (d) otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any materials or information, not requested in (a) -( c) of this paragraph and not privileged under the attorney-client privilege or work product protection, that he or she may have relevant to the anticompetitive activity being reported; and 4 ATR/FOIA-626 (e) when called upon to do so by the United States, testifying in trial and grand jury or other proceedings in the United States, fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503 et seq.), in connection with the anticompetitive activity being reported. The commitments in this paragraph are binding only upon the Antitrust Division, although, upon the request of Applicant, the Division will bring this Agreement to the attention of other prosecuting offices or administrative agencies. In the event a current director, officer, or employee of Applicant fails to comply fully with his or her obligations hereunder, this Agreement as it pertains to such individual shall be void, and any conditional leniency, immunity, or non-prosecution (hereinafter "conditional non-prosecution protection") granted to such individual under this Agreement may be revoked by the Antitrust Division. The Antitrust Division also reserves the right to revoke the conditional non-prosecution protection of this Agreement with respect to any current director, officer, or employee of Applicant who the Division determines caused Applicant to be ineligible for leniency under paragraph 1 of this Agreement, who continued to participate in the anticompetitive activity being reported after Applicant took action to terminate its participation in the activity and notified the individual to cease his or her participation in the activity, or who obstructed or attempted to obstruct an investigation of the anticompetitive activity being reported at any time, whether the obstruction occurred before or after the date of this Agreement. Absent exigent circumstances, before the Antitrust Division makes a final determination to revoke an individual's conditional non-prosecution protection, the Division will notify counsel for such individual and Applicant's counsel in writing of the recommendation of Division staff to revoke the conditional non-prosecution protection granted to the individual under this Agreement and will provide counsel an opportunity to meet with the Division regarding the potential revocation. Should any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement be revoked, the Antitrust Division may thereafter prosecute such individual criminally, without limitation, and may use against such individual in such prosecution any documents, statements, or other information which was provided to the Division at any time pursuant to this Agreement by Applicant or by any of its current directors, officers, or employees, including such individual. Judicial review of any Antitrust Division decision to revoke any conditional non-prosecution protection granted to an individual under this Agreement is not available unless and until the individual has been charged by indictment or information for engaging in the anticompetitive activity being reported. 5. Entire Agreement: This letter constitutes the entire agreement between the Antitrust Division and Applicant, and supersedes all prior understandings, if any, whether -5- ATR-627 oral or w the subject matter herein. This cannot in writing, signed by the Antitrust Division and Applicant. 6. Authority and Capacity: The Antitrust Division and Applicant represent and warrant each to other that the signatories to this Agreement on behalf of each party hereto have all the authority and capacity to execute this Agreement and to bind the respective parties hereto. The signatories below acknowledge acceptance of the foregoing terms and conditions. Sincerely, [Redacted Text] -6- ATR/FOIA-628