Skip to main content

REW Public Comment : Re/MAX Services, Inc (Higgins, Tom) 10/24/2005, REW-0197

This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.
Comment No.: REW-0197
Received: 10/24/2005
Organization: Re/MAX Services, Inc
Commenter: Higgins, Tom
State: PA
Attachments: None


From: []
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2005 12:00 PM
To: ATR-Real Estate Workshop
Subject: Gov v. NAR

Thanks for the opportunity to contact you. I have been a Realtor for the past 15 years in Pennsylvania. This issue bothers me greatly as it has been something that has been evolving to an effective co-operation between Realtors of varying Brokerages.

The MLS is a cooperative, broker-to-broker offer of cooperation and compensation that help both brokers and customers buy and sell homes. It is not a public utility, nor should it be.

The beauty of the MLS is that it allows real estate brokerages of every size to compete on a level playing field. It gives all of us access to an inventory of property listings that we are able to show and sell to our clients.

The MLS doesn't discriminate. All MLS members are treated equally, regardless of their size or their business model, and yet the rights of property owners and their listing brokers are respected. The rules of the MLS achieve a delicate balance between respecting the rights of listing brokers so they will continue to be willing to contribute their inventory of listings and permitting cooperating brokers the ability to show those listings and be assured of receiving compensation if they bring about a successful sale.


Tom Higgins
Re/MAX Services, Inc
Blue Bell, PA

Updated June 25, 2015